Karoline Leavitt forced to clarify glaring Trump gaffe as White House nails down final details of Putin summit
Leavitt clarified to the Daily Mail during the White House press briefing on Monday that the meeting would take place in Alaska, despite the president's comments.
'Perhaps there are plans in the future to travel to Russia and on Friday the president will be meeting with the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, in Alaska, as you know,' she said.
Trump, however, specifically mentioned that Friday he was going to Russia during his press conference on Monday.
'You know, I'm going to see Putin. I'm going to Russia on Friday,' Trump said in what was widely assumed to be a verbal slip.
Then he did it again.
'We're going to Russia. That's going to be a big deal,' he said later in the press conference.
Trump's comments about Russia triggered his critics who called out the president for his rhetorical mishaps.
Others speculated whether Trump was intentionally referring to Alaska as Russia as a nod to Russia. The state of Alaska was initially Russian territory before the United States purchased it in 1867 for $7.2 million.
But Leavitt's response indicates there's no current plan for Trump to go to Russia.
The high-stakes Trump-Putin summit is scheduled for Friday afternoon in Anchorage, Alaska.
The last time Putin met with an American president was in 2021 at a summit with then-President Joe Biden. Trump last met Putin in 2019 on the sidelines of the G20 in Osaka, Japan.
Russia invaded neighboring Ukraine in 2022 after meeting with Biden and Biden refused to meet with Putin after the war began.
Friday's summit will be the first time Putin has visited the United States since 2015, when the Russian leader met with then-President Barack Obama at the United Nations General Assembly Meeting in New York City on September 28, 2015.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
21 minutes ago
- Reuters
US Supreme Court declines for now to block Mississippi social media age-check law
WASHINGTON, Aug 14 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Thursday to put on hold Mississippi law requiring that users of social media platforms verify their age and that minors have parental consent in a challenge by a trade group whose members include Meta's (META.O), opens new tab Facebook, Alphabet's (GOOGL.O), opens new tab YouTube and Snapchat (SNAP.N), opens new tab. The justices denied a request by NetChoice to block the law while the Washington-based tech industry trade association's legal challenge to the law, which it argues violates the U.S. Constitution's protections against government abridgement of free speech, plays out in lower courts. Justice Brett Kavanaugh in a statement about the court's order said the Mississippi law was likely unconstitutional, but that NetChoice had not met the high bar to block the measure at this early stage of the case. NetChoice had turned to the Supreme Court after the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals let the law take effect even though a judge found it likely runs afoul of the First Amendment. NetChoice sued in federal court in 2024 in a bid to invalidate the law, which was passed unanimously in the state legislature amid concern by lawmakers about the potential negative effects of social media use on the mental health of children. Its emergency request to the justices marked the first time the Supreme Court was asked to consider a social media age-verification law. The law requires that a social media platform obtain "express consent" from a parent or guardian of a minor before a child can open an account. It also states that regulated social media platforms must make "commercially reasonable" efforts to verify the age of users. Under the law, the state can pursue civil penalties of up to $10,000 per violation as well as criminal penalties under Mississippi's deceptive trade practices law. U.S. District Judge Halil Suleyman Ozerden in Gulfport, Mississippi, last year blocked Mississippi from enforcing the restrictions on some NetChoice members. Ozerden issued a second order in June pausing the rules against those members, including Meta and its Instagram and Facebook platforms, Snapchat and YouTube. The 5th Circuit on July 17 issued a one-sentence ruling, opens new tab that paused the judge's order, without explaining its reasoning. Courts in seven states have preliminarily or permanently blocked similar measures, according to NetChoice. Some technology companies are separately battling lawsuits brought by U.S. states, school districts and individual users alleging that social platforms have fueled mental health problems. The companies have denied wrongdoing. NetChoice said the social media platforms of its members already have adopted extensive policies to moderate content for minors and provide parental controls. In its request to the Supreme Court, the state told the justices that age-verification and parental consent requirements "are common ways for states to protect minors."
Finextra
23 minutes ago
- Finextra
Fintech CEOs call on Trump to block banks from imposing 'account access' fees
The CEOs of more than 80 firms in the open banking sphere have written to President Donald Trump calling on him to prevent banks from charging fees to access consumer data. 0 Last October, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) published the Personal Financial Data Rights final rule, giving Americans the right to instruct their banks to share their financial data with third party providers. But, under the new administration's leadership, in May the CFPB moved to have the rule rescinded in a decision that the Financial Technology Association (FTA) described as a "handout to Wall Street banks". Since then, it has emerged that JP Morgan is planning to impose fees on companies wanting to access its clients' bank account data and has gone so far as sending pricing sheets to data aggregators - the intermediaries that link banks and fintechs. In the letter to Trump, made public by the FTA, the open banking CEOS say: "Large banks are taking aggressive action to preserve their market position by imposing exorbitant new 'account access' fees that would prevent consumers from connecting their accounts to better financial products of their choice. "This access is critical to ensuring Americans have control of their own financial lives in a digital economy." The move would undermine consumer choice, "which you vigorously supported during your first Administration," says the letter, adding that if the large banks are successful, it will choke off access to the finances of consumers and businesses, effectively killing competition. The CEOs - from the likes of Brex, Chime, Klarna, Plaid and Sofi - also argue that such a move would cripple innovation in crypto, AI and digital wallets and payments. "We urge you to use the full power of your office and the broader Administration to prevent the largest institutions from raising new barriers to financial freedom," they write.
Metro
23 minutes ago
- Metro
Inside where Trump and Putin will hold crunch summit
All eyes are turning to Alaska, where Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin will have a one-on-one summit centered on Ukraine. With the high-profile meeting just a day away, the main details have been revealed, including the exact location. The US and Russian leaders will come face-to-face at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in the state's largest city, Anchorage. It is Alaska's biggest military base and spans 64,000 acres at the northern end of the city. Surrounded by mountains, glaciers and frigid lakes, the remote installation is home to American fighter jets that historically intercepted Russian aircraft. The base dates back to the Cold War era and was constructed in the 1940s as an air defence and central command center to fend off Soviet opponents. In the 1950s, the base held more than 200 fighter jets and was dubbed 'Top Cover for North America' as its mission was to track and monitor threats from enemies overseas. It was formed in 2010 with the merger of the US Air Force's Elmendorf Air Force Base and the US Army's Fort Richardson. More than 32,000 people reside at the base today, making up about 10% of Anchorage's population. White House officials have said that the installation meets safety requirements for welcoming Trump and Putin. Summit planners found Anchorage to be the most suited, after also considering the state capital of Juneau and the city of Fairbanks, according to CNN. They reportedly decided that Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson was the only site in Anchorage that fulfills security requirements. Officials with the base and White House have declined to disclose specifics around securing the site for the historic meeting. A commander retired from the base last year said the discussion is unlikely to unfold close to area used for sensitive military operations. 'We always had visitors on base from different countries, and obviously not necessarily a Russian citizen on base, but we're always very mindful of that,' David Nahom, who led the Alaskan NORAD region, Alaskan Command and 11th Air Force, told Defense One on Wednesday. 'My guess is these conversations are not going to happen in areas that are required for the mission or would have any security concerns.' More Trending Trump went to Elmendorf-Richardson numerous times during his first term, and in his initial trip in 2019 said that troops stationed there 'serve in our country's last frontier as America's first line of defence'. Trump has expressed optimism on what can be accomplished at the summit toward ending the war in Ukraine. 'I believe now (Putin)'s convinced that he's going to make a deal,' Trump told Fox News Radio on Thursday. 'He's going to make a deal. We're going to find out – I'm going to know very quickly.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Melania Trump threatens to sue Hunter Biden over Epstein link – but he won't apologise MORE: What will happen after Trump's meeting with Putin in Alaska? MORE: Trump and Putin to discuss 'huge untapped potential' for Russia-US economic gains
