Industrial pottery production in Ancient Jordan: Insights from Nabataean workshops at Az-Zurraba, Ayla
Ancient Ayla, modern day Aqaba, was one of centres for industrial production of pottery (Photo courtesy of ACOR)
AMMAN — Industrial pottery manufacture was developed in Jordan, southern Levant, Asia Minor, Tunisia and Sardinia. There are different preconditions for a pottery production on an industrial scale-enough clay, dependable water source and fuel.
The operation would be located a distance from residential areas leaving a large footprint of covered and uncovered areas for the different phases of production.
"There may be evidence of clay body preparation including pits for hydrating, mixing, and settling clay. The temper in the clay body would most likely remain the same through time but there would be variability in the clay body due to the unevenness of clay sources over long periods of use," said Marie-Louise Sidoroff.
Sidoroff added that there would be large numbers of wasters in the immediate area of more than one kiln structure surrounded by open spaces for setting out pottery before and after firing.
Standardisation would be observed in vessel metrics, morphology and decoration, although structures may not survive, especially if constructed of perishable materials, an industrial operation requires a protected area to store prepared clay body, to situate potters' work stations, and to slowly dry great numbers of vessels for a week or more before firing.
'Also, problematical would be uncovering the remains of potter's wheels completely made of wood, which were typically used in antiquity, with the exception of the heakick wheels when made of fired clay or stone,' Sidoroff said, noting that the presence of markets in the region to absorb large quantities of pottery justifies the presence of an industrial production workshop.
Archaeological signatures of industrial operations are present over long periods of time at two Nabataean pottery workshops in Jordan: az-Zurraba (Petra) and Ayla (Aqaba).
"Az-Zurraba, the longest industrial operation in Jordan, was active from the 1st to at least the 6th century AD with an abundant source of clay at Ayn at-Tinah and a spring nearby. Through Neutron Activation Analysis the clay is proven to be the main pottery production resource for fine Nabataean ceramics."
"Further signatures of an industrial operation in the area are ten kilns," Sidoroff elaborated.
At Ayla, excavations by The Roman Aqaba Project uncovered large quantities of coarse ware pottery dating from its founding in the first century and possibly continuing into the 8th century AD.
Abundant fuel resources are suggested at az-Zurraba, where olive residue in the kiln area was probably obtained from an olive press excavated nearby and more problematic are necessary quantities of fuel at the desert oasis of Ayla where, so far, only small charcoal samples of palm, tamarisk and acacia have been uncovered, Sidoroff elaborated.
"At az-Zurraba five stone walled rooms indicate that potters worked in the same protected location over several centuries. The layout of the rooms suggests that individual potters at az-Zurraba were grouped together to form a tightly clustered industrial complex. So far at Ayla, only one small structure associated with a kiln has been uncovered," Sidoroff explained.
She noted that there is standardisation in clay body, vessel morphology, and decoration in vessels from both industrial sites.
At Ayla a continuity of rim form has been noted over seven centuries and beginning in the 5th AD century a new industry extended through the 7th century AD producing standardised 'Ayla amphorae.'
"Ayla potters manufactured ware with a light colour exterior and mica temper and lightly coloured exteriors on amphorae are distinguishing marks of Ayla ware. The evidence from both workshops attests to markets with the capacity to absorb industrial level production, "Sidoroff underscored.
She added that the abundance of fine ware at Nabataean and commerce with the wider Mediterranean world played a role in distribution of Nabataean pottery and quantities of Ayla amphorae are found within the site and along the Red Sea littoral.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Jordan Times
07-05-2025
- Jordan Times
Czech explorer documents southern Jordan before modern era
Robert Schick presents life and achievements of the Czech Arabist Alois Musil on Tuesday at American Centre of Research (Photo courtesy of ACOR) AMMAN — Long before the rise of modern archaeology in the Middle East, a Czech priest-turned-explorer was meticulously documenting the landscapes, people, and ancient ruins of southern Jordan. Born in 1868 in the Austro-Hungarian Empire, AloisMusil grew up in a bilingual Czech-German farming family in Rychtarov. He studied Roman Catholic theology at the University of Olomouc and was ordained a priest in 1891. His academic journey led him to the Dominican Biblical School in Jerusalem, where he studied from 1895 to 1898, developing fluency in both English and Arabic, skills that would shape his future as an orientalist and explorer. Between 1896 and 1902, Musil conducted extensive ethnographic and archaeological research across southern Jordan, venturing into northern Jordan, Syria, Iraq, and northern Saudi Arabia in the years that followed. His work has been credited with providing the earliest comprehensive documentation of sites such as Petra, Qasr Amra, Rabba, and Faynan. 'Musil was a counterpoint to Lawrence of Arabia,' said independent American researcher Robert Schick during a presentation at the American Center of Research titled 'Alois Musil's Explorations of Southern Jordan in 1896–1902.' 'He was conducting similar research for the Austro-Hungarian army.' Musil served as a soldier during World War I and returned to Czechoslovakia after the war, never setting foot in the Middle East again. He became a professor at the University of Prague, dedicating the rest of his life to publishing his findings. His three-volume work Arabia Petraea—published in German between 1907 and 1908—covers the regions of Moab, Edom, and includes a detailed ethnological travel report. Though less known than his English-language publications, these works remain vital to scholars today. 'His was the first detailed documentation of Petra's rock-cut tombs and monuments,' Schick noted. Musil also created detailed maps and took hundreds of photographs of the areas he explored—visual records that today serve as important ethnological and historical evidence. Among his many achievements, Musil is recognized as the first Western scholar to reach QasrAmra and to write about Rabba, a major settlement on the Karak Plateau before the Crusader era. His observations at Faynan added further depth to the understanding of southern Jordan's ancient history. In 1900, Musil witnessed the Ottoman Empire's efforts to build telegraph lines through Jordan's interior—a sign of the empire's push toward modernization. 'He saw how locals would flee to avoid Ottoman soldiers who confiscated their animals for transport,' Schick said. Musil's camera also captured the cultural life of the region. His collection includes rare images of rabbaba players and traditional Arabic poets, along with thousands of lines of verse that he recorded. Though trained in Biblical studies, Musil's enduring legacy lies in his work as an Arabist and ethnographer. His pioneering documentation continues to inform modern research into the cultural and historical heritage of the region.
Jordan Times
16-04-2025
- Jordan Times
Climate crisis threatens cultural heritage in Middle East — Scholars
The mosaic floor of the Byzantine church in Jerash (Photo courtesy of ACOR) AMMAN — The climate crisis directly impacts cultural heritage in the Middle East and it will continue to affect historical monuments and sites in the coming decades. Two recent collections of studies authored by archaeologists demonstrate a growing awareness of the situation, especially as it pertains to coastal and inland river flooding's impact on cultural heritage sites, noted Professor Benjamin Porter from Berkeley University. The professor added that the authors stress the need to work with various publics, from government policymakers to community stewards and stakeholders, to mitigate the emerging crisis. "Nearly all of these studies are based in the so-called developed world—North America, Europe, Japan and Australia—and, notably, none are concerned with the Middle East,' he said. 'How then should one start to think about the practice of Middle Eastern archaeology within the context of the region's climate crisis? Rather than begin with the discipline's instinct to 'preserve' and 'protect' the archaeological record," asked Porter. Middle Eastern archaeology in the 19th and early 20th century was directly influenced by European scholar and European imperialism and colonialism. Since World War Two, archaeology has continuously benefitted from European, North American, and now East Asian interests in the Middle East's carbon resources. Critics continue to describe Middle Eastern archaeology as a neo-colonialist enterprise that extracts evidence for Western research priorities under the guise of ethical 'salvaging' of global cultural heritage, the professor explained. Porter noted that this critique is not entirely fair, of course—some of archaeology's most important contributions to the governments that host their research is the discovery and documentation of monuments on which national cultural heritage and tourism destinations are based. "However, even if these contributions are viewed positively, they also serve as reminders that Middle Eastern archaeology is not and has never been a neutral bystander in the region's local and national politics.' 'Invoking archaeology's historical legacy while reflecting on the climate crisis is important as it situates archaeological practice, regardless of the position of its practitioners, within a systemic regime that has already proved harmful to Middle Eastern societies. Setting aside the visible well-documented examples of archaeologists who contributed their research to the region's ethno-national narratives," Porter elaborated. Archaeological practice can create tacit inequities despite the well-intentioned motives of researchers. For instance, local communities that live adjacent to cultural heritage sites often receive very limited benefits beyond seasonal labour and small business patronage despite their participation in the research and site interpretation process, according to Allison Mickel. In some instances, in fact, archaeological research and site development projects have displaced entire communities in the name of preservation and security, such as the relocation of families living in or alongside the archaeological sites of Umm Qais and Petra in northern and southern Jordan, respectively. "Growing awareness of the negative impacts that Middle Eastern communities can experience have led archaeologists to develop more ethically engaged sensibilities and practices in their research programmes," Porter said. To do so, they have drawn on community archaeology models that consider local groups as stakeholders in the documentation and interpretation of cultural heritage. Indeed, these collaborative programmes have grown common in archaeological practice around the work, especially in North American and Australian projects that bring indigenous communities together with archaeologists to achieve shared goals. "Over the past two decades in the Middle East, archaeologists have adopted community archaeology as a framework that can potentially reverse the discipline's imperialist and colonialist legacy. Despite early enthusiasm for the approach, collaborative and community archaeology programs have not been widely adopted. Only a handful of projects have risen in visibility," Porter said. The professor noted that this brief autopsy of community archaeology in the Middle East is key because it is likely the local rural and suburban communities that live alongside archaeological sites that stand to be the most affected by changing climate conditions. "Rural communities who are responsible for supplying a significant portion of the region's food supply will be stressed by warming conditions, erratic winter weather patterns, and increased erosion of valuable soils,' the professor said. 'Archaeological projects, regardless of the extent to which they collaborate with host communities in their research, remain dependent on communities and their businesses for basic services," Porter underscored.
Jordan Times
08-04-2025
- Jordan Times
Southern Levant: Landscape archaeology, social transformations in Early Bronze Age
The Bronze Age site Tell Deir Alla, located in central Jordan (Photo courtesy of ACOR) AMMAN — During the mid-4th to the mid-3rd millennia Cal BC, the southern Levant saw changes in social organisation, settlement character and economy. Settlements became walled, megalithic funerary monuments were built and technological advancement took place. Such changes generally have been explained in the context of the emergence within the region of a number of regional city-states, each centred upon a walled 'town', said British scholar Graham Phillips. 'Although the present discussion is focused upon the internal dynamics of the southern Levant, it is probably no coincidence that these developments were broadly synchronous with major changes in west Asia generally,' said Philip. 'To the North, there was increasing south Mesopotamian contact with North Syria and Anatolia, a process in which the Levant was, at least peripherally, involved,' added Philip from the University of Durham. To the south, the emergence of a state-level polity in Egypt appears to have coincided with increasing Egyptian interest in south-western Palestine, he said. It is hard to imagine that the kinds of changes detailed above could have taken place without corresponding modification in both the physical and conceptual landscapes inhabited by the local population, the scholar continued. The fact that the construction of fortified settlements and major funerary monuments was coincident with a period that witnessed the substantial restructuring of agricultural practices and social organisation suggests that it should be possible to delineate the articulations between the various strands of change through a consideration of the way in which the landscape might have been implicated in these developments, the professor explained. 'The present account represents an attempt to use an approach rooted in 'landscape archaeology' to examine the inter-connected nature of the various developments, and thus to elucidate their combined impact without recourse to the traditional explanatory mechanism of the appearance of state organisations,' Philip elaborated. He noted that the key notion is that landscapes are seen to be composed not simply of physical space but of culturally meaningful 'places.' 'As Knapp and Ashmore point out, 'landscape is an entity that exists by virtue of its being perceived, experienced and contextualised by people', and so is neither a passive backdrop to nor a determinant of culture. As people's senses of place arise from their own particular engagement with the world, notions of place are highly dependent upon individual social, cultural and historical situations,' Philip elaborated. A community's particular sense of place and time will play a key role in structuring the way in which they make use of the available material resources, and thus occupy and manage their environment. In this way landscapes can be seen to constitute social and ideological symbols which shape people's comprehension and experience of the world, Philip explained. The scholar added that humans do not inhabit a neutral geometric space but rather 'experiential landscapes', shaped by beliefs and values and perceived as they move, in the pursuance of their daily activities, through a network of places connected by pathways and routes. 'This is what Barrett has termed people's 'routine occupancy' of the landscape,' he added. 'From this standpoint, it is clear that constructional activity, and other physical modifications to the landscape, such as those consequent upon changing agricultural practices, will create new places, even new kinds of places, and modify existing ones. As a result, the network of routes and patterns of movement will change,' Philip underscored. In this way, human activity transforms not just the physical landscape, but also the way in which it is experienced, both through modified places and changing patterns of movement. As people transform physical spaces into meaningful places through their daily engagement with the material world, the major changes in the nature and organisation of economic activity during the EBA, much of which required direct manipulation of the physical environment, would surely have had a significant impact upon the manner in which 'places' were created and understood, the professor concluded.
