&w=3840&q=100)
India criticises Bangladesh for demolition of Durga temple in Dhaka
The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has criticised Bangladesh's interim government for 'allowing the destruction' of a Durga temple in Dhaka and for portraying the incident as a case of 'illegal land use'. The MEA added that it was 'dismayed' by the recurrence of such events in the country.
Interim government 'responsible for protecting Hindus'
When asked about the demolition of the Durga temple in Bangladesh at the weekly media briefing, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said, "We understand that extremists were clamouring for demolishing the Durga temple in Khilkhet, Dhaka."
'The interim government, instead of providing security to the temple, projected the episode as illegal land use and they allowed the destruction of the temple today. This has resulted in damage to the deity before it was shifted,' he added.
'We are dismayed that such incidents continue to recur in Bangladesh. Let me underline that it is the responsibility of the interim government of Bangladesh to protect Hindus, their properties and religious institutions,' Jaiswal said.
Authorities cite encroachment as reason for temple demolition
Authorities from Bangladesh Railway, assisted by police and military personnel, demolished a temporary Durga temple in Dhaka's Khilkhet area on Thursday, according to news agency ANI. The demolition occurred three days after a mob reportedly demanded the temple's removal.
Railway authorities stated that the Khilkhet Sarbojanin Shri Shri Durga Mandir was demolished as it had been built illegally on railway land.
The decision of the authorities has been condemned by several minority organisations, alleging that the authorities demolished the temple without giving prior notice. Bangladesh's interim government on December 10 last year said that 70 people had been arrested in 88 cases related to attacks against minorities in the country.
India-Bangladesh ties
Relations between the two countries have been strained after the fall of the Sheikh Hasina-led government, with India alleging that religious minorities in Bangladesh have faced increased threats. Dhaka, on the other hand, has dismissed India's account as 'exaggerated".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Union minister Jitendra Singh backs RSS call to review ‘socialist', ‘secular' in Preamble; Congress says Sangh 'never accepted Constitution'
NEW DELHI: Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Tejashwi Yadav on Friday slammed Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Bihar CM Nitish Kumar, accusing them of trying to erase the names of poor and marginalised voters from the electoral rolls. 'The Election Commission has suddenly announced a special intensive revision. This means that the voter list published in February, which had the latest additions and deletions, has now been set aside.' He said that the entire list of eight crore Bihari voters has been sidelined, and now a fresh voter list will be created from scratch. — ANI (@ANI) He raised doubts over why this process is being conducted with only two months left before the elections and the feasibility of completing it in time. 'This clearly raises a question, why is this being done just two months before the elections? And is it even possible to prepare a fresh voter list of eight crore people within just 25 days?' 'Not only that, documents demanded are what the poor simply don't have,' the RJD leader said. Tejaswi added that his party will take up the issue with the election commission and send a delegation to present detailed objections in the coming days. He further accused PM Modi and Nitish Kumar of conspiring to erase the names of poor and marginalised voters from the electoral rolls under the guise of the EC's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) drive. 'The matter is clear, Nitish Ji and Modi Ji are intention is to get the names of poor people removed from the voter list. In a democracy, the most important right that the poor have is the right to vote. And now the BJP and Nitish Ji want to snatch that right away from the poor, the oppressed, and those on the margins of society, the backbenchers, those who stand at the end of the social ladder.' Earlier this week, the election commission issued a notification clarifying that the SIR in Bihar aims to ensure inclusion of all eligible voters, eliminate ineligible names, and improve transparency. It said that factors like rapid urbanisation, migration, deaths, and the risk of illegal foreign entrants are a major reason for the revision. The last such revision in the state took place in 2003. Meanwhile, Congress has also objected to the exercise. Party spokesperson Pawan Khera accused the EC of acting as a 'puppet' of Prime Minister Modi. 'For a long time, we have been pressuring the Election Commission and saying their process is not transparent. With this new conspiracy, lakhs of people in Bihar and across India will be deprived of their right to vote,' Khera said during a visit to the state.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Terrorism not acknowledged': Jaishankar on why India didn't sign SCO joint release; gives 'context'
External affairs minister S Jaishankar (PTI photo/file) NEW DELHI: External affairs minister S Jaishankar on Friday backed defence minister Rajnath Singh 's decision not to sign a joint statement at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Defence Ministers' meeting in China. He said India took a principled stand after one member nation blocked a reference to terrorism , a core focus of the organisation. "Let me give you some context because I think it's important," Jaishankar said at a press conference in New Delhi, according to news agency ANI. "The SCO was created to fight terrorism. That's its primary objective. But when Rajnath Ji attended the defence ministers' meeting, and there was a discussion on the outcome document, one country, and I think you can guess which, refused to include any mention of terrorism,' Jaishankar said without naming Pakistan. According to Jaishankar, Singh rightly declined to support the joint document in the absence of that crucial reference. "SCO functions on consensus. If even one country objects, nothing moves forward. Rajnath Ji clearly said that if terrorism is not acknowledged, we will not sign the statement." SCO statement had no mention of Pahalgam: Reports At a conference of SCO defence ministers' conclave, Rajnath Singh demanded inclusion of the terror attack in the communique, while the Pakistani side pressed for having a paragraph on militant activities in Balochistan in an apparent attempt to blame New Delhi, top sources told news agency PTI. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy One, Get One Free, Up To 50% Discount, Expiring Soon Original Adidas Get Offer Undo On certain reports claiming that the declaration had found a mention of the Balochistan crisis, but failed to mention the Pahalgam terror attack, sources clarified to the news agency ANI that the reports were completely incorrect. According to sources, the alphabet soup of the declaration document did not have either B (Balochistan) or P (Pahalgam) in its text. The document did not even have a reference to T (terrorism). This prompted India to back off from signing the final declaration.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
'De-escalation, border management': Rajnath Singh chalks 4-point roadmap to end India's dispute with China
India's defence Minister Rajnath Singh on Thursday, met with his Chinese counterpart Admiral Dong Jun, and chalked out a four-point roadmap to end India's dispute with China. During the talks, India and China's defence ministers agreed to continue consultations to achieve progress on "disengagement, de-escalation, border management and eventual de-limitation", as per an official statement. Rajnath Singh and Admiral Dong Jun met on the sidelines of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Defence Ministers' Meeting in Qingdao, which marks the first high-level military engagement since India and China concluded the disengagement process at Demchok and Depsang Plains in October 2024. From strict adherence to the 2024 Disengagement Agreement to focusing on border management, here's a look at India's 4-point roadmap: 1. Adherence to 2024 Disengagement Agreement: Both nations are expected to fully implement the disengagement agreement signed in October 2024, particularly at the remaining friction points in Eastern Ladakh, including Demchok and Depsang. 2. Ongoing De-escalation efforts: Defence Minister Rajnath Singh emphasised the need for sustained efforts to reduce tensions and prevent any future incidents along the Line of Actual Control (LAC). 3. Demarcation and delimitation: Rajnath Singh also urged for expedited talks to finalise the boundary demarcation process. "Singh also stressed on border management and to have a permanent solution of border demarcation by rejuvenating the established mechanism on the issue," the government statement mentioned, referring to the border talks process between the Asian giants. 4. Bridging the Trust deficit: During his meeting with Admiral Dong, Rajnath Singh also called for bridging the trust deficit created after the 2020 standoff, India said in its statement. The SCO defence ministers, however, were unable to adopt a joint statement at the end of their meeting due to a lack of consensus on referring to "terrorism", India stated. Sharing a photo on X after the meeting, Rajnath Singh emphasised the importance of maintaining the "positive momentum" in India-China diplomatic relations. He also expressed happiness over the resumption of the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra, which has restarted after nearly six years. India and China share a 3, 800 km largely undemarcated and disputed border in the Himalayas and have gone to war over it. Following the border standoff in eastern Ladakh, India has consistently maintained that peace and stability along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) are essential for normalising overall ties with China. The standoff began in May 2020, with a deadly clash in the Galwan Valley in June that year leading to a sharp deterioration in bilateral relations. The face-off effectively ended following the completion of the disengagement process from Demchok and Depsang's last two friction points under an agreement finalised on October 21.
