Boeing's fighter jet workers in the St. Louis area reject a contract offer
The International Machinists and Aerospace Workers union said the vote by District 837 members was overwhelmingly against the proposed contract. The existing contract was to expire at 11:59 p.m. Central time Sunday, but the union said a 'cooling off' period would keep a strike from beginning for another week, until Aug. 4.
Union leaders had recommended approving the offer, calling it a 'landmark' agreement when it was announced last week. Organizers said then that the offer would improve medical, pension and overtime benefits in addition to pay.
The vote came two days before Boeing planned to announce its second quarter earnings, after saying earlier this month that it had delivered 150 commercial airliners and 36 military aircraft and helicopters during the quarter, up from 130 and 26 during the first quarter. Its stock closed Friday at $233.06 a share, up $1.79.
The union did not say specifically why members rejected the contract, only that it 'fell short of addressing the priorities and sacrifices' of the union's workers. Last fall, Boeing offered a general wage increase of 38% over four years to end a 53-day strike by 33,000 aircraft workers producing passenger aircraft.
'Our members are standing together to demand a contract that respects their work and ensures a secure future,' the union said in a statement.
Dan Gillan, general manager and senior Boeing executive in St. Louis, said in a statement that the company is 'focused on preparing for a strike.' He described the proposal as 'the richest contract offer' ever presented to the St. Louis union.
'No talks are scheduled with the union,' said Gillan, who is also vice president for Boeing Air Dominance, the division for the production of several military jets, including the U.S. Navy's Super Hornet, as well as the Air Force's Red Hawk training aircraft.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
6 hours ago
- Business Insider
Mistrial in Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm's money laundering trial
Prosecutors say Tornado Cash was the preferred money-laundering tool for the world's gutsiest scammers and hackers who used the software to "clean" at least $450 million in stolen cryptocurrency. But on Wednesday, a federal jury in Manhattan was disbanded after it could not agree on whether Roman Storm, 36, the co-developer of Tornado Cash, was a money launderer. The three-and-a-half week trial ended with a partial mistrial after the jury said they could not agree on the two most serious charges: money laundering and violating international sanctions, each carrying potential sentences of 20 years in prison. He was found guilty only of conspiring to operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business and faces a potential maximum sentence of five years in prison. He was not taken into custody Wednesday despite prosecutors complaining he is a flight risk due to his ties to his native Russia and access to an estimated $16 million in ETH. Prosecutors did not immediately say if they would seek a retrial on the two hung counts, and a sentencing has not been set. "I think Mr. Storm has every intention to stay here and fight" the one count he was convicted on, US District Judge Katherine Polk Failla said in allowing Storm to remain free on $2 million bail. Prosecutors had called Tornado Cash "a giant washing machine." They said the Seattle-area software developer knowingly helped criminals launder $1 billion in dirty crypto, all the while pocketing millions in transaction fees. The defense had countered that Storm was merely a software developer, and that he had no control over how Tornado Storm — built for legitimate privacy purposes — was used. The software, accessible through the Ethereum blockchain, lets users deposit cryptocurrency into a common pool and then withdraw it days later. The process made it virtually impossible for law enforcement or anyone else to track who was putting crypto in and who was taking it out. But once the Tornado Storm software went live, it ran automatically and was out of Storm's hands, the defense had argued. "Roman had nothing to do with the hackers and scammers," defense lawyer Keri Curtis Axel told the jury in opening statements. "It's not a crime to make a useful thing that's misused by bad people," she said. "The government must prove that Roman had a criminal agreement with a criminal purpose, and it cannot." Prosecutors told jurors a very different story. Storm actively marketed to criminals who hoped to launder their stolen proceeds, they argued. They showed the jury screenshots of marketing materials from Storm's home computer. The images included rough drafts of T-shirt designs featuring the Tornado Cash buzzsaw-styled logo imposed on a washing machine. Jurors heard three weeks of testimony. Prosecutors called a 23-year-old admitted NFT scammer to the stand. He described exchanging soap emojis with his girlfriend as he used Tornado Cash to launder $1 million in 2022. "Washy washy," the girlfriend joked, according to a text chain shown to jurors. Victims took the stand to describe watching helplessly as their stolen crypto disappeared into Tornado Cash, including $196 million swiped by hackers from the cryptocurrency exchange BitMart. "Our company does not have the ability to effect any change or take any action," BitMart attorney Joseph B. Evans told jurors, reading from the email he got back after alerting Storm that BitMart investigators had traced the stolen crypto to Tornado Cash. Jurors also learned the basics of cryptocurrency and the how-tos of so-called cryptocurrency "mixers" like Tornado Cash. Users would deposit crypto in multiple rounded quantities, jurors were told by the young NFT scammer, Andre Marcus Quiddaoen Llacuna, who testified under a cooperation agreement. "You could deposit in increments of .1, one, 100, or 10," he said, referring to ETH, the cryptocurrency that's native to the Ethereum blockchain. "That way, it was harder to notice if anyone was pulling out the same amount later on," he explained. He testified it took him about 20 minutes to deposit, in anonymized chunks, the 356 ETH he had stolen from his swindled investors, an amount worth some $1.1 million. His deposits went into a shared "pool" of ETH. Tornado Cash generated a long, randomly-generated unique password that he used days later to withdraw the 356 ETH, again in increments of hundreds, tens, or ones. While he waited, other people were likewise making and retrieving similarly rounded deposits, he said. Tornado Cash collected a transaction fee each time this was done, jurors were told. Another government witness, an FBI cryptocurrency tracing expert named Joel Decapua, told jurors that between 2020 and 2022, criminals used Tornado Cash to launder $1 billion, the criminal proceeds from 16 major hacks and scams, each involving sums of more than $5 million. The money accounted for roughly half of Tornado Cash's volume for those years, the special agent testified. The largest Tornado Cash deposit came from the so-called Ronin hack, a March 2022 cryptocurrency heist that US and world officials attributed to the North Korea-linked Lazarus Group. The US Department of Treasury announced sanctions against the Lazarus Group in 2019, calling it a controlled entity of the North Korean government's primary intelligence bureau. (The UN issued similar sanctions in 2016.) The Treasury's sanctions were updated and strengthened on April 14, 2022, after the Ronin hack, essentially making it illegal for anyone in the US to touch that stolen money. "Guys, we are fucking done for," Storm told his colleagues soon after, according to a text shown to the jury. Storm, a Russian expat living in Auburn, Washington, was one of three founders of Tornado Cash. Codefendant Roman Semenov remains a fugitive. The third founder, Alexey Pertsev, is under house arrest in the Netherlands while appealing his conviction on money laundering there.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hong Kong's Cathay Pacific unveils deal to buy 14 Boeing jets
Hong Kong's Cathay Pacific said Wednesday it would place a US$8.1-billion order for 14 Boeing jets, its first order with the American aircraft maker for 12 years. The airline has "exercised the purchase rights... to purchase 14 Boeing 777-9 aircraft; and... secured the right to acquire up to seven additional Boeing 777-9 aircraft", it said in a filing to the Hong Kong stock exchange. The new order expects the aircraft to be delivered by 2034, according to a separate filing. Cathay Pacific made the announcement as it reported its attributable profit rose slightly to HK$3.65 billion (US$4.65 million), benefiting from a pick-up in travel demand in Asia. Chair Patrick Healy heralded a "solid financial performance" in the filing. The company's passenger airlines, including Cathay Pacific and Hong Kong Express, have launched or announced 19 new destinations so far in 2025, with "more to come", he said. Cathay now flies to more than 100 passenger destinations globally, he added. However, the company warned that its lowcost airlines are facing short-term challenges as pick-up in bookings is "yet to return to normal levels". twa/reb/dan Sign in to access your portfolio
WIRED
10 hours ago
- WIRED
The Tech That Keeps Planes Flying for Ultra-Long-Haul Flights
Aug 6, 2025 9:00 AM Wide wingspans, more powerful engines, and high-efficiency materials are making super long flights more possible than ever. This year marks the 20th anniversary of the maiden flight of the Airbus A380, the double-decker, wide-body aircraft that remains the largest passenger plane ever built. At 10:30 am local time on April 27, 2005, the giant, four-engine aircraft lifted off from the airport in Blagnac, a suburb of Toulouse in southern France, and did a quick loop of the area, staying within about 100 miles of the tarmac. When it took its first commercial flight six months later, the A380—which typically seats more than 500 passengers and can hold a maximum of 853—was heralded as the future of long-haul and ultra-long-haul aviation. While the A380 has flown more than 300 million passengers on over 800,000 journeys, according to Airbus, the last 20 years have seen a different trajectory in long-distance air travel. (Long-haul flights are generally those that last for around six to 16 hours, and ultra-long-haul are those over 16 hours.) The A380 is no longer produced, and the best and most popular airplanes for long-haul flights have gotten much more efficient than previous-generation aircraft. Two of the most common long-haul aircrafts today are the Airbus A350, which typically accommodates 330 to 410 passengers, depending on the model, and the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, which seats 292 passengers on average. These aircraft are capable of making the longest flights possible with just two engines instead of four. This shift is largely due to huge gains in aircraft technology, including advanced engines, lighter components in the wings and body, and better computer technology to increase efficiency. Today's long-haul flights are quieter, more fuel-efficient, safer than ever before, and somewhat more comfortable for passengers. This story is part of The New Era of Work Travel , a collaboration between the editors of WIRED and Condé Nast Traveler to help you navigate the perks and pitfalls of the modern business trip. One of the defining features of this generation of aircraft is a large wingspan. The A350 has a wingspan of over 212 feet, which is wider than the Leaning Tower of Pisa is tall. (The A380-800, by comparison, has a wingspan of 262 feet, but it has a maximum takeoff weight of more than 1.2 million pounds, double that of the A350-900). Longer wingspans on a smaller aircraft typically mean they can stay in the air for longer with less power, similar to how a bird with large wings can harness the slightest breeze and float easily for long distances. 'They basically get a lot of lift with a little power requirement compared to smaller wingspans,' says Mory Gharib, director of the Graduate Aerospace Laboratories at Caltech. 'The shorter the wing is, the higher the drag. So you need to actually have a larger engine, and also the fuel you carry and all those things are going to be limiting.' The increased wingspan is one reason the A350-900 can fly from New York to Singapore—the longest flight in the world—with just two engines. Another crucial factor is that, over the last 30 years, aircraft engines have become substantially more efficient, even though the fundamental turbine technology remains the same. Improvements include advances in the manufacturing of lighter engine blades made of carbon-fiber composite that are twice the strength and significantly lighter than titanium blades; enhanced cooling systems; and sophisticated control programs that monitor crucial data during flight such as air pressure, temperature, airspeed, and more. The optimal location of engines on the wing has also been refined. 'If you look at the 747, with four engines—now you can provide the same amount of thrust on two engines that burn 20 percent to 30 percent less fuel than those engines that were produced 20 to 30 years ago,' says Cary Grant, an assistant professor of Aeronautical Science at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Prescott, Arizona. The difference lies in how the engines use airflow. Turbojet engines used in older aircraft force all incoming air through the engine core and combustion chambers, generating thrust by ejecting exhaust gases out the back at high speeds. This process used more energy and was much louder than newer engines. Modern long-haul aircraft use what are called high-bypass engines, which use a system that allows a large volume of air to flow around the engine core. The thrust, then, is generated primarily by the large fan at the front of the engine—the part one can see by looking directly into it—as opposed to the exhaust shooting out the back. This design has greatly improved engine efficiency as the ratio of bypass air increased. The new engines produce an extraordinary amount of power. The General Electric high-bypass engine, GEnx, which powers the Dreamliner, is almost as wide as a Boeing 737's fuselage. According to GE's website, the engine has a 10:1 bypass ratio, which means that 10 times more air goes around the outside of the engine rather than through the engine core for combustion. Computer-aided design has also made the blades more efficient and stronger, allowing them to spin at 30,000 to 40,000 rpm. 'You've got to be able to have structures that can withstand that type of rotational and torsional stress,' Grant says. Ceramic materials used in the engine core allow for higher internal operating temperatures than nickel-based super alloy metals, which are currently used in most engines. The use of lightweight composite materials, namely carbon fiber, in the aircraft's wings and fuselage has significantly reduced the overall weight of the aircraft. The less an aircraft weighs, the less energy is required to power it. The overall designs of these aircraft are more aerodynamic as well. The wings on both the A350 and the Dreamliner variants are thinner than on previous generations, and the fuselage designs, notably the Dreamliner's dolphin-like nose, generally create less drag. In the cockpit, new technologies simplify pilot controls and problem-solving through advanced feedback systems, which help reduce pilot workload and increase performance. Today's long-haul aircraft allow for semi-autonomous flight—in fact, the technology already exists for fully autonomous flights, even for large commercial aircraft. Even the passenger experience has improved, although the pace of that technology may not have kept up with that of the airplane itself. The biggest difference between today's commercial aircraft and previous generations is the ability to control cabin pressure, humidity, and air circulation. '[When] Boeing produced the 787, they were able to keep the atmosphere humidified,' says Grant. 'Just that alone is a huge improvement for people—you know, after a nine- or 10-hour flight it used to feel like you had cornflakes in your nose.' The other major improvement on long-haul flights, according to Grant? Today's airline Wi-Fi is actually good.
