Pakistan to nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan said on Saturday it would recommend U.S. President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, an accolade that he has said he craves, for his work in helping to resolve the recent conflict between India and Pakistan.
Some analysts in Pakistan said the move might persuade Trump to think again about potentially joining Israel in striking Iran's nuclear facilities. Pakistan has condemned Israel's action as a violation of international law and a threat to regional stability.
In May, a surprise announcement by Trump of a ceasefire brought an abrupt end to a four-day conflict between nuclear-armed foes India and Pakistan. Trump has since repeatedly said that he averted a nuclear war, saved millions of lives, and grumbled that he got no credit for it.
Pakistan agrees that U.S. diplomatic intervention ended the fighting, but India says it was a bilateral agreement between the two militaries.
'President Trump demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship through robust diplomatic engagement with both Islamabad and New Delhi, which de-escalated a rapidly deteriorating situation,' Pakistan said. 'This intervention stands as a testament to his role as a genuine peacemaker.'
Governments can nominate people for the Nobel Peace Prize. There was no immediate response from Washington. A spokesperson for the Indian government did not respond to a request for comment.
Trump has repeatedly said that he's willing to mediate between India and Pakistan over the disputed Kashmir region, their main source of enmity. Islamabad, which has long called for international attention to Kashmir, is delighted.
But his stance has upended U.S. policy in South Asia, which had favored India as a counterweight to China, and put in question previously close relations between Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
In a social media post on Friday, Trump gave a long list of conflicts he said he had resolved, including India and Pakistan and the Abraham accords in his first term between Israel and some Muslim-majority countries. He added: 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do.'
Pakistan's move to nominate Trump came in the same week its army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, met the U.S. leader for lunch. It was the first time that a Pakistani military leader had been invited to the White House when a civilian government was in place in Islamabad.
Trump's planned meeting with Modi at the G7 summit in Canada last week did not take place after the U.S. president left early, but the two later spoke by phone, in which Modi said 'India does not and will never accept mediation' in its dispute with Pakistan, according to the Indian government.
Mushahid Hussain, a former chair of the Senate Defence Committee in Pakistan's parliament, suggested nominating Trump for the peace prize was justified.
'Trump is good for Pakistan,' he said. 'If this panders to Trump's ego, so be it. All the European leaders have been sucking up to him big time.'
But the move was not universally applauded in Pakistan, where Trump's support for Israel's war in Gaza has inflamed passions.
'Israel's sugar daddy in Gaza and cheerleader of its attacks on Iran isn't a candidate for any prize,' said Talat Hussain, a prominent Pakistani television political talk show host, in a post on X. 'And what if he starts to kiss Modi on both cheeks again after a few months?'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
India will 'never' restore Pakistan water treaty
NEW DELHI: New Delhi will "never" reinstate a key water treaty it suspended with Pakistan over deadly violence in India-administered Kashmir, the interior minister said in an interview published Saturday. India halted the agreement following an April attack on civilians which it accused Pakistan of backing, a charge denied by Islamabad and one which was followed by days of fighting between the two foes. Despite a ceasefire holding, India's interior minister said his government would not restore the treaty which governs river water critical to parched Pakistan. "It will never be restored," interior minister Amit Shah told the Times of India. "We will take the water that was flowing to Pakistan to Rajasthan (state) by constructing a canal. Pakistan will be starved of water that it has been getting unjustifiably," he added. The 1960 Indus Water Treaty gave India and Pakistan three Himalayan rivers each and the right to hydropower and irrigation resources. It established the India-Pakistan Indus Commission, which is supposed to resolve any problems that arise. Islamabad last month said the treaty was a "no-go area", after New Delhi announced it would maintain its suspension following the ceasefire. "The treaty can't be amended, nor can it be terminated by any party unless both agree," Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar said. Halting the water agreement was one of a series of tit-for-tat diplomatic measures taken by both countries in the immediate aftermath of the Kashmir attack. New Delhi has not made public any evidence of Islamabad's alleged involvement in the April 22 killing by gunmen of mostly Indian tourists. During the four days of fighting which followed in May, more than 70 people were killed in missile, drone and artillery fire. It was the worst standoff between the nuclear-armed neighbours since 1999.
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Netanyahu battling to swing Trump and US behind Iran war
SINCE launching air strikes on Iran last week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been working to pull President Donald Trump into the war, and sway a sceptical American public. In his daily calls and public statements, Israel's longest-serving prime minister has mixed praise and deference for the US leader, while also arguing that the strikes on Iran benefit Americans. "Do you want these people to have nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them to you?" he asked during an interview on Fox News last Sunday. "Today, it's Tel Aviv. Tomorrow, it's New York," he told ABC News a day later, arguing that Iran was working on longer-range missiles that would be able to reach US shores in the future. His media blitz came after intensive and not always harmonious exchanges between Netanyahu and Trump this year, with the Israeli leader welcomed twice to the White House since the Republican's return to power in January. The New York Times, citing unnamed US administration sources, reported on Tuesday that Netanyahu had in an April meeting asked Trump for US-made bunker-busting bombs capable of reaching Iran's underground Iranian nuclear facilities — but had been refused. Having been elected in opposition to US entanglements overseas and supposed "war-mongers" in the Democratic party, Trump was seen as reluctant to commit Washington to another unpopular war in the Middle East. Much of his right-wing Make America Great Again (MAGA) coalition is staunchly anti-interventionist, including Vice-President J.D. Vance, his head of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, and influential media figures such as Steve Bannon and Tucker Carlson. But speaking on Wednesday, the president stated that he was considering joining the Israeli campaign directly, raising the possibility of the bunker-busting GBU-57 bombs being deployed against Iran's main underground uranium stockpile facility in Fordo. "I may do it, I may not do it," Trump said at the White House when asked if he had decided on US air strikes. His final decision will come "within the next two weeks", he said on Thursday. Yossi Mekelberg, a Middle East expert at the London-based Chatham House think-tank, said Netanyahu had been clever in his dealings with Trump, appealing to his "vanity" with charm as well "using his weaknesses". Once he had received an "amber light" in private from the US leader to launch the attacks last Friday, "he knew Trump's personality and knew that Trump might come on board if there was a chance of claiming glory in some way or claiming some sort of credit", he told AFP. Trump has praised the success of the Israeli military campaign, which has combined targeted assassinations of key military personnel, destruction of Iran's air defences and repeated strikes on nuclear sites. Eliot A. Cohen, a veteran former US State Department adviser and international relations expert at Johns Hopkins University in Washington, cautioned against overstating Netanyahu's personal influence, however. "I suspect this is much less about Netanyahu's influence than Trump's own view of the Iranian nuclear programme, his memory of the assassination plot against him in 2024 by Iranian agents, and the success of the initial Israeli operations," he said. An Iranian man has been charged in connection with an alleged plot to kill Trump before his election last November. Cohen said Netanyahu's lobbying could succeed for several reasons. "They are not asking for anything other than the bombing of Fordo," he said, referring to the deeply buried underground uranium enrichment facility. "Nobody is talking about an invasion or anything like that." A poll by the survey group YouGov for The Economist magazine conducted last weekend found half of Americans viewed Iran as an "enemy" and another quarter said it was "unfriendly". But it found that only 16 per cent of Americans "think the US military should get involved in the conflict between Israel and Iran". It found that majorities of Democrats (65 per cent), independents (61 per cent) and Republicans (53 per cent) opposed military intervention. Speaking on his War Room podcast on Wednesday, former Trump strategist Bannon seethed that Netanyahu had "lectured" America and started a war he couldn't end on his own. "Quit coming to us to finish it," he said.
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Sign of sovereignty: Prabowo skips G-7 for Russia, drawing scrutiny over Indonesia's neutrality
JAKARTA (The Straits Times/ANN): Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto's decision to skip the recent Group of Seven (G-7) summit in favour of visiting Russia was not a blunt snub to the West, but a clear signal of his assertive and personalised approach to foreign policy, analysts said. The move underlined Jakarta's intent to chart a more independent course and elevate its diplomatic profile, the experts noted. But they cautioned that leaning too visibly towards Moscow could cast doubt on Indonesia's longstanding commitment to neutrality, especially amid deepening global divides. 'This is a signal of sovereignty – that Indonesia does not want to be tied to one power,' Dr Hendra Manurung, a lecturer in defence diplomacy at the Indonesia Defence University, told The Straits Times. He said the Russia visit reflects Jakarta's broader strategy of agile, multipolar diplomacy – maintaining relations with all major powers rather than aligning with one camp. Dr Fitriani Bintang Timur, a defence analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, said India offers a useful parallel. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi met Russian President Vladimir Putin in October 2024, but India remains part of the Quad – a grouping with the US, Japan and Australia – which has condemned Russia's invasion of Ukraine. 'I think Modi-like engagement is something that Prabowo is striving for Indonesia to broaden the country's partnership reach beyond the traditionally Western region,' she told ST. Indonesia is not a member of the G-7 – comprising Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the US – but had been invited as a guest. Russia, once part of the grouping, was expelled in 2014 following its annexation of Crimea. 'Mr Prabowo's move to visit Russia instead of G-7 may certainly raise some eyebrows. Geopolitical signalling matters, particularly in this era of heightened competition between global powers. Indonesia, at the very least, should have sent a representative to G-7 if possible,' said Mr Pieter Pandie, an international relations researcher at the Jakarta-based Centre for Strategic and International Studies. 'It signals Prabowo's more personal and hands-on approach to foreign affairs, differing significantly from his predecessor (Joko Widodo), who was mostly uninterested in foreign affairs and was comfortable in leaving it in the hands of the Foreign Ministry,' Mr Pieter told ST. Analysts, however, noted that in May, Mr Prabowo separately hosted Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and President Emmanuel Macron of France – a G-7 member – in Jakarta, reflecting that his ties with the West remain intact. He also had a phone call with US President Donald Trump on June 12. Beyond great power politics, the visit to Russia also showed Indonesia's quiet support for Iran and the Palestinians amid the Middle East conflict, the analysts said. While not explicitly articulated, the visit was seen as reinforcing Indonesia's solidarity with countries critical of Israel, noted Dr Hendra. 'Besides bilateral ties, the bigger point is to show that in the current geopolitical situation, Indonesia wants to support Iran in its war with Israel, and also show support for Palestine,' he said. Dr Fitriani added: 'I think one of the reasons why Prabowo didn't go to the G-7 was because of the concern over conflict in the Middle East as the G-7 members mostly supported Israel.' While in Russia from June 18 to 20, Mr Prabowo met Mr Putin and delivered a keynote speech at the annual St Petersburg International Economic Forum, where the Indonesian leader clarified that his decision to skip the G-7 summit was not due to disrespect, but because of an earlier commitment to attend the forum. 'So please do not read too much into the event… Indonesia, by tradition, has always been non-aligned. We respect all countries. Our foreign policy is very simple – one phrase: A thousand friends are too few, one enemy is too many. We want to be friends with everybody,' he said. 'One of the big mistakes of many countries in South-east Asia is that we tend to always follow the biggest and the most powerful power in the world.' Mr Prabowo said the world must shift from a unipolar to a multipolar order. He also expressed respect for the leadership of Russia and China. The two countries 'have never had double standards', he said. 'Russia and China have always defended the downtrodden… the oppressed, (they) have always fought for the justice of all peoples of the world.' During the visit, Mr Putin described Indonesia as one of Russia's 'key partners' in the Asia-Pacific and reaffirmed support for Jakarta's full membership in the Brics grouping, which took effect earlier in 2025. The grouping, which is spearheaded by Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, aims to strengthen cooperation among emerging economies and amplify the influence of the Global South. Mr Prabowo and Mr Putin signed a declaration on strategic partnership, formalising closer ties. Russia offered to boost oil and liquefied natural gas supplies to Indonesia. A €2 billion (S$2.96 billion) investment fund was also announced between Indonesia's sovereign wealth fund Danantara and the Russian Direct Investment Fund. Dr Fitriani noted that Mr Prabowo visited Beijing in November 2024 and signed deals worth about US$10 billion (S$12.87 billion), demonstrating his willingness to engage with countries based on economic interests. 'This shows a pattern of Prabowo following the money,' she said. One notable offer from Russia was in nuclear cooperation. 'We are open to cooperation with Indonesian partners in the nuclear field. We also wish to implement peaceful nuclear projects', including in healthcare, agriculture and training of human resources, Mr Putin said in a joint statement after his meeting with Mr Prabowo on June 19. Indonesia plans to add nuclear power to its energy mix, with a small-scale plant slated to begin operations by 2032 as part of its push towards net-zero emissions. The Prabowo administration has also announced plans to open the door to foreign investors to help develop 75GW of renewable energy capacity over the next 14 years. Analysts said Russia's offer reflects the country's intent to deepen its footprint in South-east Asia and aligns with Mr Prabowo's push for energy resilience. Dr Hendra noted that while Russia has shown interest in nuclear cooperation, Indonesia must proceed cautiously as accepting such an offer could unsettle its neighbours. 'Russia made such an offer to show it wants to increase its presence in South-east Asia, but any real development depends on formal agreements. For now, it's likely a no,' he said. Mr Pieter called the proposal 'certainly significant' but added that 'how it will play out concretely is difficult to gauge', adding that Indonesia must tread carefully in dealing with major powers to avoid appearing biased towards any side. Dr Fitriani warned that nuclear cooperation remains politically sensitive. 'Indonesia doesn't want to be the next Iran that the world fears for its lack of transparency in managing nuclear energy capabilities,' she said. Still, Mr Prabowo's engagement with Russia – and his silence on Ukraine – could risk undermining Jakarta's neutrality in the eyes of Western partners. Mr Pieter said Mr Prabowo's visit was a win for Russia, as it signalled that some countries are still willing to engage with Moscow despite Western sanctions and condemnation over its invasion of Ukraine. 'Indonesia has always emphasised its commitment to international law, territorial integrity and sovereignty. By being seen as tilting to Moscow, some may question Indonesia's commitment to those values and norms,' he added. Dr Fitriani noted that 'Mr Prabowo risked signalling tacit approval or at least indifference towards Russia's invasion of Ukraine'. She said the Indonesian leader should now seek to rebalance ties, including by visiting G-7 countries or hosting international meetings that affirm Indonesia's commitment to global norms. 'President Prabowo needs to show that he leads Indonesia based on values,' she added. - The Straits Times/Asia News Network
