logo
CATL starts taking investor orders for world's biggest listing this year

CATL starts taking investor orders for world's biggest listing this year

Japan Times12-05-2025

Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd. (CATL) has started taking investor orders for a Hong Kong stock offering that is likely to be the world's biggest listing this year.
CATL, as the Chinese electric vehicle battery giant is known, is seeking to raise as much as HK$41 billion ($5.3 billion), according to its listing document on Monday. That's if the deal is upsized and the greenshoe exercised on top of the base offering of up to HK$31 billion.
The Fujian-based company is marketing shares at a maximum price of HK$263 each, or 1.4% lower than Friday's close in Shenzhen but roughly equivalent to Thursday's. Pricing could be decided as soon as Tuesday and the stock is expected to begin trading May 20.
The shares rose as much as 3.4% in Shenzhen trading, outperforming the benchmark index.
CATL is offering about 118 million shares in the base offering, which could increase to around 136 million if the company upsizes the deal by 15%. With the greenshoe option, the company would be selling nearly 156 million shares.
Cornerstone investors, which agree to hold shares from the deal for at least six months, have committed to buy about $2.6 billion worth of stock, according to the prospectus. They include Chinese state-owned oil company Sinopec, the Kuwait Investment Authority and alternative-asset manager Hillhouse Investment.
CATL said it was doing the deal in the form of a so-called Regulation S offering, which doesn't allow sales to U.S. onshore investors and exempts the issuer from certain U.S. regulatory filing obligations, confirming an earlier report. The limitations on certain types of U.S. investors indicates that U.S.-China tensions may be spilling into the new-listings landscape.
The company also received a waiver from the Hong Kong exchange on the need to carry out a clawback mechanism, which would have required it to allocate more shares to retail investors if demand were high enough, according to the prospectus. The waiver allows for institutional investors to maintain a larger proportion of shares allocated for the Hong Kong listing.
The share offering would more than double proceeds in Hong Kong's market for listings this year, which Bloomberg Intelligence predicts will surge to more than $22 billion. The bonanza's been driven by Chinese companies going ahead with their listing plans in the Asian financial hub despite the turmoil brought on by U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs, which have caused many deals to be postponed in America and Europe.
The deal hasn't come without hurdles.
CATL was put on a Pentagon blacklist in January based on allegations of its links to the Chinese military — something the company has denied repeatedly.
The heat has spread to even some of the banks arranging the deal.
In April, a U.S. congressional committee publicly called on JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bank of America Corp. to stop working on the listing because of CATL's alleged military links — again, denied by the company.
But both American banks stuck with the deal.
After the sale, CATL plans to use much of the proceeds for its ongoing international expansion in Europe, especially for a big factory in Hungary to supply top clients such as Mercedes-Benz. That may help the company widen its lead in the industry, where it has a a market share of roughly 38%, comfortably ahead of its closest challenger, top EV maker BYD's 17%, according to SNE Research.
As for Hong Kong, the deals keep on rolling. Chinese cancer drugmaker Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals is also gearing up for a big listing this month, people familiar with the matter have said.
Besides JPMorgan and Bank of America, joint sponsors of CATL's offering include China International Capital Corp. and China Securities International. Goldman Sachs Group, Morgan Stanley and UBS Group are also arranging the deal.
CATL said it would pay the underwriters a fixed fee of 0.2% of the deal, including shares to be issued if the offering gets upsized and the greenshoe option is exercised. The banks may also receive a 0.6% incentive fee.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S.-China trade truce leaves military-use rare earth issue unresolved
U.S.-China trade truce leaves military-use rare earth issue unresolved

Japan Times

time40 minutes ago

  • Japan Times

U.S.-China trade truce leaves military-use rare earth issue unresolved

The renewed U.S.-China trade truce struck in London left a key area of export restrictions tied to national security untouched, an unresolved conflict that threatens a more comprehensive deal, two people briefed on detailed outcomes of the talks have said. Beijing has not committed to grant export clearance for some specialized rare-earth magnets that U.S. military suppliers need for fighter jets and missile systems, the people said. The United States maintains export curbs on China's purchases of advanced artificial intelligence chips out of concern that they also have military applications. At talks in London last week, China's negotiators appeared to link progress in lifting export controls on military-use rare earth magnets with the longstanding U.S. curbs on exports of the most advanced AI chips to China. That marked a new twist in trade talks that began with opioid trafficking, tariff rates and China's trade surplus, but have since shifted to focus on export controls. In addition, U.S. officials also signaled they are looking to extend existing tariffs on China for a further 90 days beyond the August 10 deadline agreed in Geneva last month, both sources said, suggesting a more permanent trade deal between the world's two largest economies is unlikely before then. The two people who spoke about the London talks requested not to be named because both sides have tightly controlled disclosure. The White House, State Department and Department of Commerce did not immediately respond to requests for comment. China's Foreign and Commerce ministries did not respond to faxed requests for comment. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday the handshake deal reached in London between American and Chinese negotiators was a "great deal," adding, "we have everything we need, and we're going to do very well with it. And hopefully they are too." And U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said there would be no "quid pro quo" on easing curbs on exports of AI chips to China in exchange for access to rare earths. But China's chokehold on the rare earth magnets needed for weapons systems remains a potential flashpoint. China dominates global production of rare earths and holds a virtual monopoly on refining and processing. A deal reached in Geneva last month to reduce bilateral tariffs from crushing triple-digit levels had faltered over Beijing's restrictions on critical minerals exports that took shape in April. That prompted the Trump administration to respond with export controls preventing shipments of semiconductor design software, jet engines for Chinese-made planes and other goods to China. At the London talks, China promised to fast-track approval of rare-earth export applications from nonmilitary U.S. manufacturers out of the tens of thousands currently pending, one of the sources said. Those licenses will have a six-month term. Beijing also offered to set up a "green channel" for expediting license approvals from trusted U.S. companies. Initial signals were positive, with Chinese rare-earths magnet producer JL MAG Rare-Earth, saying on Wednesday it had obtained export licenses that included the United States, while China's Commerce Ministry confirmed it had approved some "compliant applications" for export licenses. But China has not budged on specialized rare earths, including samarium, which are needed for military applications and are outside the fast-track agreed in London, the two people said. Automakers and other manufacturers largely need other rare earth magnets, including dysprosium and terbium. The rushed trade meeting in London followed a call last week between Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping. Trump said U.S. tariffs would be set at 55% for China, while China had agreed to 10% from the United States. Trump initially imposed tariffs on China as punishment for its massive trade surplus to the United States and over what he says is Beijing's failure to stem the flow of the powerful opioid fentanyl into the U.S. Chinese analysts are pessimistic about the likelihood of further breakthroughs before the Aug. 10 deadline agreed in Geneva. "Temporary mutual accommodation of some concerns is possible but the fundamental issue of the trade imbalance cannot be resolved within this time frame, and possibly during Trump's remaining term," said Liu Weidong, a U.S.-China expert at the Institute of American Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. An extension of the August deadline could allow the Trump administration more time to establish an alternative legal claim for setting higher tariffs on China under the Section 301 authority of the USTR in case Trump loses the ongoing legal challenge to the tariffs in U.S. court, one of the people with knowledge of the London talks said. The unresolved issues underscore the difficulty the Trump administration faces in pushing its trade agenda with China because of Beijing's control of rare earths and its willingness to use that as leverage with Washington, said Ryan Hass, director of the John L. Thornton China Center at the Brookings Institution. "It has taken the Trump team a few punches in the nose to recognize that they will no longer be able to secure another trade agreement with China that disproportionately addresses Trump's priorities," Hass said.

Trump blocks California's ban on sales of new gasoline-powered cars
Trump blocks California's ban on sales of new gasoline-powered cars

NHK

time2 days ago

  • NHK

Trump blocks California's ban on sales of new gasoline-powered cars

US President Donald Trump has signed congressional resolutions to block California's ban on the sale of new gasoline-powered cars. California Governor Gavin Newsom has reacted sharply to the move. In 2022, California decided to ban the sale of gas-powered and hybrid cars entirely in the state by 2035. The administration of former President Joe Biden approved the bill in December last year. But the Republican-led Congress passed the resolution in May, reversing the Biden administration's approval. Trump signed the resolutions on Thursday, calling the California plan "a disaster." In response, Newsom said, "We won't let this illegal action by Trump and Republicans in the pockets of polluters stand in the way of commonsense policy to clean our air, protect the health of our kids and compete on the global stage." The governor has reportedly directed state officials to find new ways to promote electric and other clean-energy vehicles. Trump and Newsom have also been at odds over a federal roundup of immigrants in Southern California.

For Trump, resolving U.S.-China trade fight comes at a cost
For Trump, resolving U.S.-China trade fight comes at a cost

Japan Times

time2 days ago

  • Japan Times

For Trump, resolving U.S.-China trade fight comes at a cost

U.S. President Donald Trump is hailing the latest trade framework with China as a game-changing breakthrough. Yet the deal he touted Wednesday represents little more than a reset back to earlier terms — and even that came at a cost. After fresh negotiations in London, tariff rates remain essentially unchanged. Rare earth shipments from China are set to return to pre-April 2 conditions. Meanwhile, a slew of thornier issues, including trade imbalances and malign activity, remain unresolved. While Trump cast the understanding as "GREAT' in a social media post on Thursday, his team acknowledged it largely formalized terms agreed to last month in Geneva, many of which are still shrouded in mystery. To seal the deal, the U.S. had to roll back a promised crackdown on visas for Chinese students. And the back-and-forth exposed that key U.S. industries are reliant on magnets largely sourced from China. "This is basically just a reset that's being packaged by the administration as a substantive agreement,' said Tim Meyer, a professor of international trade law at Duke University's law school. "It's possible in the future, China may have a stronger hand.' Trump came into office promising to radically remake the U.S.-China trade relationship and force Beijing to open markets to more American goods. Recent developments illustrate the difficulty of solving those problems, which have vexed each of the past three presidents. "We're going to be opening up China. That's bigger than what we signed, and I think had we not signed it, that wouldn't be happening,' Trump said Thursday at the White House. "It's going to happen fairly soon.' Going forward, China holds a strong hand because of its dominance supplying rare-earth materials that are essential ingredients in mobile phones, semiconductors and other technology. Trump also made clear how important those stocks are to the U.S., appearing far more eager than Chinese President Xi Jinping to get talks back on track by pining for a phone call for months. What's more, Trump's practice of making sweeping tariff threats — only to back down later — has signaled to other world leaders even modest concessions can secure retreats. Investors have grown so used to the pattern they've adopted the acronym "TACO' — or "Trump Always Chickens Out' — to describe the phenomenon. China has an edge going forward because of its dominance in rare-earth materials that are essential for mobile phones, semiconductors and other technology. | bloomberg "This is a Chinese TACO,' said Scott Kennedy, a China expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "They have seen him in previous instances back down. They made a calculated gamble that he would back down, and he did.' The London talks were narrow by design — meant to touch on issues covered in Geneva — and therefore focused on matters such as rare earths rather than more sweeping problems including the U.S. trade deficit with China, a White House official said. Trump has said Beijing has more to lose in a trade war with the U.S., with its economy facing risks from losing access to the American market, and the recent flare-up underscored that vulnerability, the official said. Trade tensions between the U.S. and China exploded in April, when Trump imposed escalating tariffs on Beijing — reaching as high as 145% — and Xi's government retaliated with its own levies and new curbs on rare earth exports. The two countries lowered the duties in May following two days of trade talks in Geneva, but rates didn't budge further after this week's London negotiations. Trump said Wednesday the U.S. is imposing a 55% tariff on Chinese imports, essentially matching the levels he first laid out April 2. The deliberations this week came after an extended clash over last month's truce. U.S. officials accused China of stalling magnet shipments despite promises in Geneva, while Beijing vented anger with fresh Trump administration controls on chip design software, jet engines and student visas. After a call between Trump and Xi, the two sides agreed to sit down to find an off-ramp. For the U.S. president, who has long promoted himself as a dealmaker, reaching the agreements is often as important — if not more so — than their substance. He also prioritizes getting quick deals done directly with counterpart leaders, in contrast with Xi, who favors negotiations led by lieutenants in order to avoid being blindsided. It took most of Trump's first term to land a "phase one' trade deal with China that ended years of tit-for-tat tariffs; even then, few of Beijing's promised purchases of U.S. goods materialized. Chinese President Xi Jinping. Trade tensions between the U.S. and China exploded in April, when Trump imposed escalating tariffs on Beijing, and Xi hit back with its own levies and new curbs on rare earth exports. | bloomberg This week's announcement is not the final word on a China trade agreement — and it could provide a stepping stone toward a broader deal. Yet it's also unclear the framework will even hold given that the previous accord quickly broke down. Next steps — such as a possible Trump-Xi meeting — are uncertain, though the U.S. president said the leaders had agreed to reciprocal visits. The gyrations risk jeopardizing Trump's ability to secure more concessions in trade talks — especially with Beijing, said Leland Miller, chief executive officer of the China Beige Book and a member of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. "We keep ratcheting up the temperature and then ratcheting it back down, but returning to where we started isn't going back to zero. It's actually a net loss, because it eats up credibility along the way,' Miller said. "This is not just a return to the starting point; it's giving Beijing ammunition.' The relatively incremental progress contrasts with Trump's bold promises to immediately bring China to heel after years of "ripping off' the U.S. And it portends further challenges as the Trump administration struggles to land a range of trade deals with other nations. So far, only one framework agreement, with the U.K., has been finalized. Arrangements with India, Japan, the European Union and others remain works in progress. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick declared Wednesday that the White House is now turning to other deals, saying on CNBC that talks are in "good shape with lots of countries.' Trump also said he intended to send letters to trading partners setting unilateral tariff levels — again repeating an earlier threat to do so within two weeks. The U.S.-China talks also opened a new front in trade negotiations, putting export controls on the table in ways seen untenable before. China showed a new willingness to weaponize its rare earth supplies, and the U.S., in turn, curbed exports of plane parts, ethane used to make plastic and nuclear materials. Lutnick signaled some of those export moves were meant to create leverage for negotiations with Beijing, telling CNBC: "If you want to annoy us, the United States of America under Donald Trump is strong enough to annoy you back equally.' This suggests that some export controls imposed in the name of national security — and designed to keep sensitive technologies out of Beijing's hands — are now up for negotiation. U.S. officials have said, however, they're steadfast on keeping blocks on the most advanced semiconductors. And Trump's team has signaled it's prepared to ramp up controls again, if needed, to secure rare earth flows. Miller said haggling on export controls benefits Beijing. The U.S. exports at issue are equipment that can be used commercially in China or feed "their military machine,' Miller said. "Once you allow these things to be traded, you're giving Beijing leverage that otherwise it does not have.' Markets had a tepid reaction to the news Wednesday, indicating investors have started to become unmoved by Trump's trade pronouncements. Voters are growing increasingly skeptical of Trump's trade agenda. A new Quinnipiac University poll, conducted from June 5 to 9, found that 57% of voters disapproved of his handling of trade.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store