logo
What is the CBO? A look at the small office inflaming debate over Trump's tax bill

What is the CBO? A look at the small office inflaming debate over Trump's tax bill

WASHINGTON (AP) — A small government office with some 275 employees has found itself caught in the political crossfire as Congress debates President Donald Trump's 'one big beautiful bill.'
The Congressional Budget Office has projected that the legislation would increase federal deficits by about $2.4 trillion over 10 years. That's a problem for a Republican Congress that has spent much of the past four years criticizing former President Joe Biden and Democrats for the nation's rising debt levels.
The White House and Republican leaders in Congress are taking issue with CBO's findings. They say economic growth will be higher than the office is projecting, resulting in more revenue coming into government coffers. Meanwhile, Democrats are touting CBO's findings as evidence of the bill's failings.
Here's a look at the office at the center of Washington's latest political tug-of-war.
What is the CBO?
Lawmakers established the Congressional Budget Office more than 50 years ago to provide objective, impartial analysis to support the budget process. The CBO is required to produce a cost estimate for nearly every bill approved by a House or Senate committee and will weigh in earlier when asked to do so by lawmakers.
It also produces a report during each Congress on how to reduce the debt if lawmakers so choose, with each option including arguments for and against. Plus, it publishes detailed estimates when presidents make proposals that would affect mandatory spending, which includes programs such as Social Security and Medicare.
Lawmakers created the office to help Congress play a stronger role in budget matters, providing them with an alternative to the Office of Management and Budget, which is part of a Republican or Democratic administration, depending upon the president in office.
Is the CBO partisan?
CBO hires analysts based on their expertise, not political affiliation. Staff is expected to maintain objectivity and avoid political influence. In evaluating potential employees, the CBO says that for most positions it looks at whether that person would be perceived to be free from political bias.
Like other federal employees, the CBO's staff is prohibited from making political contributions to members of Congress.
The CBO's director, Phillip Swagel, served in former Republican President George W. Bush's administration as an economic adviser and as an assistant secretary at the Treasury Department.
He was reappointed to a second term as CBO director in July 2023 by then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., and Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., upon the joint recommendation of the chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees, one a Republican and the other a Democrat.
Why is the CBO being attacked now?
The stakes are incredibly high with Republicans looking to pass their massive tax cut and immigration bill by early July.
Outside groups, Democrats and some Republicans are highlighting CBO's analysis that the bill will increase federal deficits by about $2.4 trillion over 10 years and leave 10.9 million more people uninsured in 2034.
Republicans spent much of Biden's presidency focused on curbing federal deficits. They don't want to be seen as contributing to the fiscal problem.
GOP lawmakers say the CBO isn't giving enough credit to the economic growth the bill will create, to the point where it would be deficit-neutral in the long run, if not better.
'The CBO assumes long-term GDP growth of an anemic 1.8% and that is absurd,' said White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. 'The American economy is going to boom like never before after the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' is passed.'
Republicans began taking issue with the CBO even before Trump and the current Congress were sworn into office.
'CBO will always predict a dark future when Republicans propose tax relief – but the reality is never so dire,' Rep. Jason Smith, the Republican chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, said in a December press release.
Recently, House Speaker Mike Johnson has been taking digs at the office.
'The CBO is notorious for getting things WRONG,' he said in a Facebook post.
What did CBO say about the tax cuts enacted in Trump's first term?
In April 2018, CBO said that tax receipts would total $27 trillion from fiscal years 2018 to 2024.
Receipts came in about $1.5 trillion higher than the CBO projected. Republicans have seized on that discrepancy.
But the numbers don't tell the whole story. Some of the criticism of the CBO ignores the context of a global pandemic as the federal government rushed to prop the economy up with massive spending bills under both Trump and Biden.
In a blog post last December, Swagel pointed out three reasons for the higher revenues: The primary reason was the burst of inflation that began in March 2021 as the country was recovering from COVID. That burst of inflation, he said, led to about $900 billion more in revenue.
There was also an increase in economic activity in 'the later years of the period' adding $700 billion. Also, new tariffs added about $250 billion, with other legislation partially offsetting those three factors.
How CBO compares in its assessment
The CBO's projection for the Republican bill is similar to some outside groups estimates.
The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget says the bill would add nearly $3 trillion to the debt through 2034 when including interest payments. That number rises to $5 trillion if some of the temporary provisions, such as no tax on tips and overtime, are made permanent.
The nonpartisan Penn Wharton Budget Model, which conducts economic analysis of public policy issues, estimated the House-passed bill increases deficits by $2.8 trillion over 10 years. That number rises to $3.2 when using dynamic scoring to measure the bill's macroeconomic effects.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Greentech is now exploding – a 300% comeback for hydrogen? nucera, dynaCERT, Plug Power and Nel ASA
Greentech is now exploding – a 300% comeback for hydrogen? nucera, dynaCERT, Plug Power and Nel ASA

The Market Online

time18 minutes ago

  • The Market Online

Greentech is now exploding – a 300% comeback for hydrogen? nucera, dynaCERT, Plug Power and Nel ASA

Although the US administration under Donald Trump does not think much of climate change, the outlook for the hydrogen sector is improving all the time. This is because it is no longer the US setting the tone but Europe and Asia. Global efforts to make local transport cleaner and more sustainable are now also reaching the transport, logistics, and mining industries. There is still enormous potential for improvement here in terms of reducing climate-damaging emissions. Innovative technologies such as those developed by dynaCERT (TSX:DYA) are now well-known in the market. Therefore, decision-makers in public office will no longer be able to avoid discussing these issues if they want to remain in their positions in the coming years. The public pressure to combat negative climate change globally is increasing. Forward-looking investors should start positioning themselves now. thyssenkrupp nucera – Major order gives cause for hope A major player in electrolyser technology is thyssenkrupp's hydrogen subsidiary, nucera. After a successful IPO in 2023 at EUR 20, the share price initially slumped to EUR 8, but the outlook now appears to be improving steadily. nucera is to develop a comprehensive front-end engineering and design study (FEED) for a pioneering hydrogen project in Europe. This future-oriented project involves the construction of a large-scale water electrolysis plant with a nominal capacity of around 600 MW. The client has not yet been disclosed, but such a scale highlights thyssenkrupp nucera's ambitions to get off to a flying start with innovative solutions. This project also marks a significant step toward an environmentally friendly energy future in the EU, and further inquiries are likely to follow. Although a decision on the specific order volume will not be made until 2026, preliminary work is already underway. The share price has returned to the upper end of the range between EUR 8.00 and EUR 11.00, where it has been trading for a year. All that is missing now is a break above the resistance level of EUR 11.50, after which higher targets can be set again. Compared to other hydrogen stocks, nucera has already proven in the past that it can operate profitably. dynaCERT – A small spark can ignite big momentum There has already been a lot of buzz around dynaCERT. The Canadian hydrogen specialist is considered a technology supplier for large diesel engines across all commercial segments. With its in-house hydrogen retrofit devices under the name HydraGEN™, diesel combustion processes can be optimized to such an extent that, depending on usage, fuel savings of between 5 and 15% can ultimately be achieved. In fall 2024, the coveted VERRA certificate was obtained, meaning that dynaCERT customers will also receive credits for emission certificates if they report their driving logs to dynaCERT accordingly. The rollout of the latest retrofit devices is now on schedule. Following the 'bauma 2025' trade fair in Munich, pre-production of 1,000 units has already been completed in order to meet growing demand as quickly as possible. With a manageable investment of around CAD 6,000 per unit, valuable fuel can be saved. For public transport companies, logistics providers, and construction machine operators of all kinds, large-scale carbon reductions are a critical ESG issue for the future of their corporate mission and, simultaneously, a door opener for a sustainable customer base. In 2024, investor Eric Sprott already invested CAD 14 million at around CAD 0.50 per share; currently, the share price is hovering between CAD 0.14 and CAD 0.16. The reason: the wait for certification took nearly two years. Many investors lost patience and sold in line with the downward industry trend. But now, the signs have turned positive. With a German management team on board, industrial capacity expansion is proceeding exactly according to plan, so initial revenue successes should soon be announced. In addition, the stock has been listed on the OTCQB Venture Market in the US since June. Liquidity is likely to increase sharply soon – time to get in! Nel ASA and Plug Power – Is this the start of a turnaround? There has been a lot of movement in industry in recent days. After three years of total losses of up to 95%, the protagonists Nel ASA and Plug Power made their first attempts at bottoming out in May. For Plug Power, it was the announcement of a new production record in Georgia: 300 tons of liquid hydrogen were produced there in April. In Calistoga, California, Plug Power delivered six hydrogen fuel cells for a new emergency power system. This system replaces diesel-powered generators and can supply the city with clean electricity for up to 48 hours – especially during planned power outages aimed at reducing wildfire risks. The Q1 figures were not encouraging, with net losses of USD 196 million on revenues of USD 133.7 million. A cost-cutting program is now expected to save over USD 200 million annually. Despite the ongoing operational woes, 6 out of 25 analysts on the LSEG platform still recommend buying Plug Power shares. The average 12-month price target is USD 1.86 – a chance for speculative investors to double their money! Investors appear to have lost interest in Nel ASA. Here, too, the ongoing slump in orders is weighing on the Company, which is currently implementing another restructuring program. Not a single expert on LSEG is now recommending the stock as a buy. At EUR 0.21, the share is still 20% above its all-time low of EUR 0.166. There is no sign of an upward trend yet, but at least the major losses now seem to be over. Keep an eye on the price display to react quickly when momentum picks up! Over the past 12 months, thyssenkrupp nucera and dynCERT have already made progress on their path upward. Nel ASA and Plug Power are still working intensively on their turnaround. (Source: LSEG as of June 5, 2025) The stock markets are moving from one high to the next. While defense and precious metal stocks have recently been shining, hydrogen stocks are now also coming into play. However, there is still a long way to go before losses are recouped. dynaCERT has positioned itself perfectly at Bauma in Germany to supply the international transport, local transport, and mining industries with energy-saving solutions. Conflict of interest Pursuant to §85 of the German Securities Trading Act (WpHG), we point out that Apaton Finance GmbH as well as partners, authors or employees of Apaton Finance GmbH (hereinafter referred to as 'Relevant Persons') currently hold or hold shares or other financial instruments of the aforementioned companies and speculate on their price developments. In this respect, they intend to sell or acquire shares or other financial instruments of the companies (hereinafter each referred to as a 'Transaction'). Transactions may thereby influence the respective price of the shares or other financial instruments of the Company. In this respect, there is a concrete conflict of interest in the reporting on the companies. In addition, Apaton Finance GmbH is active in the context of the preparation and publication of the reporting in paid contractual relationships. For this reason, there is also a concrete conflict of interest. The above information on existing conflicts of interest applies to all types and forms of publication used by Apaton Finance GmbH for publications on companies. Risk notice Apaton Finance GmbH offers editors, agencies and companies the opportunity to publish commentaries, interviews, summaries, news and the like on These contents are exclusively for the information of the readers and do not represent any call to action or recommendations, neither explicitly nor implicitly they are to be understood as an assurance of possible price developments. The contents do not replace individual expert investment advice and do not constitute an offer to sell the discussed share(s) or other financial instruments, nor an invitation to buy or sell such. The content is expressly not a financial analysis, but a journalistic or advertising text. Readers or users who make investment decisions or carry out transactions on the basis of the information provided here do so entirely at their own risk. No contractual relationship is established between Apaton Finance GmbH and its readers or the users of its offers, as our information only refers to the company and not to the investment decision of the reader or user. The acquisition of financial instruments involves high risks, which can lead to the total loss of the invested capital. The information published by Apaton Finance GmbH and its authors is based on careful research. Nevertheless, no liability is assumed for financial losses or a content-related guarantee for the topicality, correctness, appropriateness and completeness of the content provided here. Please also note our Terms of use. This is sponsored content issued on behalf of Apaton Finance GmbH and dynaCERT, please see full disclaimer here.

Trump and Musk to speak Friday after alliance descends into public feud, Politico reports
Trump and Musk to speak Friday after alliance descends into public feud, Politico reports

CTV News

time20 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Trump and Musk to speak Friday after alliance descends into public feud, Politico reports

A war of words is beginning to emerge between U.S. President Trump and Elon Musk following the billionaire's White House exit. Joy Malbon has the details. WASHINGTON -- White House aides scheduled a call between Donald Trump and Elon Musk for Friday, Politico reported, after a huge public spat that saw threats fly over government contracts and ended with the world's richest man suggesting the U.S. president should be impeached. The reported call could ease the feuding after an extraordinary day of hostilities - largely conducted over social media - that marked a stark end to a close alliance. Shares in Musk's Tesla closed down over 14 per cent on Thursday, losing about US$150 billion in market value in the largest single-day decline in value in its history. In pre-market European trading on Friday they pared some of those losses, rising 5% after the Politico report that the two men were scheduled to speak. Musk had bankrolled a large part of Trump's presidential campaign and was then brought as one of the president's most visible advisers, heading up a sweeping and controversial effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending. The verbal punches erupted on Thursday after Trump criticized Musk in the Oval Office and the pair then traded barbs on their social media platforms: Trump's Truth Social and Musk's X. The falling-out had begun brewing days ago when Musk, who left his role as head of the Department of Government Efficiency a week ago, denounced Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill. The president initially stayed quiet while Musk campaigned to torpedo the bill, saying it would add too much to the nation's $36.2 trillion in debt. Trump broke his silence on Thursday, telling reporters he was 'very disappointed' in Musk. 'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump said. As Trump spoke, Musk responded on X. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' wrote Musk, who spent nearly $300 million backing Trump and other Republicans in last year's election. In another post, Musk asserted that Trump's signature import tariffs would push the U.S. into a recession later this year. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump posted. Minutes after the closing bell, Musk replied, 'Yes,' to a post on X saying Trump should be impeached, something that would be highly unlikely given Trump's Republicans hold majorities in both chambers of Congress. Musk's businesses also include rocket company and government contractor SpaceX and its satellite unit Starlink. Musk, whose space business plays a critical role in the U.S. government's space program, said that as a result of Trump's threats he would begin decommissioning SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft. Dragon is the only U.S. spacecraft capable of sending astronauts to the International Space Station. Late on Thursday, Musk backed off the threat. In another sign of a possible detente to come, Musk subsequently wrote: 'You're not wrong,' in response to billionaire investor Bill Ackman saying Trump and Musk should make peace. Punching back Trump and Musk are both political fighters with a penchant for using social media to attack their perceived enemies, and many observers had predicted a falling-out. Musk hit at the heart of Trump's agenda earlier this week when he targeted what Trump has named his 'big, beautiful bill,' calling it a 'disgusting abomination' that would deepen the federal deficit. His attacks amplified a rift within the Republican Party that could threaten the bill's prospects in the Senate. Nonpartisan analysts say Trump's bill could add $2.4 trillion to $5 trillion to the nation's $36.2 trillion in debt. A prolonged feud between the pair could make it harder for Republicans to keep control of Congress in next year's midterm elections if it leads to a loss of Musk's campaign spending or erodes support for Trump in Silicon Valley. 'Elon really was a significant portion of the ground game this last cycle,' said a Republican strategist with ties to Musk and the Trump administration who spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity. 'If he sits out the midterms, that worries me.' On Tuesday, Musk posted that 'in November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people.' Musk had already said he planned to curtail his political spending in the future. Musk's increasing focus on politics provoked widespread protests at Tesla sites, driving down sales while investors fretted that Musk's attention was too divided. By Nandita Bose and Andrea Shalal, Reuters Additional reporting by Jeff Mason, Joey Roulette and Jarrett Renshaw; Writing by Costas Pitas, Joseph Ax and Charlie Devereux; Editing by Don Durfee, Michael Perry and Frances Kerry

Federal vs. state power at issue in a hearing over Trump's election overhaul executive order
Federal vs. state power at issue in a hearing over Trump's election overhaul executive order

Winnipeg Free Press

time22 minutes ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Federal vs. state power at issue in a hearing over Trump's election overhaul executive order

BOSTON (AP) — Democratic state attorneys general on Friday will seek to block President Donald Trump's proposal for a sweeping overhaul of U.S. elections in a case that tests a constitutional bedrock — the separation of powers. The top law enforcement officials from 19 states filed a federal lawsuit after the Republican president signed the executive order in March, arguing that its provisions would step on states' power to set their own election rules and that the executive branch had no such authority. In a filing supporting that argument, a bipartisan group of former secretaries of state said Trump's directive would upend the system established by the Constitution's Elections Clause, which gives states and Congress control over how elections are run. They said the order seeks to 'unilaterally coronate the President as the country's chief election policymaker and administrator.' If the court does not halt the order, they argued, 'the snowball of executive overreach will grow swiftly and exponentially.' Trump's election directive was part of a flurry of executive orders he has issued in the opening months of his second term, many of which have drawn swift legal challenges. It follows years of him falsely claiming that his loss to Democrat Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election was due to widespread fraud and an election year in which he and other Republicans promoted the notion that large numbers of noncitizens threatened the integrity of U.S. elections. In fact, voting by noncitizens is rare and, when caught, can lead to felony charges and deportation. Trump's executive order would require voters to show proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote in federal elections, prohibit mail or absentee ballots from being counted if they are received after Election Day, set new rules for voting equipment and prohibit non-U.S. citizens from being able to donate in certain elections. It also would condition federal election grant funding on states adhering to the strict ballot deadline. The hearing Friday in U.S. District Court in Boston comes in one of three lawsuits filed against the executive order. One is from Oregon and Washington, where elections are conducted almost entirely by mail and ballots received after Election Day are counted as long as they are postmarked by then. The provision that would create a proof-of-citizenship requirement for federal elections already has been halted in a lawsuit filed by voting and civil rights groups and national Democratic organizations. In that case, filed in federal court in the District of Columbia, the judge said the president's attempt to use a federal agency to enact a proof-of-citizenship requirement for voting usurped the power of states and Congress, which at the time was considering legislation that would do just that. That bill, called the SAVE Act, passed the U.S. House but faces an uncertain future in the Senate. Trump's executive order said its intent was to ensure 'free, fair and honest elections unmarred by fraud, errors, or suspicion.' The Justice Department, in arguing against the motion by the attorneys general for a preliminary injunction, said the president is within his rights to direct agencies to carry out federal voting laws. The order tasks the U.S. Election Assistance Commission with updating the federal voter registration form to require people to submit documentation proving they are U.S. citizens. Similar provisions enacted previously in a handful of states have raised concerns about disenfranchising otherwise eligible voters who can't readily access those documents. That includes married women, who would need both a birth certificate and a marriage license if they had changed their last name. A state proof-of-citizenship law enacted in Kansas more than a decade ago blocked the registrations of 31,000 people later found to be eligible to vote. The two sides will argue over whether the president has the authority to direct the election commission, which was created by Congress as an independent agency after the Florida ballot debacle during the 2000 presidential election. In its filing, the Justice Department said Trump's executive order falls within his authority to direct officials 'to carry out their statutory duties,' adding that 'the only potential voters it disenfranchises are noncitizens who are ineligible to vote anyway.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store