‘They should go after the owner': London council considers motions to protect animals
'Well, I mean there aren't any bad dogs, but bad owners, that's the problem,' said dog owner Juergen Reichert, who was enjoying Greenway Off-leash dog park with his Scottish Terrier, Benny, on Friday.
'They should go after the owner, because the dog, any dog … You know we used to have a rottweiler. He was the sweetest dog in the whole neighbourhood. Everybody loved him, because that's the way we raised him,' he explained.
City councillors David Ferreira and Skylar Franke will on Monday put forward a motion that would target dangerous dogs. But it's not to be confused with legislation that targets specific breeds, said Franke.
'My understanding is breed-specific bans are not that effective,' she said.
Councillor Skylar Franke
London City Councillor Skylar Franke speaks to CTV News on Aug 8, 2025. (Bryan Bicknell/CTV News London)
Under the proposal, city staff would be directed to come up with a bylaw that would place more stringent controls on dogs that have been deemed to be dangerous.
'So, this is looking at behaviours with aggressive dogs. So, we want to strike a balance of trying to provide education and communication in order to have dogs participate more properly in the community,' said Franke.
Franke says the motion follows concerns raised by several constituents, as well as an online petition calling for the city to take action against dangerous dogs. The petition calls for measures such as mandatory training and larger fines.
Dog owner Jessica Pease says she would support new rules in principle, as long as they don't single out specific breeds.
Benny Scottish Terrier
Ten-year-old Scottish Terrier Benny is seen with his owner, Juergen Reichert, on Aug 8, 2025. (Bryan Bicknell/CTV News London)
'That would make sense to me, as far as dogs with a history. We actually had an incident where one of our dogs was bitten by another dog. And the owner gave us a fake ID so we could never track down the guy,' said Pease.
In the meantime, Ferriera and Franke are putting forward a second pet-related motion – this one dealing with pets left in hot cars.
According to Franke, as of mid-July, London police had responded to 60 such incidents to date this year. She says it uses up police resources, and costs local taxpayers in what's supposed to be provincial jurisdiction.
'We want to, again, have a better way of addressing this, and especially if we have bylaw officers and London Police Services going to these calls, we want to be able to recoup the cost of that, and we don't have a method right now to do that,' explained Franke.
The two motions will be considered by council's Community and Protective Services Committee Monday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
6 hours ago
- CTV News
No injuries in south London, Ont. car fire
A car fire in London near Wonderland and Wharncliffe roads on Aug. 12, 2025. (Joel Merritt/CTV News London) A car burst into flames in south London Tuesday night. The incident happened near Wonderland and Wharncliffe roads around 9 p.m. According to witnesses, a single van began smoking, then caught fire. Emergency crews responded and were able to extinguish the flames quickly. No injuries have been reported.
CBC
8 hours ago
- CBC
Wahnapitae man urges MNR not to kill his hybrid wolves
A man living near Wahnapitae, Ont., in Greater Sudbury, is worried about the fate of his pets after their expected government seizure next month. Bryton Bongard lives on a rural property, where he has built a large enclosure for his pack of 16 wolf-dog hybrids. In 2021, he got them as puppies from a friend who said they may be part wolf, though Bongard never looked into their lineage. What he has since learned is that in Ontario, owning wolf-dog hybrids is illegal. Ontario's Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) is now involved, and Bongard said he's expecting the ministry to seize his animals in September. But it's not the seizure that troubles Bongard. He's worried about what will happen to his dogs afterward, since he said MNR has not told him what their fate will be. Bongard said he's worried the animals will be euthanized instead of re-homed. "I have no problem with the penalties. I know I broke the rules. And yeah, I'll pay a fine. I'll help move my dogs. I'll do whatever it takes to make sure my dogs are safe and healthy," he said. CBC News asked the Ontario MNR about the rules around wolf-dog hybrids in the province, and about what will happen to these animals after they're seized. "In general, it's against the law to keep wild animals from Ontario as pets or to hold them in captivity," a spokesperson wrote in a statement. "There are a few exceptions, which are carefully regulated under the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act, 1997. As this is an active case, MNR is unable to comment further." Wolf-dogs kept in large enclosure Bongard's enclosure measures roughly 35 metres by 35 metres. The wire fencing is 2.5-metres tall with barbs on the top, as well as a metal apron underground to prevent the animals from digging out. Within the enclosure are some covered shelter areas, as well as small perches for the animals to climb upon. When Bongard enters with food and treats, such as eggs, the dogs excitedly approach with tails wagging. Bongard said he hears largely positive comments from his neighbours about the animals, and he invites people to meet the pack by appointment. The wolves have had some litters over the past few years, some of which he has already surrendered to the ministry. He said all of his animals have since been spayed or neutered so they will not have further litters. Keeping hybrids 'doesn't really work out': retired biologist The DNA of wolf-dog hybrids makes them less suitable as pets when compared to domesticated dogs, said retired wildlife biologist Dean Cluff. Cluff lives in Sudbury and worked with wolves in Northwest Territories during his career. "It doesn't really work out for the most part," he said. "They're basically unpredictable." Cluff said that while the animals may appear friendly and well socialized, they tend to follow a pack hierarchy that can shift over time, especially if something should happen to their owner. Cluff said wild wolves can travel 80 kilometres or more in a day, and it's hard to say whether wolves and hybrids born into captivity may still have that urge to roam. Re-homing hybrids difficult Bongard said he's called sanctuaries across the country, many of which are full or not interested in taking wolf-dog hybrids. Cluff said the challenges in re-homing these animals include transportation, building a big enough habitat for them, and the ongoing costs of maintaining their health and diets. Because of those issues, he said, sometimes it becomes a more humane option to euthanize the animals. Bongard has offered to pay for the costs of moving the animals, but finding places for 16 wolf-dogs may be the bigger challenge. One of the few places in Canada that specializes in wolf-dogs is Yamnuska Wolfdog Sanctuary in Alberta. They reportedly told Bongard they are already at capacity and can't accommodate his animals. Bongard said he has asked the Ontario MNR about turning his own property into a sanctuary, but does not expect the ministry to support that plan.
CTV News
18 hours ago
- CTV News
Closing submissions heard at intimidation trial of former ‘Creeper Hunter TV' creator
Jason Nassr covers his face while leaving a London, Ont. courthouse after hearing sentencing submissions and victim impact statements on July 19, 2023. (Jenn Basa/CTV News London) Jason Nassr sat next to his lawyer wearing a medical mask and taking notes as closing submissions at his intimidation trial got underway on Tuesday morning. In January 2023, the 44-year-old, who created 'Creeper Hunter TV', a website he claimed was intended to catch predators, was on trial and eventually convicted of harassment, extortion, and producing child pornography. All counts are now under appeal. It was at that trial that Nassr would be charged with intimidating a justice participant when during a heated exchange under cross-examination, he told the court he knew the name of the Crown Attorney's young child. Nassr was upset at the time because the Crown, in that case, was suggesting that he operated 'Creeper Hunter TV' for his own sexual gratification. In his closing at the intimidation trial, Crown Attorney Thomas Mack said Nassr was seething at the time he said the child's name, saying, 'The only reason he made those comments at the time is with the intention of causing fear (in the Crown) to impede him during cross-examination.' Mack said he should be found guilty because people know that Nassr is proficient online. 'He (Nassr) is adept at locating targets and he's able to intrude digitally into people's lives and he's one who went to significant lengths to extort, harass, and shame his targets,' Mack said. Later, defence lawyer Ingrid Grant told the court the Crown hasn't proven its case because Nassr did not provoke fear or impede his earlier trial. She said that Justice Alissa Mitchell cut Nassr off and didn't let him complete his sentence after he mentioned the child's name. 'Mr. Nassr gets angry... He's speaking off the cuff while he's upset,' Grant said. Justice James Stribopoulos is expected to hand down his decision on this latest case on Wednesday.
