logo
Forever, review: an unforgivably slow-paced adaptation of Judy Blume's seminal novel

Forever, review: an unforgivably slow-paced adaptation of Judy Blume's seminal novel

Telegraph08-05-2025

Sometimes a show can live up to its name for all the wrong reasons. Sprawling sluggishly over eight, hour-long episodes, Netflix's new teen drama Forever really does feel like it goes on… well… foooor-evaaaah.
This is a huge shame because, if only it were zippier, it would be precisely the kind of thoughtfully conceived and tenderly acted coming-of-age tale that our kids (and their parents) need right now: a perfect counterbalance to the worst-case scenario of Adolescence.
Created by Mara Brock Akil (best known for endearing sitcom Girlfriends and drama Being Mary Jane), it's based on Judy Blume 's classic, 1975 novel written in response to her then-adolescent daughter's request for 'a story about two nice kids who have sex without either of them having to die' – the then-typical 'punishment' for sexually active fictional teens of the era.
In the introduction to later editions, the straight-talking, sex-positive author set out her intention to push back against the prudish and dishonest teen tropes of the period. 'Girls in these books had no sexual feelings and boys had no feelings other than sexual,' she wrote.
Instead, she described two sweet, flawed and fumbling characters who lost their virginity together, 'responsibly'. Blume trusted her young readers to handle the information provided with equal responsibility – although anyone who passed the novel around the playground in the 1970s and 1980s will recall some serious snickering over the fact the male hero had nicknamed his penis 'Ralph'.
Banned by many American schools and libraries, Blume's books were loved for the honest way in which she normalised teen fears and desires. They were short on plot. The characters in Forever meet, fall in love, have sex, grow apart, accept their relationship doesn't have to last a lifetime, and break up.
Akil's series follows the same arc, updating themes to the 21st century. These kids have to navigate a world of social media confusion, viral sex tape-shaming , manscaping and ADHD diagnoses – and it's not a world through which their engaged, loving parents are always fully equipped to guide them. Akil also shifts the setting from New Jersey to sun-dazed Los Angeles and her characters' ethnicity from white to black – a switch which gives the show some much-needed bite. These are kids who don't just need to take precautions between the sheets, they also need to be prepared for the police stopping and searching their cars. Their parents are understandably terrified for their safety.
Interviewed for the Telegraph earlier this month, Akil (the mother of two teenage boys) spoke of the 'vulnerability' of young black men. So while in Blume's original, the male hero was more eager to have sex and the heroine was wary, Akil's version offers a bolder, more sexually experienced heroine Keisha (in the luminous Lovie Simone) and a more sensitive and socially awkward male lead Justin (adorable newcomer Michael Cooper Jr). Both kids are athletic and academic high fliers, meaning too much of the show is devoted to the finer details of their college applications. Their misunderstandings (and those of their parents) take far too long to resolve, with the relentless ellipses in text exchanges sound-tracked by too many drowsy R&B slow jams.
Kids whose attention spans stay the course will be rewarded with wholesome life lessons (learnt at the expense of character mistakes) and adults will gain insight into the often baffling challenges of modern youth culture. Consent – and how to put a condom on a cucumber in the dark – are covered.
It would be beyond excruciating – or 'uber awks' in Gen Zese – to watch the sex scenes together as a family. But Keisha doesn't meet 'Ralph' until almost five hours into the series. By which time, I fear, most viewers will have dumped the show.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bride and groom's risqué act in front of wedding guests leaves internet stunned
Bride and groom's risqué act in front of wedding guests leaves internet stunned

Daily Mail​

time30 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Bride and groom's risqué act in front of wedding guests leaves internet stunned

A bride and groom have left the internet stunned over their risqué act in front of their wedding guests. Haley Finch posted a video of her husband, Austin, removing her garter during their wedding reception to TikTok earlier this, and the sultry interaction quickly went viral. The bride sat in a chair in the middle of the dance floor, while Austin knelt in front of her. He then used his teeth to pull the garter off her leg - which sat high on her thigh. Haley seemed to be enjoying the moment, as she opened her mouth wide with surprise before laughing. But people on the web were shocked by the racy moment... especially since it happened in front of the couple's entire families and friends. 'Absolutely not in public?' one surprised user wrote. 'In front of the WHOLE FAMILY? You're strong,' another person shared. Haley Finch posted a video of her husband, Austin, removing her garter during their wedding reception to TikTok earlier this, and the sultry interaction quickly went viral 'That whole garter thing makes me uncomfortable. We skipped it in our wedding,' someone else revealed, while a fourth said, 'Yeah I am NOT doing the garter removal at my wedding.' A fifth comment read: 'My mom would faint.' 'This should only be done in private after the wedding,' a different viewer said. 'In front of my parents? I WOULD HAVE DIED,' announced someone else. 'I would be so embarrassed...' another person shared. 'Doing this in front of family will never not be weird to me,' admitted one user. Other comments read: 'I think my parents would legitimately have a heart attack,' 'The honeymoon is supposed to be at a different location,' and, 'Dude, this is a wedding, not your bedroom.' However, a few people encouraged the act and defended the couple. One wrote: 'It's a leg, they are MARRIED. People need to relax. It's a normal tradition at the wedding. And it was THEIR WEDDING. Don't like it? Scroll.' A garter is a piece of lingerie that some brides wear under their wedding gowns. It's a longstanding tradition for the bride and groom to do a 'garter toss,' where the man removes the bride's garter in a flirty manner with either his hands or teeth, per Maggie Sottero. The garter is then tossed into a group of single men - and whoever catches it is named the winner, and it's believed he will be the next one who will marry. A wedding garter symbolizes love and luck for your wedding guests as well as being a fun and cheeky tradition.

AMC fans threaten to BOYCOTT after movie theater chain announces shock change
AMC fans threaten to BOYCOTT after movie theater chain announces shock change

Daily Mail​

time31 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

AMC fans threaten to BOYCOTT after movie theater chain announces shock change

A shocking announcement from AMC has left movie-goers fiercely outraged. Anyone who has gone to the cinema knows the torture of waiting for the film to begin and having to watch a slew of ads about upcoming films and attractions. And now, it's going to get worse as the theater chain revealed this week that it has agreed to run even more commercials before its movies, per Bloomberg. The outlet said that starting July 1, AMC theaters will add one more commercial right before the start of the movie as part of a new deal with American cinema advertising company National CineMedia Inc. According to the publication, AMC will get a cut of the ad sales from the 'platinum spot,' which it described as 'vital revenue.' 'While AMC was initially reluctant to bring this to our theaters, our competitors have fully participated for more than five years without any direct impact to their attendance,' it said in a statement. Fans were not happy with the news, and took to X, formerly Twitter, to slam AMC. 'Now I have even more reason not to go there,' announced one angry user. 'It already takes 30 minutes for the movie to actually start! I DO NOT want to wait any longer,' agreed another. 'No, no and no. I ain't trying to see trailers and ads for 45 mins before my [movie] starts. I got s**t to do,' someone else wrote. 'I honestly think that the movie theater is going to go extinct in the next 10 years,' predicted a different person. 'Boycott AMC,' a fifth tweet read, while a sixth said, 'No thanks, I'll stay home.' Others branded the company as 'tone deaf,' 'trash,' and 'excessive.' Variety reported last month that AMC Theatres' quarterly losses had hit $202.1 million after a 'lack of winter blockbusters.' On its website, AMC currently states that 'there are approximately 20 minutes of preshow material, including trailers, between the published showtime and the start of the feature film.' Last year, a moviegoer lashed out at AMC Theaters after discovering a sneaky fee on their concessions receipt. Fans were not happy with the news, and took to X, formerly Twitter, to slam AMC TikToker Kikntiger detailed his frustration in a video entitled: 'Pretty weak move AMC Theatres.' In it, he explained how after ordering a popcorn and two large drinks at a cost of almost $24, he was then charged an additional $2 delivery fee alongside the usual $1 service fee. 'Delivery fee INSIDE of a movie theater is insane,' he wrote alongside the clip. 'Companies are getting out of control with their fees,' Kikntiger starting by saying in his 45 second rant. 'This is for concessions in a movie theater. You know, this isn't DoorDash!' he added, referring to the popular food delivery app. 'This is at my local movie theater, where the only option to get any snacks is they bring it to you, straight to your seat,' Kikntiger went on. 'You can't just go to the snack counter and order what you want and walk to the theater with it. 'So, OK, whatever - but then they charge you $2 just to deliver it 25 feet from the kitchen? 'Like, you're not driving it to my house. And then a dollar service fee, too? For what? For the privilege of ordering food?' 'I understand concessions are expensive; I don't care about that. But just slapping me with a $2 fee that I can't avoid? Ridiculous,' he said before ending his video. His post quickly went viral, gaining millions of views and erupting in backlash for AMC. A check of Dine-In AMC locations confirms that an additional $3 is added to any food order tab. As per the TikTok video, the charge consists of a $2 Delivery Fee and $1 Service Fee; AMC locations without the Dine-In option charge a $1 flat fee for service.

Justin Bieber reveals weight loss and mystery injury amid growing concerns for troubled star
Justin Bieber reveals weight loss and mystery injury amid growing concerns for troubled star

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Justin Bieber reveals weight loss and mystery injury amid growing concerns for troubled star

Justin Bieber revealed his striking weight loss as well as a mystery injury as he stepped out in Hollywood on Friday. The singer, 31, who sparked concern with an online rant earlier this week, cut a slighter figure and sported a knee brace on his left leg as he headed to a spa. A somber Bieber flashed his neck tattoo in two hoodies, paired with a baseball cap and green check print shorts. He completed his ensemble with blue sliders. The star has not publicly commented on his knee injury. has contacted a representative for Justin Bieber but did not immediately hear back. This comes after the Baby hitmaker sparked concern after going on an impromptu Instagram rant on Tuesday. The pop star took to Instagram in a bizarre post to share his thoughts about telling other people what they do or do not 'deserve.' 'Telling other humans they deserve something is like raising someone else's kids,' he wrote in his latest post. 'Who are you to tell someone what someone should or shouldn't have?' He balked at 'the audacity' and slammed his fans' unsolicited opinions: 'That's not your place. God decides what we deserve.' In response to his post, fans flooded his comments section with messages voicing concern, calling out his 'hypocrisy' and urging him to 'take a social media break.' Many fans seemed to believe he was responding to recent fan comments telling his wife Hailey Bieber, 28, that she 'deserves better' after his 'disrespectful' posts towards her. This comes after fans criticized his 'Mother's Day sucks a**' post on his wife's first Mother's Day since they welcomed their first child, son Jack Blues Bieber, in August 2024. They also pointed out that he recently admitted he previously told Hailey that she would 'never' land a Vogue cover in a since-deleted caption meant to congratulate his wife on that same, recent accomplishment. He also shared the post to his Instagram Story accompanied by Lil Tecca's song OWA OWA, in which he raps about pleasuring his partner and 'making it clear to his significant other that his time and presence should not be taken for granted,' per Genius. One fan commented on the Peaches singer's post and wrote: 'Justin. You told Hailey she couldn't be on a cover of Vogue, isn't that telling her she can't have something?' 'Didn't you just tell this girl she couldn't be on Vogue,' another fan wrote. Similar comments flooded his post. One person asked him: 'Brother didn't you tell your wife she could never be on the cover of Vogue???' Another person added, 'Take a break from social media, Justin.' 'I think you should leave God out of this and grow up,' one Instagram user penned. 'God told me you need a social media break,' another fan commented. The pop star took to Instagram in a bizarre post to share his thoughts about telling other people what they do or do not 'deserve' In response to his post, fans flooded his comments section with messages voicing concern, calling out his 'hypocrisy' and urging him to 'take a social media break'; pictured January in New York City Many fans seemed to believe he was responding to recent fan comments telling his wife Hailey Bieber , 28, that she 'deserves better' after his 'disrespectful' posts towards her; pictured April 2022 in Los Angeles This comes after fans criticized his 'Mother's Day sucks a**' post on his wife's first Mother's Day since they welcomed their first child, son Jack Blues Bieber, in August 2024; pictured February in New York City They also pointed out that he recently admitted he previously told Hailey that she would 'never' land a Vogue cover in a since-deleted caption meant to congratulate his wife on that same, recent accomplishment; pictured May in New York City 'Crashing out online is the worse,' a fan commented about his rant and recent controversial social media posts. 'God forbid a girl tell someone they deserve to be happy,' another user added, seemingly referencing Selena Gomez's recent cryptic posts. The singer's ex shared recent posts with interesting timing about 'cheering' people on and wishing she had the 'ability to erase one person's greatest pain.' The former Disney star's social media posts have recently sparked fan speculation that she was secretly sending messages of support for Hailey. 'Justin you need some therapy bro,' another user commented while one fan added, 'Bro this is not twitter.' One user wrote: 'My boy crashing out again?!?' One fan commented on the Peaches singer's post and wrote: 'Justin. You told Hailey she couldn't be on a cover of Vogue, isn't that telling her she can't have something?' Similar comments flooded his post as fans urged him to take a 'social media break' 'Crashing out online is the worse,' a fan commented about his rant and recent controversial social media posts 'Bro this is not twitter,' one fan added One user wrote: 'My boy crashing out again?!?' Justin's recent post comes amid concern about not only his marriage but his mental wellbeing regarding his increasingly bizarre behavior. After Hailey's Rhode beauty brand was acquired in a $1 billion deal last week, many fans started telling her to divorce Justin now that she has found fame and fortune on her own. Though many of the posts were apparent jokes, the couple have been entangled in rumors of marital woes while Justin has been on the receiving end of substantial backlash. The pair have been married nearly seven years after they tied the knot in 2018. Last year, they

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store