New chief Coventry says IOC will launch gender working group - Omni sports
Kirsty Coventry said on Thursday that the first meeting of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) executive board under her presidency supported her belief that "we should protect the female category".
Coventry, who on Monday became the first woman to lead the Olympic movement, had already signalled a change of direction on the politically inflammatory and scientifically complex issue of gender.
On Thursday, after an executive board meeting and also after getting together with "just over 70" members, she said the IOC, which had previously left gender rules and testing to the governing bodies of individual sports, would go ahead with developing a policy.
"We are going to set up a working group," she told a press conference.
"It was agreed by members that the IOC should take a leading role in this and we should be the ones to bring together the experts, bring together the international federations."
"We understand that there will be differences depending on the sport," she said
She said she hoped to start the working group "within weeks" with the aim of finding "consensus" on a policy.
"It was very clear we need to protect the female category but we need to ensure fairness but we need to do so with a scientific approach," she said.
Coventry said when she was elected that even with Games coming up in Los Angeles and Salt Lake City-Utah she had no worries about dealing with United States President Donald Trump.
"I have been dealing with, let's say, difficult men in high positions since I was 20 years old," Coventry said in March.
Since then relationships between Trump and Los Angeles have become frayed over Trump's anti-immigration policies. There have also been concerns after Cuban and Senegalese athletes were denied US visas.
Coventry said she was confident that there would be no impact on the LA Games in 2028
"When it comes to LA there is so much goodwill at all levels of government to see that the Olympic Games are a huge success," she said, adding that the IOC would not yield to political pressure.
"The platform will be there to ensure that our values are stuck to," she said.
"Our values will be heard and we will be able to ensure successful games for our athletes from around the world."
Coventry said the IOC planned to set up a second working group looking at how long beforehand Olympic hosts should be named.
Both LA and Brisbane in 2032, had, she pointed out, 11 years of lead time, while the French Alps were only picked as hosts of the 2030 Winter Games in 2024.
"When is the best time to award?" she asked.
Coventry also said she wanted to increase IOC revenue, reduce costs, make members feel more involved in decision making and use Artificial Intelligence.
(For more sports news and updates, follow Ahram Online Sports on Twitter at @AO_Sports and on Facebook at AhramOnlineSports.)
Follow us on:
Facebook
Instagram
Whatsapp
Short link:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al-Ahram Weekly
5 hours ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
New chief Coventry says IOC will launch gender working group - Omni sports
Kirsty Coventry said on Thursday that the first meeting of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) executive board under her presidency supported her belief that "we should protect the female category". Coventry, who on Monday became the first woman to lead the Olympic movement, had already signalled a change of direction on the politically inflammatory and scientifically complex issue of gender. On Thursday, after an executive board meeting and also after getting together with "just over 70" members, she said the IOC, which had previously left gender rules and testing to the governing bodies of individual sports, would go ahead with developing a policy. "We are going to set up a working group," she told a press conference. "It was agreed by members that the IOC should take a leading role in this and we should be the ones to bring together the experts, bring together the international federations." "We understand that there will be differences depending on the sport," she said She said she hoped to start the working group "within weeks" with the aim of finding "consensus" on a policy. "It was very clear we need to protect the female category but we need to ensure fairness but we need to do so with a scientific approach," she said. Coventry said when she was elected that even with Games coming up in Los Angeles and Salt Lake City-Utah she had no worries about dealing with United States President Donald Trump. "I have been dealing with, let's say, difficult men in high positions since I was 20 years old," Coventry said in March. Since then relationships between Trump and Los Angeles have become frayed over Trump's anti-immigration policies. There have also been concerns after Cuban and Senegalese athletes were denied US visas. Coventry said she was confident that there would be no impact on the LA Games in 2028 "When it comes to LA there is so much goodwill at all levels of government to see that the Olympic Games are a huge success," she said, adding that the IOC would not yield to political pressure. "The platform will be there to ensure that our values are stuck to," she said. "Our values will be heard and we will be able to ensure successful games for our athletes from around the world." Coventry said the IOC planned to set up a second working group looking at how long beforehand Olympic hosts should be named. Both LA and Brisbane in 2032, had, she pointed out, 11 years of lead time, while the French Alps were only picked as hosts of the 2030 Winter Games in 2024. "When is the best time to award?" she asked. Coventry also said she wanted to increase IOC revenue, reduce costs, make members feel more involved in decision making and use Artificial Intelligence. (For more sports news and updates, follow Ahram Online Sports on Twitter at @AO_Sports and on Facebook at AhramOnlineSports.) Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
Al-Ahram Weekly
6 hours ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
Trump officials to give 1st classified briefing to Congress on Iran strikes
Senators are set to meet with top national security officials Thursday as many question President Donald Trump's decision to bomb three Iranian nuclear sites — and whether those strikes were ultimately successful. The classified briefing, which was originally scheduled for Tuesday and was delayed, also comes as the Senate is expected to vote this week on a resolution that would require congressional approval if Trump decides to strike Iran again. Democrats, and some Republicans, have said that the White House overstepped its authority when it failed to seek the advice of Congress and they want to know more about the intelligence that Trump relied on when he authorized the attacks. 'Senators deserve full transparency, and the administration has a legal obligation to inform Congress precisely about what is happening,' said Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, who said Tuesday that it was 'outrageous' that the Senate and House briefings were postponed. A similar briefing for House members was pushed to Friday. CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth are expected to brief the senators on Thursday. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was scheduled to be at the Tuesday briefing, but will not be attending, according to a person familiar with the schedule. The briefing could be contentious as questions have swirled around Trump's decision to strike Iran and whether the attacks were successful. A preliminary U.S. intelligence report found this week that Iran's nuclear program had been set back only a few months, contradicting statements from Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about the status of Iran's nuclear facilities, according to two people familiar with the report. The people were not authorized to address the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. On Wednesday, Gabbard and Ratcliffe sent out statements backing Trump's claims that the facilities were 'completely and fully obliterated.' Gabbard posted on social media that 'new intelligence confirms what @POTUS has stated numerous times: Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed.' She said that if the Iranians choose to rebuild the three facilities, it would 'likely take years to do.' Ratcliffe said in a statement from the CIA that Iran's nuclear program has been 'severely damaged' and cited new intelligence 'from a historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.' Most Republicans have staunchly defended Trump and hailed the tentative ceasefire he brokered in the Israel-Iran war. House Speaker Mike Johnson even went as far as to question the constitutionality of the War Powers Act, which is intended to give Congress a say in military action. 'The bottom line is the commander in chief is the president, the military reports to the president, and the person empowered to act on the nation's behalf is the president,' Johnson told reporters. But some Republicans — including some of Trump's staunchest supporters — are uncomfortable with the strikes and the potential for U.S. involvement in an extended Middle East conflict. 'I think the speaker needs to review the Constitution,' said Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. 'And I think there's a lot of evidence that our Founding Fathers did not want presidents to unilaterally go to war.' Paul would not say if he is voting for the resolution by Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., that would require congressional approval for specific military action in Iran. The resolution is likely to fail as 60 votes would be needed to pass it and Republicans have a 53-47 majority. But Kaine says it's important to put the Senate on the record. 'You have a debate like this so that the entire American public, whose sons and daughters are in the military and whose lives will be at risk in war, get to see the debate and reach their own conclusion together with the elected officials about whether the mission is worth it or not,' Kaine said. While he did not seek approval, Trump sent congressional leaders a short letter Monday serving as his official notice of the strikes, two days after the bombs fell. The letter said that the strike was taken 'to advance vital United States national interests, and in collective self-defense of our ally, Israel, by eliminating Iran's nuclear program.' Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
Al-Ahram Weekly
6 hours ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
Pentagon chief backs Trump on success of Iran strikes - Region
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth insisted Thursday that American strikes on Iranian nuclear sites were a success, backing President Donald Trump and berating the media for questioning the results of the operation. American B-2 bombers hit two Iranian nuclear sites with massive GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs last weekend, while a guided missile submarine struck a third site with Tomahawk cruise missiles. "President Trump created the conditions to end the war, decimating, choose your word, obliterating, destroying Iran's nuclear capabilities," Hegseth told journalists at the Pentagon, referring to a 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran. Trump has called the strikes a "spectacular military success" and repeatedly said they "obliterated" the nuclear sites. On Thursday, he insisted that Iran did not manage to move nuclear materials, including enriched uranium, ahead of the US military action. "Nothing was taken out of the facility. Would take too long, too dangerous, and very heavy and hard to move!" Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform. However, US media revealed a preliminary American intelligence assessment earlier this week that said the strikes only set back Iran's nuclear program by months, coverage sharply criticized by Hegseth. "Whether it's fake news CNN, MSNBC, or the New York Times, there's been fawning coverage of a preliminary assessment." The document was "leaked because someone had an agenda to try to muddy the waters and make it look like this historic strike wasn't successful," Hegseth said. Trump has also lashed out at coverage of the intelligence report, calling for journalists to lose their jobs. Hegseth did not definitively state that the enriched uranium and enriching centrifuges at the heart of Iran's controversial nuclear program had been wiped out, but cited intelligence officials, although giving little detail, as saying the nuclear facilities were destroyed. "If you want to know what's going on at Fordo, you better go there and get a big shovel, because no one's under there right now," Hegseth said, referring to the deep-underground nuclear site. Israel launched an unprecedented air campaign targeting Iranian nuclear sites, scientists, and top military brass on June 13 in a bid to end the nuclear program, which Tehran says has only civilian purposes but Washington and other powers say is pursuing atomic weapons. Trump had spent weeks pursuing a diplomatic path to replace the nuclear deal with Tehran that he tore up during his first term in 2018, but he ultimately decided to take military action. The US operation was massive, involving more than 125 US aircraft, including stealth bombers, fighters, and aerial refueling tankers as well as a guided missile submarine. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
