logo
The tragic reality of Cuba's medical brigades. The US must lead the charge against them.

The tragic reality of Cuba's medical brigades. The US must lead the charge against them.

The Hill29-01-2025

With Marco Rubio's unanimous confirmation as secretary of State, now is the time to stand up to Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel. Rubio has a history of standing up to the Cuban regime while in the Senate, there is no reason he won't continue to do so in his new position. In fact, the Trump administration has already reinstated Cuba as a state sponsor of terrorism.
January marks National Human Trafficking Prevention Month, and it's important to remember that modern slavery comes in different forms. In 2008, Ramona Matos Rodriguez, a family medicine physician from Cuba, was sent to work in San Agustin, Bolivia, a small town in the Amazons. Her passport was seized by a Cuban security agent at the airport. She was not allowed to possess any other identifying documents, and she and her fellow doctors were forced to fill out paperwork with false statistics about made-up patients or else face retribution from the Cuban regime.
Matos was one of thousands of medical personnel trafficked abroad into forced labor — all for the profit of the Cuban regime.
Cuba has a long history of sending its armed forces and medical personnel to foreign countries under the guise of 'aid.' Fidel Castro sought to export his brand of revolutionary violence across Latin America — as in the failed 'invasion' of Bolivia by Castro's associate, Che Guevara. Cuba's communist regime also has a long history of sending military advisors and troops to prop up dictators, advance authoritarian parties, and attack democratically elected governments in Angola, Mozambique, Panama, the Dominican Republic, Ethiopia, Yemen, Algeria, Syria and elsewhere.
The other tragic but less-known human capital export of Cuba is its so-called 'Medical Brigades.' Havana has sent tens of thousands of medical workers around the world since the 1960s, from poverty-stricken African nations to Portugal and Italy. Undoubtedly, in most cases, these medical professionals do provide needed health care in often difficult environments. But the regime's reason for sending them is not really about spreading the 'good news' of communist brotherhood. Rather, it is financial: the Cuban regime makes a major profit from these programs.
Cuban medical professionals are lured with promises of travel, independence and excellent pay, but these promises often turn out to be a façade. As reported by the BBC, many of these medical workers are asked to spy on their associates and are exploited while receiving just a fraction of their wages. Numerous workers have reported unsafe conditions, violence and regime officials taking their passports, forcing them to comply if they want to return to Cuba. Combined with meager pay and often explicit threats against them and their families back home, they are isolated and vulnerable.
While the Cuban regime may want the world to see its medical brigades as a noble humanitarian effort like the Peace Corps or an organization like Doctors Without Borders, we know that this program is far closer to indentured servitude. That's because while many of these medical professionals may have volunteered, their employers wield an immense amount of power over them during their tenure.
Because their pay, passports and medical licenses are often held by the Cuban embassy, they aren't able to travel and are forced to continue working in unsafe conditions. Additionally, these doctors and their families are, in a very real sense, held hostage. Once abroad, they are cowed into silence and bullied by implicit or explicit threats to themselves or their family members back home.
This is not humanitarian work or even public diplomacy. These Cuban citizens thought they were going to use their skills to help people and instead, they are surveilled, asked to spy, deprived of their right to travel, and restricted from privately communicating with family.
All of this to bring profits and positive publicity to the communist elite back in Cuba. The first duty of any government is to protect its citizens, but Cuba's communist regime violates this obligation every day. Those doctors and nurses have taken an oath to 'do no harm,' and they should not have to fear harm at the hands of their own leaders.
A bipartisan resolution introduced in the House last Congress denounces the Cuban regime for profiteering by forcibly sending its medical personnel abroad. This resolution also condemns the Pan American Health Organization and other government officials for their role in facilitating and perpetuating human trafficking and calls on the executive branch to utilize existing visa revocation authorities on the responsible parties. Foreign officials who violate international agreements and traffic human beings must be held accountable for their actions.
It is time for nations around the world to tell Cuba that its medical professionals should not be exploited, abused or threatened — and the U.S. should lead the charge.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Magic dust and mayhem: The Great GOP Panic over Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
Magic dust and mayhem: The Great GOP Panic over Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Magic dust and mayhem: The Great GOP Panic over Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill'

Trump's so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill' narrowly passed the House by a single vote and is now stalled in the Senate. We take a closer look at this massive tax plan that gives permanent breaks for the wealthy while slashing Medicaid, food assistance, and clean energy programs. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, it would add at least $2.4 trillion to the national deficit–hardly a win for fiscal conservatives. Even Elon Musk slammed it as a 'disgusting abomination.��

Trump's new travel ban set to take effect amid escalating tension over immigration enforcement
Trump's new travel ban set to take effect amid escalating tension over immigration enforcement

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's new travel ban set to take effect amid escalating tension over immigration enforcement

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump's new ban on travel to the U.S. by citizens from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries is set to take effect Monday amid escalating tension over the president's unprecedented campaign of immigration enforcement. The new proclamation, which Trump signed on Wednesday, applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also imposes heightened restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the U.S. and don't hold a valid visa. The new ban does not revoke visas previously issued to people from countries on the list, according to guidance issued Friday to all U.S. diplomatic missions. However, unless an applicant meets narrow criteria for an exemption to the ban, his or her application will be rejected starting Monday. Travelers with previously issued visas should still be able to enter the U.S. even after the ban takes effect. Haitian-American Elvanise Louis-Juste, who was at the airport Sunday in Newark, New Jersey, awaiting a flight to her home state of Florida, said many Haitians wanting to come to the U.S. are simply seeking to escape violence and unrest in their country. 'I have family in Haiti, so it's pretty upsetting to see and hear,' Louis-Juste, 23, said of the travel ban. 'I don't think it's a good thing. I think it's very upsetting.' Many immigration experts say the new ban is designed to beat any court challenge by focusing on the visa application process and appears more carefully crafted than a hastily written executive order during Trump's first term that denied entry to citizens of mainly Muslim countries. In a video posted Wednesday on social media, Trump said nationals of countries included in the ban pose 'terrorism-related' and 'public-safety' risks, as well as risks of overstaying their visas. He also said some of these countries had 'deficient' screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their citizens. His findings rely extensively on an annual Homeland Security report about tourists, businesspeople and students who overstay U.S. visas and arrive by air or sea, singling out countries with high percentages of nationals who remain after their visas expired. Trump also tied the new ban to a terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. The man charged in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. U.S. officials say he overstayed a tourist visa. The ban was quickly denounced by groups that provide aid and resettlement help to refugees. 'This policy is not about national security — it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America, a nonprofit international relief organization. Venezuela President Nicolás Maduro's government condemned the travel ban, characterizing it in a statement as a 'stigmatization and criminalization campaign' against Venezuelans.

GOP braces for first ‘test run' on codifying DOGE cuts
GOP braces for first ‘test run' on codifying DOGE cuts

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

GOP braces for first ‘test run' on codifying DOGE cuts

Congressional Republicans are gearing up for a major test of how easily they can lock in cuts sought by President Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said he aims to have the House act swiftly on approving Trump's request for more than $9 billion in cuts to foreign aid and public broadcasting funding. That package is expected to hit the floor this week. 'We haven't done anything like this in a while, so this is probably, in some ways, a test run,' House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) told reporters. Trump last week sent Congress a request for $8.3 billion in cuts to the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and foreign aid, and more than $1 billion in cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides some funding to NPR and PBS. The request kick-starts a process that would allow Republicans to claw back funds for a list of programs on the administration's chopping block with just a simple majority in both chambers. That means Republicans wouldn't require Democratic votes in the Senate if they can stay mostly unified in greenlighting what's known as a rescissions package. But it's been decades since Congress has approved such a request to yank back funds previously greenlighted by lawmakers. Trump tried to use the same process to rescind funds in his first term but was unsuccessful, despite Republicans controlling the House, Senate and White House at the time. Republicans are bullish that this time will be different, however. '[Trump's] done this before, and they've got a great team, I think, in place,' Cole said. 'They've thought about these things a lot in the time in between his first and his second term.' 'They just seem to me to be much more sure-footed, and there's no question, the president has much more influence inside the Republican Party than he had during his first term,' Cole added. Still, some Republicans have expressed concerns about parts of the request. Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) voiced opposition last week to cutting the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), saying Wednesday that the idea makes 'no sense' to her 'whatsoever.' 'Given the extraordinary record of PEPFAR in saving lives, it has literally saved millions of lives, and so I do not see a basis for cutting it,' she said. And not all Republicans are thrilled by the proposed cuts to public broadcasting in the plan, which calls for rescinding $535 million in both fiscal 2026 and 2027. 'You go to rural America, public television is how you get emergency broadcasting and all that kind of stuff,' Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), a spending cardinal, said Thursday. 'I look at Idaho Public Television, they're a great organization, and we don't see the politics that some states do in them, or at least they believe they see that and stuff.' However, Simpson said he still intends to support the overall package. 'I don't think in the long run, the rescissions are going to hurt them, because we're talking about the advanced appropriations and stuff like that.' 'What they're concerned about is, and should be, is the next year's appropriation process and stuff,' he continued. On its website, DOGE estimates that it's racked up $180 billion in savings as of June 3 through a combination of efforts like asset sales, contract cancellations and renegotiations, 'fraud and improper payment deletion, grant cancellations' and workforce reductions. And White House budget chief Russell Vought signaled further special requests to lock in more DOGE cuts could be on the way when pressed on the matter during a budget hearing last week, particularly as the administration's ongoing efforts to shrink the government have been tangled up in courts. But he also said it's 'very important' for this first package of cuts to pass, adding, 'If it does, it'll be worth the effort and we'll send up additional packages.' 'We are very anxious to see the reception from a vote standpoint in the House and the Senate,' Vought said, though he added, 'I'm less concerned about the House as I am in the Senate.' Some Republicans see the package introduced this week as potentially the easiest one to deal with, as many in the party have been critical of foreign aid and funds going to outlets like PBS and NPR, which they've accused of political bias. In a statement promoting the package on the social platform X, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) on Friday touted the president's request as cutting '$9.4 BILLION in wasteful spending' while holding 'bureaucrats accountable to the American people.' The package would target dollars for items like migration and refugee assistance that the administration says support activities that 'could be more fairly shared with non-U.S. Government donors,' USAID efforts they say have been used to 'fund radical gender and climate projects,' and development assistance they argued 'conflict with American values' and 'interfere with the sovereignty of other countries,' among other rescissions. Funding would also be eliminated for the United Nations Children's Fund, U.N. Development Program and the U.N. Population Fund under the proposal, as well as the World Health Organization and 'portions of the U.N. Regular Budget for the U.N. Human Rights Council and the U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East.' Democrats, meanwhile, have come out in strong opposition to the plan, accusing Trump of seeking political retribution and undermining foreign assistance efforts. They've also signaled trouble down the line when it comes time for both sides to negotiate a funding deal for fiscal 2026 — when Democratic support will likely be necessary to keep the government open in early fall. 'It's going to make it very difficult for us to do bipartisan bills if we believe that he's just going to send rescissions over for whatever they want or don't want in a bipartisan agreement,' Sen. Patty Murray (Wash.), top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, told The Hill this week. 'They need Democratic votes.' There's been some GOP frustration over the administration's handling of the annual funding work as well, as lawmakers on both sides have pressed the White House for more information about its budget plans in recent weeks. 'If we're getting to the point where we are right now, where we have a [funding stopgap], where we don't really have spend plans that are meaningful, now we have the administration transferring to the Congress their desires with rescission,' Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), a senior appropriator, said. 'I don't want to be a committee that no longer has a purpose. The role that we play is significant.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store