Climate crisis threatens cultural heritage in Middle East — Scholars
The mosaic floor of the Byzantine church in Jerash (Photo courtesy of ACOR)
AMMAN — The climate crisis directly impacts cultural heritage in the Middle East and it will continue to affect historical monuments and sites in the coming decades.
Two recent collections of studies authored by archaeologists demonstrate a growing awareness of the situation, especially as it pertains to coastal and inland river flooding's impact on cultural heritage sites, noted Professor Benjamin Porter from Berkeley University.
The professor added that the authors stress the need to work with various publics, from government policymakers to community stewards and stakeholders, to mitigate the emerging crisis.
"Nearly all of these studies are based in the so-called developed world—North America, Europe, Japan and Australia—and, notably, none are concerned with the Middle East,' he said.
'How then should one start to think about the practice of Middle Eastern archaeology within the context of the region's climate crisis? Rather than begin with the discipline's instinct to 'preserve' and 'protect' the archaeological record," asked Porter.
Middle Eastern archaeology in the 19th and early 20th century was directly influenced by European scholar and European imperialism and colonialism.
Since World War Two, archaeology has continuously benefitted from European, North American, and now East Asian interests in the Middle East's carbon resources. Critics continue to describe Middle Eastern archaeology as a neo-colonialist enterprise that extracts evidence for Western research priorities under the guise of ethical 'salvaging' of global cultural heritage, the professor explained.
Porter noted that this critique is not entirely fair, of course—some of archaeology's most important contributions to the governments that host their research is the discovery and documentation of monuments on which national cultural heritage and tourism destinations are based.
"However, even if these contributions are viewed positively, they also serve as reminders that Middle Eastern archaeology is not and has never been a neutral bystander in the region's local and national politics.'
'Invoking archaeology's historical legacy while reflecting on the climate crisis is important as it situates archaeological practice, regardless of the position of its practitioners, within a systemic regime that has already proved harmful to Middle Eastern societies. Setting aside the visible well-documented examples of archaeologists who contributed their research to the region's ethno-national narratives," Porter elaborated.
Archaeological practice can create tacit inequities despite the well-intentioned motives of researchers. For instance, local communities that live adjacent to cultural heritage sites often receive very limited benefits beyond seasonal labour and small business patronage despite their participation in the research and site interpretation process, according to Allison Mickel.
In some instances, in fact, archaeological research and site development projects have displaced entire communities in the name of preservation and security, such as the relocation of families living in or alongside the archaeological sites of Umm Qais and Petra in northern and southern Jordan, respectively.
"Growing awareness of the negative impacts that Middle Eastern communities can experience have led archaeologists to develop more ethically engaged sensibilities and practices in their research programmes," Porter said.
To do so, they have drawn on community archaeology models that consider local groups as stakeholders in the documentation and interpretation of cultural heritage.
Indeed, these collaborative programmes have grown common in archaeological practice around the work, especially in North American and Australian projects that bring indigenous communities together with archaeologists to achieve shared goals.
"Over the past two decades in the Middle East, archaeologists have adopted community archaeology as a framework that can potentially reverse the discipline's imperialist and colonialist legacy. Despite early enthusiasm for the approach, collaborative and community archaeology programs have not been widely adopted. Only a handful of projects have risen in visibility," Porter said.
The professor noted that this brief autopsy of community archaeology in the Middle East is key because it is likely the local rural and suburban communities that live alongside archaeological sites that stand to be the most affected by changing climate conditions.
"Rural communities who are responsible for supplying a significant portion of the region's food supply will be stressed by warming conditions, erratic winter weather patterns, and increased erosion of valuable soils,' the professor said.
'Archaeological projects, regardless of the extent to which they collaborate with host communities in their research, remain dependent on communities and their businesses for basic services," Porter underscored.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Jordan Times
07-05-2025
- Jordan Times
Czech explorer documents southern Jordan before modern era
Robert Schick presents life and achievements of the Czech Arabist Alois Musil on Tuesday at American Centre of Research (Photo courtesy of ACOR) AMMAN — Long before the rise of modern archaeology in the Middle East, a Czech priest-turned-explorer was meticulously documenting the landscapes, people, and ancient ruins of southern Jordan. Born in 1868 in the Austro-Hungarian Empire, AloisMusil grew up in a bilingual Czech-German farming family in Rychtarov. He studied Roman Catholic theology at the University of Olomouc and was ordained a priest in 1891. His academic journey led him to the Dominican Biblical School in Jerusalem, where he studied from 1895 to 1898, developing fluency in both English and Arabic, skills that would shape his future as an orientalist and explorer. Between 1896 and 1902, Musil conducted extensive ethnographic and archaeological research across southern Jordan, venturing into northern Jordan, Syria, Iraq, and northern Saudi Arabia in the years that followed. His work has been credited with providing the earliest comprehensive documentation of sites such as Petra, Qasr Amra, Rabba, and Faynan. 'Musil was a counterpoint to Lawrence of Arabia,' said independent American researcher Robert Schick during a presentation at the American Center of Research titled 'Alois Musil's Explorations of Southern Jordan in 1896–1902.' 'He was conducting similar research for the Austro-Hungarian army.' Musil served as a soldier during World War I and returned to Czechoslovakia after the war, never setting foot in the Middle East again. He became a professor at the University of Prague, dedicating the rest of his life to publishing his findings. His three-volume work Arabia Petraea—published in German between 1907 and 1908—covers the regions of Moab, Edom, and includes a detailed ethnological travel report. Though less known than his English-language publications, these works remain vital to scholars today. 'His was the first detailed documentation of Petra's rock-cut tombs and monuments,' Schick noted. Musil also created detailed maps and took hundreds of photographs of the areas he explored—visual records that today serve as important ethnological and historical evidence. Among his many achievements, Musil is recognized as the first Western scholar to reach QasrAmra and to write about Rabba, a major settlement on the Karak Plateau before the Crusader era. His observations at Faynan added further depth to the understanding of southern Jordan's ancient history. In 1900, Musil witnessed the Ottoman Empire's efforts to build telegraph lines through Jordan's interior—a sign of the empire's push toward modernization. 'He saw how locals would flee to avoid Ottoman soldiers who confiscated their animals for transport,' Schick said. Musil's camera also captured the cultural life of the region. His collection includes rare images of rabbaba players and traditional Arabic poets, along with thousands of lines of verse that he recorded. Though trained in Biblical studies, Musil's enduring legacy lies in his work as an Arabist and ethnographer. His pioneering documentation continues to inform modern research into the cultural and historical heritage of the region.
Jordan Times
20-04-2025
- Jordan Times
Scholar calls for ‘deeper' use of Ottoman tax registers in Mamluk archaeology
AMMAN — The archaeology of the Mamluk period, as practiced today, is a form of historical archaeology heavily informed by anthropological models, noted an American professor. One methodological development of the last decade has been in the engagement with the written record. The combination of written and material sources is the greatest challenge of any archaeology of historical periods, particularly so with the Mamluk period, which produced a wealth of texts, Professor Bethany Walker said, adding that many excavations and survey reports now include an explanation, however brief, of how historical sources are used. There has been a very gradual shift from dependence on texts for interpreting archaeological data to creating a dialogue between the two in ways that inform project design, the professor said. Because written sources and archaeological data answer different sets of questions about human behaviour and can differ in chronological scale of inquiry, they can and should be used in tandem to write a multi-faceted history of Mamluk societies, Walker explained. 'In short, one data set can inform the other. the challenge is to decide which kinds of sources are most appropriate to the subject at hand and to write a coherent, analytical narrative that uses them in complement with one another," Walker highlighted. The professor added that archaeologists of the Mamluk period ('Middle Islamic' period in archaeological terminology) have generally relied on written sources that are geographically and chronologically useful and readily available in print form (and frequently translated into European languages). Narrative sources (primarily chronicles and geographies) and administrative manuals that help identify sites and provide a historical framework for their physical development. When used responsibly, such sources, in combination with archaeological evidence, can produce a rich narrative of Mamluk history. "What has been largely missing is an engagement with contemporary documentary sources. One notable exception is the early Ottoman tax registers (singular, daftar-imufassal) of the ninth/sixteenth century.' 'During the first century of Ottoman rule in Syria, many elements of the Mamluks' administration in the region were retained, including the general administrative structure, some personnel, and many of the larger landed endowments [awqāf]," Walker underlined. The registers document anticipated income from taxable commodities, though not actual taxes collected, and describe in some detail the status of rural property, whether a settled village (qaryah), a village formerly settled but now abandoned (kharāb), a piece of cultivated land (such as a garden, qiṭʿah), or a tract of cultivated land not associated with a village (mazraʿah). Tax-liable commodities (summer crops, winter crops, livestock, processed agricultural goods and animal by-products such as honey, endowments) are listed along with their estimated revenues, Walker elaborated. Specific references to land tenure and use, along with incidental information, such as how a plot of land was acquired and what its access was to water, are occasionally included. the registers, moreover, are organised according by tax districts, yielding important details on the administrative structure of the region. The registers of 1534, 1538–39, 1551–52 and 1596– 97 are preserved in manuscript form, and from these several segments have been published for Palestine and Jordan. The majority of the publications are in Turkish with Arabic summary and commentary; 11 the most widely cited one, though, is in English. "Unfortunately, these sources have not been used as fully as they could be: The general trend has been to look up an individual site name and determine whether the place was inhabited and its land continued to be cultivated after Ottoman annexation. The registers, however, yield much more important place specific data than this," Walker said. The professor added that the estimated number of households in each location is included and the dhimmīs liable for the jizyah are mentioned in each entry of a qaryah. Although the numbers are not reliable for population statistics, they do reflect the religious composition of villages, a demographic characteristic that is not readily recognisable in the archaeological record. the registers note, though inconsistently, abandoned villages, the location of roads and waterways, and the existence of facilities such as mills. 'In spite of this, their potential for studying environmental and land use has not been realised. Furthermore, because the Ottomans taxed many landed awqāf at a rate of 10 per cent, endowments made during Mamluk rule that were retained as such by the Ottoman state are also named in the registers," Walker underlined. The professor added that in many cases these are the only references we have to these local endowments of grain fields, orchards, and gardens, as they have not been thus far identified in Mamluk-era waqfīyāt or chronicles. They attest to the continued economic viability of agricultural land in the region and provide invaluable data on cropping patterns during the transition from Mamluk to Ottoman rule; the value of this data has been largely overlooked, Walker underlined.
Jordan Times
16-04-2025
- Jordan Times
Climate crisis threatens cultural heritage in Middle East — Scholars
The mosaic floor of the Byzantine church in Jerash (Photo courtesy of ACOR) AMMAN — The climate crisis directly impacts cultural heritage in the Middle East and it will continue to affect historical monuments and sites in the coming decades. Two recent collections of studies authored by archaeologists demonstrate a growing awareness of the situation, especially as it pertains to coastal and inland river flooding's impact on cultural heritage sites, noted Professor Benjamin Porter from Berkeley University. The professor added that the authors stress the need to work with various publics, from government policymakers to community stewards and stakeholders, to mitigate the emerging crisis. "Nearly all of these studies are based in the so-called developed world—North America, Europe, Japan and Australia—and, notably, none are concerned with the Middle East,' he said. 'How then should one start to think about the practice of Middle Eastern archaeology within the context of the region's climate crisis? Rather than begin with the discipline's instinct to 'preserve' and 'protect' the archaeological record," asked Porter. Middle Eastern archaeology in the 19th and early 20th century was directly influenced by European scholar and European imperialism and colonialism. Since World War Two, archaeology has continuously benefitted from European, North American, and now East Asian interests in the Middle East's carbon resources. Critics continue to describe Middle Eastern archaeology as a neo-colonialist enterprise that extracts evidence for Western research priorities under the guise of ethical 'salvaging' of global cultural heritage, the professor explained. Porter noted that this critique is not entirely fair, of course—some of archaeology's most important contributions to the governments that host their research is the discovery and documentation of monuments on which national cultural heritage and tourism destinations are based. "However, even if these contributions are viewed positively, they also serve as reminders that Middle Eastern archaeology is not and has never been a neutral bystander in the region's local and national politics.' 'Invoking archaeology's historical legacy while reflecting on the climate crisis is important as it situates archaeological practice, regardless of the position of its practitioners, within a systemic regime that has already proved harmful to Middle Eastern societies. Setting aside the visible well-documented examples of archaeologists who contributed their research to the region's ethno-national narratives," Porter elaborated. Archaeological practice can create tacit inequities despite the well-intentioned motives of researchers. For instance, local communities that live adjacent to cultural heritage sites often receive very limited benefits beyond seasonal labour and small business patronage despite their participation in the research and site interpretation process, according to Allison Mickel. In some instances, in fact, archaeological research and site development projects have displaced entire communities in the name of preservation and security, such as the relocation of families living in or alongside the archaeological sites of Umm Qais and Petra in northern and southern Jordan, respectively. "Growing awareness of the negative impacts that Middle Eastern communities can experience have led archaeologists to develop more ethically engaged sensibilities and practices in their research programmes," Porter said. To do so, they have drawn on community archaeology models that consider local groups as stakeholders in the documentation and interpretation of cultural heritage. Indeed, these collaborative programmes have grown common in archaeological practice around the work, especially in North American and Australian projects that bring indigenous communities together with archaeologists to achieve shared goals. "Over the past two decades in the Middle East, archaeologists have adopted community archaeology as a framework that can potentially reverse the discipline's imperialist and colonialist legacy. Despite early enthusiasm for the approach, collaborative and community archaeology programs have not been widely adopted. Only a handful of projects have risen in visibility," Porter said. The professor noted that this brief autopsy of community archaeology in the Middle East is key because it is likely the local rural and suburban communities that live alongside archaeological sites that stand to be the most affected by changing climate conditions. "Rural communities who are responsible for supplying a significant portion of the region's food supply will be stressed by warming conditions, erratic winter weather patterns, and increased erosion of valuable soils,' the professor said. 'Archaeological projects, regardless of the extent to which they collaborate with host communities in their research, remain dependent on communities and their businesses for basic services," Porter underscored.
