Japan lawmakers urge pension fund to invest in domestic private equity
TOKYO, April 23 (Reuters) - A group of Japan's ruling party lawmakers on Wednesday called on the country's top public pension fund GPIF to expand investment in domestic private equity and venture capital funds to strengthen the domestic private asset investment chain.
Global private equity firms such as KKR (KKR.N), opens new tab and Bain Capital have thrived in Japan due to the country's corporate governance reform, rising shareholder activism, and the government's push for industry consolidation.
But the presence of Japanese private equity firms has been limited so far, with government-backed fund Japan Investment Corporation (JIC) often the only domestic non-strategic bidder in multi-billion-dollar deals.
The call for the Government Pension Investment Fund (GPIF) to step up as well came in a proposal presented to Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba from a group of lawmakers looking at the issue, the aim being to make sure that profits from such investments remain in Japan.
"We always hear the likes of KKR and Bain help big companies overhaul themselves, but profits derived from such restructuring go to U.S. and Canadian pensions (which invest in those global private equity funds)," Fumiaki Kobayashi, a lawmaker and key member of the group, told reporters.
Specifically, the group said in its proposal that GPIF should boost its alternative investments, including domestic private equity and venture capital.
Domestic private equity funds should also "get involved in large-scale mergers and acquisitions," Kobayashi said.
Alternative assets such as private equity, property and infrastructure account for just 1.6% in GPIF's massive 258.7 trillion yen ($1.82 trillion) portfolio, far short of a 5% limit.
Former Prime Minister Fumio Kishida launched the policy group last year with dozens of lawmakers from the ruling Liberal Democratic Party to continue his key policy drive to beef up the country's $5 trillion asset management industry.
($1 = 141.7600 yen)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Out
2 hours ago
- Time Out
Toronto just surpassed Montreal in this world's top cities list
Don't look now, but Toronto has officially surpassed Montreal as one of the top cities in the world. According to the 2025 edition of the Global Cities Index, cities across the planet were evaluated across five core categories: Economy, Human Capital, Quality of Life, Environment, and Governance. Toronto showed up strong, coming in at 20th place, while Montreal barely made the top 50. Could it have anything to do with Montreal's high transport emissions, or the post-tropical cyclones and torrential downpours forecasted (again) for this summer? Oxford Economics is the world's foremost independent economic advisory firm, covering over 200 countries, 100 industrial sectors, and 8,000 cities and regions. Drawing on top-tier urban economic forecasts and a range of publicly available datasets, the Index builds a consistent global profile of the 1,000 largest cities. What is the world's top city? It should come as a surprise to absolutely no one that New York City topped the list as the world's top city. The urban giant ranked first in the Economics category as the economic capital of both the U.S. and, arguably, the world—boasting the largest metro economy globally, nearly double that of Los Angeles. While heavily reliant on finance, its stable GDP growth and future outlook remain strong. It also scores high in Human Capital, with a population of over 20 million, top universities, major corporate headquarters, and a highly educated, diverse population—though future growth may slow due to stricter immigration policies. What are the top 50 cities in 2025? Here are the top 50 countries according to the Oxford Economics' Global Cities Index 2025: 1. New York 2. London 3. Paris 4. San Jose 5. Seattle 6. Melbourne 7. Sydney 8. Boston 9. Tokyo 10. San Francisco 11. Los Angeles 12. Washington, D.C. 13. Dublin 14. Stockholm 15. Seoul 16. Zurich 17. Oslo 18. Copenhagen 19. Dallas 20. Toronto 21. Singapore 22. Munich 23. Brisbane 24. Chicago 25. Geneva 26. Denver 27. Amsterdam 28. Atlanta 29. Berlin 30. Houston 31. Perth 32. Luxembourg 33. Philadelphia 34. Brussels 35. Minneapolis 36. Vienna 37. Vancouver 38. Helsinki 39. Hamburg 40. San Diego 41. Phoenix 42. Basel 43. Montreal 44. Madrid 45. Miami 46. Tel Aviv 47. Austin 48. Bern 49. Gothenburg 50. Portland Why did Toronto surpass Montreal in this global ranking? Toronto is the top-ranked Canadian city thanks to its role as a national hub for business, finance, culture, and education. Scoring in the top 20 globally for both Economics and Human Capital, the city boasts strong GDP and employment growth, fuelled by high levels of international immigration. Home to Canada's largest banks and major universities like the University of Toronto, it's a centre for innovation and research. However, rapid population growth has strained housing supply, leading to affordability challenges and impacting its Quality of Life score. Environmental challenges and extreme weather also weigh on its overall ranking. Still, with strong governance, high life expectancy, and continued global appeal, Toronto is expected to remain a top performer for years to come. Meanwhile Montreal, the third Canadian city in the top 50, stands out for its strong Human Capital score, bolstered by world-renowned universities like McGill and a growing tech sector focused on AI and video games. It's also a key transport hub, home to major companies like Air Canada and Canadian National Railway. Once Canada's economic capital, Montreal now has the country's second-largest GDP, though lower wages in its dominant sectors contribute to some of the lowest incomes in North America. Still, housing is more affordable than in other Canadian cities, inequality is low, and residents enjoy high life expectancy and rich cultural offerings. Montreal's main weakness lies in the Environment category, due to high transport emissions and weather volatility. As climate change intensifies, reducing carbon output remains a key challenge for the city's economy.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Tesla seeks to block city of Austin from releasing records on robotaxi trial
June 6 (Reuters) - Tesla is trying to prevent the city of Austin, Texas, from releasing public records to Reuters involving the EV maker's planned launch of self-driving robotaxis in the city this month. The news agency in February requested communications between Tesla and Austin officials over the previous two years. The request followed CEO Elon Musk's announcement in January that Tesla would launch fare-collecting robotaxis on Austin public streets. Austin public-information officer Dan Davis told Reuters on April 1 that 'third parties' had asked the city to withhold the records to protect their 'privacy or property interests.' Austin officials on April 7 requested an opinion on the news agency's request from the Texas Attorney General's office, which handles public-records disputes. On April 16, an attorney for Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab wrote the AG objecting to the release of 'confidential, proprietary, competitively sensitive commercial, and/or trade secret information' contained in emails between Tesla and Austin officials. The Tesla attorney wrote that providing the documents to Reuters would reveal 'Tesla's deployment procedure, process, status and strategy' and 'irreparably harm Tesla.' Tesla and the Texas Attorney General's office did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment. Neal Falgoust, who oversees public records issues for Austin's Law Department, said the city "takes no position on the confidential nature of the information at issue" but is required to seek the Attorney General's opinion when "a third-party asserts that their information is proprietary and should not be released." Musk has staked Tesla's future on self-driving vehicles he has promised for a decade but hasn't delivered, making Austin's robotaxi launch closely watched as a potential milestone. Some analysts and investors attribute the majority of Tesla's stock market value to hopes for robotaxis and humanoid robots it has yet to deliver. Little is known about Tesla's plans in Austin. The company has said it aims to initially deploy between 10 and 20 driverless robotaxis in restricted geographic areas of Austin, which it has not publicly identified. In an April 23 response to Tesla's letter, a Reuters lawyer wrote that Tesla's intent to deploy the unproven technology on Texas roadways makes its plans 'an issue of enormous importance to Texas and the public at large' and underscored the public's right to know. Falgoust, the Austin law department official, did not respond to questions about whether the public was entitled to information about Tesla's driverless technology. Texas state law requires the Attorney General's office to decide within 45 business days, which would be next week.
Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
Instant view: US payrolls growth slows in May, unemployment rate steady
NEW YORK, June 5 (Reuters) - U.S. job growth slowed in May, while the unemployment rate held steady, potentially giving the Federal Reserve a buffer to delay the resumption of interest rate cuts. Nonfarm payrolls increased by 139,000 jobs last month after rising by a downwardly revised 147,000 in April, the Labor Department said on Friday. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast 130,000 jobs added last month after a previously reported 177,000 advance in April. The unemployment rate held steady at 4.2% and matched expectations. MARKET REACTION: STOCKS: S&P 500 E-minis added to gains and were up 51 points, or 0.86% BONDS: The yield on benchmark U.S. 10-year notes rose 7.3 basis points to 4.468%, the two-year note yield climbed 7.3 basis points to 3.997% FOREX: The dollar index extended gains a loss and was up 0.47% to 99.14, while the euro was down 0.39% at $1.1399 COMMENTS: "The report itself is a positive report overall, in line with expectations, with the employment number a little bit stronger than expected. It shows the labor market is still intact." "There's one blemish there that stands out. The household-based employment number that's used in the calculation of the unemployment rate was down sharply. There was a big increase in both the household-based employment number and in the supply of Labor in April. We just reversed both by a large amount in such a way that the unemployment rate remains steady. We were afraid it would be going higher and the fact that it held steady is an encouraging sign." "The market is taking the jobs report as a sign the economy is still holding up well. It's not that we're powering ahead. Its moderate growth but there's little sign we're losing momentum from the jobs report mid-way through the second quarter." 'If you look at the trend, it looks like job growth actually bottomed mid/late next year, so the trend looks to be higher. As interesting as today's numbers were, the more interesting data were yesterday's – the unit labor costs and productivity. Productivity was lower and labor costs higher. That ultimately translates into higher inflation. "As long as job growth holds up, the employment data is positive. The other piece of this, in my mind, if you already have had more job openings than candidates, does it make sense to post another job? We cannot find qualified people, I keep hearing. The bottom line, is that the Fed is likely to stay on hold.' ART HOGAN, CHIEF MARKET STRATEGIST AT B RILEY WEALTH "Things are slowing, but they're not collapsing and that's the good news. We're not seeing a serious degradation of the jobs market." 'The sell-off (in Treasuries) really reflects this idea that growth sentiment is heading in a bullish direction. We have yet another month of hard data resilience. There is positive progress on tariffs moderating, even if there's nothing final yet. And a lot of the doomsday scenarios people thought were always one month away - it just seems to be a less likelihood that it's coming. "There's relief, or bearish for bonds, that there are no signs of significant deterioration that people were expecting.' BRIAN JACOBSEN, CHIEF ECONOMIST, ANNEX WEALTH MANAGEMENT, MENOMONEE FALLS, WISCONSIN "The rise in payrolls was better than expected, but the previous months were revised significantly lower, taking some sheen off this report. The diffusion index for manufacturing was abysmally low, showing that payroll gains are concentrated while losses are widespread. On its face, this shows an economy that's holding up under the weight of a trade war, but the details show plenty of cracks forming." 'Payrolls came in a little higher than consensus and more than I was looking for, but basically with the exception of hourly wages, the report really doesn't indicate that the Fed would be ready to do anything to help out the labor market. 'In fact, the rise in hourly wages by 0.4% - I don't want to say significant, but it's noticeable. And so that you know just means that the Fed stays on hold and the labor market, although there are definitely signs that it's cooling and obviously that's attributed to the trade war because many people are not hiring due to the uncertainties. 'Bottom line, it's a report that's not going to move the markets very much and I would, I would classify this as a mediocre report.' JAMIE COX MANAGING PARTNER, HARRIS FINANCIAL GROUP, RICHMOND VIRGINIA "The labor market is strong, but cooling. I expect this report, with all its revisions to bring the Fed back into cutting mode in July. Wages are stable, for now, but that is likely to change in the coming months. "One of the biggest factors with labor is housing - the housing market is showing early signs of trouble, and a cooling labor market will make that worse."
