Tesla executive, Elon Musk confidant leaves EV maker, source says
Tesla executive and a confidant of CEO Elon Musk, Omead Ashfar, has left the company, according to a person familiar with the matter.
Ashfar, who was part of the CEO's office at Tesla, had started overseeing sales and manufacturing operations in Europe and North America last year.
Demand in both regions has softened, partly due to a backlash surrounding Musk's growing political involvement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Stocks hit fresh record, dollar weakens to lowest in three years amid Fed worries
NEW YORK/LONDON :Global shares hit their third record high in three days on Thursday while the U.S. dollar sank to its lowest level in more than three years amid growing market concerns about the Federal Reserve's independence. The U.S. dollar index was down nearly 0.43 per cent on the session and more than 10 per cent for the year. If the greenback's losses hold until the month ends, it will be the biggest fall in the first half of a year since the start of the era of free-floating currencies in the early 1970s. Wall Street's main indexes finished higher, with the benchmark S&P 500 and Nasdaq nearing record highs. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 0.94 per cent to 43,386.84, the S&P 500 rose 0.80 per cent to 6,141.02 and the Nasdaq Composite rose 0.97 per cent to 20,167.91. European shares finished up 0.09 per cent. MSCI's gauge of stocks across the globe rose 0.81 per cent to 909.47, hitting a new record high for the third straight session. A Wall Street Journal report said President Donald Trump - who has been urging the Fed to cut rates faster - was toying with the idea of selecting Chair Jerome Powell's replacement in the next few months ahead of the end of his term next May. Powell had just wrapped up two days of testimony to U.S. Congress, where he said the central bank would be careful in considering further rate cuts as it expects Trump's tariffs would cause prices to rise this summer. Such an appointment by Trump of a shadow Fed chair will likely shake investor confidence in the central bank's independence, which is helping to contribute to the dollar's weakness, said Wasif Latif, chief investment officer at Sarmaya Partners in New Jersey. "The market recognizes that sooner rather than later, Powell will walk off the stage and the next appointment will likely be somebody that's a little bit softer or dovish or somewhat politically driven," Latif said. "And the market is saying the next chair will likely be more amenable to big cuts than Powell has been and so I think that's part of what's feeding into the dollar weakness and gold is also reflecting that." The euro is now at its strongest level against the dollar since September 2021 and trade tariff talks are looming with Washington next week, ahead of a Trump-imposed global deadline of July 9. The single currency was up 0.33 per cent at $1.1697. The dollar weakened to a decade and half-year low against the Swiss franc at 0.80030. It was also down 0.57 per cent to 144.415 against the Japanese yen. The dollar index, which measures the U.S. currency against six peers, now sits at its lowest level since March 2022 following its slide this year. "The striking thing on the dollar trend of the last six weeks is that in almost any market regime the dollar is struggling to appreciate," State Street's Michael Metcalfe said. "It seems to be in something of structural decline," he added, highlighting State Street data that investors were now the most negative they have been on the dollar - or "underweight" in banking speak - since the COVID pandemic. Traders are now pricing in a nearly 25 per cent chance of the Fed cutting rates in its end-of-July meeting, compared with 12.5 per cent last week, the CME FedWatch tool showed. The yield on benchmark U.S. 10-year notes fell 4.5 basis points to 4.248 per cent, dropping to its lowest level in seven weeks. The two-year U.S. Treasury yield, which typically moves in step with interest rate expectations, was down 5.8 basis points to 3.721 per cent, its lowest level since May 2. Germany's equivalent, which is a benchmark for Europe, fell 0.7 basis points to 2.558 per cent. Oil prices were on track for their second straight day of gains after their sharp slump following the Trump-brokered ceasefire early this week between longtime Middle East foes Israel and Iran. Trump had also announced plans to hold talks with Iran next week to seek a commitment from Tehran on curtailing its nuclear ambitions. Brent crude futures settled up 0.07 per cent to $67.73 a barrel. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude gained 0.49 per cent to $65.24 a barrel. Gold prices gained as the U.S. dollar fell. U.S. gold futures settled 0.2 per cent higher at $3,348. Spot gold was little changed at $3,330.20 an ounce.
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Russell suggests Mercedes are still after Verstappen
SPIELBERG, Austria :George Russell has suggested his contract renewal talks with Mercedes are being held up because the team are still keen to sign Formula One champion Max Verstappen. The 27-year-old Briton, winner in Canada two weeks ago, is out of contract at the end of the season while four-times champion Verstappen has a deal with Red Bull until 2028, subject to get-out clauses. Russell told Sky Sports television at the Austrian Grand Prix that Mercedes, constructors' champions eight years in a row from 2014-2021 and currently second to McLaren, wanted to return to the top. "If you're going to be back on top you need to make sure you've got the best drivers, the best engineers, the best pit crew, and that's what Mercedes are chasing," he said. "So, it's only normal that conversations with the likes of Verstappen are ongoing. But from my side, if I'm performing as I'm doing, what have I got to be concerned about? There are two seats in every Formula One team." Mercedes boss Toto Wolff made his interest in Verstappen clear last year as he sought a replacement for seven-times champion Lewis Hamilton. In the end 18-year-old Italian rookie Kimi Antonelli was handed the opportunity and has been setting a string of age records, drawing strong support from fans. Verstappen and Russell have had a series of headline clashes on and off the track over the past 12 months, with Mercedes likely to have concerns about pairing them together should the opportunity arise. Russell told reporters separately that team boss Toto Wolff has assured him he was performing as well as anybody on the starting grid. "I think there's only one driver that you can debate in terms of performance - these are his words, these are not my words - so that's why I have no concern about the future," he said. "But there's two seats at every team and I guess he needs to think, who are those two drivers going to be for those two seats, and I guess that's what the delay is." Verstappen, appearing in the main FIA press conference, was reluctant to talk about his future when asked if he would be driving for Red Bull next year. "Do you want me to repeat what I said last year?... it's not really on my mind. Just driving well, trying to push the performance, and then we focus on next year."
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Data is changing shareholder capitalism
IF AMERICA'S CEOs have learned one lesson over the last half decade, it's this: Avoid politics. It is the right lesson – as usual, Milton Friedman was correct, the primary purpose of a business should be to increase its profits – but the rapidly changing nature of the economy calls for an update: Avoid politics whenever possible, but never when necessary. The recent history of corporate activism is instructive. Just before the pandemic, the chief executives of 181 of the largest US corporations signed a pledge to 'lead their companies for the benefit of all stakeholders', not just shareholders. They essentially promised to pursue a better world beyond profits. It did not go well. After several prominent instances of companies or executives getting burned for taking political stances – just ask Budweiser or Elon Musk – most companies now just stick to business or at least stay silent. But as data and data analysis become more valuable commodities, neutrality and apoliticism will become harder to maintain. Perhaps Friedman's shareholder capitalism no longer makes sense in the modern economy – especially if your business is working with data. And especially if your software aids the military or helps governments monitor their citizens. Two recent books illustrate how there is no such thing as neutral values when it comes to data. One is critical of Meta, alleging it used its data to assist the Chinese government in monitoring and censoring its users. That decision surely increased profits – China is a huge market – but was it ethical? It is one thing to sell sneakers in China, quite another to sell data. Either you assist the Chinese government in its efforts, or you don't. Another book, by Palantir co-founder and CEO Alex Karp and corporate affairs chief Nicholas Zamiska, argues that more companies need to be explicit about how their values should guide their work. Palantir, a data analytics company that is known (some might say notorious) for its contracts with the Pentagon and ICE, was co-founded by tech entrepreneur and libertarian donor Peter Thiel. Karp, meanwhile, has said that he agrees with progressives on most issues. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Politics aside, on its website Palantir says it was 'founded to help Western democracies and open societies harness data to protect citizens without compromising civil liberties'. It would be naive to take that statement at face value. Yet, even expressing these principles carries risks. Google also grew up as a values-driven company, with its (since discarded) slogan of 'Don't Be Evil'. Its employees took that to heart when they refused to work on a contract with the Department of Defence in 2018. The US$229 million contract went to Palantir instead, four years later. Was that a case of values paying off, or values aligning with profits? Google's old mission statement has become a bit of a punchline, and it's worth asking why. For one, it was never clear what 'evil' meant. Is it evil to help US special forces wage war, or is it evil to stay neutral in a fight against the Taliban? Again, regardless of what you think of Palantir's values, they are clear – so unlike Google, Palantir tends to attract employees who agree with its values. Another requirement for corporate mission statements is that they be related to the corporation's product. There's no need for a beermaker, for example, to take a political stance. One of the more grating aspects of Silicon Valley culture in recent years is how sanctimonious every tech startup became about its work, even if it is just another version of Groupon. There are other risks to a value-driven strategy. Karp argues that founder-led companies do better. Google is no longer run by its founders. Perhaps if it were, 'evil' would have been better defined. Palantir may one day face the same issue. It may be clear to Karp and his advisory board what Palantir should do when there is a conflict between morals and profits. But he won't be the CEO forever. How do values change under his successor, and the one after that? All of which raises the larger question: If the most valuable commodity in the world is the ability to analyse and interpret data, is shareholder capitalism now out of date? It isn't – but the Friedman doctrine is in need of an update. The goal should be to have a clear corporate mission that is consistent with what it does and can transcend successive generations of CEOs. The mission may be as simple as, 'We sell beer and hope to make money'; there is no reason to say, 'We make beer and try to save the world'. If a company is involved in data or weapons, it may require delving into some geopolitics, because there is no such thing as neutrality in that line of work. That's why Palantir makes a point of saying it stands for Western values, but you won't find anything on its website about its view of transgender athletes in women's sports. As the world economy enters the artificial intelligence era, and as more defence technology is developed in the private sector, companies like Palantir and Facebook will become more important, and ones like Budweiser and Nike less. That means some big companies will find it harder to avoid politics completely – and will have to consider their positions carefully. BLOOMBERG
