How to become an Isa millionaire at 71 by saving just £200 a month
Adele Cooke, Senior Consumer Reporter
Published: Invalid Date,
MOST of us dream of retiring with £1million in the bank - but with a bit of careful planning, you could make it a reality.
There are 4,850 Isa millionaires in the UK, according to official figures.
The wealthiest 25 of this group have a staggering £8.8million stashed away in ISAs, HM Revenue and Customs revealed in a freedom of information request made by savings app Plum.
If you want to become an Isa millionaire yourself, the best trick is to save little and often.
It is also a good idea to start to save as early as possible to benefit from compound interest.
This is when you earn interest on both the money you have saved and the interest you have already earned.
If you plan to save money for a long time, it could make sense to invest it in the stock market.
Money that is invested has historically tended to grow at a much faster rate than cash savings.
Investments can go up and down, though, so you are at risk of losing money if you invest it.
But if you invest in the market over a longer period, then there is more time to even out the ups and downs from short-term volatility.
You may also get a dividend payment in exchange for investing in a company or a fund.
Plus, if you keep your money in an Isa then you do not need to pay tax on any of the interest you earn.
What is the Bank of England base rate and how does it affect me?
What is an Isa?
Individual savings accounts (Isas) are a type of tax-free savings account.
You can save up to £20,000 into the account each year.
There are two types of Isa - cash or stocks and shares.
As its name suggests, cash Isas let you hold your money in cash, which can be helpful if you are saving for a specific goal such as a house deposit or new car.
They are a good alternative to a basic savings account if you want to save a large sum.
This is because you may have to pay tax on the interest you earn from your savings.
Basic rate taxpayers need to pay tax on any interest they earn from their savings once it exceeds £1,000 a year.
Higher rate taxpayers can earn £500 in interest before they need to pay tax, while additional rate taxpayers pay tax on all interest they earn.
In comparison, stocks and shares Isas invest your money in the stock market.
They can be a good idea if you are trying to build wealth for the long term, such as for retirement or private school.
How much do I need to save?
The earlier you start to save, the easier it is to build up a large pot.
For example, if you save just £200 a month from the age of 21 then you would become an Isa millionaire by the time you are 71.
In total you would have saved £120,000, but you would earn an enormous £880,000 in interest.
But starting later does not mean you cannot become a millionaire.
If you put away £500 a month from the age of 33 then you would have £1million by the time you are 71.
But starting later means that you will need to save more of your own money to reach the £1million mark.
Starting to save just 12 years later would mean that you would need to save £228,000 of your own money.
This is £108,000 more than if you began earlier.
Meanwhile, if you began to save at 49 then you would need to put away an eye-watering £1,666 a month to become a millionaire by 71.
You would have 22 years to build your nest egg and would end up putting away £439,000 of your own money.
In total you would earn £571,000 in interest.
This is three times more than if you started saving at 21.
Rachel Springall, finance expert at Moneyfactscompare.co.uk, said: 'It is possible to become an ISA millionaire, but it will require a strict savings regime, and consumers will need to be vigilant to watch out for stock market volatility or rate cuts.'
Can I make my child a millionaire?
It is also possible to make your child a millionaire if you start to save as soon as they are born.
A Junior Isa is similar to an adult account but you can only pay in up to £9,000 a year.
The account becomes an adult Isa once your child turns 18.
If you are able to pay in the full allowance each year, and your child continues to pay into the account when they are an adult, then they would become a millionaire by the age of 60.
This assumes that their savings do not grow in this period and there are no changes to the maximum amount that can be paid into the account.
If the savings grow in this period then your child could become a millionaire at a much younger age.
Roger Clarke, Partner at The Private Office, said: 'If your parents or grandparents set you up with a Junior ISA (JISA), you've got a head start.
'The growth of your contributions will depend upon the funds chosen and higher risk funds should, over the long term, produce higher returns.'
How do I save?
The best way to build a nest egg is to save consistently.
Try and put money away each month if you are able to.
Pay into your savings account at the start of each month so you are not tempted to spend it.
If you get a pay rise then add the extra money you earn to your account so you do not get accustomed to it entering your account.
You should also make a budget so you know that you have enough money to pay for your bills.
Always build up a rainy day fund for unexpected emergencies such as a new boiler or car before you begin to invest.
You should also pay off any debt you may have before you start investing.
If you want advice on how to invest then speak to an independent financial adviser.
You can find one by visiting unbiased.co.uk.
If you choose to invest yourself then make sure you have a diversified portfolio.
This means that you spread your investments across different stocks, bonds, alternative investments, sectors, companies and regions.
Doing this ensures that you are not badly hit if something goes wrong in one sector.
How you can find the best savings rates
If you are trying to find the best savings rate there are websites you can use that can show you the best rates available.
Doing some research on websites such as MoneyFacts and price comparison sites including Compare the Market and Go Compare will quickly show you what's out there.
These websites let you tailor your searches to an account type that suits you.
There are three types of savings accounts fixed, easy access, and regular saver.
A fixed-rate savings account offers some of the highest interest rates but comes at the cost of being unable to withdraw your cash within the agreed term.
This means that your money is locked in, so even if interest rates increase you are unable to move your money and switch to a better account.
Some providers give the option to withdraw but it comes with a hefty fee.
An easy-access account does what it says on the tin and usually allow unlimited cash withdrawals.
These accounts do tend to come with lower returns but are a good option if you want the freedom to move your money without being charged a penalty fee.
Lastly is a regular saver account, these accounts generate decent returns but only on the basis that you pay a set amount in each month.
.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Reeves can't afford to ignore the cost of government waste
The Government has let public sector waste, incompetence and inefficiency run out of control. No wonder Rachel Reeves is having to tell the Home Secretary there's not enough cash for the police and Border Force when the public wants an end to illegal migration and anti social behaviour, and no surprise the Deputy Prime Minister is railing against the shortage of cash for councils and housing when she needs billions extra to help all the new arrivals to the UK find subsidised accommodation and the public services to go with the homes. But we are not in an entirely hopeless situation. There is plenty of money to be better spent, budgets to be switched and losses to be stopped. Fraud takes large sums from the welfare budget. Too many people claim benefits on a sickness note for life when they could work, some desperately manoeuvre for a false (but helpful) diagnosis. We need a fairer system which is generous to those who are seriously disabled without threatening them with cuts, but does much more to help all the others into work. If you can work, and a job is available, you should not stay on benefits. There are the continuing over the top losses on bonds by the Bank of England which taxpayers have to pay for. No other Central bank sells bonds at big losses in the market as ours does, to add to taxpayer woes. Total losses from mid 2022 to the full wind up of their bond portfolio next decade are estimated by the OBR to stand at a stunning £250 billion. Tell the bank to cut these losses, as the European Central Bank has done with its badly bought bonds. Then there in the inexcusable waste that comes from big subsidies for the nationalised industries. Some of this waste is a direct response to prior poor policy. There is no statement from the Government of how it will control the likely big cost of its steel intervention, necessitated by an energy policy that sells industry unaffordable power. The Budget gave a large pay award to well paid train drivers without asking for smarter working to boost productivity. This blank cheque system is utterly unsustainable: tell the management they will only get bonuses and high pay in future if losses are reduced and fare revenue is boosted from more travel. The civil service expanded greatly to tackle vaccinations and lockdowns over Covid. It has grown more as we recover from the pandemic. It is unreasonable that when Ministers ask for some restoration of lost productivity, they are told they need to spend to save. Those holding out hope for an AI moonshot may see some gains in due course, but we literally cannot afford to delay an enforced return to 2019 levels of productivity (hardly impressive at the time) any longer. That need not await a study of how to buy better computers. There should be a ban on all external recruitment to the public sector, exempting key NHS personnel, uniformed staff and teachers. Ministers could authorise other special cases. Natural wastage in the civil service could save 7 per cent per cent a year on staff bills as we seek to get back to 2016 manning levels. This high rate of industry churn means more opportunities for bright and energetic public officials, as there will be more internal opportunities as staffing is rearranged and focused on main tasks. Such individuals must be empowered to take real ownership over bureaucratic structures. Perhaps the greatest cost – certainly in electoral terms – is the growing number of illegal migrants. The Government made changes to inherited policy which made a bad situation far worse. Numbers have shot up and the hotels are full. Again, a ruthless dedication to getting value for money already being spent would help, and we are certainly not getting value for the big money we give to France to police their coast. How come the French can safely intercept a UK fishing boat and take it to France for a court action over its paperwork, but they cannot stop a single people trafficking vessel at sea and do not prosecute the boat drivers? The country will not accept paying more for less every year. If the Labour Government is able to get this reckless waste under control, the Chancellor's future Budgets will only condemn the party to electoral oblivion.
Reuters
10 hours ago
- Reuters
UK private-sector pay settlements fall despite higher minimum wage, data shows
LONDON, June 9 (Reuters) - Typical annual pay settlements offered by British companies in the three months to April fell slightly, despite a rise in the minimum wage which boosted pay significantly for some lower-paid workers, industry data showed on Monday. The news is likely to be welcomed by the Bank of England, which has forecast a sharp slowdown in pay growth this year that it says is needed for consumer price inflation to return to its 2% target. Incomes Data Research said the median private-sector wage deal edged downwards to 3.4% in the three months to April from 3.5% in the three months to March. However, the proportion of employers offering pay settlements of more than 6% jumped to 11% from March's 2%, reflecting a 6.7% increase in the minimum wage to 12.21 pounds ($16.51) an hour that took effect in April, IDR said. April also marked the start of higher national insurance contributions for employers, which have made some businesses more reluctant to hire. For the whole economy, pay settlements were unchanged at 3.2%, reflecting a 2.7% rise in pay at not-for-profit employers. Very few public-sector employers were in the sample of 129 pay deals which covered 1.3 million workers, mostly at large companies, IDR said. Britain's Office for National Statistics is due to publish wage data for the three months to April on Tuesday. Preliminary Reuters polling data on Friday showed average earnings growth, excluding bonuses, is forecast by economists to slow to 5.4% from 5.6%. The BoE sees pay growth of around 3% as consistent with on-target inflation over the medium term. Average earnings data in Britain tends to exceed pay settlements by some margin as the former also captures the boost to pay when employers offer more higher-paid roles. ($1 = 0.7396 pounds)
Telegraph
a day ago
- Telegraph
Reeves has been captured by Bank of England orthodoxy
Ahead of her spending review on Wednesday, Chancellor Rachel Reeves faces a set of national accounts drenched in red ink. But Nigel Farage's upstart Reform party has a plan which, at a stroke, will apparently bring about a multibillion-pound improvement, paving the way for higher public spending without more borrowing and even allowing for tax cuts. Richard Tice, Reform's deputy leader, has this weekend written an explosive letter to Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey, accusing the UK's central bank of 'systemic misuse of taxpayers' money ... at a time when the nation's accounts are already under very severe pressure'. Despite the sud den resignation of chairman Zia Yusuf and Labour's victory in last week's Hamilton by-election, Reform has come out fighting. Still leading in most opinion polls, the party has launched a broadside against the financial establishment, publicly claiming the Bank of England 'is unnecessarily wasting tens of billions of pounds of taxpayers' money, whilst enriching City institutions'. Tice's letter to Bailey focuses on the merit of interest payments made on balances held at the Bank of England, resulting from the UK's 15-year-long quantitative easing (QE) programme. The detail behind these issues is understood by just a few – expert policymakers, specialist investors and a handful of overly curious economic commentators. But Reform's now boldly stated policy aim of forcing the Bank of England to stop paying interest to commercial banks on QE reserves, resulting in potential savings of £35bn per year, is not outlandish. I believe it should be taken seriously and openly debated – as do a range of widely respected, politically agnostic economists, including two former deputy governors of the Bank of England. Public sector net borrowing for the financial year ending March 2025 was £151.9bn, a massive £14.6bn above the Office for Budget Responsibility's (OBR) forecast and £20.7bn more than the previous year. With public sector net debt at £2,770bn – equivalent to 97.2pc of GDP, the highest ratio since the early 1960s – the Government is making annual interest payments of £105bn, which is the schools and transport budget combined and almost twice what it spends on defence. But with Reeves facing competing spending demands from all departments and Labour Left-wing activists out to get her, Reform's policy of ending obscure interest payments buried deep in the national accounts, barely recognised and even less widely understood, could unlock serious money – an average of some four times the fast-diminishing £9.9bn of fiscal headroom she has allowed for 2028/29, each and every year for the rest of this parliament. This is why Tice has written this public letter now, piling pressure on a desperately cash-strapped Chancellor who has already pointed to the 'dangers' of curtailing these interest payments, accepting the Bank of England's self-serving arguments against change, just as she swallowed whole the Treasury's long-cherished idea of scrapping of winter fuel payments that has turned out to be politically disastrous. QE was launched in response to the 2008 financial crisis, as the Bank of England 'printed' virtual money to try to revive the UK economy. Threadneedle Street created balances 'ex nihilo', using them to buy government bonds (known as gilts) from investors, mainly commercial banks, in an attempt to drive down borrowing costs. Those banks then parked the cash they received for their gilts back at the Bank of England, helping to stabilise their own balance sheets and the broader financial system, while earning the 'base interest' on those deposits. When rates were just 0.5pc following the financial crisis and 0.1pc during the Covid lockdown, the Bank earned far more on returns from gilts than it paid commercial banks in interest, reaping handsome profits which were duly passed on to the Exchequer. But when QE inevitably led to inflation, interest rates started rising – especially over the past few years, up above 5pc. And that has resulted in big losses on QE balances, which the Government is obliged to indemnify, with some £85.9bn being transferred from the Treasury to the Bank since the end of 2022. Even more controversially, the profits of commercial banks have since then been much higher than before Covid – with some of the same institutions perceived to have helped cause the financial crisis making money years down the line, again at taxpayers' expense, from the very emergency measures designed to clear up the mess. And on top of that, as Tice points out in his letter, the Bank has also been selling its stockpile of gilts back to the market – so-called quantitative tightening (QT) – crystallising billions of pounds of losses for the taxpayer. Again, many serious economists think this is a mistake, with some of the bonds bought during times of genuine distress now being sold at knockdown prices. 'Once again this is a voluntary decision by the Bank of England, that is imposing tens of billions of pounds of unnecessary losses on the taxpayer,' wrote Tice to Governor Bailey. 'QT is also partly responsible for keeping gilt yields higher than they otherwise would be, resulting in even more punitive interest costs, imposing yet more strain on the Government's profit and loss account,' Tice continued. He is right. And, of course, the Bank decided to begin its QT programme just a couple of days before Liz Truss's 'mini-Budget', piling pressure on government debt markets by flooding them with additional gilts, just as a Tory prime minister was launching policies designed to scale back the size of the state. The timing of that decision, at the very least an important contributory factor in the chaos which ensued, is almost never remarked upon. It certainly will be if the political and media class, at Tice's behest, now becomes seriously interested in the inner workings of the Bank of England's balance sheet.
