This Word Means: Mother's Day
WHY NOW?
The second Sunday of May is celebrated as Mother's Day in many parts of the world to recognise and celebrate mothers. This year, it falls on May 11.
It can be traced to the United States, particularly activist Anna Jarvis's efforts and her determination to preserve her mother's memory.
Her mother, Ann Reeves Jarvis, worked for causes related to motherhood, such as teaching mothers sanitation to prevent child mortality. She also formed a community of mothers from both sides of the American Civil War (1861-65) to work for peace.
A young Anna once heard her mother say, 'I hope and pray that someone, sometime, will found a memorial mothers' day commemorating her for the matchless service she renders to humanity in every field of life. She is entitled to it.'
Jarvis decided to campaign for the cause of Mother's Day and sought to fix a date close to May 9 — the date of her mother's passing in 1905. She wrote letters to politicians, businessmen, and church leaders to enlist their support for her cause.
She also wanted the day to be called Mother's Day and not Mothers' Day, because she wanted the celebration to honour the individual mother who cares for her family at home.
Following her attempts, some local events were held in 1908. Eventually, US President Woodrow Wilson signed a Bill in 1914 to formally recognise Mother's Day as an official holiday. It said, '… I, Woodrow Wilson, President of the United States of America… do hereby direct the government officials to display the United States flag on all government buildings and do invite the people of the United States to display the flag at their homes or other suitable places on the second Sunday in May as a public expression of our love and reverence for the mothers of our country.'
Later, as Mother's Day celebrations often became limited to selling greeting cards and candies, Anna protested bitterly against the commercialisation of the occasion.
Further, some countries have other days for celebrating mothers, such as the British Mothering Sunday. Thailand celebrates Mother's Day on August 12, the birthday of Queen Mother Sirikit. With the increasing spread of American culture and commercial practices, the May Mother's Day has gained significance even in countries without such a day in the first place.
Yes. Incidentally, that also involved an American woman who wanted to honour her parent. In 1909, Sonora Smart Dodd was attending a Mother's Day church sermon. She and her four siblings had been raised by their father, William Jackson Smart, who fought in the US Civil War.
Her great-granddaughter, Betsy Roddy, told the Associated Press in 2017 that the incident 'bugged her'. 'She thought, 'Well, why isn't there a Father's Day?'' After much campaigning over a long period, US President Richard Nixon issued a proclamation in 1972 for Father's Day, today celebrated on the third Sunday of June. This was in tribute to Dodd's requests because her father's birthday was in June.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
8 hours ago
- First Post
WWII bombs force mass evacuation in Cologne, Germany
Cologne was subject to particularly heavy bombings during World War II, with unexploded artillery still posing a threat to the city. The bombs had been found during building work on Monday in the Deutz area on the east bank of the River Rhine read more World War II-made bombs were defused in the German city of Cologne, prompting the evacuation of over 2,000 people. The operation is being dubbed the biggest bomb defusing exercise since the end of the war. Authorities evacuated an area of around 10,000 sq m on Wednesday after the discovery of three American-made explosives in a shipyard in Deutz. Cologne was subject to particularly heavy bombings during World War II, with unexploded artillery still posing a threat to the city. The bombs had been found during building work on Monday in the Deutz area on the east bank of the River Rhine. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In 2017, authorities uncovered a 1.4-tonne bomb in Frankfurt, leading to the evacuation of 65,000 people, the biggest such evacuation in Europe since 1945. In 2021 four people were injured when a World War II bomb exploded at a building site near Munich's main railway station, scattering debris over hundreds of metres. Roads, schools, and hospitals shut Road and train lines were closed throughout the day, and city officials went door to door, sending about 20,500 people out of their homes and closing 58 hotels as well as numerous restaurants and businesses. The city's typically busy streets were hauntingly empty as shops, restaurants, and businesses were ordered to cease operations during the day. Cultural institutions, including the Philharmonic Hall and several museums, were also impacted, along with government buildings, 58 hotels, and nine schools. Transportation faced major disruptions, with all roads in the area closed, many train services cancelled, and the Messe/Deutz train station shut down from 08:00 local time. With inputs from agencies
Time of India
11 hours ago
- Time of India
Jeffrey Epstein's real estate empire: Who owns them now?
It's time to put a lid on the conspiracy theories. It's been over five years since rumors have been circulating about the nature of Jeffrey Epstein's death. However, on Wednesday, the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) Deputy Director Dan Bongino revealed that there is nothing in the Jeffrey Epstein file indicating he died by any other way than suicide. Bongino updated Fox News on the investigation into the Epstein file, as conspiracies continue to float that he was murdered in prison, and said, "The evidence we have in our files clearly indicates that it was, in fact, a suicide. We do have video. It's not the greatest video in the world. I don't want to set expectations on fire." Bongino added, "However, the video does show in that specific block, that he goes in, made a phone call; you'll see 12 hours of guards going in basically check on him, come back. You'll see nobody really comes out of that bay in that area than him. There's no one in there. There's nothing there in the file at all that indicates anything other than in fact a suicide." The infamous American financier died in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. But what happened to the heap of wealth he amassed? Read on to find out. Jeffrey Epstein had amassed a significant real estate portfolio over the decades. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Tecno Pova Curve 5G - India's Slimmest 5,500mAh Curve TECNO Mobile Buy Now Undo From private islands to the landmark townhouse on Manhattan – the list of his possessions and property is quite long. Following his death, these properties became central to legal battles, settlements, and public scrutiny. While some properties have been sold and proceeds allocated to settlements, others remain in limbo, awaiting resolution. Here's an overview of his key properties and their current ownership. Take a look. Little Saint James & Great Saint James, US Virgin Islands: Epstein's most infamous holdings were his two private islands in the US Virgin Islands. Little Saint James, often referred to as 'Pedophile Island', was where many of the alleged abuses occurred. Great Saint James, purchased in 2016, remained largely undeveloped. Current ownership: In May 2023, private equity mogul Stephen Deckoff, through his firm SD Investments, acquired both islands for $60 million, significantly below the initial $125 million listing price. Settlement details: As part of a settlement with the US Virgin Islands, half of the proceeds from the sale of Little Saint James were allocated to the territory. Additionally, Epstein's estate agreed to pay $450,000 to address environmental damages on Great Saint James. Manhattan townhouse, New York City: Located on East 71st Street, Epstein's seven-story mansion became one of the most popular landmarks in the city and was valued at $77 million in 2019. The property was raided by federal authorities in July 2019 as part of their investigation into Epstein's activities. Current ownership: In March 2021, former Goldman Sachs executive Michael Daffey purchased the townhouse for $51 million. The proceeds from the sale were directed to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. Palm Beach estate, Florida: Epstein acquired his Palm Beach estate in 1990. The property was estimated to be worth over $12 million in 2019. In December 2021, a venture capitalist purchased the vacant lot for $25.845 million, with plans to demolish the existing house. Zorro ranch, New Mexico: Situated near Stanley, New Mexico, Zorro Ranch spanned approximately 10,000 acres and included various structures, such as a main residence, guest houses, and an airstrip. The ranch gained notoriety due to its association with Epstein's activities. Current ownership: In August 2023, Zorro Ranch was sold to San Rafael Ranch LLC for an undisclosed sum. The buyer's identity and future plans for the property remain unclear. Other properties: Epstein also owned an apartment in Paris on the famous Avenue Foch, though details about its current status are limited. Additionally, he held a private jet, which was auctioned off in 2020. Estate management and legal proceedings: Following Epstein's death, his estate faced numerous legal challenges and settlements. In January 2025, the estate received a substantial tax refund, increasing its value to $145 million. However, activists and some victims' advocates argued that funds should be directed towards compensating survivors rather than benefiting individuals associated with Epstein. Epstein Accuser Virginia Giuffre Cremated QUIETLY After Tragic Demise; Private Burial Details Emerge
Hindustan Times
11 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Breaking the Engagement' Review: The China-U.S. Divorce
'There is no realistic prospect or false nirvana of returning to an amicable and cooperative bilateral relationship,' David Shambaugh writes in 'Breaking the Engagement: How China Won and Lost America.' Few American scholars have a better understanding of China than Mr. Shambaugh. So when the George Washington University professor tells us that the official U.S. strategy of engagement with Beijing is dead—'D-E-A-D'—we had better pay attention. This isn't only a question of state policy. The American people have had enough of China, too. Mr. Shambaugh points to a recent Pew survey, which found that eight out of 10 Americans hold 'unfavorable' views of China, with 42% describing it as an 'enemy.' Only 6% see it as a 'partner.' Certainly, Secretary of State Marco Rubio's announcement that the U.S. would revoke the visas of many Chinese students who are already in this country—and make it much harder for future Chinese students to enroll at American universities—lays bare the fact that the U.S.-China relationship is at a nadir. It would not be overly shrill to say that in many of these cases we're educating the enemy. Mr. Shambaugh, who describes himself as a 'disillusioned former engager,' would agree. (His disillusion, it should be noted, began when the Chinese government banned him from Beijing's many universities and think tanks after he published a long essay in this newspaper in 2015, titled 'The Coming Chinese Crackup.' It took a personal slight to make the scales fall from his eyes, but fall they did.) A China-hawk ever since, Mr. Shambaugh sets out to explain how Washington and Beijing have reached the lowest ebb in their relations since Richard Nixon's 'breakthrough' in 1972. The Sino-American relationship, while always demanding vigilance, has rarely been so nakedly hostile. Mr. Shambaugh's book covers a 75-year period, from 1949—when the Chinese Communists took control of the country—to the second election of Donald Trump in 2024. Although the relationship fluctuated during that time between 'amity' and 'enmity,' as the author puts it, the American desire for engagement was not merely constant but 'axiomatic.' This policy of nonhostility was bipartisan in the U.S. Congress, even as some Democrats chafed at a glossing over by Washington of Chinese human-rights abuses and some Republicans 'questioned the long-term wisdom' of strengthening China through trade and transfers of technology. The roots of America's decadeslong policy of engagement with China lie, says Mr. Shambaugh, in its two-centuries-old 'missionary complex' to change China. America not only sought to trade with China starting in the late 18th century but to 'mold and shape it' in other ways: 'religiously, intellectually, socially, economically, and politically.' The fluctuations in bilateral relations have resulted from the dialectic between 'American paternalism vs. Chinese nationalism.' To put matters at their plainest: We like the Chinese when they're inclined to be more like us, 'conforming to American expectations of liberal development.' But one man can make a tectonic difference. American paternalism prevailed—whether genuinely or as a result of the Chinese faking conformity to extract material advantage—until 2012-13 and the ascent to power of Xi Jinping, the most hardline nationalist leader China has had since Mao Zedong. Until then, China had needed America in what was still a unipolar world, so Beijing was largely vested in playing down discord. The 1989 Tiananmen massacre and the 2008-09 financial crisis—which sparked Chinese disillusion with American economic management—were rare blips in the pre-Xi age, when China was led by less Manichean men: Deng Xiaoping, Jiang Zemin, Hu Jintao. Mr. Trump, too, has played a decisive role in altering the course of this relationship. His election in 2016 saw growing American hostility toward China grafted atop Mr. Xi's mercantilist, irredentist jingoism. This hard line on China, Mr. Shambaugh observes, was continued by the Biden administration, albeit with differences in nuance and rhetoric. With the second Trump administration, we have Mr. Rubio driving important elements of America's China policy. 'He may be,' writes Mr. Shambaugh—whose book went to press before Mr. Rubio's elevation at State in January—'the single most knowledgeable Member of Congress about China,' who has been 'outspoken and unafraid to take the Xi Jinping regime to task for a variety of its malign actions.' Given our loss of global predominance and primacy—as well as Mr. Xi's drive to make China the global hegemon—the best we can hope for, Mr. Shambaugh concludes, is 'competitive coexistence' with China. The U.S. should expose China to the world at every opportunity. 'The Chinese government's own negative behavior is one of America's greatest assets in its contest with China, and it must be taken advantage of.' We must also retain our global strut and confidence, Mr. Shambaugh says, and not overestimate China, a country with 'multiple systemic weaknesses.' These include an aging population, a stark gender imbalance, a rigid one-party system, widespread repression, massive income inequality, capital flight, a nonconvertible currency, industrial overcapacity and a vindictive control-freak at the helm. No one has the slightest idea what will happen when Mr. Xi dies. Mr. Shambaugh's most radical suggestion is his call to 'consider resurrecting and applying the 'Trading With the Enemy Act,' ' which would take American companies to task for conducting business with China in ways that harm our 'national interest.' The American corporate sector needs to 'understand that some—much—of what it does in China is strengthening an existing rival and a potential adversary.' This is a controversial idea. It's also audacious. We may not stop the Chinese juggernaut in its tracks. But there's no reason to actively help it run us over. Mr. Varadarajan, a Journal contributor, is a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and at NYU Law School's Classical Liberal Institute. Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines to 100 year archives.
