Five takeaways from the third week of the Arkansas 95th General Assembly
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. – It was a busy week for the Arkansas legislature as lawmakers dug into a range of matters impacting Arkansans.
Five of the larger issues for the week were a counter to the governor's prison plan, a planned Medicaid work requirement, no cell phones in school legislation, an end to DEI in Arkansas and watershed protections.
Prison plan:
Sen. Bryan King (R-Green Forest) introduced a public safety plan to renew the focus on the safety of Arkansans. King cited what he called the 'three-headed monster' facing the state as a high incarceration rate, a high crime rate and high prison overcrowding.
He proposed working with the Arkansas State Police and county sheriff's offices to add public-safety-focused hires, additional beds in county detention centers, and ramped-up assistance for probation and patrol officers.
Funding would come from medical marijuana and casino revenue, King said, adding that unlike the 3,000-bed prison proposal, his plan is funded.
Medicaid work requirement:
Gov. Sarah Huckabee announced her plan to create a work requirement for anyone receiving Medicaid in the state. The update to the ARHOME program would require what she called 'able-bodied individuals' to either work, go to school or stay home and take care of their children to continue receiving Medicaid.
Clients will receive support in meeting work requirement goals, including education and coaching, Deputy Secretary for Programs and State Medicaid Director Janet Mann said. Those who refuse to comply will have their Medicaid suspended, which will be restored when they comply with the requirements.
This is a slight retweaking of the state's previous effort at a Medicaid work requirement. If the Center for Medicare and Medicaid accepts it, Arkansas will be the first state in the nation with a work requirement.
No cell phones in schools:
On Wednesday, the governor made a second announcement about the Bell to Bell, No Cell Act. This would end student's using cell phones while school is in session.
Sanders said the bill was a necessity in light of a growing mental health need among young people with 'unrestricted access to smartphones and social media.'
The plan had been tested in some schools during the previous school year where it was judged a success.
End to DEI in Arkansas:
A bill has cleared the Senate and is now before the House that would 'prohibit discrimination by public entities on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin,' according to the legislation's language.
It would drop the requirement to state higher education from maintaining programs to encourage minority student, faculty and staff participation, as well as any hiring programs by state entities aiming to increase the number of minority employees.
Several people spoke against the bill in its Senate committee hearing. It is now scheduled to be heard in the House State Agencies and Governmental Affairs Committee.
Watershed protection:
A bill was introduced in the Senate to end the moratorium on issuing permits to confined animal feeding operations along any Arkansas waterway, including the Buffalo River.
The state currently maintains a temporary moratorium on issuing new permits for medium and large CAFOs along the Buffalo. The Department of Environmental Quality initiated the moratorium in 2014 after environmental concerns about the waste generated by a large-scale hog farm near the river. The farm closed in late 2019 when the state purchased its assets.
The bill was due for a Senate Agriculture, Forestry & Economic Development committee hearing, but that meeting was canceled and, as of Friday, had not been rescheduled.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
7 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Castro to seek reelection to state Senate rather than make U.S. House bid
State Sen. Cristina Castro, D-Elgin, has announced she will seek reelection to her District 22 post rather than make a bid next year for the Congressional seat being vacated by U.S. Rep. Raja Krisnamoorthi. 'When I first entered public service, it was with a singular goal: to deliver for my community and make life better for the people of the 22nd District, who I've been lucky to call my neighbors for my entire life,' Castro said in a news release. 'Over the past eight years as state senator, I'm proud to have stayed true to that mission — delivering real results and championing the working families of my district. As I think about the future and how I can continue to make the biggest impact, that goal remains my North Star.' In addition to Elgin, Castro's district encompasses all or part of 10 communities in Cook and Kane counties. Her statement came the same week that state Rep. Anna Moeller, D-Elgin, also announced she also would seek reelection to the House instead of making a bid for Congress. Krishnamoorthi, who represents the 8th District in the U.S. House, has announced plans to run in the primary for the seat currently held by U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin, who plans to retire. Both he and Durbin are Democrats, as are two other candidates who have announced they're running for the job: Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton and U.S. Rep. Robin Kelly, D-Matteson. Castro, elected to the state Senate in 2016, is the majority caucus whip for the 103rd General Assembly, chair of the Senate Executive Committee, and a member of the Latino Caucus, according to her website biography. She serves on the Appropriations, Energy and Public Utilities, Insurance, Labor and Revenue committees. Prior to being elected to the state Senate, she served on the Kane County Board from 2008 to 2016. Castro holds an associate degree from Elgin Community College and bachelor's and master's degree in business administration from Northern Illinois University.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Scapegoating entire nations.' Trump's travel ban hurts innocent Columbus families
Farxaan Jeyte is a seasoned political strategist, entrepreneur and advocate with over 20 years of experience in U.S. presidential, gubernatorial and Senate campaigns. He is active in U.S.–Africa policy and supports minority-owned businesses through his work in trade, governance and grassroots advocacy. Donald Trump's administration argues that banning citizens of 12 countries — Somalia included — from entering the United States will fill gaps in foreign vetting and prevent dangerous individuals from slipping through. The move came after an Egyptian national was arrested on charges that he firebombed a pro-Israel rally in Boulder, Colorado. Trump said the attack 'underscored the extreme dangers posed by foreign nationals who are not properly vetted.' White House officials call the move 'commonsense' and say it targets countries with weak screening and high visa overstay rates to 'protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors.' Yet for all the focus on security, the human costs of a blanket ban are impossible to ignore. The policy casts a wide net, halting travel for entire populations because of the actions of a few. It sweeps up people who pose no threat: students, grandparents and refugees. More: Habiba Soliman wanted to be a doctor. Then, her father firebombed Jewish marchers in Boulder Punishing whole nations for the crimes of individuals also raises basic fairness issues. Notably, the Boulder suspect's country of origin, Egypt, isn't even on the ban list, calling into question how effective banning other countries really is. From the administration's view, the Boulder attack was a wake-up call revealing flaws in the immigration system. Officials note the suspect was an Egyptian visitor who overstayed his visa — a failure of enforcement they cite as proof of lax vetting. Supporters of the ban point out that many listed nations are unstable, potentially allowing extremists to slip through. By halting entry from countries such as Afghanistan, Yemen and Somalia — all grappling with terrorism — the administration contends it is closing dangerous loopholes to prevent another tragedy. Critics argue the collateral damage — broken families and lost trust — far outweighs any security benefit. Human rights groups have decried the renewed policy as 'discriminatory' and cruel, saying it 'sows division and vilifies communities' seeking safety. The consequences for innocent families will be devastating. Ohio has roughly 60,000 Somali-American residents in the Columbus area. This vibrant community has contributed enormously — immigrants from Somalia have opened hundreds of local businesses and enriched the city's culture. More: 'Nobody told us about the neighborhood': Somali Americans experiences with youth violence A ban on Somalia strikes at the heart of these families. Grandparents may miss the birth of a grandchild, and students could see siblings barred from graduations. In Columbus, conversations are filled with concern for relatives stranded abroad. People who once fled terror and found refuge in America now worry they're seen as threats. It's a painful irony that has left many feeling alienated in the only country they call home. Trump's 2017 travel ban on Muslim-majority countries like Somalia caused chaos at airports and tore families apart — a history now poised to repeat. One Somali refugee in Ohio was separated from his wife and children for nearly seven years due to that ban. We can protect America without scapegoating entire nations. Rather than broad bans, officials should pursue targeted, intelligence-based measures — stronger background checks, better visa enforcement and vetting individuals based on real red flags, not blanket nationality. U.S. agencies are capable of pinpointing threats without closing the door on innocent travelers. Blanket travel bans offer a false sense of security while breeding resentment. A wiser approach balances vigilance with fairness, preserving goodwill with immigrant communities. Somali-Americans have proven their commitment to this country and should be treated as partners in safety, not suspects. Focusing on genuine threats — instead of scapegoating entire populations — is more just and more effective at keeping America safe. Farxaan Jeyte is a seasoned political strategist, entrepreneur and advocate with over 20 years of experience in U.S. presidential, gubernatorial and Senate campaigns. He is active in U.S.–Africa policy and supports minority-owned businesses through his work in trade, governance and grassroots advocacy. This article originally appeared on The Columbus Dispatch: Trump's travel ban lists countries with strong Ohio ties | Opinion
Epoch Times
19 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
House GOP Unveils Bill to Claw Back $9.4 Billion in Funding Ahead of Vote
House Republicans released their bill on June 6 to rescind $9.4 billion in federal spending ahead of a floor vote next week. The package would include eliminating funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which supports NPR and PBS. The seven-page bill would rescind $22 million from the U.S. African Development Foundation, $15 million from the U.S. Institute for Peace, and billions of dollars in bilateral economic assistance.
