logo
‘Direct attack on Canadian workers': Steel and aluminum sector reacts to Trump doubling tariffs

‘Direct attack on Canadian workers': Steel and aluminum sector reacts to Trump doubling tariffs

CTV News5 days ago

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks at the U.S. Steel Mon Valley Works–Irvin Plant, Friday, May 30, 2025, in West Mifflin, Pa. (AP Photo/David Dermer)
WASHINGTON — U.S. President Donald Trump said he will double the tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to 50 per cent next Wednesday.
Trump initially announced the boosted duties on steel during a rally at U.S. Steel's Mon Valley Works–Irvin Plant near Pittsburgh Friday evening. He told a cheering crowd of steelworkers that the increased levies will 'further secure the steel industry in the United States.'
'Nobody is going to get around that,' Trump said.
In a post on social media after the rally, Trump said he would also be increasing tariffs on aluminum to 50 per cent.
'Our steel and aluminum industries are coming back like never before,' Trump posted. 'This will be yet another BIG jolt of great news for our wonderful steel and aluminum workers. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!'
In March, Trump put 25-per-cent tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the United States. Trump used Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to impose steel and aluminum duties and said it will help bring manufacturing back to the United States.
Canada is the largest steel supplier to the United States, accounting for nearly 25 per cent of all imports in 2023. About a quarter of all steel used in America is imported.
Trump on Friday said he was thinking about a 40-per-cent tariff, but said 'the group' wanted it to be 50 per cent.
As the duties have increased with Trump's tariffs, the government's producer price index found the price of steel products has gone up roughly 16 per cent.
Bea Bruske, president of the Canadian Labour Congress, said Trump's plan to double steel and aluminum tariffs is 'yet another direct attack on Canadian workers and a reckless move that will send shockwaves across the Canadian economy.'
'This decision will shut us out of the U.S. market completely, devastating Canada's steel and aluminum industry and threatening thousands of good-paying, unionized Canadian jobs,' Bruske said.
Bruske said that, in light of the escalating threat, Canada's unions call for immediate government action to protect workers. That includes emergency reforms to employment insurance and wage subsidies.
'We need a government that is prepared to stand up for Canadian industries, invest in good union jobs, and protect our economic sovereignty in the face of growing international uncertainty,' Bruske said.
Candace Laing, president and CEO of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, said in a statement that unwinding the 'efficient, competitive and reliable' cross-border supply chains in steel and aluminum 'comes at a great cost to both countries.'
Laing said that, in 2018 under the last round of steel and aluminum tariffs, there was significant net negative job loss in America.
'Doubling the steel and aluminum tariffs to 50 (per cent) is antithetical to North American economic security,' she said. 'The fact remains that Canada is a reliable and secure trading partner that supplies materials that sustain American jobs.'
Economists have said tariffs on steel and aluminum during the first Trump administration were costly for American companies and consumers.
Trump used national security powers to impose a 25-per-cent tariff on steel imports and a 10-per-cent tariff on aluminum imports in March 2018.
Nearly a year later, the White House announced a deal had been reached to prevent 'surges' in steel and aluminum supplies from Canada and Mexico, ending the trade dispute.
A report by the Washington-based Tax Foundation said during that time companies were forced to pay higher prices and the duties resulted in the loss of about 75,000 manufacturing jobs.
The Peterson Institute for International Economics found that each job saved in steel-producing industries came at a high cost to consumers – roughly $650,000 per job.
The Canadian steel industry has warned the return of Trump's tariffs would bring back the disruption and harm seen in 2018. There were also job losses and production pauses in Canada.
Trump announced the increased tariffs during a rally to celebrate a deal between Japan-based Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel. Trump said U.S. Steel will stay an American company but few details of the deal have been made public.
Nippon Steel issued a statement approving of the proposed 'partnership.' It's not clear if a deal has been finalized.
The surge in duties on steel and aluminum imports come after the president faced his first major legal pushback against use of a different emergency power to impose sweeping tariffs on most nations in the world.
The president used the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977, usually referred to by the acronym IEEPA, to enact his so-called 'Liberation Day' and fentanyl-related tariffs.
On Wednesday, the U.S. Court of International Trade blocked those tariffs saying Trump went beyond his authority to use IEEPA to take his trade war to the world.
The following day, a federal appeals court granted the Trump administration's emergency motion for a temporary stay – allowing those tariffs to stay in place, for now.
— With files from Catherine Morrison in Ottawa and The Associated Press
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 30, 2025.
Kelly Geraldine Malone, The Canadian Press

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What is the CBO? A look at the small office inflaming debate over Trump's tax bill
What is the CBO? A look at the small office inflaming debate over Trump's tax bill

Winnipeg Free Press

time37 minutes ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

What is the CBO? A look at the small office inflaming debate over Trump's tax bill

WASHINGTON (AP) — A small government office with some 275 employees has found itself caught in the political crossfire as Congress debates President Donald Trump's 'one big beautiful bill.' The Congressional Budget Office has projected that the legislation would increase federal deficits by about $2.4 trillion over 10 years. That's a problem for a Republican Congress that has spent much of the past four years criticizing former President Joe Biden and Democrats for the nation's rising debt levels. The White House and Republican leaders in Congress are taking issue with CBO's findings. They say economic growth will be higher than the office is projecting, resulting in more revenue coming into government coffers. Meanwhile, Democrats are touting CBO's findings as evidence of the bill's failings. Here's a look at the office at the center of Washington's latest political tug-of-war. What is the CBO? Lawmakers established the Congressional Budget Office more than 50 years ago to provide objective, impartial analysis to support the budget process. The CBO is required to produce a cost estimate for nearly every bill approved by a House or Senate committee and will weigh in earlier when asked to do so by lawmakers. It also produces a report during each Congress on how to reduce the debt if lawmakers so choose, with each option including arguments for and against. Plus, it publishes detailed estimates when presidents make proposals that would affect mandatory spending, which includes programs such as Social Security and Medicare. Lawmakers created the office to help Congress play a stronger role in budget matters, providing them with an alternative to the Office of Management and Budget, which is part of a Republican or Democratic administration, depending upon the president in office. Is the CBO partisan? CBO hires analysts based on their expertise, not political affiliation. Staff is expected to maintain objectivity and avoid political influence. In evaluating potential employees, the CBO says that for most positions it looks at whether that person would be perceived to be free from political bias. Like other federal employees, the CBO's staff is prohibited from making political contributions to members of Congress. The CBO's director, Phillip Swagel, served in former Republican President George W. Bush's administration as an economic adviser and as an assistant secretary at the Treasury Department. He was reappointed to a second term as CBO director in July 2023 by then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., and Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., upon the joint recommendation of the chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees, one a Republican and the other a Democrat. Why is the CBO being attacked now? The stakes are incredibly high with Republicans looking to pass their massive tax cut and immigration bill by early July. Outside groups, Democrats and some Republicans are highlighting CBO's analysis that the bill will increase federal deficits by about $2.4 trillion over 10 years and leave 10.9 million more people uninsured in 2034. Republicans spent much of Biden's presidency focused on curbing federal deficits. They don't want to be seen as contributing to the fiscal problem. GOP lawmakers say the CBO isn't giving enough credit to the economic growth the bill will create, to the point where it would be deficit-neutral in the long run, if not better. 'The CBO assumes long-term GDP growth of an anemic 1.8% and that is absurd,' said White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. 'The American economy is going to boom like never before after the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' is passed.' Republicans began taking issue with the CBO even before Trump and the current Congress were sworn into office. 'CBO will always predict a dark future when Republicans propose tax relief – but the reality is never so dire,' Rep. Jason Smith, the Republican chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, said in a December press release. Recently, House Speaker Mike Johnson has been taking digs at the office. 'The CBO is notorious for getting things WRONG,' he said in a Facebook post. What did CBO say about the tax cuts enacted in Trump's first term? In April 2018, CBO said that tax receipts would total $27 trillion from fiscal years 2018 to 2024. Receipts came in about $1.5 trillion higher than the CBO projected. Republicans have seized on that discrepancy. But the numbers don't tell the whole story. Some of the criticism of the CBO ignores the context of a global pandemic as the federal government rushed to prop the economy up with massive spending bills under both Trump and Biden. In a blog post last December, Swagel pointed out three reasons for the higher revenues: The primary reason was the burst of inflation that began in March 2021 as the country was recovering from COVID. That burst of inflation, he said, led to about $900 billion more in revenue. There was also an increase in economic activity in 'the later years of the period' adding $700 billion. Also, new tariffs added about $250 billion, with other legislation partially offsetting those three factors. How CBO compares in its assessment The CBO's projection for the Republican bill is similar to some outside groups estimates. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget says the bill would add nearly $3 trillion to the debt through 2034 when including interest payments. That number rises to $5 trillion if some of the temporary provisions, such as no tax on tips and overtime, are made permanent. The nonpartisan Penn Wharton Budget Model, which conducts economic analysis of public policy issues, estimated the House-passed bill increases deficits by $2.8 trillion over 10 years. That number rises to $3.2 when using dynamic scoring to measure the bill's macroeconomic effects.

Latest tariff increases causing more concern locally
Latest tariff increases causing more concern locally

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

Latest tariff increases causing more concern locally

US President Donald Trump's move to double tariffs on steel and aluminum is expected to affect a variety of industries in Simcoe County. Local businesses that depend on steek and aluminum products say they are once again left in limbo for what it will mean to their bottom line and customers. 'I don't know if my can costs are doubling or tripling,' said Walter Vaz, owner of Heritage Estate in Barrie. 'We have no idea where it's going.' Heritage Estate is a small wine and cider producer near Highway 11. Even though most of their products are sold locally, they depend on cans from the United States. 'Honestly our can producers right now aren't even giving us pricing,' added Vaz. 'We have to wait literally until we place an order and then we will get current pricing at that time. It's at that time we will make a decision. Are we producing or not producing?' 'Our message currently is to stay calm, stay poised and use this opportunity to benefit local manufacturers,' said Kyle Peacock, a tariff consultant out of Orillia. Peacock works with companyies trying to navigate the ever-changing tariff world. 'Stay the course, don't upset your business and don't react,' added Peacock. 'Continue to survive, but at the same time, look at multi-sourcing into other markets that you can secure.' Trombly's Tackle Box in Orillia has been in business for almost 40 years. Logan Trombly, the owner, says the majority of their guns come from the US. 'We have made a decision recently on a lot of the American made brands,' said Trombly. 'At this point in time we're holding off on bringing them in, except for a couple of categories, because there is such a demand on some of those products.' Trombly says there no question the extra cost will have to be passed onto to consumers and that puts everyone in a difficult position. 'Some products that we sell use to retail it for $899 and our cost now is like three hundred dollars more than we use to sell it for' added Trombly. The owners say they hope the tariff situation will be addressed later this month at the G7 Summit in Alberta.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store