Calls for Nottinghamshire County Council to move back to old HQ
"In comparison, Oak House is a costly and unsuitable replacement as the civic centre of Nottinghamshire, located remotely and without sufficient transport links," it says.
The motion, tabled by Labour group leader Penny Gowland, would commit the council to exploring how County Hall could be maintained as the headquarters.If passed, the authority would also look at options to dispose of Oak House or lease some of the space, "the proceeds of which can be used to fund other areas of council business".Speaking earlier this week, incoming council leader Mick Barton said he had asked if next week's meeting could be held "at this magnificent council chamber" [County Hall], but was told the microphone system had already been moved to Oak House."I shall be looking at the whole raft moving forward of where we feel we need to be based," he added.Conservative group leader and former council leader Sam Smith said it would cost about £50m to keep County Hall functional."When proposing the motion next week, Labour will have to set out what libraries they propose to close, which waste recycling centres they'll close, what roads and pavements they will not resurface and what schools they will not build in order to fund the £50m renovation," he said.Plans for the future of County Hall have never been confirmed, but it has previously been suggested it could be turned into housing, restaurants and bars.The 22 May meeting, due to be held at Oak House, will also see Barton formally confirmed as the authority's new leader.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
30 minutes ago
- Spectator
Dirty tricks have gone too far
Last week, John Power reported on Labour's alleged 'dark arts' strategy: a cynical ploy to damage Nigel Farage and his allies not through debate, but through reputational sabotage. As a target of such smears for many years, I was not hugely surprised to see my name mentioned in the piece. I can attest to the venom of the attacks on Reform – in stark contrast to the 'kinder, gentler politics' once promised from Labour. We should expect robust debate where ideas clash, but instead what we often encounter is a reliance on smears and innuendo. In this week's Spectator, James Heale notes that my lawyers have written to Labour. Downing Street sources have reportedly denied the existence of any new 'attack team' in No. 10 with the remit of challenging Reform. But key questions remain unanswered. In recent weeks, anonymous online accounts and attack blogs have engaged in a sophisticated and targeted disinformation campaign against me. Following the allegations in The Spectator last week, some of these soon vanished. Who was behind them? Where did the money come from to fund various X accounts? And what, exactly, are the limits of Labour's 'opposition research' – better known as the 'dark arts'? The emergence and subsequent disappearance of these accounts come just as Labour ramped up its attacks on Reform UK. Over the weekend, Nigel Farage has been subject to an unrelenting barrage of slime from the Labour party's official X account, stating that he would 'put women and girls at risk' because of his position against the Online Safety Act. Peter Kyle, the Science Secretary, previously suggested that Farage was on the side of Jimmy Savile. Just how low is Labour prepared to go? My association with Nigel Farage, exacerbated by my family's financial support of Reform UK, has painted a bullseye on my back – and theirs. The assaults are manifold: in 2016, at the Republican National Convention supporting Donald Trump, I was arrested on allegations of a money-laundering conspiracy from my finance days, when I was 20. The tabloids had a field day, transforming it into a sensational saga of intrigue and excess prompting scurrilous claims of Russian interference. There were farcical allegations of illicit political financing in Montenegro, where I have lived for years, and lurid tales of investigations and arrests, along with whispers of shadowy business dealings with gangsters and despots. These tales disintegrate under scrutiny – but they were never intended to be proven. They are designed to depict me as a Bond-esque rogue. What's changed is how these attacks are amplified. Anonymous social media accounts use generative AI tools like ChatGPT and X's Grok to spread misinformation. By feeding these models with attack blogs and unreliable sources – often of their own creation – they generate misleading responses, auto-translate them, and inject them into the feeds of British journalists. This manipulation plays on well-known vulnerabilities of large language models, which can reflect the assumptions of their prompts and dream up plausible-sounding falsehoods. It is digital defamation at scale. The personal toll is profound. They imperil my petition for a US presidential pardon, following my 2017 plea deal, and have necessitated a 24-hour security team and an army of libel lawyers and investigators amid intimidation that endangers my family's safety and privacy. At the heart of this campaign lies a concerted effort to discredit me and Geostrategy, my global polling and strategy consultancy. Critics brand it a 'shady' vehicle for 'dark money', claims which are not just inaccurate, but malicious. Our polls, which align with other respected outfits, showing, for instance, majority US support for a free Ukraine, are conducted to the highest standards, belying claims of pro-Russia bias. Yet activist groups, colluding with the press, push such narratives without evidence. This approach, reminiscent of efforts against figures such as Trump, risks undermining liberal democracy by failing to accommodate dissenting voices within the system, potentially leading to greater instability. If we aim to restore faith in our institutions, we must return politics to its proper form: a competition of visions and ideas, rather than a battle of character assassination. Our democracy deserves civility, integrity and the courage to engage in open debate.
The National
37 minutes ago
- The National
Universal free bus travel should be Greens' 'top proposal'
The West Scotland MSP believes the policy would help Scots to deal with the cost of living crisis, tackle the climate emergency and bring the backing of new voters – if the party membership got on board. Greer is one of four contenders for the party's two co-leadership positions. Dominic Ashmole and fellow MSPs Gillian Mackay and Lorna Slater are also vying to take on the top job. While the party's core mission is tackling climate change, Greer argues that the 'high watermark' for climate politics was during the series of strikes in 2019, and that now, the main issue for voters is the cost of living. 'That's why the Scottish Greens need to put together our climate and our cost of living policies,' he told The National. READ MORE: Labour refuse to release files on secret meeting with Gideon Sa'ar 'It's why I'm proposing that one of our top proposals going into the next election is universal free bus travel.' Greer pointed to free travel for under 22s, a policy brought in by the party under the Bute House Agreement with the SNP, and that countries like Malta and Luxembourg have already adopted the policy. In Luxembourg, all public transport was made free in March 2020, as part of a bid to reduce emissions and encourage more people to use it. 'We need to put forward policies that will tackle the climate emergency, because we know how urgent that is,' Greer added. 'But those policies also need to help people with the cost of their daily lives. That's why I think universal free bus travel is one of the policies that will really resonate with the public. It will save people money.' He added that it would allow people to travel across Scotland for work, or leisure, and spend money in their local economies. 'The opportunities of free bus travel from a social perspective are massive,' Greer added. 'It's also one of the things that we need to do to tackle Scotland's single worst source of emissions, which is transport. We've reduced emissions in Scotland in a whole range of sectors over the last couple of decades. In transport, emissions have gone up, and it's because private car use has gone up.' Greer argued that this leaves two options - either make driving harder and more expensive, or public transport cheaper and easier. He added: 'It costs almost £20 to get a return bus ticket from Fraserburgh to Aberdeen. That is absolutely outrageous, and it is really isolating people who live in communities like Fraserburgh, the folk who own the bus companies though are making an absolute fortune off stuff like this. 'Universal free bus travel is the perfect example of combining climate justice, social justice and economic justice.' In the Scottish Parliament, he adds, more time is given to debate cars and trains in comparison to buses. 'It's frankly tiny, and that shows the inequality,' he adds. READ MORE: Thousands object to Tesla bid to supply energy in UK – how to sign the petition 'Because overwhelmingly, it's people who drive or even take the train who are making the big decisions in Scotland, and a lot of the kind of people who take the bus are very rarely in our Parliament, very rarely have the opportunity to have their voices heard on that. 'I know that's the kind of policy that resonates, and it resonates in every kind of community.' Need for 'common political strategy' Greer, long seen as a successor to Patrick Harvie who is still contesting the Holyrood election but is stepping back as co-leader, said that he believes the Greens have 'drifted a bit' over the past year after the power-sharing agreement ended. 'We've lacked that sense of shared direction and shared purpose,' he said. 'What we need is to agree a common political strategy. It's the co-leaders job to put that forward. It's for our party's council, which represents all of our branches and other groups, to debate it, amend it, agree it, reject it. But the co-leaders need to be the ones to, as our constitution says, provide political leadership and put that forward. 'One of the first things I would be doing if I was elected as co-leader is putting forward a strategy that says we focus on a handful of really simple, easy to understand, easy to communicate ideas that combine climate justice and social justice, and top of my list would be free bus travel for everyone.' With Nigel Farage's Reform UK undoubtedly set to feature in the 2026 Holyrood campaign, Greer insists that the party 'cannot dismiss' the anger voters are feeling as 'establishment centrist' parties do. He explained: 'The job of the Scottish Greens is to make it clear to people that it's not the fault of asylum seekers or trans people that everybody's lives are getting harder. 'It's the fault of billionaires, tax avoiders, greedy landlords like polluters. 'They're the people making it harder to get by. They're the people making everything more expensive. And it's all so that they can hoard more wealth themselves and they're going to spend in a thousand lifetimes. 'We can harness that anger rather than dismiss it, and we can channel it into something positive. We can give people hope that this can actually be a better and a fairer and a greener country.'
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
UK military chief meets US counterparts for Ukraine talks
Admiral Sir Tony Radakin met senior US defence officials alongside other European military chiefs in Washington DC on Wednesday to discuss military options to secure peace in Ukraine. He later attended a virtual meeting of Nato's military committee, described by its chairman Italian Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone as 'candid'. On Tuesday evening, Admiral Radakin, the chief of the defence staff, had dined with his US counterpart General Dan Caine. Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, the chief of the defence staff, travelled to Washington for talks with US military leaders (Andrew Matthews/PA) The meetings come amid renewed planning for a 'coalition of the willing', led by the UK and France, that would guarantee Kyiv's security in the event of a ceasefire. Earlier in the week, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron co-chaired a meeting of the coalition, in which members of the group also discussed the possibility of further sanctions on Russia. Western security guarantees, strongly resisted by Moscow, are one of the central issues for any peace deal for Ukraine, which fears Russia could otherwise use a ceasefire to regroup and launch a renewed invasion. So far, only the UK and France have indicated they could commit troops to a peacekeeping force in Ukraine. In an interview on Tuesday Donald Trump ruled out an American ground contribution but suggested the US could be willing to provide some form of air support. Sir Keir Starmer joined European leaders in a show of support for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky as he met Donald Trump at the White House (Aaron Schwartz/PA) His special envoy, Steve Witkoff, had earlier suggested the US could offer Ukraine a mutual defence agreement similar to Nato's Article 5, without Kyiv formally joining the alliance. Renewed talks among the 'coalition of the willing' follow last week's summit between Mr Trump and Vladimir Putin in Alaska as the US president continued to push for an end to a conflict he had promised he could finish on his first day in office. Those talks appeared to result in little progress towards a deal, but sparked concern among some in Europe that Mr Trump could seek to pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky into accepting a deal without sufficient security guarantees. On Monday, Sir Keir and Mr Macron joined other European leaders in travelling to Washington in a show of support for Mr Zelensky during a meeting with Mr Trump. Meanwhile, the UK and Russia traded sanctions as London sought to increase the pressure on Moscow to end its invasion. Europe minister Stephen Doughty unveiled sanctions on a series of organisations linked to Kyrgyzstan's financial services sector, saying they had been involved in Kremlin attempts to 'soften the blow of our sanctions by laundering transactions through dodgy crypto networks'. Russia in turn sanctioned 21 individuals, including former Labour MP Denis MacShane, several journalists, and the Government-appointed independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, Jonathan Hall.
