How Labour heralded the end of single sex education
The Village School for girls in London's affluent Belsize Park had big ambitions. Only last September the prep school added Year 7 places in a bid to launch a senior school.
But a combination of Labour's imposition of VAT on school fees, its hike in National Insurance contributions and declining pupil numbers has left its plans in tatters. In the face of these 'unsustainable' conditions, the owners of the small school, in Keir Starmer's Camden constituency, in north London, announced it will close this summer.
It is one of a growing number of casualties linked to Labour's flagship policy to remove the VAT exemption, adding an extra 20 per cent on top of already hefty fees, pricing some families out of the market.
The policy has been described as 'devastating' by the Independent Schools Council (ISC). As its shock waves are felt across the sector, it appears that single sex schools in particular, which can only market themselves to half of a shrinking pool of pupils, are under threat.
Among the dozen or so schools that have announced their closure since the start of the year, five are single sex. Even more apparent across private schools is an accelerated rush to co-educational provision. At least 16 single sex schools are currently in the process of making the switch to a mixed intake.
These instances whittle away at the number of fully single-sex independent schools, which currently stands at 231 out of a total of 1,441 ISC members in the UK (just 16 per cent). In England, about 378 single sex state schools remain. In Scotland, news that Stewart's Melville College for boys and The Mary Erskine School for girls, in Edinburgh, are merging leaves only three single sex private schools north of the border.
The latest fee-paying school in England to make the move to co-ed is the £28,000 a year St Albans School for boys, in Hertfordshire, which was established in 948 and received its charter in 1553 from Edward VI. From September 2026, it will welcome both girls and boys into Year 7.
Other big-name schools that have announced they will fully open their doors to female pupils include £44,000 a year Westminster School, in central London, which has to date just had a co-ed sixth form, and Abingdon School, in Oxfordshire, which dates back to the 13th century.
These schools insist the move to co-ed is driven by their desire to be 'reflective of modern society'. The headmaster of Westminster Dr Gary Savage explicitly denies that the school is 'reforming to preserve' and says it is accepting girls because its ethos is to 'offer the best possible liberal education to any bright child who would flourish here'.
While the steady demise of boys-only schools does predate the VAT imposition, more recently the traffic is not only one way. A number of schools that have been evangelical about 'girls' education' are now going co-ed, including Malvern St James Girls', in Worcestershire, and Godolphin School, in Salisbury, where boarding fees are more than £45,000 a year.
According to Melanie Sanderson, managing editor of the Good Schools Guide, independent schools are doing all they can to 'secure their pipeline'.
'A school is a business now and they are increasingly focused on giving parents fewer reasons to rule them out,' she says. 'If you are a dual income family, it can be more convenient to have both of your children in the same school. Did the parents with boys at St Albans ask for the school to go co-ed? I strongly doubt it. But in the landscape of a very competitive marketplace, schools are shoring up their future.'
For some, the move is more about the here and now. 'Schools are taking various measures in the fight for survival, including single sex schools going co-ed to widen the potential pool of pupils,' says Irena Barker, digital editor at School Management Plus.
She points to an increasing number of schools joining or being bought out by a larger group, which then transition to co-ed. Beyond that, one in five schools is making redundancies to try and balance the books, according to one survey of teachers.
'There is a lot of pain behind the scenes,' says Barker. 'Individual heads are obviously not always trumpeting their difficulties, but they are real and pressing.'
Fears have been raised that this threat to single sex provision could undermine advances in girls' education.
Alex Hutchinson, headteacher at James Allen's Girls' School in London, and president of the Girls Schools Association, has warned the VAT imposition could have a 'seismic impact' on girls' life chances.
The evidence is clear that while boys do as well or better in co-ed settings as in single sex ones, female pupils thrive in girls-only environments.
Girls who attend all-girls schools get better exam results than girls with similar records and backgrounds at mixed schools, and outdo boys at all-boys schools, an analysis by FFT Datalab reveals.
Single-sex settings also boost the number of girls taking 'masculine' subjects – like maths, physics and engineering at A-level and degree level. Research indicates that girls in all-girls schools are more likely to participate in sport, especially traditionally male-dominated endeavours like cricket and football, with all its attendant benefits.
Daniel Sayers, the head of St Hilda's girls' school, in Harpenden, says single-sex education gives his pupils an inner confidence and self-belief.
'I've seen time and time again, pupils thriving in STEM subjects because the 'boy' 'girl' thing is just removed,' he says. 'And that works the other way as well. I've been around lots of boys' schools and seen boys keenly participating in drama and singing, for instance. There is no sense of 'this is not a cool thing to do'; they are just living the dream, and doing what they enjoy and are really good at.'
Parents who favour single-sex schools are voicing their unhappiness at the rush to co-ed. In a recent discussion on Mumsnet, one mother cited two local girls' schools with plans to take boys.
'I'm angry that the girls' welfare is being sacrificed for financial or strategic reasons, or because girls are supposed to have a 'moderating' effect on boys' behaviour,' she says.
Her point is echoed by Melanie Sanderson, from the Good Schools Guide: 'Lots of parents actively want a single-sex education for their daughters, and you can see why. We have the narrative of 'toxic masculinity' thrust down our throats every day of the week. If you haven't got a daughter that you are very confident can handle herself if she's made to feel uncomfortable by a boy, then maybe you would want to choose single-sex schools.'
There is also a question mark over whether traditional boys' schools that open their doors to girls can adapt quickly enough: 'These schools can take decades to truly feel like a co-ed and not just a boys school that has let in some girls,' warns the head of one girls school.
According to Sanderson, there remains a group of highly aspirational parents who want what a traditional boys-only education can offer.
'These big brands – such as Harrow, Eton and Radley – deliver academically, on the sports field and socially,' she says. 'And parents are assured that in this day and age, boys all know girls from other schools. Very few are living on an island where they don't know any girls. My son goes to a boys' school but has a mixed friendship group.'
While remaining resolutely single sex, some schools are forging closer ties to make them stronger. Sherborne Girls, Sherborne Boys, and two local preps, in Dorset, have formed Sherborne Schools Group, to allow for pupils and staff to work together, share facilities and resources and leverage economies of scale.
'We fundamentally believe in the advantages of single sex but think it needs an innovative approach to get the best of both worlds,' said Dr Ruth Sullivan, the head of Sherborne Girls. 'We are exploring opportunities for sharing resources, for example our teaching expertise. While some schools are having to cut back on niche subjects, we have a teacher coming in who is going to take Arabic studies, for instance, and that will be available across the schools.'Sullivan is acutely aware, though, that not all schools have this kind of arrangement as an option.
'There are a lot of smaller schools, and many of them tend to be single sex girls' schools, that are being impacted by VAT on fees,' she says. 'These schools don't have the economies of scale and don't have some of the big endowments that some of the boys schools enjoy because they have not been around for as long. It's really tough for many schools in the sector.'
For these smaller single sex schools, where every enrolment counts, the future has never been more uncertain.
'As well as the VAT, there's the drop in the birth rate, the high cost of living that families are experiencing, stagnating wages and the energy price cap is coming off,' said Sanderson. 'The overall picture is not favourable, particularly when schools are small and living hand to mouth off the fees. In some ways, it's a perfect storm.'
The Old Palace of John Whitgift School, girls school in Croydon, south London, closing in August 2025, 136 years after opening
The Village School for girls, in Hampstead, part of Chatsworth Schools, proposed closure end of summer term 2025
Highfield Prep for Girls, Maidenhead, part of Chatsworth Schools, proposed closure end of summer term 2025
St Hilda's Bushey, girls school in Hertfordshire, part of the Aldenham Foundation, consulting on closure in August 2025
Kilgraston School, girls senior school in Bridge of Earn, Scotland, closed August 2024
St Albans School for boys, Hertfordshire
Aldwickbury Prep for boys, Hertfordshire, will welcome girls from sept 2025
King's House School for boys, is gradually moving to co-education with girls joining Reception and Year 1 in September 2024 and Years 3, 4, 5 and 7 in September 2025.
Moulsford Prep, boys school in Oxfordshire. From September 2026, it will take girls into Year 3. By September 2031, the School will have girls in every year group
Cothill, boys school in Oxfordshire; girls will be admitted in Years 3-5 in September 2025
Abingdon School and Prep School, Oxfordshire, announced its decision to move to co-education in May 2024
Abbot's Hill, girls school in Hemel Hempstead, will begin to take boys in the pre-prep and prep in September 2025
Aysgarth Prep, a boys school in North Yorkshire for nearly 150 years, welcomed girls in Years 4–8 from September 2024
Lochinver House, in Potters Bar, will be welcoming girls from September 2025 with the school becoming fully coeducational by 2031
Malvern St James Girls' School, in Worcestershire, will be accepting boys from September 2025
Cobham Hall, a girls school in Kent, will be fully co-educational from September 2025
Sir William Perkins's, a girls school in Chertsey, will open its doors to boys from September 2026, becoming fully co-educational by 2030.
Westminster School, in London. Its sixth-form is already co-ed: girls will join Year 9 for the first time in 2028 and the school will be fully co-ed by 2030
Kingsley School, in Leamington Spa, an all-through girls' school that takes boys to 11, announced that it will start becoming fully co-educational from 2025
Godolphin School, in Salisbury, will be taken over by United Learning group and go co-educational. Starting in September 2024, the prep school welcomed both boys and girls. Godolphin Senior will take boys from September 2025.
Bickley Park School for boys, in Bromley, will welcome girls from Year 1 in September 2025
*For financial or other reasons
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Labour MPs in call for benefits U-turn after change to winter fuel payment cut
Labour backbenchers have called for a Government U-turn on planned disability benefit cuts, after Chancellor Rachel Reeves restored winter fuel payments to a majority of pensioners. Ms Reeves' £1.25 billion plan unveiled on Monday will see automatic payments worth up to £300 given to pensioners with an income less than £35,000 a year. It followed last year's decision to strip pensioners of the previously universal scheme, unless they claimed certain benefits, such as pension credit. Nadia Whittome, the Labour MP for Nottingham East, warned ministers they risked making a 'similar mistake' if they tighten the eligibility criteria for personal independence payments, known as Pip. Leeds East MP Richard Burgon called on pensions minister Torsten Bell to 'listen now' so that backbenchers can help the Government 'get it right'. In her warning, Ms Whittome said she was not asking Mr Bell 'to keep the status quo or not to support people into work' and added: 'I'm simply asking him not to cut disabled people's benefits.' The pensions minister, who works in both the Treasury and Department for Work and Pensions, replied that the numbers of people receiving Pip is set to 'continue to grow every single year in the years ahead, after the changes set out by this Government'. In its Pathways to Work green paper, the Government proposed a new eligibility requirement, so Pip claimants must score a minimum of four points on one daily living activity, such as preparing food, washing and bathing, using the toilet or reading, to receive the daily living element of the benefit. 'This means that people who only score the lowest points on each of the Pip daily living activities will lose their entitlement in future,' the document noted. Mr Burgon told the Commons: 'As a Labour MP who voted against the winter fuel payment cuts, I very much welcome this change in position, but can I urge the minister and the Government to learn the lessons of this and one of the lessons is, listen to backbenchers? 'If the minister and the Government listen to backbenchers, that can help the Government get it right, help the Government avoid getting it wrong, and so what we don't want is to be here in a year or two's time with a minister sent to the despatch box after not listening to backbenchers on disability benefit cuts, making another U-turn again.' Mr Bell replied that it was 'important to listen to backbenchers, to frontbenchers'. Opposition MPs cheered when the minister added: 'It's even important to listen to members opposite on occasion.' Liberal Democrat MP Mike Martin warned that 'judging by the questions from his own backbenchers, it seems that we're going to have further U-turns on Pip and on the two-child benefit cap'. The Tunbridge Wells MP asked Mr Bell: 'To save his colleagues anguish, will he let us know now when those U-turns are coming?' The minister replied: 'What Labour MPs want to see is a Labour Government bringing down child poverty, and that's what we're going to do 'What Labour MPs want to see is a Government that can take the responsible decisions, including difficult ones on tax and on means testing the winter fuel payment so that we can invest in public services and turn around the disgrace that has become Britain's public realm for far too long.' Conservative former work and pensions secretary Esther McVey had earlier asked whether the Chancellor, 'now that she and the Government have got a taste for climbdowns', would 'reverse the equally ridiculous national insurance contribution (Nic) rises, which is destroying jobs, and the inheritance tax changes, which is destroying farms and family businesses'. Mr Bell said: 'This is a party opposite that has learned no lessons whatsoever, that thinks it can come to this chamber, call for more spending, oppose every tax rise and expect to ever be taken seriously again – they will not.' Labour MP Rebecca Long-Bailey pressed the Government to make changes to the two-child benefit cap, which means most parents cannot claim for more than two children. 'It's the right thing to do to lift pensioners out of poverty, and I'm sure that both he and the Chancellor also agree that it's right to lift children out of poverty,' the Salford MP told the Commons. 'So can he reassure this House that he and the Chancellor are doing all they can to outline plans to lift the two-child cap on universal credit as soon as possible?' Mr Bell replied: 'All levers to reduce child poverty are on the table. 'The child poverty strategy will be published in the autumn.' He added: 'If we look at who is struggling most, having to turn off their heating, it is actually younger families with children that are struggling with that. 'So she's absolutely right to raise this issue, it is one of the core purposes of this Government, we cannot carry on with a situation where large families, huge percentages of them, are in poverty.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Consumer spending slows to lowest growth of the year amid falling confidence
Consumers slowed their spending to the lowest growth of the year in May amid falling confidence, figures show. Sales of fashion and full-price big ticket items were held back by faltering consumer confidence, although gaming bucked the trend due to popular new releases, according to the British Retail Consortium (BRC)-KPMG Retail Sales Monitor. Total retail sales across the UK were up by 1% year-on-year in May, against growth of 0.7% a year ago, driven by food sales increasing by 3.6% on the back of football tournaments and two bank holidays, prompting spending on BBQs and picnics. Non-food sales were down 1.1% year-on-year in May. BRC chief executive Helen Dickinson said: 'Consumers put the brakes on spending, with the slowest growth in 2025 so far. 'Retailers are grappling with the £5 billion in extra costs from higher National Insurance contributions and wages, which kicked in during April. They also face an additional £2 billion later this year from new packaging taxes and remain concerned about the consequences of the Employment Rights Bill. 'Ensuring the new Bill supports workers' rights without undermining retailers' ability to continue to provide jobs and investment in people will determine whether Government achieves economic growth across the country or not.' Linda Ellett, UK head of retail and leisure consumer markets at KPMG, said: 'While the sunshine continued, the pace of retail sales growth didn't in May. 'Early seasonal purchases were likely a factor, as was a dampening of some spending appetite as households reflected upon the recent combination of essential bill rises. But May still saw slight growth, driven mainly by food and drink, with non-food purchases falling overall.' Separate figures from Barclays also show consumer card spending grew just 1% year-on-year in May, down from April's 4.5%. The bank said May's two Bank Holidays encouraged discretionary spending, although this was offset by wet weather in the second half of the month, and by consumers cutting back amid falling confidence in personal finances. Spending in pharmacies and on health and beauty recorded the highest growth in May – up 12% – linked to the UK's sunniest spring on record and a surge in NHS website visits for hay fever advice. Airline spending jumped by 9.7% as consumers made summer plans, while garden centres saw a 7.2% increase. Karen Johnson, head of retail at Barclays, said: 'Consumers are clearly becoming more value-conscious as financial pressures persist, but they're still finding joy in the everyday – whether that's a small treat, a cinema trip, a garden project, or a carefully planned getaway. 'The double Bank Holidays in May and record sunshine will have given non-essential spending a helpful boost, but this was largely outweighed by the rainy weather in the second half of the month, while longer-term uncertainty continues to shape how and where people choose to spend.'
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Consumer spending slows to lowest growth of the year amid falling confidence
Consumers slowed their spending to the lowest growth of the year in May amid falling confidence, figures show. Sales of fashion and full-price big ticket items were held back by faltering consumer confidence, although gaming bucked the trend due to popular new releases, according to the British Retail Consortium (BRC)-KPMG Retail Sales Monitor. Total retail sales across the UK were up by 1% year-on-year in May, against growth of 0.7% a year ago, driven by food sales increasing by 3.6% on the back of football tournaments and two bank holidays, prompting spending on BBQs and picnics. Non-food sales were down 1.1% year-on-year in May. BRC chief executive Helen Dickinson said: 'Consumers put the brakes on spending, with the slowest growth in 2025 so far. 'Retailers are grappling with the £5 billion in extra costs from higher National Insurance contributions and wages, which kicked in during April. They also face an additional £2 billion later this year from new packaging taxes and remain concerned about the consequences of the Employment Rights Bill. 'Ensuring the new Bill supports workers' rights without undermining retailers' ability to continue to provide jobs and investment in people will determine whether Government achieves economic growth across the country or not.' Linda Ellett, UK head of retail and leisure consumer markets at KPMG, said: 'While the sunshine continued, the pace of retail sales growth didn't in May. 'Early seasonal purchases were likely a factor, as was a dampening of some spending appetite as households reflected upon the recent combination of essential bill rises. But May still saw slight growth, driven mainly by food and drink, with non-food purchases falling overall.' Separate figures from Barclays also show consumer card spending grew just 1% year-on-year in May, down from April's 4.5%. The bank said May's two Bank Holidays encouraged discretionary spending, although this was offset by wet weather in the second half of the month, and by consumers cutting back amid falling confidence in personal finances. Spending in pharmacies and on health and beauty recorded the highest growth in May – up 12% – linked to the UK's sunniest spring on record and a surge in NHS website visits for hay fever advice. Airline spending jumped by 9.7% as consumers made summer plans, while garden centres saw a 7.2% increase. Karen Johnson, head of retail at Barclays, said: 'Consumers are clearly becoming more value-conscious as financial pressures persist, but they're still finding joy in the everyday – whether that's a small treat, a cinema trip, a garden project, or a carefully planned getaway. 'The double Bank Holidays in May and record sunshine will have given non-essential spending a helpful boost, but this was largely outweighed by the rainy weather in the second half of the month, while longer-term uncertainty continues to shape how and where people choose to spend.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data