logo
Quebecers can wait years to get into co-op housing. So why isn't there more?

Quebecers can wait years to get into co-op housing. So why isn't there more?

CBC03-06-2025

Social Sharing
Relics of a long life are scattered throughout Dimitri Roussopoulos's 19th-century home. The 88-year-old has lived in the two-storey townhouse since 1972, where he and three other residents pay under $1,000 a month.
"I often travel and people say, 'where do you get the money for travelling?' I say, 'well, I don't have to pay a mortgage,'" he says.
Roussopoulos is one of the founders of Canada's largest housing co-operative development, the Milton Park Community, in Montreal's Plateau-Mont-Royal borough. The network spans six square blocks, with 616 housing units, 146 residential buildings and two commercial buildings.
Since co-op members own the property, no one has to worry about being evicted or the building being sold — as long as they follow the rules.
"I have a sense of ownership, I have a sense of security," says Roussopoulos. "I feel my personality enriched. I feel healthier in every way, physically and mentally."
According to the Co-operative Housing Federation of Canada (CHF), forms of social housing, including co-ops, make up less than four per cent of Canada's housing stock.
It can also take years for a co-op housing unit to become available. In Quebec, wait times can range from one to two years, according to the Confédération québécoise des coopératives d'habitation (CQCH).
How do co-ops work?
In a housing co-op, members are co-owners and vote on how the building is managed.
Generally, housing co-ops are divided into two categories: non-profit and equity co-ops. In the latter, you buy a share of a building, which can gain value over time.
Non-profit co-ops are much more common in Canada. In those, you don't build equity — instead, you pay a monthly fee that covers building expenses and maintenance. When you leave, your unit goes to someone else. That means residents can pay significantly under market rate for housing — depending on the city, province and structure of the co-op.
WATCH | How does a housing co-op work?:
How co-operatives could become a hack to Canada's housing crisis
4 minutes ago
Duration 5:18
People who live in them say they offer an attractive, low-cost alternative as the price of renting and buying property rises. Here's how housing co-ops work and why we might start hearing more about them in Canada.
CHF Canada says there are about 95,000 co-op housing units in Canada, most of which were developed two generations ago.
"In the 1970s and 80s there was robust federal and provincial investment in new co-operative housing supply," explains Tim Ross, executive director of CHF Canada.
"That investment slowed down due to policy decisions by governments in the 80s and 90s, to first cut and then eliminate social housing funding."
More government funding
Different levels of government have scaled up funding for co-op housing in recent years. Last year, the federal government launched the Co-op Housing Development Program, setting aside $1.5 billion in contributions and loans to build and expand co-ops.
In a statement, a spokesperson for Housing, Infrastructure and Communities Canada says the government "recognizes the essential role that non-market housing, including co-operative housing, plays in fulfilling many Canadians' housing needs."
It adds that low-cost loans and forgivable loans for new and existing co-op units are available through the Affordable Housing Fund.
Quebec's Housing Ministry also says housing co-ops "are an important model in Quebec's housing supply ecosystem."
In a statement, a ministry spokesperson said funds are available through a variety of programs, including the Quebec Affordable Housing Program.
Last year, the City of Montreal announced it would sell its land — usually vacant lots or parking lots — at a break-even price if it is being used to build off-market housing.
Quebec's CQCH says it's a good start, but a far cry from government investments in the 70s and 80s.
General director Sandra Turgeon says that if governments are serious about developing this kind of housing, they'll have to provide a lot more funding long term. She adds that government programs can be tough to navigate and tend to favour long-established co-ops over new ones.
"The co-op needs to have experience," she says. "You have to already be big to get bigger."
Hurdles to starting new housing co-ops
Professor Avi Friedman heads McGill University's affordable homes research group. He says starting a new co-op can be time-consuming and complicated. The process starts with establishing a co-op entity and acquiring funding.
"A group of people need to get together and if they build their own property, they need to hire to find a site and to buy the site, get permits to build and so on. These are processes that usually are very cumbersome and long," he says.
The CQCH adds that residents won't save as much in newly established co-ops as ones established years ago. Turgeon says residents in new co-ops will pay closer to the current market rate, minus whatever government funding is available. She argues the process is still worth it.
"We work for the future. It's a little bit expensive now, but it will stay at the same price in future years and your income will increase," she says.
Ross believes the best approach is to scale up existing housing co-ops, rather than starting new organizations altogether.
"They have a track record and a balance sheet from which to work with, so that does create a more advantageous situation when it comes to new development," he says.
Not for everyone
Friedman says that the democratic nature of a co-op isn't something everyone will find appealing.
"We are individualistic in nature," he explains. "People want to own their own property, to be suburban. Once they move in, there can be issues with getting along, how to share things and so on."
Roussopoulos admits that co-op members may butt heads at times, but the sense of community makes it all worth it.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A new federal bill aims to approve projects faster. What would that mean for consultation in Nunavut?
A new federal bill aims to approve projects faster. What would that mean for consultation in Nunavut?

CBC

time12 minutes ago

  • CBC

A new federal bill aims to approve projects faster. What would that mean for consultation in Nunavut?

A new federal bill aims to fast-track major infrastructure projects, but some in Nunavut worry it could mean more development with less consultation. The One Canadian Economy Act, introduced last Friday, will speed up the approval process of major infrastructure projects — reducing approval times from five years to two. It also introduces a "one-project, one-review" approach instead of having federal and provincial approval processes happen sequentially. Nunavut has its own process to assess major projects through the Nunavut Impact Review Board, which is protected under the Nunavut Agreement. "They cannot fast-track anything without a robust system that ensures that First Nations, Inuit and Métis do give our free, prior and informed consent," said Lori Idlout, the NDP MP for Nunavut. Idlout said she's concerned about how the federal government will speed up the process to approve major projects while still fulfilling the duty to consult. "I don't think there's a possibility for them to go hand in hand," she said. Idlout also said Indigenous people still need to be at the forefront of any conversations about development, especially in Nunavut. "We need to ensure that they are heard. They are the ones who know the land, they know the migration," she said. "It's the hunters and trappers organizations whose voices need to be amplified at this time." No changes expected, review board says Dionne Filiatrault, executive director of the Nunavut Impact Review Board, told CBC in an email that she doesn't expect much to change if the legislation passes. "The Nunavut Agreement already establishes what we call a 'one window approach' but in essence is in line with a one project, one assessment approach," Filiatrault wrote. She also said current proponents of major Nunavut projects spend a lot of time working with the review board and other bodies "to optimize the process prior to submission of application." "At this time I am not foreseeing any changes to the NIRB processes," she wrote. Land use plan needed Former Nunavut premier and current lead Arctic specialist for the World Wildlife Fund Paul Okalik said Nunavut's environmental review legislation is robust. "The agreement is constitutionally protected and our rights are hard-earned and it was a hard bargain," Okalik said. "It took a long time and it can't just be overwritten by any one person in this country." Okalik also said having a land use plan for Nunavut in place will help. A draft plan was submitted in 2023 and still hasn't been approved. The plan sets out which areas of the territory are open for development and which are protected. It also tells developers where projects, like mines, will be allowed and under what conditions. "That would clearly identify the issues in play, like areas that are important to the communities, in particular being protected, and other areas being open for development," Okalik said. In the absence of a plan, the review board process acts as a stopgap measure, but it's not always effective, Okalik said. "It has been touch and go. So depending on any given day, it can work in favour of the communities and Inuit. On another day it could be going the other way. So it's really uncertain at this time given the absence of any land use plan." Nunavut Premier P.J. Akeeagok said he's pushed for support on several major infrastructure projects, including the Grays Bay Road and Port and the Kivalliq Hydro Fibre Link. Even so, Akeeagok said, those projects need to involve people on the ground. "All the projects that we put in was really from the lens of making sure that these are being led by Inuit, for Inuit. That really will have a huge benefit not only for the territory but for the country," Akeeagok said. For its part, the federal government said it will uphold the duty to consult and involve Indigenous communities through a new federal projects office, it said in a news release about the bill. That office will include an advisory council with Inuit, First Nations and Métis.

N.B. government to eliminate more interprovincial trade exceptions
N.B. government to eliminate more interprovincial trade exceptions

CTV News

time19 minutes ago

  • CTV News

N.B. government to eliminate more interprovincial trade exceptions

The New Brunswick flag waves in front of the legislative building in Fredericton. (Laura Brown/CTV Atlantic) The New Brunswick government says it is taking more steps to remove trade barriers between provinces, as it looks to lead the way when it comes to internal trade. The province announced Thursday it would remove five party-specific exceptions under the government procurement chapter of the Canadian Free Trade Agreement: Atlantic Lottery Corporation wastewater commissions regional service commissions (formerly solid waste commissions) Fredericton Area Pollution Control Commission and Greater Moncton Sewerage Commission newly created entities (for example, Crown corporations) The province says the removal of the exception for newly created entities is immediate and the other four will take effect Sept. 1, allowing time for the organizations 'to adjust to new procurement requirements.' 'New Brunswick is moving full steam ahead on removing interprovincial trade barriers and improving the flow of workers, goods and services in and out of New Brunswick,' said Premier Susan Holt. Earlier this year, on March 20, New Brunswick announced the removal or amendment of 10 party-specific exceptions for: Provincial Holdings Ltd. Forest Protection Ltd. New Brunswick Research and Productivity Council New Brunswick Arts Board New Brunswick Credit Union Deposit Insurance Corp. New Brunswick Farm Products Commission New Brunswick Museum the procurement of goods restricted by law from interprovincial movement mining fisheries and aquaculture (narrowed – only applied reciprocally to other jurisdictions that maintain the same exception) 'As part of our work with the committee on internal trade, we pledged to quickly review all of New Brunswick's 32 party-specific exceptions,' said Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Jean-Claude D'Amours. 'We're pleased to have cut that number by nearly half since the beginning of the year, and we remain committed to exploring further opportunities to remove barriers and the remaining exceptions.' For more New Brunswick news, visit our dedicated provincial page.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store