66% in Japan interested in Imperial Family, 70% approve female succession: Mainichi poll
TOKYO -- Around two-thirds of people in Japan have an interest in the Imperial Family, while 70% favor allowing women to inherit the throne, the results of a Mainichi Shimbun national survey conducted on May 17 and 18 have shown.
The 66% who said they are interested in the Imperial Family is roughly double the 33% who said they were not. As the Imperial Family continues to taper off, the future of the system is an important issue. The Mainichi Shimbun continues to regularly conduct polls gauging public awareness, including whether people care about the Imperial Family.
To a question asking whether they were interested in the Imperial Family, replies varied by age group, with 50% of those 18 to 29 years old saying they weren't, slightly higher than the 49% who were. The proportion of those interested increased with age: 54% of those in their 30s, 57% among those in their 40s, 68% for those in their 50s, 76% in their 60s and reaching the highest level at 82% among those 70 and older.
Analyzing responses from all age groups, 19% reported being "very interested" compared to 47% who said "somewhat," 23% said "not very" and 10% replied "not at all." Those with a strong interest were limited to about 20%, leaving it unclear if people's thoughts on the Imperial Family extend to discussions over the system of Imperial succession.
The current Imperial Family includes six members in the Emperor's next generation, five of whom are women. Prince Hisahito, the now 18-year-old son of Prince Akishino and Princess Kiko, is the only male of his generation with Imperial succession rights. Public debate continues over how to ensure a stable succession, but a conclusion has remained elusive for years due to a lack of momentum among the public for a swift resolution.
The survey also asked about approval of a female member of the Imperial Family ascending to the throne. Seventy percent supported the idea, while 6% opposed it, 23% answered "can't say either way" and 1% did not respond.
Although a simple comparison cannot be made due to the difference in survey methods, a similar poll in May 2024 found 81% support and 10% opposition for female succession. Over the past two decades, surveys by the Mainichi Shimbun have consistently shown support for a female emperor ranging from just under 70% to just under 90%. After then-Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's administration established an expert panel to consider the possibility, a February 2005 survey reported 87% approval, while in September 2006, just after Prince Hisahito's birth, approval stood at 72%.
The May 2024 survey took place as Princess Aiko, daughter of Emperor Naruhito and Empress Masako, began full-fledged official duties after starting work at the Japanese Red Cross Society. The most recent survey was conducted for the first time since Prince Hisahito held his coming-of-age press conference and entered university. These circumstances may have influenced opinion trends.
Approval for a female emperor by political party lines was: 72% among supporters of the ruling coalition's Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), 78% among backers of the main opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, 76% among Nippon Ishin (the Japan Innovation Party) followers, 67% for the Democratic Party for the People, 80% for Reiwa Shinsengumi and just under 80% for both LDP coalition partner Komeito and the Japanese Communist Party. Among unaffiliated respondents, support was 69%.
The online poll was carried out via the "d-Survey" method targeting smartphone users, based on a questionnaire service used by members of NTT Docomo Inc.'s "d Point Club" rewards program. Respondents were randomly selected from around 74 million users aged 18 and above across Japan, and valid responses were obtained from 2,045 people.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
10 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Japan's Ruling, Opposition Parties to Delay Compiling Plan on Imperial Succession; General Agreement on Female Imperial Family Members Keeping Status
The Yomiuri Shimbun Members of the Liberal Democratic Party and Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan attend a meeting on Imperial succession in April. The ruling Liberal Democratic Party and the opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan are expected to postpone compiling a plan for stable Imperial succession. The leaders and deputy leaders of the House of Representatives and the House of Councillors had hoped to have the plan be completed before the upper house election this summer, according to sources. The two parties apparently decided they needed more time for discussions, as they failed to overcome their differences after several unofficial meetings. The parties mostly discussed two issues: whether to allow female Imperial family members retain their Imperial status after marriage and whether the Imperial family should adopt male descendants of male lines of former Imperial family branches. The parties are generally in agreement on the issue of female Imperial family members retaining their status. However, the LDP opposed the idea of giving husbands and children of female Imperial family members Imperial status. The LDP said it is concerned that it might lead to an emperor from the female line. The CDPJ, on the other hand, seemed positive about the idea of having an emperor from the female line. LDP top adviser Taro Aso and CDPJ leader Yoshihiko Noda have repeatedly held unofficial negotiations, looking for common ground. Aso argued that Imperial status should only be given to the husbands and children of female Imperial family members if her husband is a descendant from the male line of one of the 11 branch families that lost their Imperial status after World War II. Noda presented a plan to have the Imperial House Council resolve the Imperial status issue. As both parties are in general agreement regarding female Imperial family members retaining their Imperial status after marriage, some said a plan should be compiled ahead of other issues. However, House of Representatives Speaker Fukushiro Nukaga took a more cautious stance and said the issue should be decided at the same time as whether to give husbands and children an Imperial status and pushed to postpone the final decisions.
The Mainichi
5 days ago
- The Mainichi
'American and Japanese rice farmers can join forces': US ambassador says on exports
TOKYO -- U.S. Ambassador to Japan George Glass, who assumed his position in April, contributed an opinion piece to the Mainichi Shimbun regarding exports of U.S. rice, stating, "American and Japanese rice farmers can join forces to bring relief to Japanese households." Below is the full text. * * * Rice: Easing the Burden on Japanese Consumers By U.S. Ambassador to Japan George Glass My first few weeks in Japan as the U.S. Ambassador have reinforced for me the indispensable role of rice in the national diet. Whether it's part of a lunch bento, a sushi dinner, or an onigiri on the go, rice is eaten at least once a day by most Japanese. So, when the price of that staple increases drastically, every consumer and family is impacted. With a standard 5-kilogram bag of rice now twice as much as it was a year ago, Japanese consumers are having to make hard choices about what they buy and what they eat each day. Since food represents the largest share of monthly spending for Japanese households, the current rice situation is, naturally, causing concern across the country. Americans understand what it feels like when the price of a staple food skyrockets. Last year, the United States faced its own crisis when a bird flu outbreak led to a dramatic surge in egg prices. To help mitigate a shortage, the U.S. government looked for a solution overseas, temporarily sourcing eggs from producers as far away as South Korea and Turkey. Within a remarkably short period, egg supplies stabilized and prices returned to near-normal levels. It was bold and unconventional thinking that averted an even worse situation for American consumers. In contrast, the Japanese public has endured months of rising rice prices. Even the release of emergency stockpiles has failed to ease the burden for the average consumer. Unfortunately, a combination of restrictive domestic production policies, a deficient distribution system, and protectionism have hampered the government's ability to provide immediate relief to Japanese consumers and their strained household budgets. Amid the ongoing difficulties, retailers are doing their best to meet consumer demand. Japan's largest supermarket chain, Aeon, for example, will offer premium California-grown Calrose rice at stores across Japan from June 6. Earlier this month, I hosted an event at the Ambassador's Residence in Tokyo to launch Aeon's new product and commended the retailer for providing its customers with another rice option to help them manage their weekly grocery costs. While many Japanese may not immediately associate rice with America, it has been grown in California for more than a century. Initially using methods learned from Japanese growers, farmers in California now produce high-grade rice varieties that meet the exacting standards of the Japanese market. Getting their Calrose rice on supermarket shelves in Japan, however, can be a bigger challenge. The California farmers receive around $670 (approx. 97,000 yen) per ton for their rice, which is a fair market price. But, by the time the same rice reaches the kitchen of a Japanese family, its price has ballooned to around $5,500 (roughly 800,000 yen) per ton. Multiple charges and costs applied once the rice arrives in Japan add an extra 3,500 yen to a 5-kilogram bag. It's an arrangement with no tangible benefit for the Japanese consumer. Japan's rice challenge has highlighted the urgent need for a trading system that is flexible and responsive to market needs. Reform doesn't mean undermining the livelihoods of Japanese farmers, either. As somebody with roots in farming in my home state of Oregon, I understand the essential role our agricultural sector plays in our economies and communities. I also know what it's like to wake up before dawn and spend all day, whatever the weather, tending to livestock or crops. It's hard work that requires determination and adaptability. Like Japanese farmers, American farmers are proud and dedicated stewards of the land they cultivate and the animals they raise. And just as they deserve to be paid fairly for what they produce, consumers deserve to pay a fair price for it. As last year's egg challenges in the U.S. showed, when a nation's food security is at stake, it takes resourcefulness, ingenuity, and even help from your friends to ensure supply chains are secure and supermarket shelves are stocked. The United States and Japan have a long history of helping each other in times of adversity, just as our two countries have worked together for decades to preserve peace and deliver development to nations across the world. Now, in another example of what we can accomplish as friends and partners, American and Japanese rice farmers can join forces to bring relief to Japanese households.
Asahi Shimbun
7 days ago
- Asahi Shimbun
EDITORIAL: Keep road open for female, matrilineal emperors
Discussions among ruling coalition and opposition lawmakers on measures that would secure an adequate number of imperial family members to ensure a stable succession are entering the final stages. The Constitution defines the emperor as the symbol of the state. We believe it is desirable to conclude discussions in a direction that does not intentionally exclude female or matrilineal emperors in the future while continuing to place importance on the sense of values that is widely shared by the public and which flows throughout the Constitution. RESPECT INDIVIDUAL CHOICE In autumn 2024, an interim report was compiled by the top two officers of the Lower and Upper houses based on discussions held among all participating party members as well as the views of individuals who were questioned separately. The report said 'many views were expressed generally in favor' of not disturbing the imperial succession process that has continued until Prince Hisahito, who is second in line to the imperial throne. On a second point, the report said 'a common understanding was in general obtained for moving in a direction of allowing as a pressing issue' female imperial family members to retain their status after marriage to a commoner. On the third point of allowing patrilineal male offspring of the imperial line to be adopted, the report said 'while many highly positive views were expressed, there were also opposing views.' Four meetings of all participating Diet members have been held this year and the minutes of those gatherings were released by this month. The general consensus of respecting individual choice regarding whether a female imperial family member decides to retain her status after marriage can be positively evaluated. It is only natural to protect the freedom of making a personal decision whether to retain a status that has many constraints in terms of fundamental human rights, such as freedom of expression and occupational choice. But imagination must also be exercised about the possibility that even in the case of personal choice, the individual might make such a decision while feeling both tangible and intangible pressure. There is a need to create a system that sufficiently respects the will and the rights of the individual in question. As Crown Prince Fumihito said at a news conference in 2024, imperial family members are 'real live humans.' We must never forget that they must be respected as individual human beings. Regarding whether female imperial family members should be limited only to the children and grandchildren of an emperor or should be extended to also include great-grandchildren and later generations, the majority view was in favor of the latter. DOUBTS REMAIN ABOUT ADOPTION PROPOSAL However, opinion was divided over whether to give imperial family status to the spouse and children of female imperial family members. The ruling Liberal Democratic Party was opposed because members argued for the need to maintain patrilineal sons for succession purposes. The LDP argued that the history and tradition of the imperial family of not allowing men who did not belong to the imperial line to become an imperial family member was 'extremely serious.' The opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan pointed out that not giving imperial status to such males would allow them the freedom to head a political party, religious organization or for-profit company. That would leave open the possibility of having a grave effect on the dignity and political neutrality as a female imperial family member. We cannot consent to closing the door to giving imperial status. Another proposal that has emerged is to hold meetings of the heads of the three branches of government and imperial family members to decide on each separate occasion whether to grant imperial status to the commoner male after marriage. Past Asahi Shimbun editorials have touched upon the proposal for adopting as imperial family members the offspring of the sons of the 11 imperial families that were disbanded after World War II. An editorial said the proposal 'betrays a fixation on the idea that only males of the patrilineal lineage should be allowed to succeed to the throne and is unlikely to be widely understood or accepted by the public.' Imperial House Law provisions prohibit adoption. A major reason is to avoid the confusion that has often arisen in history over the line of imperial succession and legitimacy of the emperor. In this century, a panel of experts set up by then Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi said allowing disbanded family members to return to the imperial family would be 'extremely difficult' because of problems that would arise from the viewpoints of understanding and support of the public, stability and tradition. In recent years, constitutional law scholars have pointed to the possibility that the proposal could raise doubts about the constitutional ban against discrimination based on family origin. In the latest round of discussions, the view was raised that the proposal could effectively lead to the creation of a hereditary status as an aristocratic family. Wide-ranging understanding will not likely be obtained unless such fundamental doubts can be resolved. DEEPEN DEBATE ON BASIC POINTS What has emerged from the compilation of views is the removal from the discussions of allowing for female emperors as well as matrilineal emperors. That proposal was supported by the Koizumi experts' panel and subsequent public opinion surveys have found strong support for it. There have been eight female emperors in the past and all were patrilineal heirs. There is said to be no case of a matrilineal emperor. Since Article 1 of the Constitution states that the emperor is 'the symbol of the State and of the unity of the people,' it will likely be inappropriate that the gender inequality that society is struggling to overcome is reflected in the emperor and the system that supports him. Rather than exclude the possibility of a female emperor or one from the maternal line, discussions should proceed while maintaining overall coherence. At the same time, there is a need to sufficiently keep in mind the rights of the individual who would be affected. It will be difficult to achieve complete coherence because the Constitution contains heterogenous elements. In addition to defining the emperor as a symbol of the state, the Constitution also contains throughout it universal principles of mankind such as respect for the individual and equality under the law. Debate must be deepened on such basic points as whether any new system might possibly expand the current incoherence, whether it is moving in a direction that is more in compliance for supporting the emperor as a symbol of unity of the people and whether the new system is in line with the sense of values of contemporary society that has been produced under the Constitution. A previous Asahi Shimbun editorial said the LDP should not 'push through its proposals on the strength of numbers without securing a broad public consensus.' While once again confirming that stance, discussions should not be needlessly delayed, but the debate in the final stages must reach a conclusion that is convincing to a wide portion of the public. --The Asahi Shimbun, May 28
