Insurance requirement for protest marches out of reach, P.E.I. peace organization says
A P.E.I. organization that doesn't even have a bank account is calling on the City of Charlottetown to relent after it was told it needed $2 million in liability insurance to hold a march for peace.
Earlier this month, the Island Peace Committee was planning to hold a peace march and rally condemning violence in Gaza, Sudan and Myanmar.
Such events have been held for years, committee volunteers said, but this year a new requirement popped up.
"City police told us that we needed a $2-million insurance policy to take to the streets of Charlottetown," said Marian White, a member of the Island Peace Committee. "We assumed it was a misunderstanding. But the police were firm on that."
A local insurance company quoted the organization $1,600 for a one-year policy, White said, noting that the committee doesn't even have a bank account.
"We assume the city has insurance and we want the city police to do their job of protecting the citizens. And where there are activities on the street, we expect them to be there to protect us," she said.
Why insurance is required
Carol Lang, another member of the Island Peace Committee, said she felt confused by the insurance policy requirement.
"When I look at it and what's happening in the rest of the country, and certainly the United States, free speech — we have to guard that. Because that is being clamped down on again and again, especially in the university administrations," she said.
"We just want to include everyone and look at the world [and] do what we can and make it better."
The need for third-party liability insurance has been on the books since 2015, Charlottetown police Chief Brad MacConnell told CBC News.
It exists to protect those involved as well as the city itself, he said.
"Even the most well-intentioned marches, protests or events can have unintended consequences. I think we're seeing that across the world," MacConnell said.
"There's a certain amount of due diligence to ensure that the public in general is protected."
No attempt to prevent protests: chief
For those planning events or marches, MacConnell said early communication with the city and its police force would be the best way to ensure the event is successful.
"We certainly only have the best interests of people in mind. There's certainly no attempt to try to prevent or dissuade people from entering into peaceful protest," he said.
"In fact, I have a great deal of respect for people that stand up and protest for things such as peace and other types of rights."
MacConnell said the city and police will always try to work with organizers to help them accomplish what they're trying to do, but that sometimes involves compromise.
For example, an event being held on a sidewalk would carry less risk than one that involves travelling on a roadway and may not require insurance, he said.
Ukrainian-Canadian group had insurance
Last weekend, the Ukrainian-Canadian community held a rally and a march that closed off some streets in downtown Charlottetown to celebrate their heritage at a time when Russia and Ukraine are at war. The organization had insurance and the event went smoothly, a volunteer said.
As for the Island Peace Committee, White said it won't change how protests are planned — and it doesn't plan to take out that insurance policy.
"We will continue to exercise our rights under the Charter for freedom of speech, freedom of assembly. We will continue to take to the streets and get our message across," White said.
"We believe — and it's a fact — that Islanders want to be on the right side of history, and we will continue to take to the streets."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Globe and Mail
4 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Quebec government renews promise to modify forestry reform bill that sparked blockades
The Quebec government is renewing its promise to modify a forestry bill that has provoked blockades and growing tension in the province. Indigenous Affairs Minister Ian Lafrenière said Tuesday evening that the forestry reform bill must be amended to take into account the rights of First Nations. His social media statement came after a six-hour meeting with First Nations leaders and representatives of the forest industry. He and Natural Resources Minister Maïté Blanchette Vézina are expected to meet today with the Assembly of First Nations Quebec–Labrador and the office of Premier François Legault. The legislation would designate certain areas of public land as forestry zones, but Indigenous leaders say it infringes on their rights. A series of blockades in recent months in opposition to the bill has disrupted operations for some in the forestry sector.


CTV News
29 minutes ago
- CTV News
Quebec government renews promise to make changes to forestry reform bill
Quebec Indigenous Affairs Minister Ian Lafrenière responds to the Opposition during question period, in the National Assembly in Quebec City, Wednesday, June 5, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jacques Boissinot MONTREAL — The Quebec government is renewing its promise to modify a forestry bill that has provoked blockades and growing tension in the province. Indigenous Affairs Minister Ian Lafrenière said Tuesday evening that the forestry reform bill must be amended to take into account the rights of First Nations. His social media statement came after a six-hour meeting with First Nations leaders and representatives of the forest industry. He and Natural Resources Minister Maïté Blanchette Vézina are expected to meet today with the Assembly of First Nations Quebec–Labrador and the office of Premier François Legault. The legislation would designate certain areas of public land as forestry zones, but Indigenous leaders say it infringes on their rights. A series of blockades in recent months in opposition to the bill has disrupted operations for some in the forestry sector. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 20, 2025.


National Post
34 minutes ago
- National Post
Opinion: Modernize the legal system to confront 21st-century organized crime
Article content The Jordan framework is a set of legal principles that determine whether a criminal trial has been delayed unreasonably, resulting in a rights violation. It enforces strict trial timelines of 18-30 months, forcing the dismissal of complex cross-border cases that in the U.S. could proceed under exceptions in the Speedy Trial Act. Article content The Stinchcombe disclosure rule requires the Crown to share virtually all evidence publicly, deterring the use of intelligence from our allies in court for fear of compromising sources. Our allies employ measures like public interest immunity or classified information procedures to protect sensitive data. Article content Our organized crime provisions are similarly out of step. The Criminal Code sections pertaining to organized crime (467.1–467.13) require proof of a rigid organizational structure and a benefit motive, a framework ill-suited to the decentralized, cell-based and digital networks driving today's transnational crime. In contrast, the U.S. RICO Act targets patterns of criminal behaviour, allowing prosecutions of crime leaders and facilitators in loosely co-ordinated syndicates. Article content Financial enforcement is equally weak. Between $45 billion and $113 billion is laundered in Canada each year, with British Columbia's Cullen Commission estimating that upwards of $5.3 billion is laundered through B.C. real estate every year. Article content The absence of a robust beneficial ownership registry leaves shell corporations and trusts as attractive vehicles for ' snow-washing ' illicit funds. FINTRAC's limited proactive authority contrasts sharply with the U.S. FinCEN 's ability to issue geographic targeting orders, freeze assets and compel cross-jurisdictional disclosure. Article content Jurisdictional gaps and enforcement silos further undermine our defences. Ports, airports and rail hubs often fall outside the authority of municipal and provincial police unless complex memoranda of understanding are in place, leaving vulnerabilities that organized crime exploits. Article content Intelligence is likewise siloed, with CSIS unable to readily convert its intelligence into admissible evidence — a problem the U.K. mitigates through closed-material proceedings. Article content Canada also lacks the means to compel internet service providers, payment processors and banks to sever support to foreign criminal enterprises, while the European Union's Digital Services Act — an overly restrictive act we should not strive to emulate overall — contains important elements, such as provisions empowering member states to force takedowns of criminal platforms. Article content To address these gaps, Canada should introduce targeted carve-outs to the Stinchcombe disclosure requirements and the Jordan timelines for organized crime and national security cases and create secure protocols for using allied intelligence in prosecutions. Article content The Criminal Code's organized crime sections should be modernized to include enforcement against decentralized networks alongside stronger wiretap and production order powers for digital and offshore data. Article content Financial transparency must be improved through a more robust and enforceable beneficial ownership registry and expanded FINTRAC powers.