
Where will I go? Pak women in tears as they leave family behind in India
Tears, confusion, and helplessness marked the faces of women as police vans rolled up to the Attari border — not for a journey home, but for a return to a country many left decades ago, and some barely knew. Jammu and Kashmir Police have begun deporting Pakistani nationals, many of whom have lived in India for over three decades — with homes, families, and no place to return to across the border.advertisementJammu and Kashmir Police on Tuesday brought several women to the Attari border for repatriation a week after 26 people – mostly tourists – were killed by terrorists in the union territory's Pahalgam. Post the attack, Pakistani nationals across the country were asked to leave India by April 27. Those failing to leave may face a jail term of up to three years or a fine of a maximum Rs 3 lakh or both, as per the Immigration and Foreigners Act 2025.'WHERE WILL I STAY IN PAKISTAN?'Among those deported is Rakshanda Zahoor, who has been living in Jammu for the past 36 years. "I am here since 36 years, how can I go back? But police has brought me here," said Rakshanda, expressing her anguish. She married an Indian national in 1989 but never received Indian citizenship. advertisement
'Where will I stay in Pakistan? I have no one there. My parents passed away in 1989. I have no one left there to back now,' she said with folded hands and tears in her eyes. Her husband, Zahoor Ahmad, said, 'Police suddenly came to our place and gave notice to leave India for my wife. Where will my wife go in Pakistan? This is tragic for us.''WHAT IS OUR FAULT'Another case is of Minal, a Pakistani woman from Sialkot who was married in Jammu just two months ago. She was also brought to the Attari border in a police van. 'This is very unfair that we are being sent back like criminals,' she said. 'What is our fault' she added, when asked about her views on the recent Pahalgam atack.'I DIDN'T COME HERE AS TOURIST, I BUILT A FAMILY HERE'Saba Kiran, who married in India 15 years ago, is also facing deportation. 'I don't want to go as my husband and kids are here,' she said. 'I don't want to go, I am being pushed out. I didn't come here as a tourist. I built a family here. No one wants to leave their own home,' she added before tearing up.advertisementAccording to officials, the Attari border was closed on Tuesday, and the deportation is now expected to take place today.PAHALGAM TERROR ATTACKOn April 22 afternoon, five to six terrorists opened fire on a group of tourists in the Baisaran meadow, which is around 5 kms from Pahalgam. The meadow - also known as 'mini Switzerland' - is accessible only by foot or by horseback. The Pahalgam carnage was one of the deadliest civilian attacks in the Kashmir Valley in recent years.The Resistance Front (TRF), an offshoot of the Lashkar-e-Taiba, claimed responsibility for the attack.Eyewitnesses said the terrorists emerged from the surrounding pine forests and fired at people picnicking, riding ponies, or eating at food stalls. Most of the victims were tourists, including two foreigners from the UAE and Nepal, and two locals.In a meeting of the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) on the next day of the attack, it was announced that Pakistani citizens will no longer be allowed to visit India under the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) Visa Exemption Scheme (SVES).The directive also mandates that any Pakistani nationals currently in India under this scheme must leave the country within 48 hours.advertisementAs many as 786 Pakistani nationals have left India through the Attari-Wagah border point within six days beginning April 24, a senior official told ANI. The officer informed that during the same time, a total of 1376 Indians have returned from Pakistan through the Attari-Wagah border.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


United News of India
36 minutes ago
- United News of India
Telangana ACB summons IAS officer over Formula E case
Hyderabad, June 25 (UNI) Telangana's Anti-Corruption Bureau has asked special chief secretary Arvind Kumar to appear before it on July 1 in connection with the financial irregularities in the Formula E race during the BRS regime. This comes days after the former minister and BRS working president KT Rama Rao was interrogated by the ACB for almost eight hours on June 16. Kumar had appeared before the ACB in January this year. Senior IAS officer Arvind Kumar has once again been summoned by the ACB in connection with the alleged irregularities over the transfer of Rs 54 crore from the state exchequer to the Formula E race. Kumar was the secretary of the municipal affairs and urban development (MAUD) department with KT Rama Rao as the minister when the fund transfer happened. He is currently in charge of state's disaster management department where he was shunted after the Congress government assumed office. The IAS officer has been designated as accused number 2 in the Formula E case, followed by the then HMDA's chief engineer, BLN Reddy, who is accused number 3. The ACB has accused KT Rama Rao of committing irregularities in the Formula E case, directly transferring funds to the organisers when the official sponsors backed out. Rao maintained that procedures were jumped because it was election time and he had done it to save the image of the state. He also said that the transferred sum was still lying in the account of the Formula E organisers but the Congress government has so far not made any attempt to retrieve the funds. The BRS government wanted the Formula E race to be held in 2024 after its success in 2023 but the event was cancelled by the Congress government after it came to power, citing huge costs. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has also taken up the case. UNI XC RN
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
36 minutes ago
- First Post
Rajnath's China visit for SCO marks new phase in India–China thaw since Modi-Xi 2024 meet
The last time an Indian defence minister visited China was in 2013, when then Minister A.K. Antony travelled to Beijing. Since then, India-China ties have seen repeated disruptions read more Indian Defence Minister Rajnath Singh arrived in the Chinese port city of Qingdao on Wednesday (June 25) to attend the Defence Ministers' Meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), marking a rare and significant visit as relations between the two countries continue to be strained by a prolonged border standoff. This is the first visit by a senior Indian minister to China since the deadly Galwan Valley clash in 2020 and also the first time in 12 years that an Indian defence minister has visited the country. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD First Indian defence minister visit to China in 12 years The last time an Indian defence minister visited China was in 2013, when then Minister A.K. Antony travelled to Beijing. Since then, India-China ties have seen repeated disruptions, with the most severe rupture occurring in 2020 following the military confrontation in Galwan Valley. The clash resulted in casualties on both sides and led to a breakdown in routine bilateral exchanges. Tensions have persisted along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in eastern Ladakh, where both countries have deployed thousands of troops since May 2020. Rajnath Singh's visit now comes at a time when both sides have made limited progress in de-escalation talks but have yet to achieve full disengagement at multiple friction points. First high-level Indian visit since Modi-Xi meeting in 2024 Singh's trip is also the first ministerial-level visit from India to China since Prime Minister Narendra Modi met Chinese President Xi Jinping in Astana, Kazakhstan, on the sidelines of the 2024 SCO Summit. That brief meeting, although largely symbolic, was interpreted as an attempt to restore diplomatic channels between the two sides. Since then, no other Indian cabinet-level official has visited China, making Singh's presence in Qingdao an important diplomatic signal ahead of possible future engagements. Singh to outline India's anti-terrorism and security vision During the SCO Defence Ministers' Meeting on June 25–26, Singh is expected to reiterate India's support for the SCO's founding principles, including mutual respect for sovereignty and regional security cooperation. He will also outline India's vision for peace, and call for collective and sustained efforts to combat terrorism and extremism, according to Indian officials. 'Looking forward to present India's vision for global peace and security and also, call for joint and consistent efforts to eliminate terrorism,' Singh said in a post on X, formerly Twitter, ahead of the summit. Bilateral talks with Chinese Defence Minister Admiral Dong Jun and Russian Defence Minister Andrei Belousov are expected to take place on the sidelines of the SCO meeting. Discussions are likely to include regional security, counterterrorism cooperation, and the status of border disengagement between India and China. Who Is attending from India and China? Defence Minister Rajnath Singh is leading India's delegation to the SCO Defence Ministers' Meeting. He is accompanied by senior officials from the Ministry of Defence and the Indian armed forces. National Security Adviser Ajit Doval is also scheduled to participate in separate SCO security discussions in China that focus on regional counterterrorism efforts. From the Chinese side, Admiral Dong Jun, who serves as China's Defence Minister, is hosting the meeting and will chair the summit-level discussions. He is also scheduled to hold bilateral meetings with Singh and other visiting counterparts. Meetings since 2024 Although Singh's visit is the first Indian cabinet-level trip to China in years, both countries have continued lower-level dialogues in 2024 and 2025. Corps Commander-level talks have taken place intermittently to manage tensions along the LAC. However, they have yielded only partial success, with many points of military standoff still unresolved. India has repeatedly called for complete disengagement and restoration of pre-2020 status quo in eastern Ladakh. Meanwhile, China has pushed for a broader reset of ties, even as infrastructure buildup continues on both sides of the border. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Singh's visit to Qingdao could potentially pave the way for a more formal high-level dialogue between India and China, but expectations remain cautious amid persistent mistrust. The SCO, which includes China, India, Russia, Pakistan and Central Asian countries, has become an increasingly important forum for regional dialogue on security and economic cooperation. This year, China holds the rotating chair of the organisation.


Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Special Mumbai court acquits two in gangster Ravi Pujari extortion case due to involuntary confession
Mumbai: A special MCOCA court on Tuesday acquitted two accused in an extortion case allegedly connected to gangster Ravi Pujari. The court observed that the confession was a result of threat and inducement, and involuntary, as the parents of the accused were kept in police custody and police officers were present in the confessional room. The case relates to alleged extortion threats made by gangster Pujari to a builder and his family members, demanding Rs 2 crore between Nov 26, 2018, and Jan 18, 2019. However, acquitting the duo, William Rodrigues (30) and Akash Shetty (40), the judge said, "On testing the truth of the confession, it appears that it is not made voluntarily and it is not free from threat and inducement. Therefore, no presumptive evidential value is attached to the confession and it cannot be the basis of conviction of the accused." In the 53-page judgement copy made available on Thursday, the judge pointed to the presence of police officers in civil clothes and the investigating officer inside the confession room. The judge said that the evidence of the police was not genuine. The judge noted that two police officers who departed did not deny the presence of the parents of the accused in their office. "Under such circumstances, as per arguments advanced by the defence counsel, the possibility cannot be ruled out that the parents of William were kept in the custody of the police and thereafter by use of threats about the action against the parents, William was sent for recording of confession. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Here's The Price for a 1-Day Walk-in Shower In 2025 Homebuddy Learn More Undo On this ground also, the confessional statement of William is not looking… to be a voluntary one," the judge said. The victim's family was involved in the building construction business. The extortion threats were related to their construction projects. The prosecution alleged that Rodrigues and Shetty were involved in collecting information about the victims and providing it to the then-wanted accused Pujari. It was also submitted that Pujari attempted to threaten the victim's brother and explicitly threatened to kill his son as part of the extortion. The prosecution's case alleges that Pujari obtained the phone numbers of the victim's family through Shetty. Pujari was deported in 2020 and the trial against him was separated. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai The prosecution submitted that Rodrigues expressed his willingness to confess on Feb 1, 2019. Subsequently, the DCP was appointed to record the confessional statement, and Rodrigues was held in separate police custody at Azad Maidan before the statement was taken. The confessional statement was documented in two parts. The Special Public Prosecutor argued that the confession was "free and voluntary, without any threat," and that it "established the guilt of both the accused and their involvement in the organised syndicate crimes with gangster Ravi Pujari". The prosecutor further stated that Rodrigues was given a sufficient 24-hour opportunity and was kept separately, with the confession corroborated by the victim's evidence. However, the defence lawyer strongly challenged the voluntariness and admissibility of the confession. It was submitted that the mandatory 24-hour period was not properly given to the accused and alleged that the confession was recorded under duress. The defence submitted that the confession was "manipulated" and "retracted at its earlier opportunity," therefore arguing it "cannot be relied upon".