Google celebrates May's last half moon with new Doodle
May 16 (UPI) -- Google is celebrating the final half moon of May.
The search engine released a new Doodle on Friday.
The image hovering just over Google's search bar shows a winking moon that is half illuminated, half in shadow, and surrounded by cards depicting various lunar phases.
"You'll be over the (half) moon about this latest iteration of the Rise of the Half Moon game series," the search engine said.
When users click the Doodle, they are taken to an interactive game, where players "must connect the phases of the lunar cycle to earn points."
May's moon is known as the "Flower Moon," Google said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Digital Trends
24 minutes ago
- Digital Trends
YouTube apparently wants the Oscars – 5 reasons why it might be a great idea
YouTube is interested in hosting the Oscars, according to a Bloomberg report on Sunday, citing several people familiar with the matter. It would mean wrestling the rights from Walt Disney's ABC, which has long hosted the annual awards show and whose contract runs until 2028. Recommended Videos ABC already shows the Oscars on YouTube, but by owning the rights itself, YouTube would have primary control of the broadcast, giving it greater influence over how the event is presented on its platform. Like streaming rivals Netflix and Amazon, Google-owned YouTube is ramping up its coverage of live events in a bid to boost audience numbers. Bloomberg said that if YouTube managed to nab the rights to the Academy Awards, it would be 'a huge statement from YouTube and a shock to the industry.' Here are five reasons why it may actually be a good idea … and a couple why it might not. 1. Massive reach: YouTube is the world's most-visited video platform, with around 2.7 billion monthly active users. Giving the broadcast rights to YouTube could give a real boost to the Oscars ceremony, which has struggled to maintain relevance and grow audience numbers in recent years. 2. A younger, more diverse audience: YouTube is popular with younger viewers who are turning away from regular TV in increasing numbers. Having YouTube take control of the Oscars broadcast would likely bring in more of these younger viewers, as well as broaden the ceremony's multicultural audience, generating a wave of renewed interest in the annual entertainment event. 3. A more interactive viewing experience: The show could become a whole lot more engaging via things like live chat, polls, games like forecasting, and live behind-the-scenes material that viewers could effortlessly dip in and out of. 4. Influencer involvement: It could make the Oscars more fun with greater interaction with YouTube celebrities and influencers, bridging Hollywood and digital culture in ways that could make the ceremony feel fresh again. 5. Convenient on-demand viewing: YouTube can make it easy for viewers to enjoy the highlights, movie clips, or the entire ceremony on demand after the event is over, which would align nicely with changing viewing habits. Possible downsides: 1. Loss of its traditional TV broadcast audience: If YouTube wins the rights to show the event on its streaming platform, there's a risk that it could result in some people tuning out instead of tuning in, especially older folks who enjoy the Oscars but may be slow to hop aboard online streaming services like YouTube. 2. Possible technical issues: Streaming platforms are more prone to technical issues than traditional broadcasting operations. Netflix, for example, experienced a major livestreaming failure during the Mike Tyson vs. Jake Paul boxing match in November last year. More than 60 million people tuned in, but many of them were met with poor image quality and buffering. YouTube would have to be sure that it can handle the potentially massive demand.
Tom's Guide
24 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
Google TV Streamer vs Apple TV 4K: Which streaming device wins?
The Google TV Streamer takes over for Google's long-lived Chromecast devices, offering a premium TV interface jam-packed with loads of free content and helpful features. The third-generation Apple TV 4K is a compelling mix of performance and specs built on the Apple ecosystem. While a bit pricey, this streaming device has tons of versatility and offers speedy load times. Streaming devices are a dime a dozen these days, but if you're looking for the absolute best performance built on the most versatile interface, the Google TV Streamer and Apple TV 4K are the ones to get. Deciding which of these two to buy can be slightly tricky. The Google TV Streamer is the newer of the two, taking over for the now-defunct Chromecast. Up against it is the third-generation Apple TV 4K, which first launched in 2022. While it's a few years older, it still remains one of the best streaming devices, offering blazing fast speeds and Apple's interconnected OS ecosystem. So which one should you buy? Google TV Streamer Apple TV 4K Ports USB-CHDMI 2.1aEthernet (10/100/1000) HDMI 2.1Ethernet (10/100/1000) Refresh rate 60Hz 60Hz Storage 32GB 64GB/128GB Resolution 3,840 x 2,160p 3,840 x 2,160p HDR HDR10, HDR10+, HLG, Dolby Vision HDR10, HDR10+, HLG, Dolby Vision Smart TV software Google TV tvOS Price $99 $179/$199 Apple engineering tends to be at the forefront of design, offering products with minimalist aesthetics that normally don't stand out. This extends to the Apple TV 4K, which has a boxy look and glossy finish, sporting the Apple logo on the top. It comes in a black finish, unlike the original Apple TV, which was available in a glossy silver color. This is something I like about the Apple streaming device, as it blends in a bit more on your tabletop, making it a lot less noticeable. The Google TV Streamer takes a different approach: It comes in a porcelain white colorway, which extends to its included remote. The device itself looks almost like a ski slope or skateboard ramp, flowing downward in a way that allows it to tuck neatly under a TV. This makes it easy to hide the wires that protrude from its rear and it's easier to hide behind the screen if you want it out of the way. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. To make matters slightly confusing, the Apple TV 4K comes in two different models — one of which is 64GB while the other is 128GB and offers a few more features. These include an Ethernet port and Thread networking technology, both of which are available on the Google TV Streamer. The major difference in terms of I/O between devices is the USB-C port available on the Google TV Streamer. This input not only functions as its power delivery source, but can also be used for data transfers. The TV Streamer also has a button on its rear so you can easily find the remote if it ever gets lost in the couch. All in all, I find both devices to be particularly premium-feeling when it comes to design. While it might be nice if the Apple TV 4K had a USB-C port, I don't think it's totally necessary. A 32GB model at a cheaper price wouldn't hurt, though. Winner: Draw These two devices are neck-and-neck in the performance category. They largely offer similar speeds, though the Apple device does come equipped with two much-higher storage capacities. This means you won't have to worry about memory all that much, especially on the 128GB model. The Google TV Streamer and Apple TV 4K also support the full range of HDR specifications, wrangling Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR10, and HLG all in one package. Of course, the TV you use alongside the device will require compatibility with the spec first, but having that full range on hand is a big plus. They also both have Dolby Atmos support, so if you're looking to get the best possible sound out of these streaming devices, it's definitely in the cards. I'd recommend pairing your TV and streaming device bundle with one of the best soundbars like the Sonos Arc Ultra for the best sound quality. Speaking of content playback, while you will get Apple TV Plus content served up to you, it's not as in-your-face as the Google TV interface, plus navigation is slightly more convenient on the Apple device (in my opinion). Another thing the Apple TV 4K has is a clean, no-ad interface. That's truly hard to come by these days, as it feels like ads are plastered everywhere you look. Lastly, the Google TV Streamer only supports Wi-Fi 5, while the Apple TV 4K has access to Wi-Fi 6. You won't need that faster speeds or security of Wi-Fi 6, but the stability is nice to have if you've ever noticed signal dropout in your home. Winner: Apple TV 4K Google TV is one of our favorite TV interfaces, offering a plethora of free content to enjoy and simplified navigation that's just too hard to beat. But Apple puts in a sincere effort with its redesigned tvOS platform. The big new feature is karaoke support, referred to as Apple Music Sing. It's a fun feature that lets you use your iPhone as a microphone to sing along to millions of songs on Apple Music. Also new is the liquid glass look that definitely looks more polished, but adds little to the general functionality of the interface. The Google TV Streamer, on the other hand, offers both better smart home support via Google Home and boasts several improvements with Gemini, the greatest of which are stronger search functionality and recommendations. Voice controls are also greatly improved on the device, extending to smart home automations, news overviews, and the like. Apple's AI plans are still up in the air at the moment, so it's hard to say if the Apple TV 4K would ever get an upgrade to include Apple Intelligence. Seeing as the third-gen model uses the A15 Bionic chip, it's unlikely the device could even support it, but rumors are circulating that a new set-top box with the A17 Pro processor is in the works. While I do like the clean and less-cluttered (ad-free) look of Apple TV 4K's tvOS, I think you'll get far better mileage out of Google TV and Gemini. Winner: Google TV Streamer You can't go wrong choosing one over the other, as they both offer very similar experiences. But here's how I'd set them apart from one another. I think if you're looking to get the best streaming upgrade for your TV but are looking to spend as little as possible, the Google TV Streamer is the one to buy. You can find the Google TV Streamer for $97 on Amazon right now, which nets you about the same features available on the $199 128GB Apple TV 4K. You will have to contend with Google TV's ads and older Wi-Fi 5 standard, but I find these compromises tolerable given the price disparity. Plus, you get access to some incredible features built on Gemini. That's totally worth the $99 price of entry. If you use Apple products regularly, appreciate that functionality, and want to deal with absolutely no ads tossed your way (on the fastest possible interface to boot), get the Apple TV 4K instead. I personally use Apple's streaming box more often, but I think it'll be better when Apple finds its AI footing. When that might happen is still anyone's guess.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Cat soap operas and babies trapped in space: the ‘AI slop' taking over YouTube
Babies trapped in space, zombie football stars and cat soap operas: welcome to YouTube in the era of AI video. Nearly one in 10 of the fastest growing YouTube channels globally are showing AI-generated content only, as breakthroughs in the technology spur a flood of artificial content. Guardian analysis of data from the analytics firm Playboard shows that out of the top 100 fastest growing channels in July this year, nine were showing purely AI-generated content. The offerings include channels featuring bizarre narratives such as a baby crawling into a pre-launch space rocket, an undead Cristiano Ronaldo and melodramas featuring humanised cats. AI video generation has surged amid the release of powerful tools such as Google's Veo 3 and Elon Musk's Grok Imagine. The channels have millions of subscribers in total, including 1.6 million for the space-stranded infant and 3.9 million for Super Cat League, which features human-like cats having affairs and, among one of many bizarre scenes, the felines shooting down and dismembering an eagle. Many of these videos qualify as 'AI slop', which refers to low-quality, mass-produced content that is surreal, uncanny or simply grotesque. But some contain a brief, rudimentary plot – in a sign of the growing sophistication of AI-generated content. YouTube has tried to stem the slop deluge by blocking the sharing of advertising revenue with channels that post repetitive and 'inauthentic' content – a policy targeted at AI content. 'All content uploaded to YouTube is subject to our community guidelines – regardless of how it's generated,' said a spokesperson for YouTube, which is owned by Google's parent company. After being contacted by the Guardian about the channels – which included channels in the fastest growing list for June – YouTube said it had removed three of them from the platform and blocked a further two from receiving advertising income. It did not specify which channels had been sanctioned. One expert said AI video generators herald the next wave of internet 'enshittification', a term first used by the British-Canadian author Cory Doctorow. Coined in 2022, Doctorow used it to describe the decline in quality of users' online experiences, as platforms prioritise profit over offering high-quality content. 'AI slop is flooding the internet with content that essentially is garbage,' said Dr Akhil Bhardwaj, an associate professor at the University of Bath's school of management. 'This enshittification is ruining online communities on Pinterest, competing for revenue with artists on Spotify and flooding YouTube with poor quality content.' 'One way for social media companies to regulate AI slop is to ensure that it cannot be monetised, thus stripping away the incentive for generating it.' Ryan Broderick, the author of the popular Garbage Day newsletter on internet culture, is scathing about the impact of AI video, writing last week that YouTube has become a 'dumping ground for disturbing, soulless AI shorts'. Instagram's Reels video feature is also flooded with AI content. On the platform, a video of various celebrities' heads attached to animal bodies has gained 3.7m views, starring the 'Rophant' (Dwayne Johnson and an elephant) and 'Emilla' (Eminem on a gorilla). On TikTok, many AI-generated videos have gone viral, including a video of Abraham Lincoln vlogging his ill-fated trip to the opera and cats competing in an Olympic diving event. However, the Lincoln and cat Olympic videos are more in the spirit of the internet's pre-slop era of playful wit. Instagram and TikTok said they require all realistic AI-content to be labelled. Videos suspected to contain AI from these channels were cross-checked with deepfake detection service provider Reality Defender. The channels featuring AI videos for July are: Super Cat League (3.9 million subscribers) বজল মিয়া 767k (2 million subscribers – this account has since been closed) LSB POWER GAMING (1.7 million subscribers) Amite Now Here (1.4 million subscribers) Starway (2.8 million subscribers) AmyyRoblox (2.4 million subscribers) Again Raz Vai (1.8 million subscribers) Cuentos Facinantes (4.8 million subscribers) MIRANHAINSANO (4.9 million subscribers) Sign in to access your portfolio
