UN report: Pro-govt forces committed mass killings in Syria's coast
The 66-page report, released Thursday by the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic, focused on violence against Syria's Alawite communities along the Mediterranean coast in March. The report extensively detailed abuses including murder, torture and abductions amid clashes that erupted between gunmen loyal to the deposed Assad regime and state security forces and militias allied with the government.
Hundreds of Alawites were killed as the violence swiftly descended into sectarian revenge attacks that forced tens of thousands to flee their homes. It was some of the worst violence since Assad was overthrown by a rebel coalition in December.
The U.N. report documented how armed groups went door to door in a number of locations to identify Alawite men. The men were separated from their families and then taken outside to be shot. Alawite women and children were also killed, the report found. Bodies were left in the streets for days, it said.
The commission identified several armed groups aligned with Syria's government whose fighters allegedly perpetrated many atrocities. It also found that atrocities were committed by pro-Assad forces and said more needed to be done to bring those responsible to justice.
'The scale and brutality of the violence documented in our report is deeply disturbing,' said Paulo Sérgio Pinheiro, who chaired the commission. 'While dozens of alleged perpetrators of violations have reportedly since been arrested, the scale of the violence documented in our report warrants expanding such efforts.' Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad Hasan Al-Shaibani welcomed the report and said, 'We take serious note of the alleged violations committed during that period.' The United Nations-backed commission said it continued to receive reports of ongoing killings, abductions and arbitrary arrests of members of the Alawite community.
The Alawites are a religious minority to which former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad belongs. They sometimes occupied prime slots in the deposed regime but also suffered subjugation by the Assads along with Syria's other ethnic and religious minorities.
Questions around the new Sunni Islamist government's involvement in the killings or its inability to protect the Alawites deepened a sense of mistrust among Syria's minorities at a time when the new leaders are struggling to consolidate their control and unify the country.
Sectarian clashes erupted last month in southern Syria between ethnic Druze and Arab Bedouin. Druze accused government forces of colluding with the Bedouin. The area remains tense.
Syria's government has vowed to hold perpetrators of sectarian violence accountable. Last month, a government investigatory committee reported that it had preliminarily found 298 people from military factions and 265 linked to armed militias with ties to the Assad regime who committed sectarian attacks.
On Thursday, the U.N. commission welcomed the government's actions but stressed that more needs to be done to bring justice and prevent future attacks.
Dow Jones The Wall Street Journal
Far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich says construction plan 'finally buries the idea,' as Australia, France, UK prepare to recognise statehood. The Wall Street Journal
Europe's largest wave of prisoner exchanges since World War II was set in motion when a Ukrainian soldier reached into the pocket of a dead Russian officer and found a phone.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
4 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Tweedledee and Tweedledum': Albanese and Wong are ‘putting stress' on Australia-US alliance
Sky News host Steve Price discusses Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong's 'slack-jawed' approach to Palestinian recognition and how this move has put stress on the Australia-US alliance. 'I am referring to the slack-jawed way our leader has decided to reward the terror group Hamas with the decision to recognise a Palestinian state with a visit to the UN,' Mr Price said. 'One can only wonder at the tone of the phone calls between other left-leaning leaders like France's Macron and the UK's Starmer in the lead-up to this. 'So, here we have Tweedledee and Tweedledum, Albo and Wong, courting votes from the Harbour Bridge march … and the Greens putting stress on the US alliance to support a fanciful notion that no one … in the Middle East thinks is ever going to happen.'

Sydney Morning Herald
6 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The one thing America could learn from us
A few weeks ago I watched as protesters braved the rain to cross the Sydney Harbour Bridge in a March for Humanity, calling for aid to Gaza. Among the Palestinian flags, one image stood out: the Indigenous flag, symbolising a shared history of dispossession. This week Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced that Australia will next month recognise a Palestinian state at the UN. These developments remind us that identity cannot be separated from politics. At a time when democracies elsewhere are fracturing under the weight of polarisation, Australia's institutional resilience should embolden us to embrace our differences more openly in political discourse – not frighten us. As an Australian studying in the US during both of Trump's presidential victories I saw first hand how identities can be politicised to fracture a society. After the October 7 Hamas attacks I witnessed, as a graduate student, how Harvard students retreated into ideological silos, avoiding dialogue with those whose identities they perceived to be at odds with their own. Australia feels different – partly because of how our political system is structured. Identity weighs less heavily on our social conscience, but perhaps that's why it's so often ignored. Identity politics refers to the idea that our race, gender, religion or class shapes our political views. Over time it has often been framed as divisive. Peter Dutton, after the 2023 Voice referendum defeat, said the result was a rejection of 'the madness of identity politics'. But his own loss in the 2025 election might suggest otherwise. A wave of post-election commentary emphasised the Liberal Party's need to better reflect 'modern Australia', with female representation highlighted as one of the most glaring absences in the party room. Loading Australia's electoral system structurally limits the worst elements of polarisation caused by identity politics. Unlike the US, where turnout hovers around 60 per cent, Australia's compulsory voting system ensures broad participation and fosters a more centrist politics. Our Westminster system means Australian voters elect a party to govern, not a singular leader. Our ballots are cast for local MPs, and the party with the majority elects our prime minister. In contrast, the US system centres on the direct election of a president, making national politics more personalised by design. Preferential voting also encourages engagement with more than one party and rewards coalition-building over extremism. This institutional design helps insulate us from the deep political tribalism seen in the US and gives us the space to explore identity in a less adversarial way. A few months ago, during the 2025 Australian federal election, the main topics on the campaign trail were the cost of living, Medicare, affordable housing and Australia's future energy mix – a far cry from the US presidential election, which focused on a 'war on woke' and employed rhetoric that divided American voters along lines of race, gender and sexuality. This contrast is driven in part by the need of American candidates to use emotionally charged narratives to boost voter turnout.

The Age
6 hours ago
- The Age
The one thing America could learn from us
A few weeks ago I watched as protesters braved the rain to cross the Sydney Harbour Bridge in a March for Humanity, calling for aid to Gaza. Among the Palestinian flags, one image stood out: the Indigenous flag, symbolising a shared history of dispossession. This week Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced that Australia will next month recognise a Palestinian state at the UN. These developments remind us that identity cannot be separated from politics. At a time when democracies elsewhere are fracturing under the weight of polarisation, Australia's institutional resilience should embolden us to embrace our differences more openly in political discourse – not frighten us. As an Australian studying in the US during both of Trump's presidential victories I saw first hand how identities can be politicised to fracture a society. After the October 7 Hamas attacks I witnessed, as a graduate student, how Harvard students retreated into ideological silos, avoiding dialogue with those whose identities they perceived to be at odds with their own. Australia feels different – partly because of how our political system is structured. Identity weighs less heavily on our social conscience, but perhaps that's why it's so often ignored. Identity politics refers to the idea that our race, gender, religion or class shapes our political views. Over time it has often been framed as divisive. Peter Dutton, after the 2023 Voice referendum defeat, said the result was a rejection of 'the madness of identity politics'. But his own loss in the 2025 election might suggest otherwise. A wave of post-election commentary emphasised the Liberal Party's need to better reflect 'modern Australia', with female representation highlighted as one of the most glaring absences in the party room. Loading Australia's electoral system structurally limits the worst elements of polarisation caused by identity politics. Unlike the US, where turnout hovers around 60 per cent, Australia's compulsory voting system ensures broad participation and fosters a more centrist politics. Our Westminster system means Australian voters elect a party to govern, not a singular leader. Our ballots are cast for local MPs, and the party with the majority elects our prime minister. In contrast, the US system centres on the direct election of a president, making national politics more personalised by design. Preferential voting also encourages engagement with more than one party and rewards coalition-building over extremism. This institutional design helps insulate us from the deep political tribalism seen in the US and gives us the space to explore identity in a less adversarial way. A few months ago, during the 2025 Australian federal election, the main topics on the campaign trail were the cost of living, Medicare, affordable housing and Australia's future energy mix – a far cry from the US presidential election, which focused on a 'war on woke' and employed rhetoric that divided American voters along lines of race, gender and sexuality. This contrast is driven in part by the need of American candidates to use emotionally charged narratives to boost voter turnout.