
Hull City Ladies co-owner accused of aggressive behaviour towards players
In early April a series of letters about Johnson's alleged conduct at the third-tier club, where he was the first-team manager before he became a director and co-owner, were sent to the Football Association as part of written evidence to support complaints about him. The letters were written by, among others, current and former players, club staff, volunteers and sponsors.
The correspondence, some entitled letters of 'no confidence' in Johnson and one as a 'character reference', included claims that Johnson was verbally aggressive towards players on multiple occasions, and that he created a toxic environment where women felt intimidated. He kicked footballs at players in rage on more than one occasion, according to the letters.
Johnson was also alleged to have made a reference, loudly in front of witnesses, to having allegedly slept with a player from the team. Johnson was contacted by the Guardian for a response.
The letters submitted to the FA state that several players left because they did not wish to play under Johnson and a number of the squad say they will look for a new club if Johnson stays. A group of sponsors said they were withholding funding and would reconsider only if Johnson goes.
The FA is understood to be in contact with Hull and offering advice on how the issues raised can be appropriately addressed by the club, although club sources have told the Guardian they are disappointed by the FA's level of involvement so far and are unhappy that Johnson has not been suspended by the FA pending an investigation.
The Guardian revealed on 16 April that Johnson had submitted a request to the FA for the club to be relegated, amid allegations of mismanagement of the club's finances being made against him by his own players. Multiple club sources alleged that Johnson's relegation submission was an attempt at retaliation after several squad members criticised him in public social media posts. The FA is understood to have dismissed his request because it considers such requests for voluntary relegation only if submitted formally by clubs, not by an individual.
Several club personnel are understood to have had a meeting to discuss the situation with the Emma Hardy, the MP for Hull West and Haltemprice, who is understood to have requested an urgent meeting with the FA.
Players were said to have been in tears after Sunday's final fixture of the season, a 1-1 home draw with Rugby Borough. Hull finished eighth in the FA Women's National League Northern Premier Division.
Sign up to Moving the Goalposts
No topic is too small or too big for us to cover as we deliver a twice-weekly roundup of the wonderful world of women's football
after newsletter promotion
Hull City Ladies are not affiliated with the men's Championship team Hull City. Johnson owns 50% of the shares in Hull City Ladies's parent company, HCLFC Limited.
After the club received several letters of no confidence in Johnson's leadership as chair, an EGM was held at the club last week to vote in a new chair. Johnson did not attend and remains a director.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Wales Online
3 hours ago
- Wales Online
Rugby player banned after shouting 'get your baps out' at female referee
Rugby player banned after shouting 'get your baps out' at female referee Casey Johnson said he 'had no real explanation' for why he shouted the 'abhorrent' phrase at the match official The Ossett RUFC player has been banned for 32 weeks (Image: Google) A rugby player has been hit with a 32-week ban after shouting "get your baps out, ref" at a female referee while watching one of his club's matches. Casey Johnson, a player for Ossett RUFC in West Yorkshire, has been suspended from spectating, playing or coaching rugby until March having admitted to shouting the "abhorrent and highly offensive" phrase during a match earlier this year, with a Rugby Football Union panel finding him to have engaged in "conduct prejudicial to the interests of the union and the game". The RFU hearing in June heard how the referee - whose identity has been kept anonymous - was left "shocked" by Johnson's actions, with her "heartbroken and angry" parents in the crowd also hearing the remarks. Sign up to Inside Welsh rugby on Substack to get exclusive news stories and insight from behind the scenes in Welsh rugby. Johnson was also charged with shouting "go on, show us your boobs" at the official, which he denied. However, the panel were content that this "made no different to the appropriate sanction". The panel heard that Johnson was "intoxicated" at the time of the incident and that he 'had no real explanation for why he shouted the phrase at the match official'. It also noted that he had 'appreciated at the time that what he had said was inappropriate and had intended to apologise to the match official at the end of the game". However, he was advised not to do so by his friends, due to his intoxicated state. Article continues below During the hearing, the referee was praised for handling the situation "impeccably" and carrying on with the match, while she herself commended the response of both clubs in the swift action they took against Johnson. Explaining what happened in her written testimony, the referee said: 'I was approached by the Ossett coach after the game who told me that he had been made aware by my dad during the game of the nature of the comments that were being made. 'The coach profusely apologised and informed me that they had sent someone over during the game to speak to the spectators. After the game as I was walking to the changing rooms I was approached by the spectators' friends who apologised on his behalf... and also apologised to both of my parents at the end of the match. 'Once changed, I entered the clubhouse and approached the Ossett coach to get the name of the spectator. The coach returned two minutes later with their head coach, who had been watching the game, and the spectator's name. "The head coach apologised on behalf of the spectator and the club and condemned the spectator's behaviour and called it unacceptable, 'disgusting', and assured me it did not represent the values of the club," she added. 'Whilst I don't condone what happened, and I wouldn't wish it upon any match official, I am glad that what started off as an uncomfortable and negative experience was made significantly better with the reactions and support that I've received both post-match and from people within the refereeing community.' Finding the incident to be a "top end" offence, the panel initially issued Johnson with a ban of 42 weeks. However, his remorse and acceptance of the charge "at the earliest opportunity", together with his clean disciplinary record, saw his suspension reduced by 33 per cent to 28 weeks. Applying a mandatory four week increase as per the guidelines on match official abuse issued by the RFU's Head of Judiciary last year, Johnson has been banned from playing, coach or spectating for 32 weeks, although this does not include mid-week training. He has also been made to pay £125 in costs. 'It goes without saying that such a phrase shouted to a woman has no place in society, including rugby, and it plainly goes against rugby's core values," the panel concluded. Article continues below "It has the very real potential to impact on the participation of women in rugby (whether as a match official, player, coach or spectator) and cannot and must not be tolerated. 'Female participation in rugby (whether playing, coaching, refereeing or spectating) is fundamental to the values of rugby union and a vital element of the game. 'That participation is put at risk by actions such as those of [Johnson] here and it is the responsibility of everyone involved in rugby to take whatever steps are necessary to ensure that such actions are removed from the game.'


The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Prospective football agents to take case over Fifa's faulty online exam to Cas
A group who claim that technical problems with Fifa's online football agent exam prevented them from completing the test are to take their cases to the court of arbitration for sport (Cas). As revealed in the Guardian last month, several prospective agents complained that there were various issues with the platform being used for Fifa's new global exam that took place for the first time on 18 June, including candidates being left with insufficient time to answer the questions or later finding out that multiple answers had not been recorded. Some were allowed to resit the exam on 30 June but many were informed they will now have to wait until next year and had no right to appeal. However, in a letter that has been seen by the Guardian that was sent to Fifa's general secretariat last month, the group of more than 40 candidates who were affected asked for a review 'based on fundamental and obvious errors in the application of Fifa regulations' that they estimate could have had an impact on 'thousands worldwide'. 'Across borders and examination centres, candidates encountered severe technical and procedural irregularities that compromised the fairness, transparency, and validity of the exam,' the letter read, listing several examples including 'incorrect or misleading questions' and 'multiple correct answers marked as wrong. 'The list of technical issues is extensive, and in many cases, nearly never-ending,' the letter added. 'These conditions made it impossible for many candidates to complete the exam under fair or standardised conditions. We are appealing directly to Fifa, believing in its responsibility and commitment to justice. We are not an institution. We are students and professionals, volunteering our time in search of fairness. Please do not reject our appeal automatically.' In response, Fifa insisted it 'diligently checked every substantiated complaint regarding technical impediments in the context of the exam' but said it could not respond further to their letter and said the issue had 'already been resolved'. As such, the group is now planning to take their case to Cas, where they will request an opportunity to retake the exam before the scheduled date next year. Fifa has yet to comment publicly on the claims but is understood to have been reassured by providers that there was no issue with the exam platform. World football's governing body is believed to be satisfied that the majority of the candidates were able to take the exam with no technical problems.


Daily Mirror
4 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Emma Raducanu takes advice from Royal Family in blunt response to critics
Emma Raducanu has a new method for dealing with criticism, having grown frustrated with a focus over her personal life and decision to continually switch coaches Emma Raducanu says she tries to take a leaf out of the Royal Family 's book when dealing with her critics. Raducanu has spent her entire professional career in the spotlight after winning the US Open at the age of 18 back in 2021. That early success made her a household name and has become a double-edged sword, providing huge opportunities and success, as well as harsh criticism. Raducanu has sometimes found it difficult to deal with the focus on her personal life, injury struggles and career decisions. Her decision to pull out of playing in the mixed doubles with Andy Murray at Wimbledon in 2024 sparked anger, while rumours of a romance with Carlos Alcaraz often overshadowed the tennis at SW19 this year. The other regular topic concerns Raducanu's continual changing of coaches, with Francisco Roig the latest to join her team. Raducanu believes the perception over her high turnover of coaches is unfair, but tries not to let it get to her. 'I'm a lot more clear on what I do and don't like,' she told the Guardian. 'The experiences that I've had with different coaches… People love to say I've had so many different coaches but if I went into the details of a lot of them, people would not be saying the same thing. I just don't do that, because I don't want to 'out' these people. So I keep it to myself. 'When you see things like: 'Oh, Emma on her ninth coach', I'm like: 'Guys, come on.' Certain ones don't count. If you've had a trial, you don't have to carry on after the trial. A few have been trials, a few have been other situations. I just try and take the high road and try to do what the royal family would do.' Raducanu appeared to be referring to the Royal Family's famous "never complain, never explain" mantra. She has certainly been unapologetic over her chopping and changing of coaches. The 22-year-old has worked with a number of different coaches during her career, be it for a prolonged period of time or a short stint. She credited Mark Petchey for his influence at Wimbledon this year and has also worked with Nigel Sears, Andrew Richardson, Torben Beltz, Dmitry Tursunov, Sebastian Sachs and Vladimir Platenik over the years. She is now gearing up for the US Open with Roig, the former coach and mentor of Rafael Nadal. And, as for the constant speculation about her personal life and presence of paparazzi, she tries to ignore it. 'I guess it comes with the territory, people being so curious,' she added. 'I think they're more curious about this news than any tennis results and tennis news. "But I just keep to myself, my private life to one side. It's always funny when people try to find something out, but I try not to read into it so much.'