logo
Why Black Women Are Disproportionately Impacted By Uterine Fibroids

Why Black Women Are Disproportionately Impacted By Uterine Fibroids

Forbes4 days ago
Women at doctor's office.
Although uterine fibroids are not an uncommon topic, the potential for severity of the condition is rarely discussed. This is especially true for Black women who tend to develop fibroids at a younger age and experience more severe symptoms and complications than white women. But there are steps that women of color can take to ensure they are getting the proper care. Uterine fibroids are noncancerous growths in and around the uterus, are far more common than some women might think. A systematic review estimated that 70% to 80% of women will develop uterine fibroids in their lifetime — but Black women experience them at disproportionate rates to other races, according to past research.
Fibroids are almost always noncancerous, and many people do not ever develop symptoms or need treatment, according to a review published August 2022 in Endocrine Reviews. But for others, symptoms can be bothersome, painful, and even cause reproductive problems, such as infertility, multiple miscarriages, or early labor. Almost two-thirds of all women will develop uterine fibroids. Black women, however, are three times more likely to experience them than women of other races. Black women also have an increased chance of having larger and multiple tumors with more severe symptoms, and are more likely to develop them earlier in life compared with women of other races.
Research published in Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology found that nearly 1 in 4 Black women between ages 18 and 30 have fibroids compared with roughly 6 percent of white women. These findings also showed that by age 35, 60 percent of Black women will have fibroids, compared with 40 percent of white women of the same age. Black women are also 2 to 3 times more likely to experience complications or recurrent fibroids. According to Hilda Hutcherson, MD, professor of obstetrics and gynecology and associate dean for diversity and minority affairs at Columbia University Medical Center in New York City, uterine fibroids in the majority of women are asymptomatic, and these tumors don't cause a serious health threat.
But for those who do get symptoms, they may experience things like:
Some women may also experience complications during pregnancy and labor — or in rare cases, infertility. 'Fibroids are not often associated with infertility — in fact, many women don't discover they have them until their first ultrasound after becoming pregnant,' says Dr. Hutcherson. Although it isn't entirely clear why Black women develop fibroids at a higher rate compared with other races, the 2022 research from Endocrine Reviews has uncovered a few factors that may contribute. Those include:
Higher Levels of Chronic Stress An accumulating body of research suggests that racism contributes to chronic stress, or allostatic load, which refers to the cumulative burden of chronic stress and life events. Chronic psychological stress was found to be associated with a risk of uterine fibroids, according to a meta-analysis of observational studies. A study that followed more than 22,000 Black women found that higher exposure to perceived racism was associated with a higher risk of fibroids among women who were born in the United States.
This added stress may directly increase the likelihood of fibroids by activating inflammatory and other biologic pathways, or indirectly contribute to risk by leading to behavioral coping mechanisms like overusing alcohol, poor diet, or lack of physical activity, according to the authors of the January 2023 Fertility and Sterility review.
Exposure to Harmful Chemicals Black women may also have an increased risk of fibroids because they disproportionately experience environmental and occupational exposures, including organic pollutants and air pollution. Per the Environmental Protection Agency, organic pollutants are chemicals that are used in agriculture and manufacturing that can have an adverse impact on human health. Black women are also more likely to use chemical hair straighteners, which contain endocrine-disrupting chemicals that past research has linked with fibroids.
In addition there are certain risk factors noted in the Endocrine Reviews paper that make it more likely for women of any race or ethnicity to have fibroids, such as being overweight or getting older, until menopause, when they usually decline, per research. What does this mean for women of color who are diagnosed with uterine fibroids? 'The question of what to do when confronted with fibroids is a tricky one,' says Hutcherson. 'Fibroids are benign, so if they aren't actively affecting a woman's health or threatening her fertility, I typically recommend that my patients just leave them alone.'
If a woman with the condition opts for treatment, Mayo Clinic notes there are medications that can shrink fibroids or relieve heavy menstrual bleeding, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may be used to help relieve pain. If medications aren't enough, minimally invasive surgery may be used to remove the fibroids or there are procedures that can destroy the fibroids without surgery.
In extreme cases, a hysterectomy can be recommended — but that should be the treatment of last resort. There are alternative treatments for severe fibroids that are less invasive and can preserve fertility. There is evidence that Black women may not always be offered the same treatment options compared with white women. A study published in the American Journal of Emergency Medicine that looked at management of acute pain in the ER found that Black patients were 40 percent less likely to be given medication for acute pain compared with white patients.
According to a study published in 2022 in the Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Black women are less likely to receive minimally invasive treatment for uterine fibroids: 81 percent of white women included in the review underwent a less invasive laparoscopic fibroid surgery compared with only 57 percent of Black women. Instead, Black women are at least twice as likely to have a hysterectomy due to fibroids compared with white women, per Michigan Medicine. What's more, about one-third of these hysterectomies are performed between ages 18 and 44 — significant childbearing years.
Although these disparities have existed throughout America's history, it's only recently that there has been more dialogue and research about the extent and effects of these injustices, according to BU School of Public Health. Black women–led health advocacy organizations are part of the effort to to educate and disseminate information about conditions that disproportionately impact women of color. The Resilient Sisterhood Project is dedicated to educating and empowering women of African descent through outreach efforts to build awareness about diseases of the reproductive system that disproportionately affect them. The U.S. government is also investing in improving these disparities. In March 2023, the White House detailed several initiatives, including $471 million to support implementation of the White House Blueprint for Addressing the Maternal Health Crisis to reduce maternal mortality and morbidity rates and address persistent disparities and implement implicit bias training for healthcare providers.
In most cases, uterine fibroids can be treated. However, it's important to find the right doctor who will help you better understand your options. That's the first step that women of color can take toward receiving quality medical care and experiencing a successful and healthy recovery. Start your search with these tips:
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Banned chemicals found in American shampoo, sunscreen and tampons across major brands
Banned chemicals found in American shampoo, sunscreen and tampons across major brands

Fox News

time2 days ago

  • Fox News

Banned chemicals found in American shampoo, sunscreen and tampons across major brands

From shampoo and sunscreen to tampons, many personal care products on American shelves contain chemicals linked to cancer, infertility, and hormone disruption—ingredients that are banned or restricted in the European Union and other countries. Despite these alarming associations, no federal law in the U.S. requires companies to disclose potentially harmful ingredients. Only California mandates limited transparency, leaving most Americans in the dark about what they're putting on—and absorbing into—their bodies. For Tiah Tomlin-Harris, a two-time survivor of triple-negative breast cancer, that lack of transparency was a wake-up call. Diagnosed before age 40 with no genetic predisposition, Tomlin-Harris began asking hard questions: Where is this coming from? Genetic testing came back negative, placing her among the 80–90% of breast cancer patients whose illness isn't linked to family history. Her background as a chemist in the pharmaceutical industry gave her a unique perspective—and a critical eye for labels. "I started to dig into the causations," she told FOX. "The first thing I did was remove every single product in my house—from hair care to dish detergent. I went back to grandma's remedies—baking soda, vinegar—because I didn't know what was safe anymore." As she researched, she realized just how many widely used beauty and hygiene products are packed with potentially harmful chemicals. While Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has pushed for the removal of toxic additives in processed foods, he has yet to tackle the personal care industry. FDA Commissioner Marty Makary admits the agency is in a "deregulatory mindset," saying, "[We've] been regulating too much." That mindset has led to an explosion of consumer-driven tools like Yuka and Clearya, apps that scan barcodes and analyze ingredient safety using AI. "Most people are shocked," said Julie Chapon, Yuka's co-founder. "They assume green packaging means safety." Tomlin-Harris emphasized the disproportionate impact on women of color, particularly Black women. "We spend nine times more on beauty products than any other demographic, yet these products often contain the most harmful ingredients—parabens, phthalates, formaldehyde, benzene. These aren't just linked to cancer. They're weakening chemotherapy drugs. They're disrupting hormones. They're impacting fertility—for men and women." A Consumer Reports investigation found carcinogens in 10 of the top braiding hair brands, many of which are marketed to Black women and girls. Janet Nudelman, Director of the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics at Breast Cancer Prevention Partners, agrees that consumers are often left choosing "between protecting against skin cancer versus increasing their risk of breast cancer" because of harmful ingredients. Dr. Leonardo Trasande, whose studies highlight the health hazards of common chemicals, called the current system "rigged to produce chemical exposures that are toxic to our hormones." The consequences, he warns, are societal: higher healthcare costs and lifelong reproductive and developmental health problems. The federal government is slowly responding. The Safer Beauty Bill package, reintroduced in Congress, seeks to ban toxic ingredients, increase ingredient disclosure and protect vulnerable populations like hairstylists, nail technicians, and women of color. But for now, consumers are largely left to protect themselves. FDA Commissioner Makary insists change is coming: "We're doing an inventory of all chemicals in the food supply to see how we can make it safer." Still, advocacy groups say the U.S. is far behind the EU in regulating cosmetic safety. Industry representatives push back. The Personal Care Products Council asserts: "PCPC and our member companies are fully committed to upholding the highest standards of safety, quality and transparency." But for advocates like Tomlin-Harris, promises aren't enough. "This isn't just a women's issue," she said. "It's a people's issue. Men are affected. Children are affected. Our entire population is being exposed to chemicals we didn't consent to, and we're paying the price." Her message is clear: "We need transparency. We need regulation. And we need accountability from the companies creating these products. It's time to detox our routines, demand safer alternatives and prioritize our health."

Your heart could be aging faster than you are
Your heart could be aging faster than you are

UPI

time2 days ago

  • UPI

Your heart could be aging faster than you are

The research team theorizes that telling folks their heart age might help spur them to healthier lifestyles and treatment. Photo by Adobe Stock/HealthDay July 31 (UPI) -- Researchers who have developed a new "heart age" calculator say many Americans have unhealthy hearts that are physiologically older than their chronological age, with men faring worse than women. The research team theorizes that telling folks their heart age might help spur them to healthier lifestyles and treatment. "Many people who should be on medicine to lower their risk for heart attack, stroke or heart failure are not on these medications," explained study senior author Dr. Sadiya Khan in a news release. "We hope this new heart age calculator will help support discussions about prevention and ultimately improve health for all people." The new heart age calculator, which is free to the public, is available online. Study findings were published Wednesday in JAMA Cardiology. Khan, a professor of cardiovascular epidemiology, and her colleagues at Northwestern University in Chicago, note that the calculator is based on the American Heart Association's PREVENT equations, which talk about a patient's heart risk in terms of percentages. For example, a doctor might use the equation to tell a patient, "8 out 10 people with your [cardiovascular] profile may have a heart event in the next 10 years." Khan's group hoped that expressing the heart's condition as an age might be easier for folks to grasp. To test the new heart age tool, they applied it to data on 14,000 nationally representative U.S. adults, ages 30 to 79, who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2011 and 2020. None of the participants had any prior history heart disease at the time of the analysis. In most cases, people's heart age was older than the number of candles on their birthday cake. For example, over the whole cohort, women had an average heart age of 55.4 years, compared to an average chronological age of 51.3, the study found. The news was worse for men: Their average heart age was 56.7, compared to an average chronological age of 49.7. Certain demographic factors were in play, Khan's group noted. Among men, for example, nearly a third of those who had achieved a high school education or less had a heart age that was 10 years or more older than their chronological age, the study found. For men and women alike, being Black or Hispanic also tended to widen the gap between heart age and chronological age. "Black men had a heart age 8.5 years older than their actual age, compared to 7.9 years for Hispanic men, 6.7 years for Asian men and 6.4 years for white men," a Northwestern University news release said. "The gaps were 6.2 years for Black women, 4.8 years for Hispanic women, 3.7 years for white women and 2.8 years for Asian women." The key to shrinking these health gaps is prevention, Khan said. She hopes the new tool can help motivate people. "We hope this tool helps doctors and patients discuss risk for heart disease more effectively so we can better inform what therapies can prevent heart attacks, stroke or heart failure events from ever happening," Khan said in the news release. "The important thing is that we have very good options available in our toolbox to help slow that aging down if we can identify it," she added. "This may be even more important in younger people who don't often think about their risk for heart disease." More information Find out more about keeping your heart healthy at the American Heart Association. Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Rising heat is causing students to underperform across the globe
Rising heat is causing students to underperform across the globe

Los Angeles Times

time2 days ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Rising heat is causing students to underperform across the globe

As climate change drives temperatures higher, prolonged periods of heat exposure are doing more than just making classrooms uncomfortable. According to a new systematic review published in PLOS Climate, extended exposure to heat significantly impairs students' cognitive abilities, affecting their academic performance, especially in complex subjects such as mathematics. The study analyzed previous research encompassing nearly 14.5 million students across 61 countries. The findings show clear evidence that heat exposure over time is correlated to lower scores in math and other complex cognitive tasks among elementary, middle and high school students. Even on days when temperatures were between 80 and 90 degrees Fahrenheit, the data show that students can experience heat stress, followed by a drop in cognitive performance. The effects of heat exposure on learning are often not seen until much later, said Konstantina Vasilakopoulou, a Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology professor who co-authored the paper with Matthaios Santamouris of the University of New South Wales. 'So many studies have found that temperatures of the year before a serious exam affect students more than temperatures during the exam year itself. We simply do not have enough time to recover,' Vasilakopoulou said. According to the paper, students from lower-income families often have less access to air-conditioned classrooms and homes, making them more vulnerable to the harmful effects of heat. Racial disparities were also evident in the data, with Black and Latino students in the U.S. seeing up to three times greater cognitive losses due to heat compared to their white peers. 'There are larger numbers of Black and Hispanic people living in poorer areas where the conditions are worse, temperatures higher, and air conditioning and ventilation often lacking,' Vasilakopoulou said. Future climate scenarios predict even greater, and in some ways, surprising challenges. By 2050, if current warming trends continue without adequate adaptation measures, students in currently cooler regions may start to suffer the same problems that those in warmer climates do now. That's because in places that are already hot, there's more likely to be some amount of infrastructure to deal with the heat, whereas in colder areas, that may not be the case. Adaptive strategies such as improved ventilation, air conditioning and green infrastructure can help reduce the effects, but many schools, particularly those in underserved areas, lack the resources to implement them effectively. In Southern California, the findings resonate deeply. 'As classroom temperatures rise over time — especially during extended heat waves or in schools with less shade, poorer insulation and lacking access to air conditioning — students tend to show declines in attention, memory and test performance,' said Edith de Guzman, a climate researcher at UCLA's Luskin Center for Innovation. Heat can also affect students' abilities to enjoy outdoor recreational activities, having serious effects on their physical, mental and social well-being, she said. In L.A., public school starts in August — instead of September — further exposing students to heat while at school, and ultimately affecting those attending under-resourced campuses more. Consider, for example, Orange County's Garden Grove Unified School District, which serves cities including Anaheim and Santa Ana, where many campuses lack air conditioning, according to Thelma Briseno, a senior director at the L.A.-based nonprofit Climate Resolve. In previous summers, teachers have reported temperatures reaching 100 degrees on some days and having to resort to makeshift strategies to keep students cool, such as going out and buying bottles of water and fans. 'Things like an indoor heat standard really need to be in place, and there's nothing like that that exists right now for schools,' Briseno said. Some of the most striking findings from the various papers reviewed in the article found that for every 1 degree Celsius drop in temperature in a classroom, students' speed and accuracy increased by 7.5% and 0.6%, respectively. Alarmingly, using the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's projected increase of 1.5 degrees Celsius over preindustrial levels by 2050, another study found that if no cooling measures are taken, elementary school students may see a cognitive performance drop of 9.8%. After reviewing the findings, Dr. Marc Futernick, a Climate Resolve board member and managing editor of the Journal of Climate Change and Health, emphasized that what is at stake is no less than the future of humanity. 'If we are moving into a world where we can't think, create or strategize as well as we could in the past, what does that mean for our future?' he said. 'We should be focused entirely on preventing these effects, on controlling the climate crisis the best we can, and adapting our communities to things like extreme heat, preventing the exposure in the first place.' Climate Resolve has advocated solutions such as 'cool roofs,' increased tree planting and cool pavement technologies, which significantly reduce temperatures. 'You obviously have to address the issue from a community standpoint,' Briseno said. 'Community cooling in residential areas and also within the school building themselves,' she concluded, 'it's a collaborative effort between people in the built environment.' For example, a community-driven 'cool communities initiative' in the Pacoima neighborhood of L.A. has proven to be successful, creating noticeable improvements in neighborhood temperature comfort. The study emphasizes the urgent need for policymakers and education leaders to prioritize protecting students from rising temperatures. Without decisive action, educational disparities intensified by heat exposure will continue to grow, potentially hindering entire generations' abilities to learn and succeed. 'We penalize vulnerable populations and need to provide opportunities for them to recover and lead the future,' Vasilakopoulou said. 'We can't pretend that we're all equal. [We need] better conditions for our homes, for our schools, and for our cities.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store