
What did SC tell the 'qualified IT professional' who wanted crores in alimony after just 1.5 years of marriage?
The Court's response was firm: "You're educated, earn yourself."
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
Finance
Operations Management
CXO
Public Policy
others
Others
Data Science
Healthcare
Data Analytics
Data Science
Degree
Digital Marketing
MBA
Cybersecurity
Leadership
Design Thinking
Project Management
Technology
MCA
Management
PGDM
Artificial Intelligence
healthcare
Product Management
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
9 Months
IIM Calcutta
SEPO - IIMC CFO India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
7 Months
S P Jain Institute of Management and Research
CERT-SPJIMR Fintech & Blockchain India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
As reported by Bar and Bench, the woman, a qualified IT professional with an MBA degree, had sought extravagant interim maintenance from her estranged husband, who she claimed was wealthy and had filed for annulment citing mental health issues, including schizophrenia.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Unsold Container Homes in South Cotabato - Prices You Won't Believe!
Shipping Container Homes | Search Ads
Search Now
Undo
Her demands included:
Rs 12 crore in alimony
A BMW luxury car
A high-end flat in Mumbai
The matter was taken up by a Bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai, Justice K Vinod Chandran, and Justice NV Anjaria.
Live Events
CJI: 'Why don't you work?'
During the hearing, CJI Gavai questioned the fairness of the woman's expectations considering her background. He said, as quoted by
NDTV
: 'You're an IT person. You've done your MBA. You're in demand in cities like Bengaluru and Hyderabad... Why don't you work?'
Highlighting that the marriage lasted only 18 months, the CJI further remarked (via Bar and Bench): 'It lasted just 18 months. And you are seeking a crore a month?'
The Court viewed the demand as excessive and stressed that maintenance is not a substitute for self-reliance.
The Court's Verdict: Dignity Over Dependence
The Court offered the woman two options: Accept the luxury apartment without legal entanglements, or Opt for a one-time settlement of Rs 4 crore
The Bench reiterated its stance with a powerful closing note: 'You are well-educated. You should not be depending on handouts. You should earn and live with dignity.'
This case echoes a series of recent judgements where Indian courts clarified that maintenance laws are for support, not entitlement: In March 2025, the Delhi High Court ruled that Section 125 of CrPC is meant to protect, not reward, individuals who avoid work despite being qualified. The court said: 'A well-educated wife with ability and past work experience should not remain idle solely to claim maintenance.'
In December 2024, the Supreme Court ruled that alimony cannot be claimed merely to match the husband's wealth. The Court said a husband is not obligated to maintain his ex-wife as per his rising financial status after separation.
The Supreme Court's latest observation sends a powerful message: Education and skills are empowerment tools, and the law encourages individuals, especially women, to use them.
Inputs from TOI

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Deccan Herald
28 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Most migrants from Bihar unaware of SIR portal, finds survey
Conducted among 338 workers, the survey found that 75% earn less than Rs 17,000 a month, and 68% lacked accurate information on required documents.


India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
No Entry For GM Crops, Says New Delhi; India-US Trade Talks Hit A Sacred Wall
New Delhi: Genetically modified (GM) crops will not be crossing India's borders anytime soon, no matter how urgently the United States knocks. As trade negotiations between New Delhi and Washington enter a crucial phase, insiders say one red line is not up for discussion. 'There are things that are not about negotiation. Some things are a matter of principle,' said a senior official close to the development. That principle, sources say, is GM corn and soy. While American negotiators have made agricultural access a central demand, pressing India for a wider entry gate for U.S. farm goods, New Delhi is not blinking, especially on GM imports. Over the years, the issue has mutated from a mere trade disagreement into a symbolic fight over sovereignty, food safety and grassroots politics. The United States Trade Representative (USTR) has repeatedly flagged India's restrictions on GM products, calling them 'non-tariff barriers'. But Indian authorities remain unmoved, largely because of the hardline stance taken by domestic groups closely aligned with the ruling establishment. Last month, the message from Sangh affiliates was if America insists on forcing GM crops into the Indian market, there may be no trade deal at all. Carried in Business Standard, that warning echoed the sentiments of influential groups such as the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh (BKS) and the Swadeshi Jagran Manch (SJM), which have long opposed agricultural concessions to Washington, particularly in sectors like dairy and GM crops. Their argument? Food security. The BKS has often warned that allowing U.S. crops into India, especially without clear labelling or transparency, could sabotage domestic farming ecosystems and compromise health safety standards. On the other hand, the SJM sees this as a direct attack on economic self-reliance. Meanwhile, the clock is ticking. U.S. officials have privately hinted at the urgency of the moment, pointing to a deadline set by President Donald Trump, who is seeking a revival of his trade agenda. Trump has marked August 1 as a red-letter day. If no interim deal is inked by then, India could be hit with reciprocal tariffs, potentially as high as 26 percent. Indian trade negotiators are not indifferent to that pressure. But according to officials involved in the process, the sixth round of talks will only happen in the second half of August after Trump's deadline expires. Any hope for a short-term resolution seems, at best, unrealistic. As one official put it, 'We are not looking at compromise in areas that touch the lives of millions.' In other words, GM corn is off the table. And perhaps, so is the deal, at least for now.


Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Lenskart receives shareholder nod to raise ₹2,150 crore via IPO: Report
Lenskart IPO: Peyush Bansal-led Indian eyewear company Lenskart has received the approval of its shareholder to raise ₹ 2,150 crore through a fresh issue of shares, reported MoneyControl, citing people aware of the development. According to news report, the company filed its corporate action development with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs' (MCA) Registrar of Companies (RoC), as per the data accessed by TheKredible. The proposal to raise money via an IPO was reportedly given the green light at the company's annual general meeting on 26 July 2025, said the report, adding, the eyewear company is expected to file its draft red herring prospectus (DRHP) with the capital markets regulator, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), in the upcoming days. The overall IPO size is expected to be around $1 billion or ₹ 8,500 crore, which includes a secondary offer-for-sale (OFS) component by the existing investors, the report added. Earlier this month, Mint reported that the eyewear company's founder, Peyush Bansal, is looking to buy a 1.5-2% stake in the eyewear retailer worth about $150 million from existing investors ahead of its planned IPO. Peyush is buying small stakes from a bunch of investors. This is being negotiated at around $7-8 billion valuation. Existing investors like TR Capital, Chiratae, Softbank and Kedaara Capital are expected to sell their stake as part of the deal. Over the years, the company has raised $1.08 billion in funding across 19 rounds, including its latest Series I round for $18.2 million on 21 July 2023. It has received investments from various firms, including SoftBank Vision Fund, TPG, and Chiratae Ventures. Kotak Mahindra Capital, Axis Capital, Citi, Morgan Stanley, and Avendus Capital are the company-appointed book-runners for the IPO, which is soon expected to hit Dalal Street. The company was founded in 2010, and since then, it has emerged as one of the biggest players in the Indian eyewear industry. It has 2500 retail outlets across the nation and a presence globally, such as in Singapore and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).