
Apple to bring blood oxygen feature to some US watches with software update
The move will allow users of Apple Watch Series 9, Series 10, and Apple Watch Ultra 2 in the United States to view their blood oxygen levels on a paired iPhone.
It comes after years of legal wrangling with Irvine, California-based Masimo, which has accused Apple of hiring its employees and stealing its pulse oximetry technology after discussing a potential collaboration.
Masimo won a ruling at the U.S. International Trade Commission to block imports of watches with the feature, which prompted Apple to remove the feature and set off a lengthy appeals process.
The watch models affected Thursday did not have the blood oxygen feature when shipped, but Apple said U.S. Customs had approved the software update.
With the update, a user can start a session in the blood oxygen app on Apple Watch, and the Apple Watch sensors will collect data that will be used by the iPhone to calculate and display the levels, Apple said.
Apple first introduced pulse oximetry in its Series 6 Apple Watches in 2020. Masimo released its blood oxygen tracking W1 watch in 2022.
Masimo convinced the ITC to block imports of Apple's Series 9 and Ultra 2 smartwatches in 2023, based on the commission's determination that Apple's technology for reading blood oxygen levels infringed upon Masimo's patents.
Apple temporarily resumed sales of the watches the next day after persuading the Federal Circuit to pause the ban.
The Federal Circuit reinstated the ban the next month, leading Apple to remove pulse oximetry capabilities from its watches in the United States.
Masimo did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
(Reporting by Stephen Nellis in San Francisco; Additional reporting by Blake Brittain in Washington and Puyaan Singh in Bengaluru; Editing by Anil D'Silva)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Pictures of the week: From Limp Bizkit in Abu Dhabi to a robotic knockout
Investing in disruptive technology can be a bumpy ride, as investors in Tesla were reminded on Friday, when its stock dropped 7.5 per cent in early trading to $575. It recovered slightly but still ended the week 15 per cent lower and is down a third from its all-time high of $883 on January 26. The electric car maker's market cap fell from $834 billion to about $567bn in that time, a drop of an astonishing $267bn, and a blow for those who bought Tesla stock late. The collapse also hit fund managers that have gone big on Tesla, notably the UK-based Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust and Cathie Wood's ARK Innovation ETF. Tesla is the top holding in both funds, making up a hefty 10 per cent of total assets under management. Both funds have fallen by a quarter in the past month. Matt Weller, global head of market research at GAIN Capital, recently warned that Tesla founder Elon Musk had 'flown a bit too close to the sun', after getting carried away by investing $1.5bn of the company's money in Bitcoin. He also predicted Tesla's sales could struggle as traditional auto manufacturers ramp up electric car production, destroying its first mover advantage. AJ Bell's Russ Mould warns that many investors buy tech stocks when earnings forecasts are rising, almost regardless of valuation. 'When it works, it really works. But when it goes wrong, elevated valuations leave little or no downside protection.' A Tesla correction was probably baked in after last year's astonishing share price surge, and many investors will see this as an opportunity to load up at a reduced price. Dramatic swings are to be expected when investing in disruptive technology, as Ms Wood at ARK makes clear. Every week, she sends subscribers a commentary listing 'stocks in our strategies that have appreciated or dropped more than 15 per cent in a day' during the week. Her latest commentary, issued on Friday, showed seven stocks displaying extreme volatility, led by ExOne, a leader in binder jetting 3D printing technology. It jumped 24 per cent, boosted by news that fellow 3D printing specialist Stratasys had beaten fourth-quarter revenues and earnings expectations, seen as good news for the sector. By contrast, computational drug and material discovery company Schrödinger fell 27 per cent after quarterly and full-year results showed its core software sales and drug development pipeline slowing. Despite that setback, Ms Wood remains positive, arguing that its 'medicinal chemistry platform offers a powerful and unique view into chemical space'. In her weekly video view, she remains bullish, stating that: 'We are on the right side of change, and disruptive innovation is going to deliver exponential growth trajectories for many of our companies, in fact, most of them.' Ms Wood remains committed to Tesla as she expects global electric car sales to compound at an average annual rate of 82 per cent for the next five years. She said these are so 'enormous that some people find them unbelievable', and argues that this scepticism, especially among institutional investors, 'festers' and creates a great opportunity for ARK. Only you can decide whether you are a believer or a festering sceptic. If it's the former, then buckle up.


Harpers Bazaar Arabia
3 hours ago
- Harpers Bazaar Arabia
The 5 Best Plumping Lip Glosses That Don't Sting
Yes, a little tingle is part of the plumping magic, but beauty doesn't have to mean pain. With these next-gen formulas, you can get the plush, full-lipped look you love without the sting Lip plumpers have long been the beauty world's love-hate relationship. On one hand: luscious, fuller-looking lips in seconds. On the other: that unmistakable tingling (or, let's be honest, stinging) sensation that can make even the boldest beauty lover reach for the makeup wipes. Here's the reality: almost all lip plumpers sting to a degree. Why? Because they work by triggering a mild reaction that increases blood flow to the lips, causing them to swell slightly. It's science — and it's why that tingle happens. But not all formulas are created equal. Some keep the sensation subtle, trading aggressive burn for a comfortable warmth, hydrating shine, and just the right amount of plump. Here are five formulas you can use without feeling that familiar burn. Too Faced Lip Injection Maximum Plump The OG IT girl of the lip plumping world, Too Faced's cult-favourite delivers serious volume, but the 'Maximum Plump' version moderates the sting with a cushiony, high-shine finish. Expect a noticeable pout without the tear-inducing burn, plus added hydration to keep lips smooth long after the gloss fades. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Too Faced Cosmetics (@toofaced) Dior Addict Lip Maximiser A runway and red carpet essential, Dior's 'Lip Maximiser' is volume in a tube. The formula is enriched with hyaluronic acid for hydration and comes in a range of chic shades. The plumping effect is subtle and the tingle minimal – think gentle awakening rather than hot pepper panic. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Dior Beauty Official (@diorbeauty) Maybelline Lifter Gloss This lip plump is proof that comfort and gloss don't have to cost a fortune. Infused with hyaluronic acid, Maybelline's 'Lifter Gloss' delivers a glass-like shine and a soft, hydrated pout without noticeable sting. Perfect for everyday wear and available in an impressive range of shades. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Maybelline New York (@maybelline) Fenty Heat Gloss Rihanna's answer to a plumping gloss strikes a balance between instant fullness and wearable comfort. Her 'Heat' range offers a warm, tingly sensation that's more spa-steam than chilli-flake. Bonus: the scent alone is addictive. View this post on Instagram A post shared by FENTY BEAUTY BY RIHANNA (@fentybeauty) About Face Blurred Matte Lip Plump Halsey's 'About-Face' line is known for its fearless colour, but this matte plumper is all about comfort. The blurred finish gives a modern, diffused look, while the plumping action is so subtle you'll barely feel it, until you notice your lips looking just that much more soft and plush. View this post on Instagram A post shared by about-face beauty by Halsey (@aboutfacebeauty)


Zawya
6 hours ago
- Zawya
Intel shares rise on report of possible US government stake
Intel shares rose 4% on Friday on hopes of more financial aid for the turnaround of the struggling chipmaker after a report that the U.S. government may buy a stake. The Bloomberg News report followed a meeting between CEO Lip-Bu Tan and President Donald Trump on Monday after Trump demanded the new Intel chief's resignation over his "highly conflicted" ties to Chinese firms. Trump, who called the meeting "very interesting", has taken an unprecedented approach to interventions and deal-making with corporate America. His administration had struck a deal with MP Materials that would make the Department of Defense the largest shareholder of the rare-earth producer. Federal backing could give Intel more time to revive its loss-making foundry business, analysts said, but it still faces a weak product roadmap and trouble attracting customers for new factories. Under the Biden administration, Intel had emerged as one of the biggest beneficiaries of the 2022 CHIPS Act, as former CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out plans to build advanced factories. Tan, however, pared back such ambitions, slowing construction of new plants in Ohio. He plans to build factories based on demand for the services, which analysts have said could put him at odds with Trump's push to shore up American manufacturing. The report said a deal would help build out the Ohio plant, which has faced delays and was expected to be completed by 2030. It could be a "game-changer", said Matt Britzman, senior equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown. But he warned "government support might help shore up confidence, but it doesn't fix the underlying competitiveness gap in advanced nodes." Intel lost its competitive edge years ago to Taiwan's TSMC . It has virtually no presence in the booming AI chips market dominated by Nvidia and is losing market share in PCs and datacenters to AMD. Its latest 18A manufacturing process is facing quality issues, Reuters has reported, as only a small share of chips produced are good enough for customers, while it remains partly dependent on TSMC to make Intel in-house designed chips. "Intel also needs capability; can the US government do anything to help here?" Bernstein analysts said. "Without a solid process roadmap the entire exercise would be economically equivalent to simply setting 10s of billions of dollars on fire." (Reporting by Alun John in London and Rashika Singh and Arsheeya Bajwa in Bengaluru; Editing by Jan Harvey, Rashmi Aich and Arun Koyyur)