logo
REGN Stock Undervalued At $500?

REGN Stock Undervalued At $500?

Forbes3 days ago

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:REGN) shares witnessed a notable 19% decline on Friday, May 30, in the wake of the unexpected failure of itepekimab, its chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment in conjunction with Sanofi, during a late-stage clinical trial. One of the two trials did not achieve its primary endpoint, which is a significant setback considering that itepekimab was anticipated to become a blockbuster drug, with peak sales projections from Sanofi estimated between $2 billion and $6 billion.
This recent occurrence has intensified the existing pressures on REGN stock. At present, trading at $490, the stock has decreased 60% from its 52-week peak of about $1,200. A large portion of this downturn can be ascribed to the company's less-than-expected performance, especially concerning its existing blockbuster treatment, Eylea. To add to Regeneron's challenges, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently rejected a pre-filled syringe variant of Eylea HD, citing problems with a third-party supplier.
In light of the significant drop in Regeneron's stock price, a natural question emerges: is REGN now a viable buying opportunity? From a valuation standpoint, the stock seems undervalued, indicating an attractive entry point for investors. We believe there is little reason for long-term concern with REGN stock, rendering its current valuation notably low.
Our conclusion is derived from a thorough analysis that compares REGN's current valuation with its recent operating performance and historical financial health. Our evaluation of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals across essential parameters—Growth, Profitability, Financial Stability, and Downturn Resilience—suggests that the company continues to exhibit a very strong operational performance and financial condition, as elaborated further below. Nevertheless, for investors seeking lower volatility than that of individual stocks, the Trefis High Quality portfolio offers an alternative — having outperformed the S&P 500 and delivered returns exceeding 91% since its inception. Additionally, see – Buy, Sell, or Hold HIMS Stock?
When considering the cost per dollar of sales or profit, REGN stock appears slightly undervalued compared to the broader market.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals' Revenues have seen a slight decline over recent years.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals' profit margins are significantly higher than those of most companies in the Trefis coverage universe.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals' balance sheet appears very robust.
REGN stock has experienced an impact that was slightly better than the benchmark S&P 500 index during various recent downturns. Concerned about the influence of a market crash on REGN stock? Our dashboard – How Low Can Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Stock Go In A Market Crash? – includes a comprehensive analysis of the stock's performance during and after past market crashes.
In conclusion, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals' performance across the mentioned parameters is summarized as follows:
Regeneron has demonstrated strong performance across crucial financial metrics, and we contend this is not fully captured in its current stock valuation, which renders it an attractive investment. This substantiates our assertion that REGN is a stock worth buying. The recent clinical trial setback for itepekimab will most likely postpone its launch, as the drug will require further trials. Nevertheless, Regeneron stands to gain significantly from the strong growth of Dupixent, a drug created in partnership with Sanofi. Dupixent's sales rose 19% to $3.7 billion last quarter, with potential peak annual sales surpassing $20 billion. Furthermore, Regeneron has a promising pipeline with over a dozen programs currently in late-stage trials, suggesting future growth opportunities.
Even though a setback in a clinical trial and declining Eylea sales may logically lead to a compression in valuation multiples, we believe the selling pressure on REGN stock at values below $500 is excessive. We think investors can exploit this current dip as a buying chance for strong long-term gains. Nevertheless, prior to making any investment choices, it's critical to consider the associated risks. Any adverse outcomes from ongoing clinical trials, particularly related to its COPD treatment, could result in further declines in the stock. Moreover, during periods of broader market downturns stemming from macroeconomic uncertainties, REGN stock could also decrease. Although Regeneron has historically outperformed the broader market during certain recent corrections, it remains susceptible to sharp declines. Separately, see – Plug Power's Hydrogen Hopes Dashed?
While REGN stock appears promising, investing in a single stock can present risks. Conversely, the Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio, consisting of 30 stocks, has a history of consistently outperforming the S&P 500 over the past 4 years. Why is that? Collectively, HQ Portfolio stocks have delivered better returns with less risk compared to the benchmark index; presenting less volatility, as demonstrated in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senate to Keep Spectrum Sales in Tax Bill, Key Republican Says
Senate to Keep Spectrum Sales in Tax Bill, Key Republican Says

Bloomberg

time22 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Senate to Keep Spectrum Sales in Tax Bill, Key Republican Says

A key Republican said senators have reached an agreement to reauthorize spectrum sales to internet companies that would generate billions of dollars in revenue toward funding US President Donald Trump's sweeping tax cuts and spending bill. Spectrum sales were included in the House version of the reconciliation package but the provision had drawn objections from South Dakota Republican Senator Mike Rounds, who previously said they risked undermining the US military's communications capabilities.

Why Tesla now needs the EV tax credit that Musk once said should go away
Why Tesla now needs the EV tax credit that Musk once said should go away

CNN

time25 minutes ago

  • CNN

Why Tesla now needs the EV tax credit that Musk once said should go away

It wasn't long ago that Tesla CEO Elon Musk was advocating for ending the $7,500 tax credit for buyers of electric vehicles. 'Take away the subsidies. It will only help Tesla,' he said in a post on his social media platform X last year, adding 'Also remove the subsidies from all industries!' But now, with House budget and tax bill known as the 'big, beautiful bill' proposing to end that tax credit, he and Tesla are suddenly arguing for the continuation of those same credits as the Senate debates its own version of the bill. 'Abruptly ending the energy tax credits would threaten America's energy independence and the reliability of our grid' said Tesla's solar power unit in its own post on X late last month. 'There is no change to tax incentives for oil & gas, just EV/solar,' Musk said in a follow-up post. The turnabout may have to do with the recent financial troubles at Tesla. Many experts believed that getting rid of the EV tax credit would hurt legacy automakers, which continue to lose money on their EV operations, more than it would hurt Tesla. But Tesla's sales took a nosedive this year, and it needs the credits to maintain buyer demand. The battle over EV tax credits, and Musk's broader opposition to the Republicans' budget and taxation bill, has caused a major split between President Donald Trump and Musk – a member of the administration's inner circle as recently as last week. The outcome could endanger the key legislative priority of Trump and Republicans. It could also be affect the finances of the beleaguered Tesla. Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson have both suggested that the loss of federal support for EV's is driving Musk's opposition to the bill. 'Elon and I had a great relationship, I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump told reporters Thursday. 'I am very disappointed. Elon knew the inner workings of this bill… all of a sudden he had a problem and he only developed the problem after he found out we had to cut the EV mandate.' Despite Trump's reference to an EV mandate, there has never been a federal rule requiring Americans buy EVs rather than gasoline-powered cars. But the Biden administration did pass the $7,500 EV tax credit in an effort to spur demand for EVs. Musk immediately denied removal of the EV tax credit was the reason for his opposition to the bill. 'Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill,' he posted on X shortly after Trump's remarks. Tesla shares (TSLA) fell 14% following the exchange. Musk has focused most of his criticism on how the domestic policy bill would balloon the deficit. However, he is also no longer is arguing that ending the EV tax credit would be good for Tesla. Tesla did not respond to a request for comment. However, Musk's shift on the EV tax credit likely reflects changes at Tesla since late last year. Backlash to Musk's political activities played a major role in the company's recent sales troubles, including its first drop in annual sales in 2024 and its biggest ever drop in its sales during the first three months of the year. That resulted in a 71% plunge in net income in the first quarter. While the $7,500 EV tax credit goes to car buyers, it indirectly benefits EV makers by increasing demand. When an earlier version was phased out in 2019, Tesla was forced to cut prices to keep buyers interested. It's not just Musk who changed his opinion on the credit's important to Tesla. The same analysts who once believed removing the EV tax credit would help Tesla are now concerned over its loss. In a note to clients the day after the election, Garrett Nelson, an analyst for CFRA Research, wrote that ending the credit 'will widen Tesla's competitive moat by making competing EV models even more uneconomic, as we believe (Tesla) is the only profitable manufacturer of EVs.' But now, Nelson is expressing worry over Tesla's value if the credits go away. 'Our view is the 'Big Beautiful Bill' would be a net negative for Tesla, as tax credits for EVs, energy storage and solar would be going away,' Nelson said in response to questions from CNN. 'That, and ongoing EV market share losses in China and Europe, are some of the primary reasons why we downgraded the stock in April.' Still, despite cutting his price target for Tesla, Nelson still has a buy recommendation on Tesla shares, as does Dan Ives, another Tesla bull. The tech analyst for Wedbush Securities said the change in finances at Tesla make the tax credits more important than in the past. 'Musk has definitely changed his tune from earlier on this,' Ives told CNN. 'The reality is it will hurt Tesla less than other EV makers, but it will still hurt. And Tesla needs all of the demand help it can get.' Under current bill language, the tax credit remains in place for upstart EV makers like Rivian and Lucid but goes away for Tesla and most legacy automakers, said John Murphy, auto analyst at Bank of America. But he said the greatest challenge for Tesla is that demand for EV among American buyers appears to have stalled. 'I think 8% market share might be the high water mark for EV,' he said at a presentation Wedneday, speaking about overall demand for electric vehicles in the US market. Because of that, and the lack of new Tesla models, especially a lower-priced version that had been promised, 'I think (Musk) is going to be challenged to grow volume.'

Trump Threatens Musk Contracts as Feud Escalates
Trump Threatens Musk Contracts as Feud Escalates

New York Times

time25 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Trump Threatens Musk Contracts as Feud Escalates

President Trump threatened to cut billions of dollars in federal contracts and tax subsidies for Elon Musk's companies on Thursday, the latest escalation in the growing feud between the two men. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' the president wrote on Truth Social. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Last year, Mr. Musk's companies were promised $3 billion across nearly 100 different contracts with 17 federal agencies. Most of the contracts were for SpaceX, Mr. Musk's space technology company. Tesla, his electric vehicle company, also has contracts with the federal government. But the relationship between the two men very publicly dissolved Thursday. Mr. Musk until last week was a top presidential adviser and has since turned into a critic of one of Mr. Trump's priorities. Mr. Musk has called the president's signature legislation currently moving through Congress a 'disgusting abomination.' The two lashed out at each other from on their own social media platforms on Thursday. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Mr. Trump wrote on Truth Social. Mr. Musk responded on X, the social media platform he owns, 'Such an obvious lie. So sad.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store