logo
Robert Clive: Why the founder of British Indian empire slit his own throat

Robert Clive: Why the founder of British Indian empire slit his own throat

iStock Robert Clive the first British Governor of the Bengal Presidency 18th Century
On a grey November morning in 1774, London was buzzing with a shocking story. Robert Clive, Baron Clive of Plassey, called by some the founder of Britain's Indian Empire and by others its 'most shameless plunderer', was dead.Horace Walpole, the witty politician, told friends Clive had 'cut his own throat.' Lady Mary Coke, an English noblewoman, wrote in her diary that he had 'killed himself.' Some said a razor was found by his side, others whispered about opium. The coroner's report gave no clear cause, but many believed Britain's most famous 'nabob' had ended his own life. It was, some thought, a fitting end for a man whose rise had been as ruthless as his fall.
Also Read: After Jhansi ki Rani, another queen fought the BritishRobert Clive was born in 1725 in the small Shropshire village of Styche. As a boy, he was described in books as restless, quick-tempered, and full of ambition. Local tales say he once climbed a church tower and sat on the edge, legs dangling high above the ground, showing early that he was not easily scared.
At around 19, with little to keep him in England, Clive sailed to Madras as a junior clerk for the East India Company. It was 1744, and the Company was still a trading business, not yet an empire. But India at that time was divided between rival princes and competing European powers. In this chaos, Clive's boldness, cunning, and skill for planning found their place.
By 1751, the French-backed Chanda Sahib threatened British influence in southern India. Clive, still only a junior officer, proposed seizing Arcot, a bold strike deep in enemy territory. Marching 200 British troops and 300 sepoys through monsoon rains, he took the town without resistance. For 50 days, his force held against an army ten times its size.Historian Thomas Babington Macaulay romanticised this siege, '…the commander who had to conduct the defence… had been bred as a book-keeper… After three desperate onsets, the besiegers retired… the garrison lost only five or six men.'William Pitt the Elder, Prime Minister, called him a 'heaven-born general,' a title Clive wore proudly, though he had never had formal military training.Also Read: When Bengali gym bros flexed muscles against the BritishSix years later came the event that made Clive's name, and his fortune. In 1756, Siraj-ud-Daulah, the new Nawab of Bengal, took control of Calcutta. After the 'Black Hole' incident, where many British captives died, Clive set out to retake the city.On 23 June 1757, at Plassey, Clive faced 50,000 men with only 3,000. But the real battle had been fought in secret, key Nawabi commanders, including Mir Jafar, had already been promised British gold and power. The Nawab's army broke apart before any large fight.Some in Britain called it military genius. Others saw it as plain bribery and betrayal. Either way, Bengal, the richest province in India, passed into Company control. Historians agree this was a turning point in the creation of British rule in India.Clive returned to England in 1760 with a fortune that made him one of the wealthiest men in the country, £234,000 in cash from Bengal's new ruler, plus a jagir worth £30,000 a year. He bought estates, secured a seat in Parliament, and in 1762 was made Baron Clive of Plassey. Pitt repeated his 'heaven-born general' praise.But the public mood was shifting. To many, Clive and his fellow 'nabobs' were symbols of greed. In Parliament, he was accused of plunder and corruption. His infamous defence, that he was 'astonished at my own moderation' given how much more he might have taken, only deepened his villainous image.
Also Read: Narco-colonialism: How Britain exploited Indians for its drug trade with China By 1765, Bengal's finances were collapsing under Company misrule. Clive returned, this time to consolidate rather than conquer. At the Treaty of Allahabad, he secured from the Mughal Emperor the diwani, the right to collect taxes in Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa. This single stroke made the Company the true ruler of Bengal.He restructured the army, raised salaries to curb petty graft, and banned officials from accepting private gifts, not out of altruism, but to ensure the Company's monopoly on wealth. When he left in 1767, he had built the fiscal skeleton of the British Raj, a system designed to feed London's coffers at Bengal's expense.Back in England, famine in Bengal (1769–1773) stirred outrage. Critics linked it to the Company's revenue demands, and Clive was twice called before Parliament. Though exonerated in 1773, the inquiries dragged on his health and reputation. Edmund Burke and other MPs painted him as the embodiment of imperial greed.Clive's body failed him, too. He suffered from gallstones, dulled the pain with opium, and sank into depression. On 22 November 1774, he was found dead at his home in Berkeley Square. Horace Walpole told the story of the razor. Historic UK later wrote bluntly that he 'committed suicide by cutting his own throat.'Some still call Clive the 'Founder of the British Empire in India.' Others, like historian William Dalrymple, have called him 'a vicious asset-stripper.' The National Army Museum calls him 'a greedy speculator.' Perhaps, as noted in many modern reports, he was both: a man who built the foundations of Britain's Indian empire while filling his own pockets. His life's story is one of conquest without mercy, wealth without pity, and an end as dark as the means by which he rose.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Memorial event honours victims of partition tragedy
Memorial event honours victims of partition tragedy

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Memorial event honours victims of partition tragedy

Kanpur: On the occasion of Partition Horrors Remembrance Day, a memorial event was organised at the Veerangana Rani Lakshmibai Auditorium located at Chhatrapati Shahuji Maharaj University, honouring the countless unnamed victims of the 1947 partition. The programme began with a two-minute silence in tribute to those who perished during the tragedy. District magistrate Jitendra Pratap Singh said ," In the tragedy of partition, we lost a significant part of our nation. In 1947, there was a massive displacement of people in the Indian subcontinent, with nearly a million people losing their lives. These people endured countless difficulties and struggles, contributing immeasurably to the progress of independent India today." CDO Deeksha Jain said that the suffering of those who endured the tragedy of partition cannot be expressed in words. In their honour, records from the national archives related to the partition and books on the historical tragedy were displayed. The exhibition depicted the role of the British and the Muslim league in the partition, the uncertain journeys of people during the partition, the perspective of the contemporary press, and the horrific violence against women. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Diversify your portfolio with Edelweiss NFO Edelweiss Mutual Fund AMC Undo A large number of people visited the exhibition. Mahesh Meghani, the general secretary of the UP Sindhi Society, said, "The Sindhi community endured the tragedy of 1947. We believe in the tricolour and salute the land." A short film on partition was also shown. Surendra Awasthi, the representative of the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly, paid tribute to the partition victims. tnn Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Independence Day wishes , messages , and quotes !

Government Approves Recognition for NMMC CBSE Schools
Government Approves Recognition for NMMC CBSE Schools

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Government Approves Recognition for NMMC CBSE Schools

Navi Mumbai: Two CBSE schools of Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation (NMMC) received permanent recognition from govt, extending their affiliation with CBSE board until 2030. The schools, School No 93, CBSE School Seawood Sector 50, and School No 94, Koparkhairane Sector 11, were inaugurated on Aug 4, 2018, to provide quality English medium education to lower and lower middle-class students in Navi Mumbai civic area. The recognition marks a significant achievement for the NMMC Education Department. Municipal commissioner Dr Kailas Shinde, along with his team, played pivotal roles in securing this status, said an official from the education department of NMMC. Admissions for Class 1 began in the academic year 2018, with subsequent classes introduced each year through class rotation. Currently, both schools offer education from Class 1 to Class 8 and are equipped with smart TVs, CCTV cameras, computer rooms, digital classrooms, supplementary nutrition, sports facilities, and qualified teachers, said Shinde. School No 94, Koparkhairane, was honoured as a 'PM Shri School' at the central level, reflecting the high standards achieved. "The schools have witnessed increasing student enrolment and positive responses from the community," said an official. "This is a milestone in the quality educational journey of NMMC," stated Shinde. An atmosphere of enthusiasm prevails among students, bolstered by the schools' government recognition and the continuous efforts of the education department. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Independence Day wishes , messages , and quotes !

Buddhist Piprahwa relics have finally returned, but is India's heritage free yet?
Buddhist Piprahwa relics have finally returned, but is India's heritage free yet?

Economic Times

timean hour ago

  • Economic Times

Buddhist Piprahwa relics have finally returned, but is India's heritage free yet?

Urn our keep: Late Mauryan Brahmi inscription on a steatite vase from a Piprahwa stupa that reads, 'Relics of the Buddha Lord', Indian Museum, Kolkata On July 30, gem-encrusted relics believed to be linked to the Buddha's ashes finally returned to India. In 1898, a team led by British civil engineer and indigo plantation owner William Claxton Peppe excavated a stupa in his estate in Piprahwa, in today's Uttar Pradesh. The team found relics associated with Shakya clan, the community to which the Buddha belonged. The most sacred caskets were handed over to colonial authorities and deposited in the Indian Museum in Calcutta. But Peppe, reportedly with state consent, retained a portion of the find: roughly 20% of the stones, categorised at the time as 'duplicates'. Narendra Modi rightly called the repatriation of the Piprahwa relics 'a joyous day for our cultural heritage'. The items, including over 300 gem-encrusted stones, had vanished from public view, and were taken outside colonial India. Last month, they were about to be auctioned off by Sotheby's in Hong Kong on behalf of Peppe's descendants for an estimated $13 mn, when GoI intervened. On the 78th anniversary of India's independence, behind the deserved celebration of the relics' return lies a deeper reckoning: what legal memory still governs ownership of culture in postcolonial India? It's a reminder of what remains unreconciled: colonial-era laws that governed whose heritage was protected, whose discoveries were criminalised, and whose claims still shape the institutional memory of India's cultural past. Indian Treasure Trove Act of 1878 was repealed in 2018. But its legal and moral legacy continues to haunt our understanding of cultural ownership. Peppé, reportedly with state consent, retained a portion of the find: roughly 20% of the gem-encrusted stones. The Piprahwa repatriation is not just an act of diplomatic triumph. It is also a case study of the legal double standards that once underwrote empire, and which linger in the deep and accommodating shadows of museums and markets. Now that repatriation has gained momentum across former colonising and colonised states, what structural work remains to be done?Unlike the treatment meted out to the Peppe family, there were many cases of Indian villagers unearthing buried objects. These finders were subsequently prosecuted under the Indian Treasure Trove Act. In the 1914 'Mala Naicker And Anr. vs Unknown' case, two Tamil labourers were sentenced for failing to report a discovery of 'treasure' to the 'nearest government treasury'. In the 1938 'Govindaraja Pillai vs Vanchinatham Pillai' case, six men in Madras Presidency were convicted for not disclosing an uncovered 'treasure trove'.These cases reflected how the Act operated in practice. On paper, the 1878 law required anyone who found treasure worth more than ₹10 to report it to the collector. If no rightful owner could be identified, the treasure was to be claimed by the British crown. In principle, the law applied to all. In practice, enforcement targeted Indian subjects, particularly poor and/or rural finders, while British officials and landowners were often exempt from scrutiny or do not have a complete registry of enforcement actions under the Act. But, to date, no public record exists of cases involving prosecution of British or European residents. The Peppe case illustrates how easily colonial privilege could reclassify sacred relics as private heirlooms, all under the law. The result was a selective legal ecosystem: privatised for some, and weaponised against Buddha's relics were, for over a century, kept from Indian scholars, pilgrims and institutions. Their retrieval is both overdue and meaningful. But restitution is not the same as redress - not for those whose names were never remembered, whose prosecutions were never questioned and whose claims were dismissed, not because they were weak, but because they were 'native'.Even now, the Act's influence endures in regulatory ambiguity, including gaps in enforcement of Antiquities and Art Treasures Act 1972 that surrounds antiquities, in the often-unchallenged authority of global auction houses, and in the persistent hesitation of museums to revisit the provenance of their we are to move from symbolic restitution to substantive redress, India must begin a historical inventory. That means building a transparent, public database of repatriated and contested cultural objects, including those held in private collections, auction pipelines or museums also requires a systematic review of acquisition records in our institutions, many of which still carry the legacy of colonial-era curatorial practices. Without such a reckoning, we risk treating each return as an isolated triumph, rather than part of a broader, unfinished narrative - one in which cultural memory is still being negotiated, and justice remains means revisiting narratives we tell - and don't tell - about who found what, who kept it and who was punished. It means acknowledging that many stories of cultural theft are not just about missing objects but also, and importantly, about missing return of the Piprahwa relics is a rare act of historical rightness. But it should not be mistaken for closure. Cultural heritage is not just about the past. It is about power: who defines what is sacred, what is legal and who is allowed to Buddha has come home. Now, let us ask: whose stories are still in exile? (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Tariffs, tantrums, and tech: How Trump's trade drama is keeping Indian IT on tenterhooks Good, bad, ugly: How will higher ethanol in petrol play out for you? As big fat Indian wedding slims to budget, Manyavar loses lustre As 50% US tariff looms, 6 key steps that can safeguard Indian economy Stock Radar: JSPL forms Ascending Triangle pattern on weekly charts, could hit fresh 52-week high soon Nifty and business are different species: 5 small-cap stocks from different sectors with upside potential of up to 30% F&O Radar | Deploy Bear Put Spread in Nifty to play index's negative stance amid volatility Wealth creation: Look beyond the obvious in some things; 10 fertilizer sector companies worth watching

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store