AI Startups Are Making Their Employees Work Hours That Will Make You Break Out in a Cold Sweat
Say a little prayer for AI workers in Silicon Valley.
In the rush to conquer the AI sector, some startups have adopted a career schedule known as "996" — a draconian work regimen that first took hold in mainland China, according to Wired, in which employees work from 9am to 9pm, six days a week, for a total of a soul-crushing 72 hours.
That's obviously a grueling routine, but the AI industry demands it because the space is so extremely competitive at the moment; startups are going to bat against each other, legacy tech companies, and overseas AI companies in places like China.
AI startups are gobbling up boatloads of money — $104.3 billion in the first six months of this year — so the race is on to turn those investment dollars into profit and market share. That pressure is pushing more startups towards the 996 schedule.
"It's becoming increasingly common," staffing and recruitment expert Adrian Kinnersley told Wire. "We have multiple clients where a prerequisite for screening candidates before they go for an interview is whether they are prepared to work 996."
Back to the Future
A tough schedule is nothing new to Silicon Valley, which is stuffed to the gills with industry lore about tech stars booking all-nighters at "velvet sweatshops" like Microsoft.
"There's a really strong and growing subculture of people, especially in my generation — Gen Z — who grew up listening to stories of Steve Jobs and Bill Gates, entrepreneurs who dedicated their lives to building life-changing companies," Will Gao, head of growth at AI startup Rilla, told Wired.
But the problem with this work schedule is it chucks out any pretense of work-life balance, taking a toll on the bodies and minds of workers.
It's also a type of schedule could shut out certain sectors of the population from tech work, such as women — who are usually the primary caretakers of children and adult relatives — who already only make up 35 percent of the STEM workforce in the United States.
There's also a dark irony at play: the basic promise of the AI industry is that it will provide an alternative to the soul-crushing jobs to which so many of us are now subjected — while the very workers tasked with creating that future are being treated like beasts of burden.
More on AI: AI Therapist Goes Haywire, Urges User to Go on Killing Spree
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geek Wire
12 minutes ago
- Geek Wire
Microsoft cuts another 40 jobs in Washington state, continuing layoffs amid AI investment surge
Microsoft has laid off more than 15,000 people globally since May. (GeekWire File Photo / Todd Bishop) Microsoft laid off another 40 employees in Washington, bringing the total number of job cuts in its home state to 3,160 since May, according to a public filing. These latest cuts are on a much smaller scale than those made by Microsoft in May and July, when it eliminated 1,985 and 830 positions in the state, respectively, as part of broader layoffs that impacted more than 15,000 people globally. Microsoft confirmed that these cuts are separate from the prior reductions. The company declined to provide details about the teams, roles, or regions impacted. 'Organizational and workforce changes are a necessary and regular part of managing our business,' a Microsoft spokesperson said in a statement. 'We will continue to prioritize and invest in strategic growth areas for our future and in support of our customers and partners.' The company said it is providing severance packages and outplacement services to affected employees, including career counseling and job search support. Microsoft noted that some laid-off workers have transitioned to other roles at the company. The layoffs coincide with record capital spending on AI infrastructure, with the company investing more than $30 billion this quarter alone, in part to expand capacity for training and running AI models. Rising capital expenditures have created pressure to reduce operating costs through workforce reductions. The ongoing layoffs have created tension inside Microsoft's workplace culture, with some employees expressing concern about job insecurity and what some see as an erosion of the more compassionate environment under CEO Satya Nadella. In a company-wide memo July 24, Nadella acknowledged the 'uncertainty and seeming incongruence' of cutting jobs while simultaneously making record investments in AI infrastructure, calling the layoff decisions 'among the most difficult we have to make.' Microsoft's global headcount held steady at 228,000 over the past year, according to its annual 10-K filing. That reflected an initial round of layoffs in May, prior to larger cutbacks in July, even as the company continues to hire in some areas. The company briefly surpassed a $4 trillion market value after a blockbuster earnings report last week, becoming only the second company to reach that mark. Its stock closed Monday up 2.2%, at a market value of $3.98 trillion.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Massive AI spending shows early payoff for Big Tech
After months of questions about whether major tech firms were overshooting AI spending, Google, Microsoft and Meta are taking a victory lap after outperforming investors' lofty expectations. 'It's showing it's starting to pay off and companies are doubling down,' Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives said, adding, 'It puts fuel in the engine for tech to rally more in the second half [of the year].' Major tech firms promised eye-popping investments in AI heading into 2025, as they pushed to build out the data center infrastructure that is expected to underpin the development of frontier AI models — a frenzy reinforced by President Trump's own AI infrastructure push. These investments, already under scrutiny because of their sheer size, faced additional pressure earlier this year with the emergence of DeepSeek. The Chinese AI startup released its R1 model, which it claimed could compete with top American AI models and was developed with a fraction of the infrastructure. However, the tech giants seem to have quieted critics so far with the results of their spending. Google kicked off a series of strong tech earnings last week, beating investor expectations with $96 billion in revenue and $28 billion in net income last quarter. The search giant, which initially planned to invest $75 billion in capital spending this year, also upped the ante with an additional $10 billion investment. This raised the bar for Microsoft and Meta coming into this week, said Dave Wagner, head of equity and portfolio manager at Aptus Capital Advisors. Microsoft did not disappoint, reporting $76 billion in revenue and $27 billion in net income last quarter. The company's cloud computing platform Azure surpassed $75 billion in revenue for the fiscal year, up 39 percent year-over-year in the last quarter. It also announced plans to invest another $30 billion in capital spending next quarter, after spending about $88 billion over the past year. The company's stock jumped Thursday on the strong earnings report, briefly boosting the company's market valuation above $4 trillion. It is only the second company in the world to cross the historic threshold, following Nvidia's lead last month.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Legendary investor Vinod Khosla advises Gen Z to invest in this one skill because ChatGPT can teach you everything else
In a candid and far-reaching discussion on Nikhil Kamath's YouTube channel, legendary venture capitalist Vinod Khosla, one of Fortune's most powerful people in business, delivered some advice for Gen Z. It could be seen as a stark warning or as simple pragmatism: The single most important skill for young workers at this moment is not specialization, but the ability to learn rapidly and adapt continuously. His reasoning is simple yet profound: 'ChatGPT can teach you any new areas,' rendering traditional academic paths and fixed skill sets increasingly obsolete. The title of the episode was more blunt: 'College Degrees Are Becoming Useless.' The Sun Microsystems cofounder, known for his contrarian views and unwavering certainty in technological possibilities, painted a future where artificial intelligence (AI) will fundamentally transform the job market. He asserted that 'there isn't a job where AI won't be able to do 80% of 80% of all jobs' within the next three to five years. He explained that the vast majority of all job functions will be replicable by AI, hence the 80% of 80% estimate. It recalled Sam Altman's claim that AI will result in 'intelligence too cheap to meter.' Looking 10 to 15 years out, Khosla said, he believes 'there's no chance there's a job that humans do that AI can't do almost as well.' He allowed for some minor exceptions and said even heart or brain surgery an AI should theoretically be able to perform to a high level, although regulation may not allow it. This rapid pace of change, faster than the world has seen in the past 50 years, demands a radical shift in how young people approach their careers, he argued. For a 22-year-old wondering where to focus their efforts, Khosla's advice is clear: 'You have to optimize your career for flexibility, not a single profession.' He emphasized that the value of learning lies not in mastering one specific trade like welding, finance, or even accounting, but in cultivating 'the ability to learn' in its own right. He claimed that at 70 years old, he is learning at a much faster pace than ever before, and every young person should strive for this capability. This includes thinking from first principles and jumping into diverse fields, whether physics, biology, or finance, because AI tools will facilitate the rapid acquisition of new knowledge. Khosla argued that even disciplines like computer science are valuable less for programming expertise (which AI increasingly handles) and more for the 'process of thinking' and understanding systems and architectures they impart. The ultimate goal for a young individual, he suggests, is to choose a path where 'your knowledge compounds and your capability compounds over time,' mirroring the principle of financial compounding in knowledge acquisition. The quality of the entrepreneur For aspiring entrepreneurs, Khosla advises a strategic focus, since he believes that anybody in any industry not using AI will be rendered obsolete by somebody who is using the tool. While AI may democratize technology, he said, success will hinge on the innate 'quality of the entrepreneur'—their ability to think strategically, envision long-term goals, select the right teams, and wisely choose who to trust for advice. Khosla believes the current shortage is not of technology or capital, but of 'great entrepreneurs who know how to make these choices.' Beyond individual careers, Khosla and Kamath talked about the wider implications of AI on the economy. Khosla said it should drive down the cost of many things, acting as a deflationary force on many services, and he envisioned an AI-powered utopian future where services like education, medical expertise, and legal advice become 'almost free.' He speculated that in 20 to 25 years, $10,000 might buy more goods and services than $50,000 does today, thanks to the deflationary impact of machines providing abundant services. The career path open to Gen Z Khosla is far from the only thought leader weighing in on the employment prospects for Gen Z in the age of AI. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang have engaged in an ever-more-heated war of words over the former's doomsday prediction that 50% of all white-collar jobs will be wiped out. Geoffrey Hinton, the 'godfather of AI,' has largely agreed with Amodei, saying that only the 'very skilled' will remain employed. Huang and Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell have largely agreed with Khosla, arguing that creativity and constant learning will create new jobs for the economy in a virtuous cycle. Goldman Sachs chief economist Jan Hatzius has looked at the data and echoed Khosla's argument that college degrees are losing value, finding that the 'safety premium' of a college degree is disappearing. Berkeley economist Brad DeLong agrees that the college degree is losing its status but casts the blame away from AI and toward the policy uncertainty plaguing the economy, arguing that many Gen Z college graduates are going unhired because conditions are just too risky for most companies. Goldman seems to agree with DeLong, finding in July that AI was overhyped as a reason for most corporate layoffs. Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve isn't completely sold on the revolutionary prospects of AI, arguing that it may be a revolutionary invention like the electric dynamo, but may end up being a one-off boost to productivity, like the light bulb. Gen Z, for its part, seems to be craving more human connection. Starbucks recently announced it would sunset its mobile-only locations, thought to be more appealing to Gen Z and a desire for 'frictionless' experience, in favor of a renewed emphasis on hospitality and human-to-human connection. The generation has been weathering criticism of late that they lack the social skills necessary for success, with the stereotypical 'Gen Z stare' at the center of the conversation. Careers site Glassdoor, for its part, has punctured the myth of 'conscious unbossing' by Gen Zers, finding that they are becoming managers at exactly the same historical rate as any other generation, AI notwithstanding. Ultimately, Khosla's message for the next generation is one of relentless pursuit of learning and adaptability. In a world rapidly being reshaped by AI, the ability to continuously reinvent oneself and embrace new knowledge may be the ultimate differentiator for survival and success. The human capacity to learn new things, after all, is endless. For this story, Fortune used generative AI to help with an initial draft. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
