Runcorn by-election on a knife-edge as recount takes place
Mr Farage said: 'Reform UK have won the Runcorn and Helsby by-election by four votes!
'Labour have demanded a recount. We are very confident we have won.'
It is a dramatic development in a seat which Labour held with a majority of 14,696 in the 2024 general election and came as Reform made gains in local contest across England.
Acting returning officer Stephen Young said: 'Because of the close proximity of the parties, we have agreed to do a full recount of all the ballot papers.'
The Runcorn and Helsby by-election was triggered when former Labour MP Mike Amesbury quit after admitting punching a constituent.
The 2024 result suggests it should be a safe Labour seat – Amesbury won 53% of the vote – but if the recount upholds Reform's lead then Sarah Pochin will be the new MP.
Turnout in the seat was 46.33%, with 32,740 votes cast.
Elsewhere, more than 1,600 council seats were up for grabs across 23 local authorities, along with four regional mayors and two local mayors.
Labour lost seats to Reform in Northumberland while in other parts of the country Mr Farage's party made ground at the expense of the Conservatives.
In her first set of elections as Tory leader, Kemi Badenoch's party is set for a 'battering', with the prospect of losing seats to both Reform and the Liberal Democrats on opposing sides of the political spectrum.
Reform's Dame Andrea Jenkyns, a former Conservative minister, appears on course to win the Greater Lincolnshire mayoral race.
Reform look set to take control of Staffordshire County Council after taking 24 of the 30 seats to be counted overnight, with Conservatives winning the other six.
It means when counting resumes later on Friday, Reform need to win just eight more seats to have a majority on the council.
Mr Farage said he wanted to 'smash the two-party system'.
Reform's deputy leader Richard Tice said the results showed a 'seismic shift going on tonight in British politics, where Reform is is taking huge chunks of votes and seats from both the two main parties'.
He told Sky News the party was also 'absolutely smashing it' in traditionally Conservative Lincolnshire.
Labour Party chairwoman Ellie Reeves said the elections 'were always going to be a challenge' for her party because they were largely in areas 'dominated by the Conservatives, often for decades'.
She acknowledged voters 'aren't yet fully feeling the benefit' of changes brought in since Sir Keir took office.
'However the results turn out this evening, this Labour government will go further and faster in turning our country around and giving Britain the future it deserves,' she said.
But there was some good news for Labour as the party held the North Tyneside mayoralty, although with a majority of just 444 ahead of Reform in second place.
Conservative frontbencher Helen Whately said 'we know we're going to have a really hard night' because 2021 was a 'high watermark' for the Conservatives.
The shadow work and pensions secretary told BBC's Newsnight: 'We're going to get a real battering in these elections.'
Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey said: 'We are expecting to see big gains against the Conservatives in their former Middle England heartlands.'
The Green Party was also hoping for success in local contests, with co-leader Carla Denyer saying: 'We are taking seats from both the Conservatives and Labour up and down the country as voters, understandably, move away from the tired old parties that have let us all down.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
2 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
British steelmakers boosted by change to EU tariffs
The EU has agreed to more than double the UK's tariff-free quota for certain steel products in a move the Government described as a 'direct win' from Sir Keir Starmer's deal with the bloc earlier this year. At May's UK-EU summit, Sir Keir and European Commission President Ursula Von Der Leyen agreed to restore Britain's steel quotas to historic levels after they were slashed in March. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the announcement was 'yet another positive step forward for the UK steel sector' that would give producers 'certainty'. The agreement comes at a difficult time for the industry, which continues to face 25% tariffs on exports to the US. An agreement with President Donald Trump to effectively reduce those tariffs to zero is yet to come into effect, but Britain has been protected from the 50% tariff Mr Trump imposed on steel from the rest of the world last month. UK Steel director general Gareth Stace said Friday's change was 'excellent news' for the sector that had been 'plagued by problems' in exporting steel to the EU. He added: 'The quota will restore historic trade flows and is good news for both UK steelmakers and their EU customers.' The decision means the UK can export 27,000 tonnes of 'category 17' steel – which includes angles and sections of steel – to the EU each quarter without paying tariffs. The figure had been cut to 10,000 tonnes after the EU introduced a cap intended to prevent a single exporter dominating the market. In total, the UK exports around 2.4 million tonnes of steel to the EU, worth nearly £3 billion and accounting for 75% of British steel exports. Ministers expect the change to help protect jobs in the industry, which has been a priority for the Labour Government since coming to power. In April, the Government used an almost unprecedented weekend recall of Parliament to take control of British Steel to prevent the shutdown of its blast furnaces and maintain the UK's primary steel-making capacity. British Steel's interim chief operating officer Lisa Coulson said: 'The removal of EU tariffs on British-made steel is a significant boost to our business. 'The EU is an important market to us, particularly for the products our highly skilled colleagues manufacture in Scunthorpe, Teesside, and Skinningrove.' But Conservative shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith described the quota as 'tiny' and 'embarrassing from a Government which has nothing to show on removing the US tariffs on steel which the PM claimed to have delivered back in May'. He added: 'It's a paltry return for giving up 12 years of fishing rights and tying the energy costs of every business to a higher cost EU emissions regime over which the UK will have no say. 'When Labour nationalised British Steel we said they had no plan. This government by press release shows we were right.'
North Wales Chronicle
2 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Universities ‘on notice' they could face penalties over free speech
Skills minister Baroness Jacqui Smith has said the Government will 'not tolerate the silencing of academics or students who voice legitimate views'. The Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act, which comes into force on Friday, will require universities and colleges in England to promote academic freedom to ensure discussions can take place on campuses without fear of censorship of students, staff or speakers expressing lawful opinions. It also bans universities from using non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) in cases of bullying, harassment and sexual misconduct. The Office for Students (OfS), England's higher education regulator, can investigate universities and colleges and impose fines if it has found they have failed to protect free speech rights. In March, the OfS issued a record penalty of £585,000 to the University of Sussex after a three-and-a-half year probe into the resignation of academic Professor Kathleen Stock. The OfS's investigation found the institution's trans and non-binary equality policy statement had 'a chilling effect' of possible self-censorship of students and staff on campus. It was launched after high-profile protests called for the dismissal of Prof Stock in 2021 over her views on gender identity. Professor Arif Ahmed, director for freedom of speech and academic freedom at the OfS, previously suggested universities could face higher fines in the future if they fail to uphold free speech. Baroness Smith said: 'Academic freedom is non-negotiable in our world-leading institutions, and we will not tolerate the silencing of academics or students who voice legitimate views. 'These strengthened protections make this explicitly clear in law, and the record fine already handed down by the OfS has put universities on notice that they must comply or face the consequences. 'Through our Plan for Change we are restoring our world class universities as engines of growth, opportunity and innovation, and fostering a culture of free inquiry and academic freedom is at the heart of that.' In January, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson announced the Government would be pushing ahead with key measures in the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act. But she announced the 'statutory tort' – which could have allowed individuals to bring legal proceedings against universities that failed to comply with freedom of speech duties – would be removed from the legislation. Ms Phillipson said the tort would create 'costly litigation that would risk diverting resources away from students'. The implementation of legislation, passed under the previous Conservative government in 2023, was paused by Labour in July last year after the general election due to concerns it could be 'burdensome' for universities. A new OfS complaints scheme will allow academics, external speakers and university staff to raise concerns about restrictions on their lawful free speech, which could lead to fines if their free speech is not protected. Students will be able to make complaints to the Office of the Independent Adjudicator. Prof Ahmed said: 'Free speech and academic freedom are fundamental to the quality of students' education and their experience in higher education. 'From today universities and colleges take on new legal duties to secure and promote freedom of speech and academic freedom. 'The OfS's regulatory requirements to prevent and address harassment and sexual misconduct are also fully in place. 'These are an important set of measures which will further protect students from harassment while ensuring that students and academics are free to discuss controversial views, including those which some might find shocking or offensive.'
Rhyl Journal
2 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Universities ‘on notice' they could face penalties over free speech
Skills minister Baroness Jacqui Smith has said the Government will 'not tolerate the silencing of academics or students who voice legitimate views'. The Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act, which comes into force on Friday, will require universities and colleges in England to promote academic freedom to ensure discussions can take place on campuses without fear of censorship of students, staff or speakers expressing lawful opinions. It also bans universities from using non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) in cases of bullying, harassment and sexual misconduct. The Office for Students (OfS), England's higher education regulator, can investigate universities and colleges and impose fines if it has found they have failed to protect free speech rights. In March, the OfS issued a record penalty of £585,000 to the University of Sussex after a three-and-a-half year probe into the resignation of academic Professor Kathleen Stock. The OfS's investigation found the institution's trans and non-binary equality policy statement had 'a chilling effect' of possible self-censorship of students and staff on campus. It was launched after high-profile protests called for the dismissal of Prof Stock in 2021 over her views on gender identity. Professor Arif Ahmed, director for freedom of speech and academic freedom at the OfS, previously suggested universities could face higher fines in the future if they fail to uphold free speech. Baroness Smith said: 'Academic freedom is non-negotiable in our world-leading institutions, and we will not tolerate the silencing of academics or students who voice legitimate views. 'These strengthened protections make this explicitly clear in law, and the record fine already handed down by the OfS has put universities on notice that they must comply or face the consequences. 'Through our Plan for Change we are restoring our world class universities as engines of growth, opportunity and innovation, and fostering a culture of free inquiry and academic freedom is at the heart of that.' In January, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson announced the Government would be pushing ahead with key measures in the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act. But she announced the 'statutory tort' – which could have allowed individuals to bring legal proceedings against universities that failed to comply with freedom of speech duties – would be removed from the legislation. Ms Phillipson said the tort would create 'costly litigation that would risk diverting resources away from students'. The implementation of legislation, passed under the previous Conservative government in 2023, was paused by Labour in July last year after the general election due to concerns it could be 'burdensome' for universities. A new OfS complaints scheme will allow academics, external speakers and university staff to raise concerns about restrictions on their lawful free speech, which could lead to fines if their free speech is not protected. Students will be able to make complaints to the Office of the Independent Adjudicator. Prof Ahmed said: 'Free speech and academic freedom are fundamental to the quality of students' education and their experience in higher education. 'From today universities and colleges take on new legal duties to secure and promote freedom of speech and academic freedom. 'The OfS's regulatory requirements to prevent and address harassment and sexual misconduct are also fully in place. 'These are an important set of measures which will further protect students from harassment while ensuring that students and academics are free to discuss controversial views, including those which some might find shocking or offensive.'
