logo
How Jacinda Ardern Changed the Look of Leadship

How Jacinda Ardern Changed the Look of Leadship

Vogue2 days ago

In my 20s, I believed that to hold power, you had to project 'gravitas.' Not just certainty, but a kind of impermeable seriousness. You didn't smile too much. You didn't laugh to put people at ease. You spoke as though everything you thought was self-evidently right, and you carried yourself like you were the only person who could save the room, the meeting, the country.
The politicians I saw on TV projected that certainty with force—aggressive in debate, unflinching in tone, never showing doubt. In the professional world, the men and women who held power negotiated with the same posture of strategic dominance. I admired them, and in some ways wanted to be them. But I also felt like in becoming them, I would have to give up some essential part of myself: my openness, my reflex to make others comfortable, the little ways I softened sharp edges in conversation.
And then there was Jacinda. A woman just a couple of years older than me, with indisputable power, standing at a press conference with a kind of presence I'd never seen. It was liberating to watch. It felt like permission.
I'm not the only one who felt this way. In the years since, Ardern has become an icon for a particular kind of Millennial and Gen X woman—emotionally attuned, politically engaged, and skeptical of institutional performance. The women I know admire her for her compassion, her humor, her realness. 'She [showed] me that not only would motherhood not mean the end of your personal goals, but that showing up for your family at the same time as standing up for what's right is possible and important,' reflects Rhiannon, an operational strategist in her early 40s. 'She just seems like a genuinely good person,' says my friend Julia, who works in government. Ardern's decision to bring her baby to the UN General Assembly, and the visibility of her partner Clarke Gayford adjusting his schedule around hers, quietly challenged the idea that women—especially mothers—must shape their ambitions around someone else's.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The 3 Impossible Leadership Strategies Needed For Trump-Musk Feud
The 3 Impossible Leadership Strategies Needed For Trump-Musk Feud

Forbes

time17 hours ago

  • Forbes

The 3 Impossible Leadership Strategies Needed For Trump-Musk Feud

The Trump-Musk battle: who will win? To the surprise of no one, the world's richest man and the world's most powerful political leader have run into a difference of opinion - a blustery Trump-Musk feud that's capturing the headlines. The break-up between Elon Musk and Donald Trump is the battle that everyone saw coming, spinning into a tweetstorm of insults, unwanted revelations and surprising outbursts. Trump has characterized Musk as someone who has 'lost his mind' over the Big Beautiful Bill, and is declaring that he will not speak to the Tesla chief again. Meanwhile, Bloomberg reports that Musk's battle with Trump has caused a $34 billion dent in his personal fortunes. Yet, underneath it all, three leadership communication strategies could instantly resolve the conflict. Read on to find out why these simple ideas are simply impossible. The President told reporters in the White House on Thursday that Musk knew the inner workings of the bill 'better than anybody sitting here. He had no problem with it," according to reports from SkyNews. "All of a sudden, he had a problem and he only developed the problem when he found out we're going to have to cut the EV mandate." Musk replied, 'False. This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' Musk then went on X, the social media platform that he owns, to claim that Trump is 'in the Epstein Files', according to NBC News. He even suggested that Trump should be impeached - and replaced by Vice President JD Vance. How can this battle of giants be resolved, simply and easily, with some fundamental leadership communication? Here are three ways that you will recognize instantly - as you simultaneously realize that none of these things are going to happen. It's been said that, 'Everywhere you go there you are.' No matter how much money you have, or you have lost, you're still the same person. Your emotions exist beyond the balance sheet. At our core, we are all human beings - even the billionaires among us. We are all flawed, ambitious, and looking for a little more. The battle between Trump and Musk is something that could happen to any leader, anywhere. The key takeaway here is to consider the advantages of collaboration versus chaos. Few leaders in politics or business have leveraged chaos as effectively as Donald Trump and Elon Musk. While their respective domains and methods differ, both of these titans have consistently leveraged uncertainty, upheaval and unpredictable actions to galvanize support and drive their agendas forward. This shared appetite for chaos suggests a deliberate, if sometimes intuitive, embrace of disorder as a foundational element of their operational and leadership strategies. Yet this feud seems futile: like a circular firing squad, the chaotic back-and-forth only seems to create wounds everywhere. For the Trump-Musk battle, it seems unlikely that these two solo acts will put the old band back together again. The first step towards reaching agreement is the desire for some sort of mutually beneficial outcome. The feud will continue until that mutual benefit is discovered. This approach is well-documented in various negotiations, including labor disputes, service recovery situations, divorces, legal dealings and high-level investor conversations. Yet, for these two men who are well-versed in all of these things, the return to the base impulse of competition, insults and secret-shaming creates collateral damage and chaos. In the Trump-Musk breakup, the question is: who really wins?

It's Reigning Men, That's the Problem
It's Reigning Men, That's the Problem

Bloomberg

time21 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

It's Reigning Men, That's the Problem

This is Bloomberg Opinion Today, an iron-pumping circuit of Bloomberg Opinion's opinions. Sign up here. Poland's new populist president Karol Nawrocki — a former boxer — admits to joining a free-for-all football fan melee back in 2007. That more than qualifies him for the ranks of world leaders enamored of physical strength and thuggish joys, says Adrian Wooldridge. Among them, Adrian lists Russia's Vladimir Putin, India's Narendra Modi, China's Xi Jinping, Turkey's Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Belarus's Alexander Lukashenko. Lionel Laurent says the US State Department might just call them America's ' civilizational allies ' since Donald Trump shares their preoccupation with athletic prowess.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store