Tiny Tuvalu seeks assurance from US its citizens won't be barred
SYDNEY (Reuters) -Tuvalu, a tiny Pacific nation that scientists predict will be submerged by rising seas, said it is seeking written assurance from the United States that its citizens will not be barred from entry after being apparently mistakenly included in a list of 36 countries facing visa bans.
An internal diplomatic cable signed by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio showed the United States, which has already barred entry for citizens from 12 countries, was considering expanding travel restrictions to the 36 countries, including three Pacific Island states, Reuters and other media reported last month.
Nations on the list would have 60 days to take corrective action, the cable showed.
The news had caused significant concern in Tuvalu, whose population of 11,000 is at risk from rising sea levels, and where a third of residents have applied to an Australian ballot for a landmark climate migration visa.
Tuvalu's ambassador to the United Nations, Tapugao Falefou, said he had been told by a U.S. official that Tuvalu's inclusion on the list was "an administrative and systemic error on the part of the U.S. Department of State".
In a statement on Tuesday, Tuvalu's government said it had not received any formal notification that it was on the list, and had also been assured by the United States embassy in Fiji it was "an error within the system".
"The Embassy has provided verbal assurances that there are no current restrictions on Tuvaluan nationals entering the United States, and that the matter is being reviewed with authorities in Washington," the statement from Tuvalu's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Labour and Trade said.
It added Tuvalu was seeking a "formal written confirmation to that effect and continues to engage the U.S. Government to ensure Tuvaluans are not unfairly affected".
The embassy did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
A U.S. official familiar with visa policy who is not authorized to speak publicly told Reuters "no decisions have been made, and any speculation is premature".
"Tuvalu's public statement mischaracterizes and omits some of the valid concerns the United States has with travelers from that country," the official added.
The other Pacific Islands listed in the cable were Vanuatu and Tonga.
Tonga's government had received an official U.S. warning, and was working on a response, Tonga media reported.
Vanuatu's government did not respond to a request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
JD Vance has 30-point lead over 2028 rivals despite Trump listing him behind Marco Rubio, new poll finds
President Donald Trump has about three years and six months left in his second term, but one top GOP figure has already opened up a commanding lead in the race to succeed him as the Republican Party standard-bearer. An Emerson College poll released on Friday revealed that Vice President J.D. Vance has a whopping 34-percent lead in a hypothetical Republican primary race over his next-closest potential rival, Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The survey found Vance garnering support from 46 percent of GOP primary voters, while Rubio only received 12 percent. The next-highest hypothetical vote-getters were Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., with DeSantis — who unsuccessfully challenged Trump for the GOP nomination in last year's election, getting 9 percent of support, while Kennedy garnered support from 5 percent of respondents despite being a registered Independent, not a Republican. Vance's commanding lead among potential Republican primary voters could be an indicator that the GOP faithful see him as the natural heir to Trump's nationalist-populist iteration of Republicanism. But it could also be a result of Vance's high-profile role giving him higher name recognition than Rubio despite the ex-Florida senator spending years on the national political scene. Trump, who has often floated — perhaps in jest — the idea of running for and serving an unconstitutional third term, has been reluctant to throw support behind any possible political heir so early in his term. But in an interview with NBC News last month, the president seemed to favor his fellow Floridian over his current vice president when asked who he saw as a successor, mentioning Rubio's name before Vance's during an appearance on Meet the Press. 'You look at Marco, you look at J.D. Vance, who's fantastic … you look at — I could name 10, 15, 20 people right now just sitting here,' he said after moderator Kristen Welker asked about his confidence that his brand of MAGA republicanism would outlast his time in the White House. A White House official later told NBC that they'd been surprised by Trump elevating Rubio's name over Vance's, but it wasn't exactly out of place for the president to do so given his history of stoking and reveling in competition and rivalry among his inner circle. Another White House aide said Trump sees both men as 'both very loyal and very talented,' while an ally of the ex-Florida senator said people in Rubio's orbit are 'feeling really good about how things are playing out' given Trump's decision to allow Rubio to also serve as his national security adviser — the first time a president has allowed his Secretary of State to have that dual role since Henry Kissinger did so under President Richard Nixon five decades ago. The Rubio ally acknowledged Vance has the advantage in an eventual GOP primary race but said the Secretary of State has 'the pole position' should the vice president falter for any reason. Another Rubio ally noted that in Trump-era politics, one can fall just as fast as one can rise. 'Vance is the guy for now, but as we have seen, for now isn't forever,' they said.
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Trump's remittance tax aims to slow illegal immigration by targeting the money flow
The Senate's version of the "one big, beautiful bill" includes a tiny, 1% tax on international cash transfers — called a remittance tax — which, according to experts, will have a major impact on immigrants working in the U.S. A remittance is a money transfer to another country outside the U.S., which is a common practice among immigrant workers who send part of their wages back to family in their native countries. Tens of billions of dollars in remittances are sent to other countries from the U.S. every year. Earlier versions of the bill included higher tax rates and specifically targeted illegal immigrants sending money outside the U.S. The current version of the "big, beautiful bill," however, imposes a 1% fee only on cash transfers, not electronic transfers, sent to other countries. U.S. citizens who want to send cash to other countries will also be subject to the 1% tax. The tax is expected to generate $10 billion in extra revenue for the federal government, according to an estimate done by Politico. Besides generating extra revenue, Lora Ries, director of the Border Security and Immigration Center at The Heritage Foundation, told Fox News Digital that the remittance tax has the potential to discourage illegal immigration into the U.S. by making it harder to send money back home. "Illegal aliens generally want five things when coming to the U.S.: to enter, to remain here, work, send money home (remittances), and bring family and/or have children here," she explained. "Prevent those five things, and you prevent illegal immigration and encourage self-deportation." The administration has been pushing hard for illegal immigrants to self-deport, incentivizing them by offering to front the cost of commercial flights and providing a $1,000 stipend to those who opt to self-deport. Ries said the remittance tax could be another effective strategy besides ICE raids that could help to crack down on illegal immigration into the country and reduce the number of illegal immigrants in the U.S. Ries said, however, that the 1% needs to be much higher to be effective. "A 1% tax only on cash transfers does very little. The tax should be much higher and cover all types of money transfers," she said. "Until now, the U.S. government has not touched the annual billions of dollars going out of the country, not benefiting the U.S. economy," she went on. "Remittances should be taxed to discourage unauthorized employment and its earnings." Meanwhile, Ariel Ruiz Soto, a senior policy analyst at the Migration Policy Institute, told Fox News Digital that though he believes the remittance tax will have a significant impact, it may not be in the way the Trump administration hopes. He argued that discouraging remittances to countries like El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras — where such payments account for more than 20% of the GDP — could actually drive more migration from those nations. "If you're Honduras, if you're El Salvador and Guatemala, even a 1% tax, if it decreases the remittances, could actually be a significant toll in the development of those countries," he said. "If the remains were actually to decrease significantly, that could potentially backfire on President Trump's agenda to reduce irregular migration because he could actually make circumstances, economic circumstances in these countries more difficult and spur new irregular immigration in the future." The House of Representatives is currently considering the Senate's version of the "big, beautiful bill."
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
AIM-260 Air-To-Air Missile Funding To Start Production Sought In New Budget
For the first time, at least publicly, the U.S. Navy and U.S. Air Force are seeking funds – nearly $670.5 million in total – to support procurement of AIM-260A Joint Advanced Tactical Missiles (JATM) for operational use in its latest annual budget request. The two services, collectively, are asking for almost $687 million more for the ongoing development of the secretive JATM next-generation long-range air-to-air missile. The U.S. military, as a whole, began releasing parts of its proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2026 yesterday, something that typically occurs much earlier in the year. On the procurement front, the Navy is seeking $301.858 million for the AIM-260A, while the Air Force is asking for $368.593 million. The Navy and the Air Force also want $222.782 and $425,029 for JATM, respectively, on the research and development side. The AIM-260A is being developed as a successor to the AIM-120 Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM) in U.S. military service. Details about the JATM's design remain highly classified, but a central known requirement is that it has to have substantially longer range than the AIM-120, but in a package with the same general form factor. It is also expected to have advanced guidance and networking capabilities, as you can learn more about here. Specific details about what the requested procurement funding for the AIM-260A in Fiscal Year 2026 would be used for are classified. When it comes to missiles, procurement money is often used to pay for long-lead-time materials to help prime the production pump, as well as acquire complete munitions and other ancillary items. What role classified funding streams may still play in supporting the JATM program is unclear. Also of note, there is $221 million for the Special Update Programs line item that was understood to previously be housing AIM-260 JATM, and the US Navy is requesting $302 million for JATM as well. — Colby Badhwar (@ColbyBadhwar) June 26, 2025 Still, any public movement forward on actually procuring AIM-260As is a significant development. JATM has been in the works since at least 2017. As of 2019, the goal was to begin fielding the missiles in 2022. There are no indications that this has occurred, even on a limited level. Testing of the AIM-260A, including live-fire shots, has been ongoing in the interim. The open addition of the procurement funding in the U.S. military's proposed Fiscal Year 2026 budget follows a notable surge in JATM live-fire test activity last year. The U.S. military's latest annual budget request does make clear that AIM-260A development is ongoing. Interestingly, this also marks the first time that the service publicly asked for JATM research and development funding. The Navy's JATM research and development funding request has also notably emerged in a Special Access Program (SAP) line item, nicknamed Link Plumeria, which has been used to support other advanced aviation efforts in the past. This includes the F/A-XX sixth-generation naval fighter program, which is now set to be effectively shelved to help prioritize work on the U.S. Air Force's new F-47, as you can read more about here. SAPs provide additional layers of heavily compartmented security protocols to protect against the disclosure of especially sensitive national security information. The Navy's F/A-18E/F Super Hornets and Air Force F-22 Raptor stealth fighters are expected to be among the first U.S. aircraft to be armed with AIM-260As, but other types will surely follow. The upcoming F-47 will likely feature it prominently. The Air Force has also said in the past that JATM will be part of the arsenal for its future Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) drones. In general, Navy and Air Force officials have talked about the AIM-260A being a priority development effort in the past, especially in the context of planning for a potential future conflict with China in the Pacific. The emergence of China's PL-15 air-to-air missile in 2016 is known to have been a key driver behind starting the JATM program in the first place. Pakistan's combat employment of PL-15-series missiles, as well as its Chinese-made J-10 fighters, global firsts for both systems, drew particular attention during a brief, but intense conflict with India earlier this year. China has also been surging ahead with other longer-range air-to-air missile developments, as have Russia and other countries. The U.S. Air Force warned last year that air-to-air and/or surface-to-air missiles with ranges of up to 1,000 miles look set to be part of the threat ecosystem facing American forces by 2050. The U.S. military also has its own developments in this regard, including the Navy's AIM-174B air-launched version of the Standard Missile-6 (SM-6), which the service formally unveiled last year. TWZ previously explored in detail how the AIM-174B and AIM-260A will fit into the Navy's overarching future air combat strategy. Though it remains unclear when the AIM-260A might begin to enter the U.S. service, the Navy and the Air Force are now openly taking steps toward actually acquiring an operational stock of the missiles. Contact the author: joe@
