logo
Consider refreshing your portfolio with this tariff-dodging drinks specialist

Consider refreshing your portfolio with this tariff-dodging drinks specialist

Telegraph29-04-2025

Questor is The Telegraph's stock-picking column, helping you decode the markets and offering insights on where to invest.
Nobody but nobody knows what is coming next in the Trump-trade-and-tariffs drama. Not even the president himself, judging by how he has offered a 90-day delay in the imposition of reciprocal tariffs, crafted exemptions for technology hardware products and noted that the final duties levied on Chinese goods could be lower than suggested.
Talk of trade deals seems to boost share prices, while concerns over more policy confusion support gold and silver instead – and there can be no clearer argument for a balanced, diversified portfolio than that. Within the equity portion, the least comfortable place to be is probably that of a company which sources heavily from Asia and sells extensively into the US.
Merseyside-headquartered Nichols ticks neither box and its financial solidity, lofty margins and healthy cash flow all mean its shares can continue to provide valuable portfolio ballast, not to mention welcome dividends.
Last week's update from the soft drinks specialist, whose key brands include Vimto, Slush Puppie and Levi Roots, offered three items of good news.
First, it revealed that trading for the first three months of 2025 had met expectations. Andrew Milne, its chief executive, also left guidance for full-year revenues and profits unchanged, as growth in the UK packaged drinks and 'out of home' segments more than offset weakness in the international packaged arm, where a shift to a concentrate model in West Africa compounded the unavoidable near-term impact upon demand of Ramadan.
Second, Mr Milne revealed an increase in the net cash pile. Last year's final dividend of 17.1p a share will be paid on May 1, to take our tally of payments to 276.5p a share. The company's net cash balance sheet and cash flow mean there should be more to come for patient shareholders.
Finally, management's initial assessment of the Trump tariffs is that less than 2pc of sales may be affected.
Our support over the past seven years has not yielded a capital gain, even if the income offsets the paper loss, but the fault here is ours, not that of the company. We simply paid too high an earnings multiple at the point of entry, and the combination of Covid 19 and supply chain stress, plus the usual rough-and-tumble of competition and higher interest rates, left the rating exposed on the downside.
Even if 20pc-plus profit margins and returns on capital help to justify that valuation, the prevailing forward multiple of 20 times forward earnings is still not really bargain-basement territory, either.
Investors must therefore coolly assess whether Nichols can meet the medium-term financial goals laid out at last year's analysts' meeting. If so, pre-tax income could reach £45m and earnings per share exceed 90p, for which investors would currently be paying less than 14 times earnings. Such a rating would look tempting and at least tariffs may not prove an unwelcome, additional obstacle.
Questor says: hold
Ticker: NICL:AIM
Share price: £12.20
Update: S&U
This month's full-year results show a third straight drop in annual profits and a second consecutive reduction in the total dividend at specialist lender S&U, thanks to the combination of an increase in loan impairments, higher interest rates and regulatory pressure.
That all leaves the shares no higher than they were in 2013 and they may not do much until a court case and a regulatory inquiry that both relate to the wider car loan industry are complete, but we do at least have S&U's valuation on our side, in the shape of a healthy dividend yield and a discount to net asset value (Nav).
Consumers, lenders, regulators and politicians are waiting for a decision from the Supreme Court on an appeal from two companies, which wish to prove they did not mis-sell car finance to the detriment of consumers between 2007 and 2021.
S&U's Advantage Finance arm is also a specialist in car loans. It has suffered a dip in lending and collections and an increase in arrears and impairments, as consumers await the regulatory and legal findings. Property finance arm Aspen Bridging is taking up some of the slack and analysts do believe that group pre-tax profits will bounce back in the year to January 2026, but the share price suggests that investors are waiting to see it before they believe it.
The stock trades on a forward price-to-earnings ratio of less than eight and offers a dividend yield of 7.8pc, according to consensus analysts' forecasts. Moreover, the stock market capitalisation of £177m stands well below the company's Nav of £238m, to suggest a lot of bad news is already in the share price.
Ticker: SUS
Share price: £14.35

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EXCLUSIVE Poll reveals whether Americans stand with Trump or Musk as feud spirals
EXCLUSIVE Poll reveals whether Americans stand with Trump or Musk as feud spirals

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE Poll reveals whether Americans stand with Trump or Musk as feud spirals

Republicans far-and-away are on President Donald Trump 's side amid his very public break-up with former DOGE leader Elon Musk. In a Daily Mail poll conducted by JL Partners and released Friday, 59 percent of Republicans sided with the U.S. president, while just 12 percent chose Musk. Another 28 percent said they were unsure. 'Republicans are clear: Donald Trump is their man. As our polling showed before, Trump voters are sticking by the person they backed in November over Elon Musk,' said J.L. Partners pollster James Johnson. During Thursday's dust-up, Musk suggested he had more political staying power than Trump, pointing out the president had just three and a half more years in office. Musk also said he backed Trump being impeached - and replaced by 40-year-old Vice President J.D. Vance. Since April Trump has lost some support with GOP voters, while Musk's has grown - but Trump still has nearly five times as much support. Previous polling found that 70 percent of Republicans backed Trump, while 6 percent selected Musk. Only 10 percent of Democrats voiced support for Trump, while 35 percent picked Musk. Fifty-four percent of Democrats were unsure which MAGA-aligned individual to choose. The fresh poll was conducted Friday with a sample of 1,006 registered voters, with a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percent. On Thursday Trump and Musk took part in a spectacular public spat, which included cameos by dead serial pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and anti-Semitic rapper Kanye West. The fallout between Trump and Musk - who were political allies for a little less than a year - started in recent weeks when the billionaire started resisting Republicans' 'big, beautiful bill,' arguing that the spending wiped out DOGE's cost-cutting efforts. Then, on Thursday, when Trump was supposed to be hosting the new German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office, he was asked about Musk's recent criticism. From there the dam broke. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will any more, I was surprised,' Trump told reporters. The president suggested that Musk was angry - not over the bill ballooning the deficit - but because the Trump administration has pulled back on electric vehicle mandates, which negatively impacted Tesla, and replaced the Musk-approved nominee to lead NASA, which could hinder SpaceX 's government contracts. 'And you know, Elon's upset because we took the EV mandate, which was a lot of money for electric vehicles, and they're having a hard time the electric vehicles and they want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidy,' Trump said. 'I know that disburbed him.' Over the weekend, Trump pulled the nomination of Jared Isaacman to lead NASA. Isaacman had worked alongside Musk at SpaceX. 'He recommended somebody that I guess he knew very well, I'm sure he respected him, to run NASA and I didn't think it was appropriate and he happened to be a Democrat, like totally Democrat,' Trump continued. 'We won, we get certain privileges and one of the privileges is we don't have to appoint a Democrat.' Musk posted to X as Trump's Q&A with reporters was ongoing. 'Whatever,' the billionaire wrote. 'Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill,' he advised. 'In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that [is] both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this!' Musk continued. 'Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way.' The spat quickly turned personal with Musk then posting that Trump would have lost the 2024 election had it not been for the world's richest man - him. Musk had publicly endorsed Trump on the heels of the July 13th assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania and poured around $290 million of his fortune into the Republican's campaign. The billionaire also joined Trump on the campaign trail when he returned to the site of the Butler shooting in early October, a month before Election Day. Elon Musk objected to President Donald Trump's claim that Trump would have won Pennsylvania - and the 2024 election - without the help from the world's richest man. 'Such ingratitude,' Musk commented Trump said in the Oval that he likely still would have won Pennsylvania without Musk's help and because Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris didn't choose the state's governor, Josh Shapiro, to be her running mate. Even with Shapiro on the ticket, Trump claimed, 'I would have won Pennsylvania, I would have won by a lot.' Musk said that was laughable. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk claimed. 'Such ingratitude,' the billionaire added. The 53-year-old Musk also asserted he had more staying power than the 78-year-old president. 'Oh and some food for thought as they ponder this question: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years,' Musk said Thursday afternoon, responding to a post from MAGA agitator Laura Loomer. Loomer said she was reporting from Capitol Hill and that Republican lawmakers were trying to determine if it was better to side with Trump or Musk. After his meeting with Merz, Trump continued to throw punches online. Trump asserted that he had asked Musk to leave his administration and said the billionaire went 'CRAZY!' 'Elon was "wearing thin," I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump wrote. The president then threatened to pull SpaceX and Tesla's government contracts. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Trump wrote. Musk then taunted Trump to act. 'This just gets better and better,' he wrote. 'Go ahead, make my day …' In a follow-up post, Musk said he would 'begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.' The Dragon is how NASA astronauts currently travel to the International Space Station - and how supplies make it there. As the fight continued, Tesla shares plummeted. Anti-semitic rapper Kanye West even got involved. 'Broooos please noooooo. We love you both so much,' West wrote. And Musk threw the Epstein bomb. '@RealDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public,' Musk wrote. 'Have a nice day, DJT!' Epstein is a serial child sex offender who died in prison in 2019. Trump pledged to release the files related to Epstein, with Attorney General Pam Bondi releasing some pages in February, but most of that information was already in the public domain. 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out,' Musk added. Trump didn't directly respond to Musk's Epstein charge, instead posting what amounted to a shrug on Truth Social, while also continuing to back the 'big, beautiful bill.' 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago,' Trump wrote. 'This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress.' Later he ignored shouted questions from reporters on Musk's Epstein charge as he hosted the National Fraternal Order of Police executive board in the State Dining Room. Asked for comment, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told the Daily Mail in a statement: 'This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted.' 'The President is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again,' Leavitt added. Trump didn't directly respond to Musk's Epstein charge, instead posting what amounted to a shrug on Truth Social, while also continuing to back the 'big, beautiful bill.' 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago,' Trump wrote. 'This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress.' Later he ignored shouted questions from reporters on Musk's Epstein charge as he hosted the National Fraternal Order of Police executive board in the State Dining Room. A source familiar pointed out to the Daily Mail that 'everyone knows President Trump kicked Jeffrey Epstein out of his Palm Beach Golf Club.' 'The Administration itself released Epstein files with the President's name included. This is not a new surprise Elon is uncovering. Everyone already knew this,' the source continued. The source also mused, 'If Elon truly thought the President was more deeply involved with Epstein, why did he hangout with him for 6 months and say he "loves him as much as a straight man can love a straight man?"' It was less than a week ago that Trump gave Musk a golden key and a DOGE send-off from the Oval Office.

Brands are claiming to be 'Made in America' and then they're getting sued
Brands are claiming to be 'Made in America' and then they're getting sued

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Brands are claiming to be 'Made in America' and then they're getting sued

Brands are desperate to emphasize that they are 'Made in America' as President Trump continues to wield tariffs to push for a homegrown manufacturing renaissance. However, some companies have been accused of misleading customers by claiming their product was made in the US, when in fact it was in part made overseas. As a result, dozens of brands are now facing legal action over their advertising and packaging. The litigation is being driven by a California law firm Kazerouni Law Group which has already launched 10 of the 13 class action suits filed so far this year. By comparison there were only seven similar cases brought in the whole of last year, according to consumer advocacy group Truth in Advertising. 'One of the platforms the administration was running on was how important American-made things are,' Abbas Kazerounian, founding partner of Kazerouni Law Group, told the Wall Street Journal. 'So the American public has out and out said, "This is something that's important to us."' Kazerouni's cases allege that popular brands have used that sentiment to sell more products and justify higher prices, without their origins being entirely in the US. High profile consumer goods makers have been drawn in to the fray, including Goya Foods, French's Mustard, PepsiCo's Pure Leaf Teas and Dude Wipes. Only Dude Wipes has spoken publicly of their case, telling the Journal that they are confident it will be dismissed. The brand now puts 'Assembled in the U.S.A.,' on their men's toiletry products, to reflect the fact that some components come from overseas. Last year Kazerounian sued the hair care brand Olaplex, for claiming to be made in the US. The case resulted in a settlement, and while Olaplex does not admit wrongdoing it agreed to pay Kazerouni's $1.05 million fees and give the plaintiff $5,000. Another high profile case, brought by another firm, saw a jury award $2.36 million in April to class action plaintiffs that sued the maker of Bigelow Teas. The case argued that the tea company had inaccurately put 'Manufactured in the USA' on its packaging. The odds are certainly in Kazerounian's favor. Of the 80 'Made in America' class action suits brought since 2011 only five have been dismissed, according to data from Truth in Advertising. Abbas Kazerounian, founding partner of Kazerouni Law Group is leading the legal charge Pure Leaf teas made by PepsiCo have also found themselves in the firing line No juries have ever come out in favor of defending companies either, the group said. Companies are so concerned about the threat of legal action that they are preemptively amending their advertising and packaging materials. The maker of Jeep and Ram vehicles changed a new ad campaign to avoid saying their vehicles were built in America because they contain imported parts. 'I think it's important to educate the public, and the businesses for that matter, who are more sophisticated than consumers generally, on why these cases are important,' Kazerounian concluded.

Diplomatic win for UK hosting US-China trade talks
Diplomatic win for UK hosting US-China trade talks

Sky News

time2 hours ago

  • Sky News

Diplomatic win for UK hosting US-China trade talks

Sky News understands that the Trump administration approached the UK government to ask if it would host round two of the US-China trade talks. This is a useful 'diplo-win' for the UK. The first round was held in Geneva last month. News of that happening came as a surprise. The Chinese and the Americans were in the midst of a Trump-instigated trade war. President Trump was en route to Saudi Arabia and suddenly we got word of talks in Switzerland. They went surprisingly well. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent and his Chinese counterpart He Lifeng, met face-to-face and agreed to suspend most tariffs for 90 days. But two weeks later, the Trump administration accused Beijing of breaking the agreements reached in Geneva. Beijing threw the blame back at Washington. On Wednesday, Donald Trump and Xi Jinping spoke by phone. The Chinese claimed this call was at the Americans' request. Either way, the consequence was that the talks were back on track. "I just concluded a very good phone call with President Xi of China, discussing some of the intricacies of our recently made, and agreed to, trade deal," President Trump said this week. From that call came the impetus for a second round of talks. A venue was needed. In stepped the UK at short notice. Beyond being geographically convenient, UK government sources suggest that Britain is geopolitically in the right place right now to act as this bridge and facilitator. The UK-China relationship is in the process of a "reset". Other locations, like Brussels or other EU capitals, would have been less workable. Crucially too, for the UK, this is also potentially advantageous as it seeks to get its own UK-US trade agreement, to eliminate or massively reduce tariffs, over the line. 5:08 Talks on reaching the "implementation phase" have been near-continuous since the announcement last month, but having the American principals in London is a plus. Sideline talks are possible, but even the presence of the US team in the UK is helpful. For all the chaos that President Trump is causing with his tariffs, he has instigated face-to-face conversations as he seeks resets. Key players are sitting down around tables - yes, to untangle the trade knots which Trump tied, but this whole episode has pulled foes together around the same table; it has forced relationships and maybe mutual understanding. That's useful. And for this next round, between superpowers, the UK is the host. Also useful.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store