To give a boost to homestead kitchens, New Hampshire lawmakers eye changes to regulations
Homestead kitchens can only sell foods that are low risk, meaning they are safe to store at room temperature. (Photo)
Business isn't always a piece of cake for homestead sellers.
These are residents who bake bread, decorate cookies, can jams, and produce other similar foods for sale straight from their own kitchens. Some feel certain state requirements have made running their small-scale operations more difficult, sapping their time with repetitive labeling changes, limiting where in the home they can prepare their goods, and precluding them from offering food service on a weekly basis without a license.
A group of bills backed by bipartisan sponsors would allow for QR code or website ingredient lists in some circumstances, permit once-weekly food service without needing a food service license, open up the opportunity for production spaces outside the home kitchen, and make other tweaks aimed at reducing barriers for home-based food producers.
The House Environment and Agriculture Committee heard these bills Tuesday, and has already voted to recommend several of them for passage by the full Legislature.
Homestead kitchens can only sell foods that are low risk, meaning they are safe to store at room temperature. This includes breads, cookies, candies, jams and jellies, fudge, double-crusted fruit pies, and other goods, according to the Department of Health and Human Services. They cannot sell things like cheesecakes, soups, pumpkin pies, 'low acid foods such as canned gravies or some canned vegetables,' or other potentially hazardous foods.
What makes the difference in whether operators need to be licensed is where they want to sell their goods. You don't need a license if you're selling from your residence, your farmstand, a farmers market, or a retail food store, according to DHHS. But if you want to sell 'to restaurants, other food establishments excluding retail food stores, over the Internet, by mail order or to wholesalers, brokers or other food distributors,' you need a license, the department says.
DHHS currently licenses 140 homestead operations, and does not have an estimate for the total number of operators in the state because of the licensure exemptions, according to Maddie Miller, a public health public information officer for the department. The agency has received an increase in inquiries about homestead food operations in the past several years, she said.
There are also 15 'self-inspecting' towns and cities where the department advises potential sellers to check to see if they are required to have a license to operate. Some farmers markets may require sellers to be licensed even though it's not required by the state, the department noted.
Here are the measures lawmakers are considering to support home-based food production.
Often, home-based food producers change their offerings with the season. Even the weekly variance of what they harvest from their gardens may result in a slight change in recipes, such as swapping out the type of berries they use in their muffins.
But every changed ingredient necessitates a new label, which is required of both licensed and unlicensed homestead operations. These labels, much like food labels you'd find in a grocery store, require a list of ingredients in descending order by weight, as well as a list of major food allergens. They also require information identifying the seller, the name of the product, and whether they are an exempt operation or licensed by DHHS, and other details.
House Bill 304, led by Dover Democratic Rep. Peter Bixby, would make it so that the list of ingredients on the good's packaging can be replaced with a QR code or website where customers can find the list, still organized by weight. It still must include other standard labeling information, including the list of allergens, on the physical packaging of the food.
This option to streamline labeling could only be used by those selling out of their homes or their own farm stands. Those selling goods in other ways – at farmers markets or online, for instance – must still have the ingredients listed out on the physical packaging.
The bill also makes explicit in law that producers may list either a physical or email address on their labeling, which Bixby said was an important safety element. It also cleans up language in the statute that makes reference to the sales cap that was previously on homestead food operations, which lawmakers did away with in recent years.
Addie Leader-Zavos, who runs a small market farm and farm store with her husband in Dunbarton, said the bill would save them time and money. They sell five items, but because they rotate ingredients seasonally, that amounts to 'hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of labels,' Leader-Zavos said.
'I don't know if any of you have ever had a screaming fight with your printer when you are under pressure, but it is not fun, and it is a huge barrier to be able to do business efficiently,' she said.
She said the bill would make a significant difference for producers, while still keeping consumers safe and featuring allergens on the physical packaging of goods.
The committee voted, 13-0, to recommend the bill for passage.
Another measure, House Bill 371, would change the parameters of what qualifies as an 'occasional food service establishment' so that these producers could operate once a week. That definition is important because those that fall under it are not required to obtain a food service license.
'We want our food producers to offer clear messaging about when their product will be available, and this allows for more consistent offering of the product on an occasional basis,' said Rep. Judy Aron, a South Acworth Republican who chairs the committee and is sponsoring the measure.
Under current law, this term is defined as an establishment where food is served on premises no more than four days in a 30-day period. The bill would change that to four days in a 28-day period, which would allow for a once-weekly operation, and alter the language to specify that the food may be consumed off the premises.
Leader-Zavos said changing the wording of the current law to allow for take-away food would help lower barriers for home operators who don't have the furnishings, parking spaces, or physical space to accommodate customers consuming their food on premises.
The committee recommended, 13-0, that the Legislature pass this bill.
One lucrative niche in home-based food production is intricately decorated sugar cookies, said Leader-Zavos. These bakers may wish to use another room in their home to sit down and decorate, but under New Hampshire law, they can produce homestead food only from the home kitchen of their residence.
House Bill 307, also led by Bixby, would change that to also allow food to be produced in 'a food production area in the person's primary residence that meets the water supply and sanitary requirements established in rules adopted under RSA 541-A,' the administrative procedure act.
The bill would help address a simple, human reality for many home-based food producers, a large portion of whom are women with children earning supplemental income for their families, Leader-Zavos said.
'One of the the things that I hear over and over and over and over again from this this type of producer is, 'I can't keep my kids out of the things that I'm making for my customers, and I can't keep my husband out of the things that I'm making for my customers,'' Leader-Zavos said to laughs from lawmakers.
She argued it could improve food safety by allowing home food producers to have a separate space in their home where they can close off their ingredients or production process.
DHHS officials raised some concerns about food safety, since the safety regulations are designed for kitchens.
'We just want to make sure that if we remove 'kitchen' that we're not unintentionally allowing for these spaces to be used without meeting those sanitary requirements,' said Erica Davis, the administrator for the food protection section within DHHS' public health services division.
Leader-Zavos said home food producers are highly incentivized to follow proper food safety procedures.
'New Hampshire is a lot of small towns where people know each other, and they know the practices of what people are doing,' she said. 'And so I think that if there was a question about someone's sanitation or a product being moldy or something like that, I think the word would absolutely get out quickly.'
That kind of bad local publicity 'would kill our business before DHHS found out about it,' said her husband, Michael Williams. He also argued that by making business easier for home-based food producers, the state will attract more operators like them, who have background in professional kitchens and are therefore better informed about proper food safety practices.
The committee did not vote on a recommendation for this bill Tuesday. It also heard, but has not yet voted on, House Bill 150, which would make it explicit in law that home food producers can use commercial kitchen equipment, provided it can be properly cleaned in the processing area. It also unanimously recommended for passage House Bill 279, which would establish a study committee for recipe and process approval for homestead foods.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Big Beautiful Bill would ban regulating AI
How did they give away the future of American workers to tech executives? Buried in President Trump's Advertisement Iin Massachusetts, the Republicans' ban would block the State House from considering legislation that would safeguard our fundamental rights. Labor unions, led by the Massachusetts AFL-CIO, and community members have come together to urge the Legislature to pass an act fostering artificial intelligence responsibility, known as the FAIR Act. Advertisement The bill would establish needed guardrails around the use of AI and similar technologies by employers and in the workplace. It would restrict the use of AI-driven worker surveillance tools, many of which are already being used, and prevent employers from relying solely on automatic decision-making systems in hiring, firing, or promotion. With workers increasingly being asked to incorporate AI into their everyday work, this legislation would also establish strong anti-retaliation protections and worker autonomy provisions. If AI tools are to be used for good, we need meaningful human oversight and worker input at every step of their implementation. Preventing states like Massachusetts from considering policy like the FAIR Act would halt community-based momentum and leave workers and their families exposed to the unchecked harms of AI. This kind of giveaway for tech billionaires is the exact opposite of what Americans want from Congress. are wary of how US companies develop and use AI. But congressional Republicans are not listening to workers. Instead, they follow Elon Musk and the other Big Tech executives who want to make Washington, D.C. the next Silicon Valley and hope you won't notice the single section in Trump's bill that lines their pockets and strips you of democracy until 2035. Advertisement Trump urged House Republicans to pass the bill with the AI ban in it. But there is one more hurdle to the president's agenda ahead — the Senate. Senators must now decide whether they will stand with the interests of workers and everyday people or the interests of Big Tech billionaires. The line between tech innovation and tech domination will be drawn not in Washington, but in the workplaces, schools, and sectors where AI transforms our lives, for good and bad. It is the job of state and local representatives to adapt to these changes and pass regulations that make sense for their communities — if only Republicans don't stifle democracy first.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Minnesota lawmakers extend tax breaks for Big Tech data centers
Minnesota Technology Center houses multiple data centers, including a Cologix and a Vaultas data center, in this facility next to U.S. Bank Stadium in Minneapolis Friday, May 23, 2025. (Photo by Nicole Neri/Minnesota Reformer) The Legislature passed a bipartisan bill Monday that extends tax breaks for some of the country's most profitable technology companies on their data centers up to the year 2077, in a win for both Big Tech and the trade unions that build the data warehouses. The once boutique tax subsidy has exploded in cost in recent years, as tech companies chased the benefit to meet ever increasing demand for computing power. In fiscal year 2015, the state estimated a sales tax break for data center purchases of computers, servers and other equipment costs the state about $6 million. That number is projected to explode to $114 million in fiscal year 2025 — a 1,800% increase — according to state tax expenditure reports. Minnesota currently has 42 data centers, with the majority spread across the metro. Nationwide, tech companies are rapidly building data centers — warehouses with computer servers used to power the internet and, increasingly, AI — to store and process data. As Gov. Tim Walz and his fellow Democrats in the divided Legislature confronted a worsening fiscal outlook, however, they looked to the data center tax breaks. They settled on revoking the sales tax exemption on electricity bills, which are massive because of data center energy requirements. Curbing this tax break alone will bring in an estimated $140 million over the next four years. But lawmakers also gave Big Tech a win, extending the expiration of the state's sales tax break for data centers on purchases of computers, servers, software and cooling and energy equipment. Minnesota law currently allows data centers this sales tax exemption on technology equipment for 20 years, up to the year 2042. The bill passed Monday will extend the tax break to 35 years with a sunset date of 2042. This means that a data center that makes its first purchase in 2042 could continue claiming the exemption until 2077. Sen. Ann Rest, DFL-New Hope, has been negotiating for the data center sales tax break throughout the session. Rest, the Senate's chief author of the data center bill, said the Legislature can use the tax breaks as leverage to ensure proper regulation of the nascent industry. 'This is the beginning of how we can bring a new industrial age that is one that we are going to control,' Rest said Monday. The bill also includes a new annual fee on large-scale data centers between $2 million and $5 million to go to the Department of Commerce's weatherization account, which grants energy upgrades to low-income Minnesotans. The bill also requires public utilities to offer a clean energy tariff for data center companies, i.e, the company can pay an additional fee to the utility for the utility to fund the development of clean energy technology that the data center could one day consume. Rep. Athena Hollins, DFL-St. Paul, voted against the bill. 'I am anti-tax breaks for billionaires. When we are saying that we are trying to incentivize people to come to our state to build these facilities, we are saying that the tax burden is going to lie on our constituents,' Hollins said Monday. The sales tax exemption on technology equipment — even with the elimination of the sales tax break on electricity — is expected to cost Minnesota $133 million in fiscal year 2027 and jump to $219 million in fiscal year 2029 as the number of data centers increases and they purchase more equipment, according to the Department of Revenue. The data center tax breaks are a huge win for building trade unions, which warned lawmakers that Minnesota will lose jobs if it can't compete with neighboring states to entice tech giants to build their data centers here. Amazon recently announced it was suspending construction of a data center in Becker, citing regulatory uncertainty. Meanwhile, the company announced a $20 billion data center project in Pennsylvania, where Gov. Josh Shapiro — a potential Walz rival for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination — stood with construction workers to make the announcement. The Minnesota data centers package included a provision requiring that companies must pay workers a prevailing wage to build the data centers, which ensures much of the construction will be done by unionized companies. The House passed the bill 85-43 and the Senate 40-26. Walz is expected to sign the data centers package.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Texas Set To Roll Out Country's Biggest School Choice Initiative
(Texas Scorecard) – After decades of campaigning by education reform advocates, Texas is set to enact the nation's largest education savings account program, opening new options for up to 100,000 students. The state will spend the next year preparing for the program's 2026-2027 launch. Gov. Greg Abbott signed Senate Bill 2, which creates the ESA program, into law on May 3. An ESA allots funds to parents for use toward a range of educational expenses, including private school tuition, tutoring, and online learning. The program, which has been allocated $1 billion by the Legislature, will support up to 100,000 students, making it the largest launch of a universal school choice program in the nation, according to the governor. Most students will receive $10,000. However, special needs students will receive $11,500, and homeschool students are eligible for $2,000. The ESA program will be managed by the Texas comptroller. The comptroller will maintain a list of pre-approved vendors and educational providers, but participating families will also be able to request approval for other vendors and educational providers to suit their needs. A specific provision in the legislation dictates that no rule or action may prohibit or restrict religious or institutional values when distributing funds. In addition, it prevents limitations on participating parents when 'determining the methods or curriculum to educate students.' If the program is not maxed out the first year, a weighted lottery will determine who is next in line to receive funding. Once the program is rolled out, students will be considered in the following order: Siblings of currently participating students All other students Former students who have previously been enrolled in the program but have since stopped for a period of time The program further prioritizes students based on household income and disability status: Households 500 percent below the federal poverty line whose participating child has a disability Households 200 percent below the poverty line, which are expected to be the largest qualifying group Households 200 percent above the poverty line Households 500 percent above the poverty line No more than 20 percent of the funding will go towards the latter priority group, though it's unlikely to reach that amount. The comptroller's office will provide further details on the application process in 2026. In addition to school choice, lawmakers also passed House Bill 2, which covers public school finance. The total K-12 education funding for the 2026–2027 biennium is about $80 billion out of a $338 billion state budget. HB 2 increases the basic allotment per student from $6,160 to $6,215, which districts can use to meet a variety of needs, while the rest of the funding is earmarked to expand teacher incentives and create more grant funding. However, additional oversight of public education was also a priority of lawmakers. Senate Bill 12 increases parental control and oversight in K-12 education, limits DEI-related activities, and enhances transparency and accountability in Texas schools. It also bans instruction or programming regarding gender identity and sexual orientation.