Sprint sensation Gout Gout's ‘crazy, big-money' sacrifice to stay in Australia
Gout Gout has turned down massive sponsorship offers because they required him to move away from Australia.
All of the biggest sporting companies around the globe have come calling for Australia's schoolboy sprint sensation, flashing big-money deals but with strings attached.
These included moving overseas to high-end training facilities in places like Jamaica, the home of the world's fastest man Usain Bolt.
But Gout's manager James Templeton has repeatedly knocked back the advances, preferring to leave the 17-year-old around his family and current support system with coach Di Sheppard in Ipswich.
After breaking Peter Norman's 56-year-old national 200m record in December at the Australian All-Schools Championships, Gout signed one of the biggest deals in Australian athletics history with Adidas.
'JT (Templeton) told me how much they were willing to pay to get me on their side,' Gout told GQ.
'It was crazy. The number kept getting higher and I realised how much these companies think I'm worth.
'But that sponsorship really helps you get to the next level because obviously you need the money to travel and to train. Especially since I'm at school, so I don't need to go and find a job at Maccas or whatever to put fuel in my car. It definitely helps a lot.'
Gout, who lives at home with his six brothers and sisters and parents who fled South Sudan 20 years ago, says he hasn't splashed out with any of his new-found riches yet.
'Long term, I'd like to set myself up and set my family up,' he says. 'I've saved a lot and I bought myself a new car when I got my Ps, so that's probably the biggest purchase I've made so far. I haven't gone crazy.'
He describes the attention he's received since his breakthrough performances last year as 'crazy'.
'People asking me for photos and things of that nature, it's definitely surreal. It's crazy to think how far I've come. But it's given me perspective to see how far I can actually go, as well.'
His next big race is in Europe during the July school holidays where he'll compete in the U/23 Diamond League event in Monaco before setting his sights on the world athletics championships in Tokyo in September.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
27 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
WTC? Waste of Time Championship
Those who have blamed the Lord's pitch for the helter-skelter World Test Championship final might have picked the wrong target. The Australia-South Africa Test match has been played by 22 cricketers re-acquainting themselves with red balls and the concept of a game going for five days. It's not their fault that they're not ready: a lack of readiness has been built into its design, as if the powers of international cricket want to look like they're saving the Test format while doing everything they can to undermine it. Imagine if a football World Cup final were played as a one-off, out-of-season friendly for the benefit of Jeff Bezos. Not even FIFA could screw up that badly. None of South Africa's players had taken part in a first-class game of cricket in the past five months. One, Lungi Ngidi, last bowled a red ball in a match in August 2024. (He looked a tad rusty.) Three of the Australians had played some county cricket in England last month, but for the rest, their last first-class cricket was three to six months ago. Rusty? Just a bit. Australian viewers might be a bit rusty too. Those who wanted to watch the game had to pinch their noses, hold their breath and submerge themselves in the swamp that is Amazon. For the Test match not to be protected by anti-siphoning laws gives a pretty good idea of how Australian regulatory and broadcasting interests rate it. For the rights to be sold to a company with a rap sheet including (but far from limited to) tax avoidance, industrial-scale fraud, forced labour and abuses of workers on five continents, monopolistic market manipulation, invasion of privacy – okay, we got the point when Jeff Bezos lined up to kiss Donald Trump's ring – well, for a cricket fan it's like being blackmailed into buying a Tesla. Test cricket is just another Amazon product, along with rape and paedophilia guides, 'I Love Hitler' T-shirts and web services for war criminals. Millions, presumably, are trying to swing a free trial so as not to further enrich Bezos. Good luck trying to cancel it. All of this asks the question: What is the WTC final anyway? Is it really a thing, or just a nice boondoggle to give Test cricket some 'context'? If its purpose is to convince the world that Test cricket matters, it's done as good a job as most of the batsmen on the opening two days. The WTC was devised to give meaning to matches throughout a two-year cycle, although the nature of that meaning, expressed in a points table as hard to read as a Shane Warne zooter, remains all the more unclear for South Africa's presence. Nobody believes the Proteas are one of the top two, three or even four Test teams (although at the time of writing, cricket being cricket and two-horse races being what they are, South Africa still have a chance of being world champions, at some form of cricket, at last. Maybe, maybe not. In this kind of 'Test', the whole thing could flip over in an hour.)
The Age
32 minutes ago
- The Age
WTC? Waste of Time Championship
Those who have blamed the Lord's pitch for the helter-skelter World Test Championship final might have picked the wrong target. The Australia-South Africa Test match has been played by 22 cricketers re-acquainting themselves with red balls and the concept of a game going for five days. It's not their fault that they're not ready: a lack of readiness has been built into its design, as if the powers of international cricket want to look like they're saving the Test format while doing everything they can to undermine it. Imagine if a football World Cup final were played as a one-off, out-of-season friendly for the benefit of Jeff Bezos. Not even FIFA could screw up that badly. None of South Africa's players had taken part in a first-class game of cricket in the past five months. One, Lungi Ngidi, last bowled a red ball in a match in August 2024. (He looked a tad rusty.) Three of the Australians had played some county cricket in England last month, but for the rest, their last first-class cricket was three to six months ago. Rusty? Just a bit. Australian viewers might be a bit rusty too. Those who wanted to watch the game had to pinch their noses, hold their breath and submerge themselves in the swamp that is Amazon. For the Test match not to be protected by anti-siphoning laws gives a pretty good idea of how Australian regulatory and broadcasting interests rate it. For the rights to be sold to a company with a rap sheet including (but far from limited to) tax avoidance, industrial-scale fraud, forced labour and abuses of workers on five continents, monopolistic market manipulation, invasion of privacy – okay, we got the point when Jeff Bezos lined up to kiss Donald Trump's ring – well, for a cricket fan it's like being blackmailed into buying a Tesla. Test cricket is just another Amazon product, along with rape and paedophilia guides, 'I Love Hitler' T-shirts and web services for war criminals. Millions, presumably, are trying to swing a free trial so as not to further enrich Bezos. Good luck trying to cancel it. All of this asks the question: What is the WTC final anyway? Is it really a thing, or just a nice boondoggle to give Test cricket some 'context'? If its purpose is to convince the world that Test cricket matters, it's done as good a job as most of the batsmen on the opening two days. The WTC was devised to give meaning to matches throughout a two-year cycle, although the nature of that meaning, expressed in a points table as hard to read as a Shane Warne zooter, remains all the more unclear for South Africa's presence. Nobody believes the Proteas are one of the top two, three or even four Test teams (although at the time of writing, cricket being cricket and two-horse races being what they are, South Africa still have a chance of being world champions, at some form of cricket, at last. Maybe, maybe not. In this kind of 'Test', the whole thing could flip over in an hour.)
News.com.au
39 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Four of the six Australians combined to shoot 22-over in opening round of US Open at Oakmont
Cameron Smith's horror run at the majors in 2025 continued on the opening day of the US Open, failing to find a birdie as he was one of four Aussies combined to shoot 22-over par as Oakmont Country Club proved the 'brutal test' everyone expected. Even world No.1 Scottie Scheffler, who labelled the layout littered with thick, inches-high rough and slick greens the hardest US Open course ever, had six bogeys in a three-over 73 as only 10 players in the field finished under par. Adam Scott, playing in his 96th straight major, avoided too much carnage and was two-under before finishing at even par, while Marc Leishman, in his first major since 2022, stumbled late in a one-over 71 to be the best Australians as their countrymen battled. They are all chasing American JJ Spaun, who opened with a four-under 66, one of the 10 players in red figures. That didn't include Smith, who missed the cut at both the Masters and the PGA as the former world No.2 slipped to 176 on the rankings and could only manage five bogeys in an opening five-over 75 as questions continued to be asked about the impact of his move to LIV Golf. The 2022 British Open champ has now missed the cut in three straight majors after also failing to make the weekend in last year's Open Championship. Smith's best finish in a major since his move to the Saudi-backed league is fourth in the 2023 US Open. But since finishing sixth at the 2024 Masters, Smith missed the top 30 at the two majors that followed before the three missed cuts. Smith wasn't on his own battling the course, with 16 players shooting 80 or worse. Min Woo Lee was also birdie-less in his seven-over 77, while Jason Day shot a six-over 76, which included a birdie, five bogeys and a double. Cam Davis eked his way to a four-over 74 to stay closer to the leaders, giving the Aussie quartet 21 bogeys, two double-bogeys and just three birdies on a day where the world's best battled. Bryson DeChambeau, the defending champion who finished on three-over himself, labelled it a 'brutal test of golf'. 'I think the rough is incredibly penalising,' he said. 'Even for a guy like me, I can't get out of it some of the times, depending on the lie. It was tough. It was a brutal test of golf.'
