Singapore election 2025: RDU takes on PAP incumbents in Holland-Bukit Timah GRC debut as expected
[SINGAPORE] Opposition party Red Dot United (RDU) will square off against the ruling People's Action Party (PAP) team led by Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan, as it makes its maiden bid for Holland-Bukit Timah GRC.
Candidates from both parties successfully filed their nomination papers at Methodist Girls' School on Wednesday (Apr 23).
The four-man RDU team includes new faces assistant engineer Sharad Kumar, operations manager Nizar Subair and music teacher Emily Woo – who was earlier fronted as the party's team lead in Jurong Central SMC.
Rounding up the team is financial consultant Fazli Talip. He contested in East Coast GRC under the Workers' Party banner in GE2011.
Business owner Patrick Tan, who was earlier introduced as a candidate in RDU's four-man team, did not contest in the Holland-Bukit Timah GRC.
From left: The four-man RDU team earlier announced comprised business owner Patrick Tan, financial consultant Fazli Talip, assistant engineer Sharad Kumar and operations manager Nizar Subair. Emily Woo is contesting the constituency instead of Tan. PHOTO: DARWIS SUNARYO, LIANHE ZAOBAO
The RDU team goes up against the incumbent PAP team comprising Senior Minister of State for Foreign Affairs and National Development Sim Ann, lawyer Christopher de Souza, and businessman Edward Chia.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), which contested in the constituency in the past three elections, did not field a team. SDP secretary-general Chee Soon Juan said last Saturday that the party wanted to 'consolidate [their] resources'.
The PAP team fended off SDP challengers and retained the 'rich man's ward' with 66.36 per cent of the votes in GE2020, 66.6 per cent in GE2015 and 60.08 per cent in GE2011.
Bukit Panjang rematch
Neighbouring Bukit Panjang SMC will see four-term MP Liang Eng Hwa up against SDP chairman Paul Tambyah.
Prof Tambyah, an infectious diseases expert whose profile rose significantly during the Covid-19 pandemic, contested the single-seat ward for the first time in GE2020 in a last-minute tactical switch by the opposition party.
Though he was defeated by PAP's Liang who garnered a vote share of 53.73 per cent at the 2020 polls, Prof Tambyah put up a strong fight that ended up being the closest contest among all SMCs that election.
Since the Bukit Panjang single seat was carved out of the Holland-Bukit Timah GRC in 2006, both parties have faced off four times, with SDP fielding a different candidate and PAP claiming victory each time so far.
For more election coverage, visit our GE2025 microsite
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
10 hours ago
- Business Times
This isn't how you ‘restore gold standard' science
IN another attempt to concentrate power, President Donald Trump has signed an executive order to 'restore gold standard science' in federal research and policy. It sounds reasonable given the instances of bad or faked science being published, including high-profile papers on Alzheimer's drug development and one misleadingly claiming that hydroxychloroquine would cure Covid-19. In the last decade, scientists themselves have grown concerned about the large number of studies whose promising results couldn't be replicated. However, researchers dedicated to reforming their field say the president's plan isn't a solution. It's a way to give government officials the power to reject evidence they disagree with – without any accountability or transparency. There is already a long history of US policies that ignored scientific evidence, from allowing toxic lead in petrol to decades of failing to act on the known dangers of asbestos and cigarettes. Science alone can't decide policy, but the public and lawmakers need reliable scientific data to decide, for example, which pesticides or food additives to ban, or how to regulate genetically modified crops. Trump's order cites as a flaw in the system the prolonged school closures during the pandemic. Many US schools stayed closed long after those in most European countries had reopened. However, the US policy decision had little to do with science – shoddy or otherwise. It was more about a clash of values and political polarisation, along with a lack of balanced, evidence-based public discussion. He also criticises the National Marine Fisheries Service for basing restrictions on Maine's lobster fishing industry on a worst-case scenario aimed at protecting the endangered right whale. But the public might benefit from knowing such scenarios – unless their likelihood is being exaggerated. Ultimately, the decision comes down to values: Americans might want to act on even a small chance that an industry could drive a species to extinction. The language in the executive order is nearly identical to that used by scientists already working to improve research standards, including reproducibility, communication about errors and uncertainty, and scepticism about assumptions. In recent years, fields with replication problems have made progress towards those goals by requiring more transparency in reporting data and statistical methods. Peers uncovered fraud in the research of Harvard Professor Francesca Gino, who was fired from her tenured position last month. Journals and scientific societies are requiring more disclosure about potential conflicts of interest, and scientists are using a platform called PubPeer to criticise published work, which can lead to corrections and retractions. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up But the president's directive isn't really aimed at improving science. 'The executive order converts principles of good practice into weapons against scientific evidence,' said psychologist Brian Nosek, co-founder of the Centre for Open Science. Deciding what's credible should be a decentralised process, Nosek said, with many people and lines of evidence being presented and different parties challenging each other. He and other experts in science research reform say that even good studies aren't perfect. There's widespread concern the executive order could allow government officials to flag almost anything as not up to their definition of 'gold standard'. Sometimes the best we have are observational studies or models. Nutrition is notoriously hard to study with reproducible experiments, but we still have to decide what to put in school lunches. And there is no default precautionary position where you wait for perfect evidence; inaction can kill people, too. The executive order comes amid drastic federal funding cuts to the National Science Foundation and similar institutions. It's not surprising that many scientists see the order not as a way to improve scientific standards, but as the latest offensive in a war on science. The document begins by blasting the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for discouraging in-person learning during the pandemic even though 'the best available scientific evidence showed children were unlikely to transmit or suffer serious illness or death from the virus'. On the surface, this is backed up by reporting from The New York Times, citing data showing prolonged school closures didn't significantly decrease Covid-19 mortality, and also set many kids back in their education. In his book, An Abundance of Caution, journalist David Zweig makes a case that the relevant scientific data were available in the spring and summer of 2020, and by May many European schools were up and running with no uptick in casualties. In my own reporting back in summer of 2020, I found the problem was more bottom-up than top-down. The data couldn't reassure people that there was zero risk, and some worried that any danger of severe infection was unacceptable – for students or teachers. By summer 2020, the CDC had acknowledged the benefits of in-person education, but the American public was struggling to have a rational debate. It was more a matter of moral outrage over our different values than any disagreement over science. Many factors fed some regrettable policy choices, including social media algorithms that drowned out reasoned fact-based discussion with misinformation and mudslinging. What we didn't need then was more centralised control of science – and it's the last thing we need now. BLOOMBERG
Straits Times
14 hours ago
- Straits Times
Former senior minister Teo Chee Hean to be next Temasek chairman, taking over from Lim Boon Heng
Mr Teo Chee Hean will first join Temasek's board as deputy chairman on July 1. PHOTO: ST FILE Former senior minister Teo Chee Hean to be next Temasek chairman, taking over from Lim Boon Heng SINGAPORE - Former senior minister Teo Chee Hean will be the new chairman for state investor Temasek Holdings, succeeding Mr Lim Boon Heng who will be stepping down on Oct 9, 2025. Mr Teo will first join Temasek's board as deputy chairman on July 1, before taking the helm in October. Mr Lim has served as the chairman for 12 years, notably guiding Temasek's global expansion and supporting the fight against the Covid-19 pandemic, among other efforts such as in corporate governance and sustainability. In a separate statement, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong said: 'I thank Mr Lim for his dedicated service at Temasek - under his stewardship, Temasek has expanded its global presence, strengthened its governance processes, and established itself as a leader in sustainable development. 'I also welcome Mr Teo as the incoming chairman. With his extensive experience in public service and deep understanding of Singapore's strategic priorities, I am confident he will build on Temasek's strong foundations, and steer its continued success in an increasingly complex global environment,' added Mr Wong, who is also Finance Minister. Temasek executive director and chief executive Dilhan Pillay Sandrasegara said on June 6 that Mr Teo has had a 'remarkable' public service career across multiple domains. 'I'm pleased to welcome Mr Teo Chee Hean as our fifth chairman... We are privileged that Temasek can benefit from his perspectives and extensive experiences, and we look forward to his stewardship as we navigate the opportunities and challenges ahead,' he said. Mr Teo, a key figure in Singapore's third-generation leadership, served as deputy prime minister from 2009 to 2019 and as Coordinating Minister for National Security from 2011. He was appointed Senior Minister in 2019. He began his career in the navy in 1972 and rose to become chief of navy before leaving the armed forces in 1992 to enter politics. His first Cabinet role was as minister of state for finance and communications. He later held ministerial portfolios in home affairs, defence, education and environment. Temasek also announced on June 6 that Mr Cheng Wai Keung, Mr Stephen Lee and Mr Bobby Chin will be retiring from the board in the coming months. Mr Cheng, who is deputy chairman, and Mr Lee, a director, will step down on June 30 after nearly 14 years and eight years of service respectively. Mr Chin, also a director, will retire on July 31 after serving for 11 years. Temasek has a net portfolio value of $389 billion as of March 21, 2024. It is a significant contributor to Net Investment Returns Contribution (NIRC), alongside sovereign wealth fund GIC and central bank Monetary Authority of Singapore, which is used for Government spending. Mr Teo noted that in an 'era of deepening global uncertainty', Temasek must remain clear minded on critical matters such as international relations, security and climate change. 'As a key Singapore institution with a global investment footprint, Temasek understands that its long-term success requires both addressing today's risks and opportunities and anticipating tomorrow's trends,' he said. 'I look forward to working with Temasek's Board, management team and members of the wider Temasek family to build on the achievements of Temasek and chart a path for its continued success in the new global environment.' Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Straits Times
17 hours ago
- Straits Times
Rolex lovers splash out on used watches before Trump tariffs
Rolex watches on display at a store in New York on April 8. PHOTO: REUTERS Rolex lovers splash out on used watches before Trump tariffs LONDON – Watch enthusiasts snapped up used Rolex and Patek Philippe timepieces at the end of April, splashing out before possible tariffs from United States President Donald Trump. The watch dealer and trading platform Subdial often sees a flurry of activity after people get their pay cheques at the end of each month. In April, the post-payday spike was 160 per cent higher than normal trading levels, far above the average 112 per cent bump experienced on other pay days over the past year. The volume growth was particularly strong in the US and Britain, Mr Christy Davis, founder of London-based Subdial, said in an interview. 'People heard about the tariffs and went, 'Oh shoot, let's buy now,'' he said. 'They waited for pay day and then sales volumes just went through the roof.' The phenomenon echoed another trend seen in Switzerland, where watch exports jumped by nearly a fifth in April – with shipments to the US more than doubling ahead of expanded tariffs threatened by Mr Trump. Watches made from precious metals, steel and bimetallic materials – products also targeted by the US President – saw the most growth, according to the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry. The US jump was likely a one-off response by exporters seeking to avoid higher tariffs, rather than a structural increase in demand, Mr Jean-Philippe Bertschy, an analyst at investment management firm Vontobel, said in a note. Swiss watch exports fell 6.4 per cent to the rest of the world in the month, continuing a weak start to the year. The secondary watch market has continued its gradual rebound from February's post-pandemic lows. Since reaching that nadir, the Bloomberg Subdial Watch Index has risen about 5.3 per cent through late May, returning to levels last seen in October. It remains far from the levels it reached three years ago, when the prices of used luxury watches surged as Covid-19 lockdowns ended. Bloomberg Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
