
Ted Heath deserves to be remembered for more than his blemishes
On global issues, with which he much concerned himself, Heath often appeared to be defending the indefensible. The tyrant Saddam Hussein he described as an 'astute person, a clever person'; he was openly against Western intervention in Bosnia, and came close to being a no-bones apologist for a brutal communist regime in China with whom he had, it was said, opaque business links. A confirmed bachelor, seemingly asexual, Heath cut an isolated figure, fuming in the wilderness, all too often reviled by the party he'd once led. How had this man ever become prime minister?
The picture he painted of himself, it turned out, didn't do him justice, because to know something of Edward Heath, his beliefs and their formation, is to gain increasing respect for him. Heath had once seemed the great hope of conservatism, the Balliol-educated son of a Kent builder who would lead the party away from its stuffy, class-ridden image and make it fit for the modern age. The Mirror called him 'a new kind of Tory leader…who has fought his way to the top by guts, ability and political skill.' The Panorama programme pushed him as 'the man for those Conservatives who think the party needs a 'tiger in its tank.'' Even Marcia Williams, political secretary to opponent Harold Wilson, gushed about Heath's 'clean and shining silver hair, well-tended and suntanned face, immaculate blue suit and tie.' Yesterday's man once looked like tomorrow's saviour.
There seem, in fact, to have been two distinct Edward Heaths – before and after he became party leader. In his Oxford days, he'd been President of the Oxford Union and head of the Conservative Association, attracting plaudits wherever he went. He'd visited Spain during the Civil War and travelled widely in Germany, attending a Nazi rally. There he saw Hitler speak and met Goebbels, Goering and Himmler, returning from the experience an ardent anti-appeaser.
As artillery officer in the Second World War, he'd fought bravely through France and the low countries, described by one admiring major as 'the most capable officer I met in any department during the four years in which I had command.' In 1946, Heath attended the Nuremberg Trials, and became, ever after, a convinced Europhile: 'My generation did not have the option of living in the past; we had to work for the future…Only by working together right across our continent had we any hope of creating a society which would uphold the true values of European civilisation.' Finally, as PM, he got his wish, taking us into Europe on New Year's Day 1973. Many, seeing the wholesale dismantling of that legacy, will surely continue to feel that he was right.
Certainly, he had legions of admirers in his early days. Elected as MP for Bexley in 1950, he was promoted under Eden a few years later, becoming, in Lord Chancellor David Kilmuir's description, 'the most brilliant Chief Whip of modern times…the most promising of the new generation of Conservatives.' Even Tony Benn rolled over for Heath: 'How you manage to combine such a friendly manner,' he wrote, 'with such an iron discipline is a source of respectful amazement to us all.' With his classical conducting and his yachting – the latter of which he excelled at, winning two international cups – Heath had real hinterland too. 'He changed the scale of my thinking,' said one colleague who worked for him. 'He is what I would like to be.'
But it was as leader and then PM that his limitations became clear. 'Gone,' as minister Ian Gilmour put it, 'was the genial, human and successful Chief Whip and in his place…was a brusque and dour leader of the party.' In speeches, Heath was leaden and uninspiring, forever torturing the House with turgid, fact-laden addresses. His honesty and integrity were acknowledged, but party members sniped about his social background (his voice was almost comically posh and plodding, though the 'ow' sounds gave him away).
They also speculated darkly and ad nauseam about his 'confirmed bachelor' status ('The voters of Aldershot,' wrote Julian Critchley, 'evidently much preferred dull wives to no wives at all.') Curt and brusque, with a deadpan humour too subtle for many and an intolerance of dissent, Heath made needless enemies among MPs and party members. What stands out, though, is the loyalty and affection many close colleagues went on feeling towards this awkward, bloody-minded man. 'I don't know what it is – it's a mystery to me,' said Willie Whitelaw. 'I only know I trust him more than I've ever trusted anyone.'
Having won a surprise election victory in 1970, Heath, a meticulous planner, arrived with the boldest of intentions, speaking of 'a change so radical, a revolution so quiet and yet so total that it will go far beyond the programme for a Parliament.' Yet his free-market, non-interventionist aims quickly hit the rocks. Soon he was bailing out companies and, amidst an endless barrage of walkouts and work-to-rules, caving into union demands like the best of them. Following two miners' strikes, a compulsory 'three-day week' to conserve energy, and an eye-watering five 'states of emergency' in four years, Heath went to the country in 1974, losing by a wafer to Harold Wilson. When he lost another election later that year, it was clear to everyone except Heath himself that it was time for change.
Enter Margaret Thatcher, and the Great Sulk began. At conference after conference, Heath lambasted her policies, all attempts at a rapprochement scotched by him. He denounced her to the press as a 'traitor' and at one public event, presented with a chocolate image of her face, reportedly picked up a knife and stabbed it into splinters, to the glee of onlooking hacks. In an open letter to the Times, his biographer and onetime acolyte George Hutchinson laid into him: 'You are already estranged from a number of old friends…You are in danger of losing the goodwill and respect of the party.' Heath, as so often, sailed on regardless. Yet as he did so, his real achievements – taking us into Europe, the abolition of Resale Price Maintenance – seemed to recede on the horizon.
Heath may now be the forgotten man – widely considered a failed prelude to Thatcherism – yet this is unjust. What the electorate could embrace in the eighties – after a decade of industrial woe, an IMF bail-out and the Winter of Discontent – was miles on from what they'd have swallowed a decade before. As Ian Gilmour put it: 'To attack Ted Heath for not having behaved like Margaret Thatcher is little more sensible than to say that the First World War could have been won more cheaply by using the methods of the second.'
Meanwhile, his term in office has lessons for today's bunch of leaders. Kemi Badenoch, in her great policy-purdah, might recall Heath's rigorous planning and lofty aims for national renewal – all torpedoed, within weeks, by the intransigence of actual, unforeseen events. Keir Starmer could reflect on the words of Enoch Powell (probably Heath's deadliest foe) about the perils of abandoning core policies: 'Does my right hon. Friend not know that it is fatal for any Government or party or person to seek to govern in direct opposition to the principles on which they were entrusted with the right to govern?'
As for Heath himself, he deserves, perhaps, more credit than he's customarily given. The smouldering resentment of his later years too often undermined what was at times a formidable, even inspirational career. As Labour MP Denis Macshane pointed out, he had, by the end of it all, 'made and lived more history than any other British politician in active service.' The last word, though, surely goes to Philip Ziegler, his official biographer: 'He was a great man, but his blemishes, though by far less considerable, were quite as conspicuous as his virtues, and it is too often by his blemishes that he is remembered.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
23 minutes ago
- Spectator
Labour must confront the uncomfortable causes of immigration protests
That sound you hear is the penny finally dropping in Downing Street. Having spent the year since the horrific post-Southport riots blaming unrest over migration and asylum solely on misinformation and far-right groups, Labour appears to be realising the rot runs much deeper. Government officials, reports the Times, have warned the cabinet that Britain is 'fraying at the edges', after more protests outside of asylum hotels in Epping, Diss and now Canary Wharf (of all places). Angela Rayner is said to have told colleagues that immigration was having a 'profound impact on society', insisting the government needed to acknowledge 'real concerns' about rapid social change, twinned with a decaying economy. Indeed, the way Tory and now Labour governments have up to now dealt with the asylum issue would only make sense if it were designed to generate social conflict. The brunt of the small-boats crisis has been borne by some of the most poverty-stricken communities in the UK, purely because the hotel rooms there are cheaper and the glare of the London-based media is miles away. Then, locals' fears about the violent and sexual crimes committed by some of the men who have arrived illegally and unvetted are ignored, up until the point they spark a protest. Or worse. We've seen this time and time again. In Knowsley, in Merseyside, in February 2023; in Epping, now. A migrant is accused, or indeed charged, of sex crimes, leading to a protest, which then descends into mindless violence. In the case of Epping, the Ethiopian asylum seeker – whose arrest triggered last week's protests outside the Bell Hotel – was charged with three counts of sexual assault, one count of inciting a girl to engage in sexual activity and one count of harassment without violence. He'd racked up these offences after just eight days in the country. The protests in Epping – a leafy, prosperous Essex market town, populated by the old East End working-class-done-good – show this is clearly not just about poverty, either. There is now a deep sense of unease bubbling across society, about an asylum and migration system that has become an affront to common sense and a menace to public safety. And those who haven't imbibed the metropolitan multiculturalist script, which insists we all ignore the evidence of our own eyes, are now increasingly emboldened to voice their opposition. For a year, the government has refused to walk and chew gum at the same time on this issue. There is, of course, nothing that justifies the violence and racism we saw after Southport, or following otherwise peaceful protests since. Those on the right who cannot summon the minerals to condemn this bigotry, even when masked men are trying to push a flaming wheelie bin towards a Holiday Inn which has migrants inside, are engaging in their own form of moral cowardice. But only condemning this racism, or painting it all as some concerted 'far right' insurgency, as the government has, is clearly not enough, either. Whatever else you might say about them, the peaceful protests outside of that hotel in Epping are clearly not mini BNP rallies. Even the mainstream media have begun to concede this, with Sky News noting that Sunday's big demonstration was made up of 'families sat on the grass, multigenerations of them, kids playing in the sunshine'. 'Residents are simply angry about events that have unfolded here in recent weeks.' In voxpops from the demos and the town, residents seem ever-keen to insist they are not 'far right' and condemn the troublemakers who have also, inevitably, shown up looking to clash with police, attack hotel staff and abuse migrants in the street. By ignoring legitimate public anger, and the catastrophic policy failures that have produced it, the government has only created more space for those who want to leap on the asylum issue for their own despicable ends. The Labour government now has a choice. It can double down on decades of failed orthodoxies, while mumbling something about 'reasonable concerns', or it can rip them up those orthodoxies for the good of the country. Locking up rioters and condemning the uglier side of this unrest is the easy bit. Now is the time to end the mix of uncontrolled illegal immigration, govenment-compelled multiculturalism and official neglect of communities that has brought us to this precipice. Tough on riots, tough on the causes of riots.


The Herald Scotland
36 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Ministers urged to explain plans which could re-establish Hong Kong extraditions
Shadow Home Office minister Alicia Kearns urged the Government to ensure 'protections will be put in place to ensure no Hongkonger, CCP (Chinese Community Party) critic or anyone targeted by the CCP will be extradited under the new arrangement'. The UK's extradition treaty with Hong Kong was suspended by the then-Tory government after a new national security law was imposed on the territory by China in 2020. The treaty meant Hong Kong could request that someone living in the UK suspected of a crime at home could be handed over to face justice, and vice versa. Fears that the law could lead to human rights abuses were behind the UK's reasoning to put the agreement on ice. Ministers have now introduced a law change in the Commons which would tweak how Hong Kong is designated under the 2003 Extradition Act. The statutory instrument introduced in the Commons on July 17 would effectively establish a 'case-by-case' extradition route with Hong Kong, as well as Zimbabwe. It also changes how Chile is classified under the Act because the South American country has signed an international extradition treaty. Security minister Dan Jarvis leaves the Cabinet Office on Whitehall, central London, following a Cobra meeting (James Manning/PA) In a letter to shadow home secretary Chris Philp seen by the PA news agency, security minister Dan Jarvis suggested the change was needed as no extradition to Hong Kong can currently be made 'even if there were strong operational grounds to do so'. Mr Jarvis added: 'The way to resolve this situation is to de-designate Hong Kong and Zimbabwe from the Act so that we can co-operate with them on the case-by-case ad hoc basis available for non-treaty partners. 'The safety and security of our citizens is our top priority. 'Ensuring that territories are correctly designated under the Act will ensure that the UK can accept extradition requests in a lawful and timely way to ensure the public is not put at risk.' Writing in response to Mr Jarvis, shadow minister Ms Kearns questioned why the Government had taken the step, as she said the situation in Hong Kong had 'worsened' in the years since the national security law was introduced. She pointed to the case of Jimmy Lai, the 77-year-old British national and proprietor of the Apple Daily newspaper, who is facing detention by the Chinese government, as well as other critics of Beijing. 'Has the Government assessed political freedom and the rule of law have been returned to Hong Kong, or have you decided these issues are no longer saleable alongside the 'reset' in relations between the UK and China?' Ms Kearns asked in her letter. Government plans to reintroduce extradition cooperation with Hong Kong are highly concerning. Why does the Government deem this reasonable when freedom of expression, political freedom and the rule of law in Hong Kong have been crushed by The National Security Law and the… — Alicia Kearns MP (@aliciakearns) July 24, 2025 In a post on social media, she added: 'I urge the Government to give urgent reassurances on how this system will be safely managed and what protections will be put in place to ensure no Hong Konger, CCP critic or anyone targeted by the CCP will be extradited under the new arrangement.' The Hong Kong national security law criminalises anything considered to be secessionist from China, and has led to a crackdown on critics of Beijing. Some 150,000 Hongkongers have moved to the UK under a special visa scheme launched in early 2021, after the law was introduced. Since coming to power, Labour has sought to reset relations with China with the aim of boosting trade, after the Conservatives took an increasingly hawkish attitude towards the country while they were in office. In a statement, security minister Mr Jarvis said it was 'entirely incorrect to say the UK has restored extradition co-operation with Hong Kong'. He added: 'The 1997 treaty remains suspended and this legislation simply completes the severing of ties between the British and Hong Kong extradition systems. This amendment is in order to give legal effect to the suspension of the extradition treaty with Hong Kong.' The Government is 'unwavering in its commitment to upholding human rights, the rule of law, and the safety of all individuals in the UK, including the many Hong Kongers who have made this country their home', Mr Jarvis said.


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Government to pay more for wind-generated energy
The government has increased the maximum price it will pay to companies for the electricity generated by new wind farms. It comes as ministers are trying to meet challenging pledges to bring down household bills and create an electricity grid that it is almost entirely free of fossil fuels by Department for Energy Security and Net Zero published the details ahead of the latest auction for government-backed auction opens in August and will be one of the last which can deliver projects in time to meet the government's target of Clean Power by Conservatives have described the new prices for offshore wind as "eye-watering".The government said the prices would not be what is eventually paid, as companies will put in lower bids to win contracts. A spokesperson for Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said "the auction will reveal the true price, just like it did last year, where the auction cleared at prices significantly lower".Each year, companies who want to build renewable energy projects bid for government-backed government agrees to pay them a fixed price for the electricity they produce for a set period, now up to 20 years, and up to a maximum price known as the Administrative Strike Price, or put in bids below the ASP to win project contracts and then the government sets a new guaranteed price, known as the clearing price, based on year, the maximum guaranteed price for offshore wind will be £113 per megawatt-hour, up from £102 in offshore wind, which is a newer technology, is more expensive at £271/MWh, up from £ wind has seen a smaller rise from £89/MWh to £92 while the price for solar energy has come down to £75/MWh from £85/ Shadow Energy Secretary Claire Coutinho said: "These are eye-watering prices - the highest in a decade and way above the average cost of electricity last year. And this is before the hidden costs of grid, storage and wasted wind which all end up on our energy bills"She claimed Ed Miliband was putting "Net zero zealotry above the economy or the cost of living".The government argues that switching to renewables will protect consumers from volatile gas prices and bring bills down "for good." Johnny Gowdy, from not-for-profit group Regen, which advises on transitioning to net zero, said the ASP was about "setting the starting point for the auction; with competitive bids we would expect the actual auction strike price to be much lower""There is also a trade-off between volume and price. If the bid prices are high then the government will procure less capacity. If the price is low then the government will be able to buy more capacity."He says that the cost of producing offshore wind "probably has risen over the past couple of years" but he adds "we will have to wait and see the auction outcome" to find out how auctions have resulted in a clearing price that was lower than the maximum is a risk to setting the maximum price too 2023, under the Conservatives, no offshore wind developers bid for any projects as they said they weren't viable at the price offered. The government has made changes to the system in the hope of attracting more bids to create the first time this year, offshore wind projects which don't have yet have full planning permission will be able to apply for a contract lengths have also been extended for wind and solar projects from 15 years to 20 and the Energy Secretary will be able to see developer's bids before he sets the final overall budget.A spokesperson for DESNZ said its reforms to the system would "enable a competitive auction that secures the best possible price for consumers while securing the clean energy we need to get us off the fossil fuel rollercoaster."