Why MAGA Activist Laura Loomer Has Found Herself At Odds With Donald Trump
Quick Read
Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed.
Laura Loomer, a far-right activist and Trump supporter, has become critical of the administration, clashing over policies and personnel. With 1.6M followers, she claims to influence MAGA views, despite the White House denying her advisory role.
Washington:
Laura Loomer once had to chain herself to a building to get attention. Not any longer.
A far-right activist who has jockeyed her way up from online agitator to self-appointed presidential adviser, Loomer has long been one of President Donald Trump's most fervent supporters.
She has recently found herself at odds with the White House, however, clashing with the administration over both policy and personnel choices that she views as counter to the MAGA movement.
In the past few weeks, Loomer has criticized the new pope, mounted a campaign against Trump's pick for surgeon general, Casey Means, blasted his attorney general, Pam Bondi, and noisily objected to Trump's diplomatic efforts during his Middle East trip.
If Loomer were just another online rabble-rouser, the friction likely would not matter. But with 1.6 million followers on X and her own weekly program that draws thousands of viewers, Loomer can claim she speaks for the MAGA faithful and, in turn, influence how they view the performance of the president and his administration.
Loomer has said it's her job to keep Trump on track. She has flitted in and out of the president's inner circle and has claimed to be responsible for the firings of National Security Adviser Mike Waltz and other aides.
"What makes her more dangerous than other people is that she clearly seems to have Trump's ear,' said Peter Montgomery, who tracks conservative movements for the liberal advocacy group People For the American Way.
Loomer did not respond to requests for comment for this story, but made clear how she views her role during her online video show earlier this month.
'I'm not working for President Trump. I'm not getting paid by President Trump. I'm not in the Trump White House,' Loomer said during her show. 'I wasn't even on the Trump campaign. And yet, I feel like very single day, it's a full-time job just to make sure the president is protected and that he's receiving the information he needs to receive.'
WHITE HOUSE INFLUENCER?
Loomer met last month with Trump at the White House, after which Trump immediately fired several national security officials Loomer claimed were disloyal. Trump later denied that Loomer was the reason.
A short time later, Waltz himself was fired, something Loomer also claimed she engineered.
But the White House says that Loomer is not a presidential adviser, unofficial or otherwise. She has no pass to enter the complex, said a White House official, and there are no further meetings planned with her.
A self-proclaimed 'Islamophobe' who for years argued that the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks were an inside job, Loomer has a history of provocative and self-promotional actions including handcuffing herself to Twitter's headquarters in New York in 2018 after the platform banned her for hate speech. Other Trump supporters such as U.S. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene have denounced her remarks as "racist, "hateful" and unrepresentative of the MAGA movement.
Last September during the presidential campaign, Loomer traveled on Trump's plane to his debate with opponent Kamala Harris and then was by his side when he commemorated the 9/11 attacks in New York, sparking outrage among critics and concern within the campaign. Earlier, she had said the 'White House would smell like curry' if Harris, who is of Indian heritage, were elected.
AT ODDS
Trump then called her a 'strong person' and a 'free spirit.' But Loomer has become increasingly critical of Trump's administration, if not the president himself.
She sparred online with top Trump adviser Elon Musk over skilled workforce visas. She has repeatedly argued that the administration's hires are being improperly vetted.
When Trump praised the new pope, Leo XIV, Loomer blasted the pontiff as 'anti-MAGA' and a Marxist. She expressed dismay last week when Trump announced he was lifting economic sanctions on Syria, and when he struck an investment deal with Qatar, which she accuses of funding pro-Palestinian demonstrations in the United States. Qatar is a longtime backer of Hamas, but there is no direct evidence tying it to funding the protests.
Loomer was scornful of the possibility Trump might accept a luxury 747 from the Qatari government. 'I love President Trump. I would take a bullet for him,' Loomer wrote on X. 'We cannot accept a $400 million `gift' from jihadists in suits.'
Trump has said the plane would be given to the country, not him.
She has continued to hammer Bondi for what she says is a failure to clean up the Justice Department. On Monday, she appeared on former Trump adviser Steve Bannon's show and claimed that she has known that former President Joe Biden was terminally ill for a year. Biden's office announced on Sunday that he has advanced prostate cancer.
Bannon, who also views himself as the conscience of the MAGA base, called her 'a warrior in the information war.'
But the White House's biggest headache may be Loomer's crusade to derail the nomination of Casey Means as Trump's surgeon general. In numerous posts, Loomer has argued that Means, a wellness expert who graduated from medical school but lacks a license to practice medicine, is unqualified.
'I want to know which one of President Trump's geniuses chose a woman who literally talks to trees and spiritual mediums,' Loomer posted on X the day Means was nominated.
Trump has defended the choice.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
For Indian students, dreams of America are suddenly in doubt
For Indian students, dreams of America are suddenly in doubt Anupreeta DasPragati KB New York Times Updated: Jun 02, 2025, 15:14 IST IST Nobody knows what the halt on visa interviews means and how long it will last. The uncertainty has upended thousands of carefully made plans In India, the country that sends more students to the United States than any other, young people who had hoped to pursue higher education in America this fall described feeling in a state of limbo after the Trump administration's decision to pause interviews with foreign nationals applying for student visas.
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Israel warns Hamas of annihilation as Trump says ceasefire ‘very close'
News • 4 days ago Elon Musk has officially stepped down as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) under the Trump 2.0 administration, following his criticism of the president's "Big, Beautiful Bill." In his May 28 announcement, Musk thanked President Trump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful government spending but expressed concerns over the massive spending package, which he believes undermines DOGE's mission. As Musk's exit raises questions about the future of federal cost-cutting efforts, potential successors for the DOGE leadership include Vivek Ramaswamy, Luke Farritor, Tom Krause, and Marko Elez. This video delves into Musk's departure, the impact of Trump's new bill, and the possible candidates who may lead DOGE forward in streamlining government spending. Stay tuned for updates on the evolving dynamics of U.S. fiscal policy and government efficiency.
Mint
32 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump's presidency has only seen federal spending rise so far
Amid the layoffs, cancelled programmes and other cutbacks in Washington since Donald Trump moved back into the White House in January, one thing hasn't changed: Federal spending has just kept going up. Spending since 21 January is up 8.7% over the equivalent period in 2024, 7.2% over 2023. Some kinds of federal spending are irregular and intermittent, and any comparison like this can be affected by the timing of payments, but the Congressional Budget Office's latest monthly budget review made adjustments for timing shifts and estimated that spending in the 2025 fiscal year, which began in October, was up 7% through April over the same period a year earlier. Also Read: A trade arrangement that leaves out the US could trump Trump's tariffs The increase appears to be real. What's driving it? The Daily Treasury Statement from which these numbers are derived breaks down what it calls 'withdrawals' into 102 categories, one of which—public debt cash redemptions—is not really spending. Some high-profile cutbacks show up as sharp spending declines at the Department of Education and the US Agency for International Development. Others don't because the affected agencies are folded into larger departments, as with the $1.2 billion, 7.7% decline in spending at the National Institutes of Health, which falls under the Department of Health and Human Services. Also, the full impact of the cutbacks imposed by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Office of Management and Budget and department heads probably isn't showing up in the numbers yet because firing workers and shutting down programmes costs money up front, plus court orders have halted many cuts, at least temporarily. Also Read: The US should stay away from gimmicks and tackle its real fiscal problem These numbers also reflect a fair amount of what you could call fiscal noise. The sharp decline in spending at the Office of Personnel Management seems to be a timing issue with payments for federal employees' health insurance, not a policy change. The big increase in spending at the Treasury Department seems similarly flukey. As already noted, the overall spending increase appears to be real, driven by familiar forces like the seemingly inexorable growth of Social Security, Medicare and other social insurance programmes, as well a significant new contributor since interest rates went up in 2022—interest payments on the federal debt. The US government is, as the saying goes, 'an insurance company with an army," and by my somewhat idiosyncratic accounting (I've included tax refunds because they encompass the nation's biggest antipoverty program, the Earned Income Tax Credit), social insurance, defence and interest payments have together accounted for 76% of spending since Trump took office and 74% of the increase over 2024. Also Read: Remittance tax: An idea that America should axe The Trump-backed tax and spending bill that passed the House last week takes aim at Medicaid, the health insurance programme for the poor and the Agriculture Department's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program—also known as food stamps—in both cases mainly by making it harder to qualify for benefits. Most of the other big spending categories appear to escape largely unscathed, and because the legislation also includes tax cuts, most projections indicate that it will increase the deficit and federal debt. Since Trump took office the deficit has actually been shrinking, though, thanks to a 13% increase in federal revenue. Is that sustainable? Revenue from customs and certain excise taxes—such as tariffs—is up 82%. Last week the Budget Lab at Yale estimated average annual tariff revenue of $280 billion over the next decade, way up from fiscal year 2024's $77 billion. But that's now in doubt after the US Court of International Trade ruled most of President Trump's new tariffs illegal [a decision that has been stayed while it is examined], and is in any case a drop in the bucket next to federal income and payroll tax revenue that totalled $4.6 trillion last year. Also Read: Mint Quick Edit | America's credit rating slip: How serious? Individual income taxes have generated most of this year's revenue gains, the bulk of them in the form of increases in non-withheld taxes that cannot be relied upon to continue. Non-withheld tax revenue tends to jump after financial markets do, with the beneficiaries of capital gains, employee-stock-option exercises and big bonuses often owing large amounts at tax time. The performance of the stock market so far this year points to fewer such happy events in coming months. For all the action in Washington since 21 January, it's a remarkably familiar picture. Federal income tax revenue is volatile, and spending on Social Security, Medicare and other social insurance programmes just keeps going up. ©Bloomberg The author is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering business, economics and other topics.
