
NY Times columnist compares Elon Musk to history's worst murderers over USAID cuts
New York Times columnist David Brooks suggested Elon Musk belongs on a list of history's greatest mass murderers, including Pol Pot, Mao and Stalin due to DOGE'S cuts to USAID.
"So far, 55,000 adults have died of AIDS in the four months since Trump was elected; 6,000 children are dead because of what DOGE did. That's just PEPFAR, the HIV. You add them all up, that's 300,000 dead, and we're four months in. You add that all up and accumulate that over four years the number of dead grows very high," Brooks said on PBS News Hour Saturday.
"There are mass murderers in the world, Pol Pot, Mao Tse Tung, Stalin. We don't have anybody on the list from America," Brooks added.
The New York Times columnist conceded the so-called deaths that he claims Musk is responsible for are not "the same kind of genocide" perpetrated by the despots he cited, but maintained that Musk's closure of USAID made him partially responsible for mass deaths.
The casualty counts Brooks cited were provided by a Boston University digital tracker that monitors deaths that it claims occur from changes in U.S. foreign aid created by Global Health Professor Brooke Nichols. When filtered for USAID cuts, the tracker states that 99,528 adults and 207,680 children have died this year from "funding discontinuation."
The communist regime Khmer Rouge killed between 1.5-3 million people between 1975 and 1979 in the Cambodian Genocide when the group plunged the country into mass violence targeting intellectuals and religious minorities following their overthrow of the Cambodian Monarchy and installation of Pol Pot as dictator in 1975.
Thirty-eight million people died of starvation during Mao's Great Leap Forward and the ensuing famine it produced. Mao biographers Jung Chang and Jon Halliday estimate that Mao was responsible for over 70 million peacetime deaths.
Stalin killed over six million of his own citizens in the gulags, the Great Terror and other actions.
Brooks is purpotedly one of the few conservative voices at the New York Times. However, the columnist has espoused liberal views on a host of topics and has praised Biden's presidency. He has also positioned himself as a fierce critic of President Donald Trump.
"Trumpism can be seen as a giant attempt to amputate the highest aspirations of the human spirit and to reduce us to our most primitive, atavistic tendencies," Brooks wrote in a recent column.
USAID was set up in the early 1960s to act on behalf of the U.S. to deliver aid across the globe, particularly in impoverished and underdeveloped regions. The agency now operates in 60 nations and employs some 10,000 people, two-thirds of whom work overseas — though most of the on-the-ground work is contracted out to third-party organizations funded by USAID, according to a BBC report.
The Trump administration, however, has argued that USAID is a corrupt organization that is mishandling U.S. taxpayer dollars. DOGE froze USAID funds and sent much of its staff home shortly after Trump took office. Musk, who was spearheading the DOGE effort to root out "waste, fraud and abuse" in government, has said the agency is beyond repair. The Trump administration announced that it would be cutting 90% of all USAID contracts in April.
U2 frontman Bono recently made a similar claim as Brooks on Joe Rogan's podcast, saying 300,000 people have died due to USAID cuts. Musk swiftly shot back on social media, calling the Irish rocker a "liar/idiot" and claiming that there have not been any deaths from USAID cuts.
"He's such a liar/idiot Zero people have died!" The Tesla CEO posted.
Musk and Brooks did not respond to Fox News Digital's request to comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Vogue
17 minutes ago
- Vogue
Kylie Jenner Gets Real About Her Breast Augmentation—Down To The Implant Size
Of all the things I expected to read on the internet today, it wasn't Kylie Jenner detailing (down to the implant size) her breast augmentation. The plastic surgery transparency was all in response to a video posted by YouTuber and TikTok user @rachleary, pleading for the youngest KarJen sibling to share her surgery details. 'Please can you just tell me/us/anyone that's interested, what it is you asked for when you had your boobs done?' Leary asked, explaining that she didn't expect Jenner to share the surgeon but would love to know what exactly the surgeon did. 'I feel like you've been quite open about having your boobs done,' Leary continues, outlining that she 'd like to know about the style of implant ('teardrop' or 'high profile') but also the placement (under or over the muscle). 'Can you just share what it is you have had?' she pleads, caveating that she feels that it's important not to speculate and would prefer to ask Jenner directly. TikTok content This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from. In a stunning turn of events, Jenner responded, commenting: '445 cc, moderate profile, half under the muscle!!!!! silicone!!! garth fisher!!! hope this helps lol.' Had Kris Jenner not shared just this month who the surgeon behind her recent facelift was, the transparency would seem unimaginable. Confirmed by People, New York-based aesthetic and reconstructive surgeon Dr Steven Levine performed Jenner's recently debuted work. This isn't the first time Jenner (Kylie) has been open about her breast augmentation, though. In 2023, during an episode of The Kardashians, she admitted to the surgery during a conversation with a friend: 'I had beautiful breasts [before giving birth to her first child, Stormi]. Natural tits. Just gorgeous. Perfect size, perfect everything,' she said. 'And I just wish, obviously, I never got them done to begin with.' Whatever your perspective on sharing details of plastic surgery, there is something heartwarming about Jenner sharing her own experience, especially considering how desperately Leary wanted to know. Celebrities, (maybe) they're just like us.

Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Former SpaceX Engineer's Impulse Space raises $300 million to expand space tug fleet
-Impulse Space, a space technology startup developing orbital transfer vehicles commonly known as "space tugs," has raised $300 million in a late-stage funding round led by Linse Capital, bringing the company's total funding to $525 million. Led by Tom Mueller, a founding employee at Elon Musk's SpaceX, Impulse Space is creating spacecraft designed to transport satellites between different orbital positions to meet growing demand for orbital logistics services. WHY IT'S IMPORTANT As SpaceX's Starship and Blue Origin's New Glenn approach operational status, industry experts anticipate a surge in rideshare missions. These launches place multiple satellites on single rockets, often requiring space tugs to deliver them to precise orbits. CONTEXT The funding positions Impulse Space to address increasing demand for in-space mobility across commercial, civil, and defense sectors seeking faster, cost-effective orbital transport solutions. In-space mobility has become essential for satellite deployment, Earth observation support, and deep space exploration. Space tugs offer satellite operators a cost-effective way to reach specific orbits without requiring customized launches. BY THE NUMBERS Impulse has signed more than 30 commercial and government contracts valued at nearly $200 million and is seeing more interest from across sectors. The company has completed two missions completed using Mira, Impulse's high-thrust space vehicle. The startup did not disclose the valuation of its funding round and did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for the information. WHAT'S NEXT Impulse plans to expand its workforce, accelerate research and development for long-duration missions, and scale production of its Mira and Helios space vehicles to meet increasing customer demand.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
You Might Have ‘Recession Nails' And Not Even Know It
Ro Wilson used to spend up to $150 on fresh gel extensions with intricate nail art every month. 'Christmas nails, Halloween nails, spring nails,' she said. 'For the last couple of years, I was very loyal ... the nail that I got always matched the theme of the month.' But this January, the New York-based marketing professional decided to stop and give her weakened nail beds a break ― and she noticed the reprieve her wallet got as well. She now considers her Gel X habit an 'unnecessary spend.' 'Right now, it's more important for me to have a one-bedroom apartment and have less money to spend on beauty than it would be for me to have two, three roommates,' Wilson said about her current priorities. She's dubbed her current bare short nails a 'recession indicator,' a play on the 'recession nail' trend, or 'princess nails' as some more positively call it, that has taken off on TikTok in recent days. According to these TikTokers, short, understated nails are in, and more expensive long coffin nails and gel extensions are out this year. As one TikToker with plain, manicured nails put it, these are 'low-maintenance nails for the recession.' But can the state of how you do your nails actually be a sign of where the economy is going? Washington State University economist Christopher Clarke said short, simple nails could possibly be a recession indicator, but beauty trends are a 'noisy' signal of an economic downturn because 'things go in and out of style, and that has nothing to do with the economy, it just has to do with the seasonality of human preferences,' he said. For Clarke, the key recession indicators are a rise in unemployment claims, the overall unemployment rate, and declining investments. But he understands why we want to make TikTok videos with our own interpretation of recession indicators, because humans crave a narrative to explain their anxieties about the future. 'When we feel anxiety about all these changes in the economy ... we need a story to help us frame it, to help us understand what we're going through,' he said. Nail artists themselves are more skeptical, however, about whether short, simple nails are a recession indicator. Long nails 'won't be going anywhere anytime soon,' said Christa Cole, a Pasadena, California-based nail technician. 'My clients love the way they can be creative and express their style with their nails.' Nail artists said the length of the nail doesn't indicate tightening budgets, but how often you come to the salon does. Los Angeles-based nail artist Christina Tran has noticed a trend over the past year, where clients are opting for simpler nail art and stretching out the time between appointments to save money. When clients ask for 'basic and boring,' understated short nails, 'I'm not going to chew her out about it. I'll be like, 'Oh, maybe it's a financial thing, or they have to get out of here in a hurry or something.' But it's like, girl, don't you see what I could do?' Tran said about the simple, short nail look. In Tran's view, the ultimate recession nails are when you no longer have the budget to get your nails done at all. Similarly, Los Angeles-based nail artist Sigourney Nuñez said recession nails are not dependent on length ― they are the nails you do yourself to save money. She believes we'll soon see parallels between what was popular during the 2008 recession and what's trending now. 'Back then, DIY nail art really took off and drugstore polish was super affordable, so people got creative at home,' she said. As one TikToker recently put it, 'Recession core is just gluing the same $5 press-on nails back every time they pop off for two months.' When times are tough, Clarke said people will cut out unnecessary luxury items, citing how budget retailer Walmart's stock price rose during the 2008 recession while Target's fell. However, what makes nail trends difficult to track as recession indicators is that what some consider a luxury, others view as a necessity. Even though gel manicures with nail art can cost more than $100, some customers will never give them up, no matter the cost. 'There will always be those loyal clients who would rather skip eating out than miss their nail appointment,' Nuñez said. Tran said she has clients who will tell her 'how they're struggling, but they'll still come and get their nails done, because it's been so ingrained in their personality.' As for Wilson, she has given up her monthly gel extension habit. But she still plans to reserve elaborate nail art for special occasions in the future. 'I like the idea of growing my own nail out,' Wilson said, 'and just doing designs and getting gel on that, versus paying $120-plus for fake nails that were going to break off anyway.' The 1 Thing Nail Professionals Would Never Do To Their Own Nails Hair Stylists Are Bracing For A Recession — And Noticing A Hot New Trend With Clients Sex Workers Already Predicted There's A Recession Coming — Here's How They Know