logo
AFL umpires weigh up taking legal action against Kane Cornes, Dale Thomas and Luke Hodge

AFL umpires weigh up taking legal action against Kane Cornes, Dale Thomas and Luke Hodge

Courier-Mail2 days ago

Don't miss out on the headlines from AFL. Followed categories will be added to My News.
Four AFL umpires are reportedly weighing up legal action against Kane Cornes, Dale Thomas and Luke Hodge in the wake of Lachie Schultz's concussion saga.
The four men in control of the contest that took place at Optus Stadium on May 8 have explored their legal rights regarding comments made by the Channel 7 trio over their handling of the incident.
FOX FOOTY, available on Kayo Sports, is the only place to watch every match of every round in the 2025 Toyota AFL Premiership Season LIVE in 4K, with no ad-breaks during play. New to Kayo? Get your first month for just $1. Limited-time offer.
Collingwood's Schultz was left concussed during the club's round nine clash against Fremantle at Optus Stadium on May 8.
The 27-year-old was evidently dazed after an ugly fourth-quarter collision with Fremantle's Jordan Clark as play continued to unfold.
A day after match the AFL released a statement saying the umpires 'did not see the injured player at the time so play continued'.
AFL executive general manager of football Laura Kane was then forced to come forward and admit the information given by the umpires was 'inconsistent' with new audio first uncovered by Channel 7's Agenda Setters.
The audio, which can be heard in the above video player, appeared to show the umpires were aware of Schultz' condition.
The three former AFL stars, turned media personalities, were largely critical of the umpires involved after hearing the audio during a show that went to air on May 13.
Dale Thomas (left), Kane Cornes (middle) and Luke Hodge (right) could be facing legal action from the umpires.
The saga took a fresh twist however only days later when the AFL issued a third statement which noted a miscommunication between the umpiring department and AFL House was to blame for the initial statement.
Weeks later the story is now back in the spotlight with the four umpires considering taking legal action against the Channel 7 trio, according to Nine's Tom Morris.
'They are filthy. Not at the AFL, but at three of the most high profile experts in the game,' Morris told 9News Melbourne.
'I can tell you that umpires Simon Meredith, Craig Fleer, Justin Power and Martin Rodger are considering taking legal action against Luke Hodge, Dale Thomas and Kane Cornes.
'The umpires remain furious that Hodge, Thomas and Cornes made comments heavily criticising them on Channel 7 on May 13.
'I've spoken to Rob Kerr, who is the umpires' association boss.
'He confirmed in a statement to 9News that Meredith, Fleer, Power and Rogers were weighing up their legal options.'
News.com.au contacted Channel 7 who responded with: 'no official comment at this stage'.
The move comes after Morris said on Channel 9's Footy Classified on May 13 that the umpires were not happy with Kane's handling of the incident.
Morris said he has been told by one umpire: 'A large section of umpires are filthy. They feel they continually get thrown under the bus'.
Kane ultimately admitted the AFL got it wrong with their first statement and said the miscommunication had come from the umpiring department, not the field umpires.
'Our process in determining what happened Thursday night failed and for that we take full responsibility,' Kane said.
Schultz was visibly concussed during the fourth quarter incident. (Photo by Janelle St Pierre/AFL Photos via Getty Images)
'Today we have determined there was a miscommunication from members of the umpiring department, not the field umpires, which formed the basis of our initial public statement on Friday.
'Those team members have been counselled and reminded of the importance of ensuring our process is fully followed regarding these types of incidents and in this instance it was not.
'I have asked GM Football Performance Josh Mahoney to review these processes to ensure the right information is communicated and to ensure this does not happen again.
'Everyone, including our umpires are aligned in ensuring the health and safety of players continues to be the utmost priority and the AFL has been in regular contact with the AFLUA today.'
Originally published as Umpires weighing up taking legal action against Ch 7 personalities

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HAVE YOUR SAY: The big Devils questions
HAVE YOUR SAY: The big Devils questions

Mercury

time39 minutes ago

  • Mercury

HAVE YOUR SAY: The big Devils questions

Don't miss out on the headlines from Sport. Followed categories will be added to My News. Tasmania's political upheaval has put the state's AFL team in jeopardy. But what are your views on the team and the stadium? Have your say and answer the big questions here. The survey closes at 12pm on Friday, June 13. AFL As Tasmania faces political upheaval and a new election which could spell trouble for the AFL's potential 19th team, the Devils have vowed to fight on. Sport After a Sunday night eating KFC and watching a movie with his young son, a much loved local sportsman went to sleep and never woke up. Now an event has been named in his honour.

Former Whittlesea mayor Aidan McLindon told suspension is ‘unlawful'
Former Whittlesea mayor Aidan McLindon told suspension is ‘unlawful'

Herald Sun

time39 minutes ago

  • Herald Sun

Former Whittlesea mayor Aidan McLindon told suspension is ‘unlawful'

Don't miss out on the headlines from North. Followed categories will be added to My News. A former Melbourne mayor who was suspended under new powers recently created by the state government wants to challenge the decision in the Supreme Court. Whittlesea mayor Aidan McLindon was suspended for six months on April 16 following a recommendation by Local Government Minister Nick Staikos. It was the first time the power had been used since it was introduced in October as part of amendments to the Local Government Act 2020. The change allows the Local Government Minister to recommend a councillor be suspended if they are found to create a serious risk to health and safety or prevented the council from performing its functions. In a written statement provided to the Herald Sun Mr McLindon said he had received advice from senior layers suggesting Mr Staikos had acted 'unlawfully'. 'As a result of this advice I will be applying to the Supreme Court to judicially review the actions of the Minister,' Mr McLindon wrote. Mr Staikos said Mr McLindon was suspended following a report by municipal monitors appointed to Whittlesea Council and other information provided. 'As the matter is expected to be subject to litigation, it would be inappropriate to comment any further,' Mr Staikos said. Mr Staikos recommended the sanction against Mr McLindon six weeks after Whittlesea chief executive Craig Lloyd banned the mayor from attending council premises in person — including the meetings he chaired — after he was accused of intimidating staff and other councillors. The ban followed a vote of no confidence in Mr McLindon by the city's other councillors. Immediately after his suspension Mr McLindon said he was being punished for speaking up for rate freezes and against rainbow flags being hoisted at childcare centres which no one else had the 'courage' to do. He denied being a 'bully' and 'aggressive', saying he had no arguments with staff and the accusations against him were false. '(The suspension) should send shivers down the spine of every democratically elected councillor in this state to say your jobs are no longer safe,' he said. 'Because what we have witnessed now is that if you ask a question, if you ask where the money is going … they will mobilise bureaucracy against you.' Following the suspension the state government announced a commission of inquiry into Whittlesea council to address 'potentially serious and systemic' governance issues. The four month independent inquiry began on May 19 and will examine matters affecting good governance at the council and any legislative, regulatory or other reform needed to address the issues occurring since the local elections last year. Mr Staikos said he believed a commission of inquiry was needed after receiving a letter co-signed by 10 councillors asking for an urgent intervention. 'The situation at the City of Whittlesea is unprecedented — including the unanimous no-confidence motion in the mayor and his subsequent ban from council premises for occupational health and safety reasons,' he said. 'We want Victorians to have confidence in their local councils. This inquiry will help to identify any changes needed to ensure the council is operating as required and in the best interests of its local community.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store