Gambling is illegal in Texas, but that didn't stop a billion-dollar company from trying to open a casino — residents did
One by one, residents of the Texas city of Irving stood up to voice their opposition to controversial plans for a new casino complex to open in their own backyard.
'We do not live in Las Vegas because we do not want to live in Las Vegas,' one man who described himself as a local educator said at the city's planning and zoning commission meeting last Monday.
'This deal is a bad deal for Irving and what happens in Vegas has to stay in Vegas,' said another resident, during the six-hour-long meeting that rolled into the early hours Tuesday.
At a separate heated town hall event the week before, others held up signs saying 'Don't Vegas my Irving' as a casino lobbyist was booed and jeered for nearly two hours.
Despite the protests, at around 2:30 a.m. Tuesday, planning commissioners voted to recommend approval of the Las Vegas Sands Corporation's plans to install a 'destination resort' with a casino to the city council.
But ultimately the residents prevailed — at least for now.
Following immense public pressure, Sands announced Thursday it had removed the casino element from their proposal.
For the last month, Irving has been embroiled in a scrappy public fight over the proposal put forward by Sands, owned by Trump megadonor Miriam Adelson, who also has a majority stake in the Dallas Mavericks.
Sands bought the property and the land where the Texas Stadium used to stand in 2023. Now it wants to rezone it to be home to a new casino.
But aside from fierce opposition from many Irving residents, Sands has another major battle on its hands: gambling is illegal in the state of Texas.
The casino behemoth has been lobbying hard for gambling legalization in the state for years.
'Y'all can relax,' casino lobbyist Andy Abboud, the company's senior vice president of government relations, told the unimpressed town hall last week. 'It's not even legal yet!'
But campaigners believe Sands is biding its time in order to achieve its end goal.
'They're facing some challenges at the state level, but they are playing the long game,' Irving city councilman Luis Canosa told The Independent. ' They are lobbying very hard, spending tens of millions every year. And it doesn't matter for them if it gets legalized in 10 or 15 years, they still want to have the security that they have the rezoning, which once it's given, cannot be taken away.'
Texas has some of the most restrictive gaming laws in the U.S. and campaigners argue that greenlighting casinos would lead to a rise in domestic violence, gambling addiction and human trafficking.
To build its casino in Texas, Sands needs a Constitutional Amendment legalizing gambling at state level to pass and it needs Irving City Council to approve the zoning entitlements.
'They want to leave gaming open to establish a full predatory casino that extracts money from the working class, from hurting families, from addicts, from older people in Social Security checks that cannot afford to lose anything,' Canosa said. 'It's going to be a machine to extract money from the working class people for the exclusive benefit of billionaire special interests.'
Canosa described Irving, a suburb of Dallas, as a place where people 'from different walks of life coexist peacefully' and where many Texans have moved to raise a family.
At the tense town hall last week, Abboud from Sands was asked by a resident whether the company was considering alternative cities, such as Frisco, Arlington or Dallas, for its $4 billion development.
'I hate to disappoint everybody…but we're focused on Irving right now,' he replied.
Abboud tried to bill the complex as a 'family-friendly' destination.
'It would become another spectacular entertainment option for people that are living here,' he said, as some people in the crowd shouted. 'It'd be more restaurants, it would be an arena. It would be family-friendly entertainment with bowling alleys, movie theaters…an arena where you can see everything from Coldplay to Lady Gaga to Disney on Ice.'
Abboud, who was hit with questions for over an hour, was honest that Sands is not interested in opening the development without a casino.
'Can you please do a destination tourist place but without a casino?' Sister Mary Angelica asked. 'This would show that the Sands company really cared about the people who live here and are not only profit-minded.'
But Abboud's answer was all business.
'The bottom line is that if we're going to build a $4 billion facility and build an arena and build all the other amenities, the gaming component helps us subsidize and build all of the other amenities that make it great,' he said, to a chorus of booing.
For now, the company says it will proceed with the complex without the casino.
'Team Sands will now pretend they don't want gaming in Irving until they get a friendlier council,' Canosa said after Thursday's win. 'If their pro-casino candidates get across the finish line, they'll bring it back in a heartbeat.'
The councilman was the first to bring the city's intention to fast-track the plans to the public at the end of February and claimed the company 'tried to go behind residents' backs' with the negotiations.
'We don't want it here, and the residents don't want it. There's massive opposition,' he told The Independent.
Not everyone agrees. City council member Dennis Webb said it was a loss of opportunity for Irving.
'I am sad that people keep wanting to come to Irving wanting to do something for us, and we keep losing all of these opportunities to get some great amenities for our citizens, who constantly tell me there is nothing in Irving to do,' he said, according to the Dallas News.
Sands executive Mark Boekenheide reinforced Abboud's message that the company 'cannot commit' to the project without the casino element. 'The economics will not work without a casino piece,' Boekenheide told city council members Thursday.
The executive said that the complex is projected to create 9,000 jobs for the community and could generate millions in tax revenue for the city.
Speaking before Thursday's meeting, Casnosa told The Independent he would be 'proud' if his fellow council members stood up to Sands.
'If the gaming piece gets delayed or taken out, that will mean that at least enough of the representatives listened to the people and stood strong in in, frankly, a heroic act,' Canosa said. 'Because whenever people see in Texas that Miriam Adelson is showing up with an interest, everybody bends over backwards.
'These people are very powerful. It does take a lot of integrity to stand up.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
'We're happy to have this fight': Trump administration leans into California protests
President Donald Trump's immigration agenda has met a groundswell of opposition in Los Angeles, the country's second-largest city. At least 56 people have been arrested so far in massive protests against the administration's immigration raids in the city Friday. The demonstrations have spilled over onto one of the region's largest freeways, and federal authorities are facing criticism after they arrested, and apparently injured, a prominent labor leader. In response, the White House has threatened to arrest California's governor and mobilized Marines to support National Guard troops in defending federal property — even though state officials say they don't want the assistance and are now suing the administration. For the White House, this scene — Trump battling a blue state over his signature issue — is a win. It's a nationally watched saga of the sort that has long defined his career: a made-for-TV moment. 'We're happy to have this fight,' a White House official said, emphasizing that politically, the administration sees it as a winning issue. Democrats and immigration activists have broadly blasted the Los Angeles operation as illegal and inhumane and insisted that it's all about politics — and not about sound public policy. 'This Administration's actions are not about public safety — they're about stoking fear,' former Vice President Kamala Harris, a Los Angeles resident who ran against Trump last year, wrote in a statement. But Trump allies argue that it's simply Trump carrying out the hard-line immigration agenda that was the centerpiece of his campaign. NBC News spoke with four White House officials, in addition to other Trump supporters, who requested anonymity to speak candidly. 'This is what America voted for, period,' a Trump adviser said. 'This is the America First focus that got the president elected and is driven by nothing else than what he promised American voters.' 'Look at the violence, the attacks on law enforcement,' the adviser added. 'If Democrats want to support that, let them. This is why we win elections and they do not.' Trump advisers also pointed to the fact that the president's immigration policies continue to get high marks in most public polling. A CBS/YouGov poll conducted just before the Los Angeles immigration raids found that 54% of respondents approved of the administration's ' program to deport immigrants illegally.' Those numbers help clarify why the administration and more broadly congressional Republicans are politically comfortable leaning into support of the raids over vocal opposition from critics — and a persistent threat of legal challenge. 'I know there's no question places like California have thumbed their nose at the American people and decided they want to be a sanctuary for criminals,' Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., said Monday, adding, 'I think he's exercising exactly what he said he'd do and what people elected him' to do. Trump advisers say the president also points to the fact that he got more votes in California in 2024 than in his previous campaigns, even though he still badly lost the heavily Democratic-leaning state. The administration's response to the protests does seem to have one eye on the reaction in conservative media, a space increasingly dominated by pro-Trump influencers. Some of those influencers have been posting from the protests — most notably Phil McGraw, a well-known Trump supporter better known as 'Dr. Phil,' who embedded with Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents during the Los Angeles raids, as he did during similar immigration raids in Chicago this year. The Trump adviser, asked about McGraw's involvement, said: 'This is an important moment in American history. People have a right to see it in a way not unfairly skewed by a biased mainstream media.' The adviser wouldn't elaborate on how McGraw, whose presence was first reported by CNN, was able to have front-line access to the federal immigration operations. A spokesman for McGraw didn't respond to a request for comment. Republicans more broadly also see the fight as a political winner and say Democrats are functionally taking the bait on an issue in which polling has given Trump an advantage. 'I think it is a symptom of how far left this party has done when you have major Democrats standing on the side of illegal aliens that are torching vehicles,' Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis told Fox News on Monday. 'It is one of the reasons the Democratic Party is struggling so much nationally,' he added. Matthew Bartlett, a Republican strategist and former Trump administration official, said the raids shouldn't be a surprise because immigration is a 'legitimate issue' the voters have signaled they care about. 'There is no political upside in defending or denying the images of burning cars, rioters and looting and the destruction,' he said of Democrats. 'A feeling that things have spun out of control in California and that government can't effectively govern. … It has changed the conversation from illegal immigration to a breakdown in society.' Still, there has been some disagreement — at least in public messaging — about how far to push in going after California Democrats, a break between what may be politically popular with the base and what's politically realistic. The clearest example centers on the Trump administration's authorizing the deployment of National Guard troops over the opposition of California Gov. Gavin Newsom. Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass have argued that inserting National Guard troops will inflame tensions and potential violence — a response that has led Trump to signal he would consider arresting Newsom if he were to continue what the administration considers to be his interference. 'I would do it if I were Tom,' Trump said, referring to his 'border czar,' Tom Homan. 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity. But I do think it would be a great thing.' While detaining Newsom would no doubt please Trump's MAGA base, White House officials privately say it's not currently in the cards. 'It's not being actively planned or considered,' a senior White House official said. 'But anyone who breaks federal law puts themselves at risk of being arrested. That's just a basic fact.' A second White House official said that if either Newsom or Bass, a former Democratic congresswoman, do something at odds with federal immigration law, they could be detained. But the official also acknowledged that the optics of arresting California officials amid an immigration fight they believe most Americans support could backfire with some Republican voters because, at the moment, it doesn't appear they have actually broken any immigration laws. The official said there isn't some grand strategy to deploy National Guard troops in blue cities across the country; the administration is simply waiting to see whether other protests get out of control. Meanwhile, Newsom has leaned into the threats, practically daring the administration to arrest him rather than focusing on the protesters. 'He's a tough guy. Why doesn't he do that? He knows where to find me,' Newsom told MSNBC on Sunday. Referring to Homan, he added: 'That kind of bloviating is exhausting. So, Tom, arrest me. Let's go.' On Monday, California sued the Trump administration, arguing that Trump's federalizing the state's National Guard is 'unlawful.' 'Let me be clear: There is no invasion. There is no rebellion,' Democratic state Attorney General Rob Bonta said. 'The president is trying to manufacture chaos and crisis on the ground for his own political ends. Federalizing the California National Guard is an abuse of the president's authority under the law — and not one we take lightly. We're asking a court to put a stop to the unlawful, unprecedented order.' Trump supporters have lined up behind him, with some even offering to head to Los Angeles to help, despite having no law enforcement experience. 'Preparing to deploy … to Los Angeles,' vocal Trump supporter Benny Johnson said on X. He followed up with a post to his 3.7 million followers showing him wearing military-style gear with his name on it. The increasingly contentious political fight over Los Angeles, administration officials admit, is no longer about just deporting those with criminal records, which was Trump's main pitch to voters on the campaign trail. On Monday, an MSNBC host asked Homan whether everyone ICE has arrested as part of the Trump administration's immigration efforts had criminal records, and he had a blunt response. 'Absolutely not,' he said.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Trump, Musk and the end of a bromance
It started with a tweet. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' wrote Elon Musk. Donald Trump's tax and spending bill was a 'disgusting abomination'. What followed was a remarkable – and remarkably public – feud between the world's richest man and the US president: insults were traded, threats were made, shares in Musk's publicly traded companies plummeted. It was quite the turnaround for the pair. Last year, Musk had given Trump's re-election campaign more than $280m in donations. And only two weeks ago, when Musk stood down from his position in Trump's administration, the two were still insistent that their relationship was good. Yet even then, as the Guardian's global affairs correspondent Andrew Roth reports, there were signs of tension. And as he tells Michael Safi, they were about more than a clash between two big egos, but over the future direction of the Maga movement itself.
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump brands Greta Thunberg a 'young, angry person' in blistering attack
Donald Trump also suggested Greta Thunberg should take "anger management classes" following the Swede's emotional SOS video after her aid boat Madleen was intercepted Donald Trump took aim at Greta Thunberg in a savage rant - branding the climate campaigner a "young, angry person" with "anger issues". The President slammed the activist's attempt to provide Palestinians with aid on the British-flagged boat Madleen, which Israeli forces intercepted in the early hours of Monday. During which, a video emerged on X (Twitter) showing Greta, 22, appealing for help from the Swedish government. The campaigner, who was travelling with 11 other activists from across the world, has now reportedly been locked in a cell in Israel and will appear in court later today. However, Mr Trump showed no mercy as, in an interview with reporters today, he claimed Greta should attend "anger management classes". "Well, she's a strange person. She's a young, angry person. I don't know if it's real anger — it's hard to believe, actually... I saw what happened. She's certainly different," Mr Trump said. The bullish President continued: "Anger management — I think she has to go to an anger management class. That's my primary recommendation for her." It is believed Mr Trump had a call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday. Although the world leader, 78, did not confirm if Greta came up in that conversation, he referenced "other problems" Israeli faces. Shaking his head as he spoke, Mr Trump said: "I think Israel has enough problems without kidnapping Greta Thunberg. Is that what she said? She was kidnapped by Israel?" Madleen was seized by Israeli forces in "international waters," thought to be the western fringes of the Mediterrenean Sea. The activists had travelled for several days on the yacht in the hope they would reach the Gaza Strip to support stricken communities. Yet, once the ship was stopped, the Israeli Foreign Ministry described it as "a selfie yacht". It said: "The yacht is claiming that it is delivering humanitarian aid. In fact, it is a media gimmick for publicity (which includes less than a single truckload of aid) - a 'selfie yacht'." Greta, from Stockholm, is yet to respond to these remarks, as it is understood she has been locked up in an Israeli jail cell and will appear in a court for "illegal migrants" later today. Others onboard the ship have been - or are due to be - sent home to their home countries, authorities in Israel said. Maria Malmer Stenergard, the Swedish Minister of Foreign Affairs, said on Monday that she believes Greta is not in need of support from the ministry after the climate activist called on followers to pressure the government into action.
