French court orders release of Lebanese militant Georges Ibrahim Abdallah
Georges Ibrahim Abdallah was serving a life sentence for complicity in the murders of two diplomats, one American and one Israeli, in Paris in 1982.
He has been imprisoned in France since his arrest in 1984.
The Paris Court of Appeal ruled Abdallah can be released next Friday on the condition that he leave France and never return, judicial authorities said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
27 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Baby Accounts Could Create Generation of Millionaire Retirees
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A new federal savings initiative could dramatically reshape the financial future of millions of American children. Signed into law by President Donald Trump as part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, "Trump accounts" promise to give babies born in the U.S. a $1,000 head start on building long-term wealth. With additional contributions from families and employers, and potentially decades of compounding investment growth, these accounts could have the potential to turn today's youngsters into retirement millionaires. But while the headline numbers are eye-catching, the real impact may lie in how families choose to use the funds—for college, a first home, or retirement—and what kind of financial support system exists around them. Here's how the program works, what it could grow into, and why some experts see it as the start of a generational wealth shift in America. What Are Trump Accounts? Each baby born in the U.S. between 2025 and 2028 who has a Social Security number will receive a one-time $1,000 deposit from the government into their Trump account. There are no income requirements to qualify. Parents, relatives, and employers can contribute up to $5,000 annually to each account. While contributions made before a child turns 18 are not tax-deductible, employer contributions—up to $2,500 per year—are excluded from taxable income. The saved money must be invested in low-cost mutual funds or ETFs that track a U.S. stock index, such as the S&P 500. For now, more stable investment options like bonds or cash are not on the table. The accounts will become available in July 2026, and no money can be withdrawn until the child turns 18 years old. "Currently, the Trump account functions similarly to a traditional retirement account," Scott Hefty, senior wealth manager and founding partner at Serae Wealth, told Newsweek. "It offers tax-advantaged growth and penalty-free withdrawals after age 59 and a half. However, there are several exceptions that allow for earlier use. These exceptions include education expenses, buying a first home, or starting a business." Hefty added that while some may prefer more flexibility, "the rules are in place because the government is offering a benefit in exchange for encouraging certain outcomes…This account reflects a broader shift in how Americans build wealth across generations. We are moving toward a model where families, employers, and the federal government each play a part." The policy follows on from similar initiatives in the U.S. and abroad designed to bolster the lifetime savings of new generations. In Germany, new early-start pensions with a government contribution are being rolled out for kids. Here at home, Connecticut offers an initial government savings deposit of $3,200, albeit only for low-income children. Composite image created by Newsweek of a retired couple, a stack of coins, a piggy bank and a baby. Composite image created by Newsweek of a retired couple, a stack of coins, a piggy bank and a baby. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty How Much Can Be Saved? How much can be saved depends on whether contributions are made by the family of the child, and whether that child and/or their family/employers make contributions when they are an adult. The Internal Revenue Service is also expected to clarify tax rules around the savings before the accounts become available, which will impact overall savings. Based on an average return rate of 7 percent annually and the maximum $5,000 being invested every year, by the time a child reaches 65 years old, they could bank approximately $6,950,000 before tax—plenty of money to see them through a long and comfortable retirement. The simple fact of the matter is that to continue making the maximum $5,000 contributions every year means the parents of the child must be extremely financially secure, given that they may already be making contributions to their own savings funds, like 401(k)'s and general savings accounts. According to data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis, Americans saved only 4.5 percent of their disposable personal income in May 2025. In a more realistic scenario, where the family and/or account beneficiary save a consistent $1,000 per year in the account and leave it untouched until 65, it would result in a saving of $1,464,800—still, nothing to be disappointed about. If the $1,000 seeded from the government remains in the account with no contributions, by the time the account holder reaches 65, they will have around $93,380 to help them through later life. "That amount of money is a tremendous gift for a child, and opens up a lot of extra doors," Matt Hylland, a financial planner at Arnold and Mote Wealth Management, told Newsweek. "Perhaps they can be more comfortable taking a job in an industry they enjoy, even if it is lower paying. Or, it gives them the freedom to save for other non-retirement goals like a home down payment, or college savings for their children." College and Home Buying There's also the fact that plenty of savers with Trump accounts are unlikely to keep the money there all the way through to retirement, with many being likely to use the funds to pay for college expenses or to buy a home. As Hefty said, the account rules "reflect the overall goal of the program, which is to support long-term retirement preparedness." But he also acknowledged that the exceptions for earlier use—like education or first-home buying—align with key milestones in life.` Based on the same 7-percent compounding rate and the maximum annual contribution of $5,000, the account would be worth $194,856 by the time the child turns 18. In a more realistic scenario, where the parent has put away $1,000 into the account per year, this would drop to $55,831—which is still no small amount to help toward expensive college bills. The national average age to buy a home in the U.S. is now 38, according to a 2024 report by the National Association of Realtors. In this scenario, with a $1,000 seed and $1,000 contributions each year, there would be around $210,700—a hefty down payment, or in some cases, the total cost of a home in a more inexpensive area of the country. "If the seed contribution continues beyond 2028," Hylland said, "the potential for long-term impact grows even further." "Even a modest contribution, combined with the federal seed money, can be beneficial over time," he said. "I believe nearly every child who receives a Trump account will benefit in some way. The scale of that benefit will vary, but the baseline is an improvement compared to having no such account at all."
USA Today
28 minutes ago
- USA Today
People are starving in Gaza. Why are we so comfortable just letting that happen?
If Trump were truly empathetic to Palestinians, he would stop the United States from sending military aid to Israel and instead focus on getting aid into Gaza. Gaza is facing starvation. The U.S. government could do more to intervene. That's it. That's the tweet. The situation in Gaza is continuing to get worse. There have been more than 125 deaths due to malnutrition since the Israel-Hamas war began in 2023, and more than 1,000 Palestinians have been killed trying to access food. About 470,000 people are being affected by famine-like conditions, according to the World Food Program. The images coming out of Gaza are horrific, showing emaciated children starving due to a lack of resources. Things have gotten so bad that two Israeli human rights groups said on July 28 that the country was committing genocide in Gaza, a claim that had already been made by Amnesty International and a United Nations special committee. President Donald Trump has the power to do something about this. Whether he actually steps up to the plate is unlikely. I run a soup kitchen in Gaza. The horrors of starvation here are indescribable. | Opinion Trump seems concerned about starvation in Gaza. Will he do anything? Trump acknowledged the issue at a July 28 news conference when he was asked if he agreed with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's claim that there is 'no starvation in Gaza.' The U.S. president seemed to disagree that there is no starvation. 'Based on television, I would say not particularly, because those children look very hungry,' Trump said. He went on to say that the United States would 'be even more involved,' and said he'd ask Netanyahu to ensure that these children received food. I'm not about to celebrate Trump's bare minimum answer. He does not deserve a pat on the back for acknowledging a humanitarian crisis, even if it goes against a U.S. ally. It's good that he wants people to get food, but I'll believe he means it when aid trucks are finally able to make their way into Gaza. Netanyahu has yet to respond to Trump's claims. If Trump were truly empathetic to Palestinians, he would stop the United States from sending military aid to Israel and instead focus on getting aid into Gaza. In the first year of the war against Hamas, our country sent $17.9 billion to Israel; the $30 million Trump recently designated to aid distribution is a fraction of that. If Trump truly believes this has reached the level of a humanitarian crisis, he needs to be focusing on providing relief to the people of Gaza and threatening to withhold aid to Israel until this crisis is subdued. Trump could also show that he is capable of diplomacy and cutting deals by working to reignite ceasefire conversations between Israel and Hamas after those talks were abandoned on July 25. Opinion: Trump must think big with Israel. It's time for a Palestinian state. Why are we just standing around while kids starve? Currently, Israeli leaders seem to have no interest in alleviating the hunger plaguing the people of Gaza. They say it's because Hamas has routinely stolen aid from the United Nations, even though there is no proof of this, according to The New York Times (there is proof of the group stealing from smaller organizations). Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. It can be easy to feel as though we have no agency over this conflict as ordinary people, but something can be done. We cannot turn away as people are starving, especially when our country is capable of doing something about it. Yes, it's important to fight terrorism, and what Hamas did on Oct. 7, 2023, is unforgivable. But innocent people, innocent children, continue to suffer because of this conflict. The United States has the power to alleviate this suffering as a close ally to Israel. We must demand intervention before this catastrophe gets any worse. While posting photos and infographics about the starvation on social media might make you feel good, it is no substitute for calling your elected officials and demanding something be done, nor is it as effective as protesting in the streets. To many people in my generation, this is the greatest issue of our lifetime. We must continue to speak up about the injustices we're witnessing and demand that things change as these horrors persist. Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeño on X, formerly Twitter: @sara__pequeno You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.
Bloomberg
30 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Merz's €172 Billion Budget Hole Builds Pressure for Debt Reform
A €172 billion ($199 billion) hole in Chancellor Friedrich Merz's financial plans is increasing pressure for even deeper reforms of Germany's constitutional debt restrictions. The shortfall, spread over the next four years, will be set out in the medium-term financial plan that the German cabinet is set to approve Wednesday, along with the budget for 2026.
