Wimbledon security is ‘critical', official says over player's concerns in match
During her match on Monday, the world No 33, Yulia Putintseva, raised security concerns to the umpire about a spectator whom she described as 'crazy' and 'dangerous' and asked to be ejected.
'Take him out, because maybe he has a knife and he will attack after, I don't know,' Putintseva, 30, said to the umpire during her match against Amanda Anisimova.
Wimbledon's operations director, Michelle Dite, said on Tuesday that if players had any concerns, they 'absolutely' should be brought to light.
'We would rather know about these things, and that is what happened yesterday, and the chair umpire then had some really good communication as planned,' said Dite, adding that it was not a stalking incident.
A Wimbledon spokesperson declined to say if the spectator was ejected. 'Security was in the area. The issue was dealt with,' he said. The incident is the latest surrounding security measures after a man who was given a restraining order in Dubai in February for stalking Emma Raducanu was blocked from buying tickets for the championships this month in the public ballot.
Dite said: 'Protocols were followed. The matter was dealt with.'
On Tuesday morning, more than 10,000 spectators queued outside the grounds with fans and umbrellas to watch British players including Jack Draper, a top contender for the championship.
On Monday, more than 13,000 people entered the grounds after queueing in the heat, some overnight, as opening-day attendance jumped to 42, 756 from last year's 40,514. Protesters on the ground's outskirts called for a boycott of Wimbledon's banking partner, Barclays, over ties to Israel's war on Gaza.
On Tuesday, with temperatures expected to reach 33C (91F), spectators were encouraged to hydrate after the tournament opened with record-level heat. Amid soaring temperatures, a woman collapsed while watching a match on Monday, and a number of spectators were treated for heat-related incidents.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Dite, discussing the incident on Monday during which Carlos Alcaraz interrupted play to hand a struggling spectator a bottle of water, thanked the returning Wimbledon champion for his support and acknowledged there had been a delay in the medical response.
'Yes, it did take a while, but this lady had fainted, so it needed to be managed very carefully. I know there was a bit of delay but we all work very hard,' said Dite.
'It takes a while sometimes to just assess the situation,' she added. 'And thanks to Carlos for his support for going to get some water.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ben Stokes reveals he was bed-bound following ‘exhausting' first India Test
Ben Stokes revealed he was bed-bound for two days due to exhaustion following the England vs India first test match. Speaking on BBC Radio 4, Stokes described feeling "very tired physically and mentally" after the five-day game. He noted that teammate Brydon Carse also experienced significant fatigue, underscoring the demanding nature of test cricket. England, led by Stokes, secured a five-wicket victory at Headingley, giving them a 1-0 lead in the five-match series. Watch the video in full above.
Telegraph
11 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Saving Jasprit Bumrah for Lord's is ridiculous by India
Ben Stokes played a straight bat. 'Their choice,' he said bluntly, when asked about India's selection for the second Test at Edgbaston. But behind the steely stare, the England captain must have been jumping for joy, for India had left out Jasprit Bumrah, one of the great fast bowlers in Test history. It is a baffling decision to headline a fudged selection. Bumrah is delicate, of course, and a heavy workload across five Tests in Australia eventually saw him break down in Sydney. He cannot be expected to play all five Tests in this series, coming as thick and fast as they do. India have bizarrely telegraphed that Bumrah will only play three. But the second, at Edgbaston, simply had to be one of them. India are 1-0 down, having lost a game they could and should have won at Headingley. They have been very clear that he is fit and available for the match, but they have left him out. Ravi Shastri, who was a very fine coach of India, could not believe it. 'You have the best fast bowler in the world and you make him sit out after seven days' rest. It's something very hard to believe and I can't agree with it.' Bumrah had a big workload at Headingley, bowling 43.4 overs, more than any other seamer in the game. He was the outstanding bowler on show, and was devastating in the first innings, if neutered a little in the second. But since, he has had a full week off to rest up for this challenge. The official reason given by the captain Shubman Gill is that India are 'managing his workload'. He continued: 'This is an important match for us, but the third match being at Lord's, we thought there might be a bit more in the wicket than here.' There are two reasons saving Bumrah for Lord's is wrong-headed. The first is that their series is hanging by a thread; lose at Edgbaston and it will be as good as gone. As England learnt the hard way in the 2023 Ashes, coming back from 2-0 down is nigh on impossible. India's handling of Bumrah is reminiscent of England's muddled shuffling of their bowlers in the 2021/22 Ashes. Mark Wood was their best bowler in the first Test at Brisbane, but was then rested at Adelaide. By the time he returned for the final three Tests, England were toast. There is little point in any of Bumrah's three Tests in this series being once it is lost. The second is that the flat pitch at Edgbaston is actually more reason to play Bumrah. He is the one quick on either side with the skill to take the surface out of the equation. India have other decent seam bowlers, who have caused England trouble in the past, but none like him. There is no guarantee that the Lord's pitch will have anything more in it than Edgbaston, even if the slope is always helpful for quicks, especially those as awkward as Bumrah. Alas, the sense is that there is sentimentality involved in this decision. Bumrah, like all visiting Test players, wants to play at the Home of Cricket, because of its prestige, and the allure of a place on the hallowed honours board. Bumrah has played one previous Test at Lord's, in 2021, the most memorable moment of which was his no-balls to Jimmy Anderson late on the third day. But he took three vital wickets on day five; enough to drive India to victory, but not enough to get on the honours board. India's selection more widely felt a total fudge, and very confused. Once they had decided to leave out Bumrah, surely the brilliantly tricksy left-arm wrist-spinner Kuldeep Yadav's case for inclusion grew even stronger. Instead, they played it safe, packing the batting by picking the off-spinning all-rounder Washington Sundar. India should forget that their tail was blown away in Leeds, and instead concentrate on picking their most dangerous bowlers in order to take 20 wickets. They dropped the coming man, Sai Sudharsan, and did not even gamble on the uncapped Arshdeep Singh's left-arm pace. They may have stumbled upon a magic formula, and could still win at Edgbaston, especially if they hold their catches. But the sense is that they have made their job so much harder than it needs to be.
Wales Online
11 minutes ago
- Wales Online
Former British No.1 tennis player banned from Wimbledon grounds
Former British No.1 tennis player banned from Wimbledon grounds Christopher 'Buster' Mottram was Britain's leading male player in the late 1970s and early 80s, but has been barred from Wimbledon since 2023 following 'misdemeanours' Buster Mottram, pictured during his tennis career, has been banned by Wimbledon (Image: MSI ) A divisive former tennis star has reportedly been excluded from Wimbledon. Christopher Mottram, known widely as 'Buster', was Britain's leading male player in the late 1970s and early 80s as well as representing his country in the Davis Cup. However, he has been barred from SW19 since 2023, fellow former British tennis star Roger Taylor has revealed. Taylor made the claim in his recently-released book, The Man Who Saved Wimbledon, per the Daily Mail's Eden Confidential column. Now 70, Mottram was seen as a controversial figure. He once wrote a letter in support of then-prime minister Margaret Thatcher during her battles with the trade unions in the 80s, even signing it on behalf of the Davis Cup team, which left the tennis authorities fuming. Additionally, he faced allegations of racism due to his backing of Enoch Powell, a far-right politician notorious for his 'Rivers of Blood' speech about mass immigration in the late-60s. Taylor, 83, wrote: "His antics and beliefs saw him frozen out by the establishment. He never became a permanent member of the All England Club which, for player with his record, would usually be guaranteed. In 2023, following further misdemeanours, he was banned from the place altogether." Article continues below Mottram is said to be no longer welcome at SW19 (Image:) When approached for comment, a Wimbledon spokesperson said: "I'm afraid we don't comment on our membership." Mottram has been left feeling despondent by his expulsion, although Taylor attributed the ban primarily to his own conduct. He wrote: "Buster spent more time there than just about anyone else and it's been very sad to watch his decline and exclusion, even if much of it has been down to his own failings." In his heyday, Mottram soared to 15th in the world rankings in 1978 and 1983, with his most notable Wimbledon achievement being reaching the fourth round in 1982. He made it to the fourth round at both the French Open and the US Open as well. He was also a member of the British Davis Cup team that was runner-up to the United States in 1978. A young Mottram in action (Image: Getty ) Mottram abruptly hung up his racket in 1983, blaming the continuous "hassle" of participating in year-round tournaments. He later ventured into right-wing politics but found himself ejected from UKIP for fraternising with the British National Party (BNP) and its leader Nick Griffin. After attempting to broker a pact between UKIP and the BNP, Mottram was ejected from the party, then under Nigel Farage's leadership. Farage said at the time: "There are no circumstances, no possible situations, in which we would even consider doing any type of deal with the BNP whatsoever. "I'm simply amazed that the BNP thought we would even consider such a thing, given that we are a non-racist, non-sectarian party." Article continues below Griffin had entertained hopes of forming an agreement to prevent BNP and UKIP candidates from competing against one another in the forthcoming European elections.
