Conservative Karol Nawrocki wins Poland's presidential election
WARSAW — Conservative Karol Nawrocki has won Poland's weekend presidential runoff election, according to the final vote count.
Nawrocki won 50.89% of votes in a very tight race against liberal Warsaw Mayor Rafał Trzaskowski, who received 49.11%.
The close race had the country on edge since a first round two weeks earlier and through the night into Monday, revealing deep divisions in the country along the eastern flank of NATO and the European Union.
The outcome indicates that Poland can be expected to take a more nationalist path under its new president, who was backed by US President Donald Trump.
A first exit poll initially showed Trzaskowski with a slight lead over conservative historian Nawrocki, but two hours later an updated 'late poll' showed Nawrocki winning 50.7%, more than Trzaskowski with 49.3%
Turnout was 72.8% — higher than the 67.3% reported in the first round on 18 May. Voting started at 7 am and ended at 9 pm.At a conference at 6:30 pm, the chairman of the Polish National Electoral Commission said incidents had been reported during the voting, with "232 possible offences" taking place.The runoff follows a tightly contested first round of voting on May 18, in which Trzaskowski won just over 31% and Nawrocki nearly 30%.Though the final result was still unclear on Sunday evening with the two locked in a near dead heat, both men claimed to have won in meetings with their supporters in Warsaw.'We won,' Trzaskowski told his supporters to chants of 'Rafał, Rafał.''This is truly a special moment in Poland's history. I am convinced that it will allow us to move forward and focus on the future,' Trzaskowski said. 'I will be your president.'Nawrocki, speaking to his supporters at a separate event in Warsaw, said he believed he was on track to win. 'We will win and save Poland,' he said. 'We must win tonight.'The new president will have significant influence over whether Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk's centrist government can fulfill its agenda, given the presidential power to veto laws. — Euronews
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leaders
4 hours ago
- Leaders
Trump, Xi to Hold Crucial Call Amid Growing Trade Tensions
US President Donald Trump and his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping will likely hold a long-awaited phone call later this week, the White House announced on Monday. This potential conversation emerges as trade tensions between the world's two largest economies escalate significantly. This upcoming discussion holds immense importance for global financial markets and international trade relations, emphasizing the leaders' direct engagement. Renewed Trade Frictions President Trump reignited strains with China last week, asserting that the world's second-biggest economy had violated a previously agreed-upon deal. This agreement had temporarily reduced significant tit-for-tat tariffs between both nations, aiming for a more balanced trade environment. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed the impending dialogue, stating, 'The two leaders will likely talk this week,' when reporters inquired about the anticipated contact. Trump and Xi have not had any confirmed contact for over five months since the Republican leader returned to office, despite frequent claims by the US president that a call was imminent. Trump even asserted in an April Time Magazine interview that Xi had called him, a claim Beijing subsequently denied, insisting no recent call had occurred. Stock markets worldwide largely slid on Monday as these US-China tensions resurfaced, reflecting investor concerns about the ongoing trade dispute. Tariffs and Accusations In early April, Trump introduced sweeping worldwide tariffs, targeting China most heavily. He accused other countries of 'ripping off' the United States and running significant trade imbalances, disrupting established global trade norms. Beijing and Washington had agreed last month to slash staggeringly high tariffs on each other for 90 days after constructive talks between top officials in Geneva. However, Trump and top US officials in Washington last week accused China of violating the deal, with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick telling Fox News Sunday that Beijing was 'slow-rolling' the agreement. Beijing immediately rejected those 'bogus' US claims on Monday, in turn accusing Washington of introducing 'a number of discriminatory restrictive measures,' further complicating the trade landscape. Moreover, Trump has separately escalated tensions with other trade partners, including the European Union, by vowing to double global tariffs on steel and aluminum to 50% starting Wednesday. Short link : Post Views: 67
Asharq Al-Awsat
7 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Moscow Poses No Threat to Britain, Says Russia's UK Embassy
Russia's embassy in London said on Tuesday that Moscow had no intention of attacking Britain, rejecting accusations by the British government of growing aggression and daily cyberattacks. Britain said on Monday it would radically change its approach to defense to address new threats, including from Russia, after endorsing the findings of an independently-produced Strategic Defense Review. After unveiling the defense overhaul on Monday, Healey said Europe was facing war, growing Russian aggression, new nuclear risks and daily cyberattacks, Reuters reported. Russia's embassy issued a statement on Tuesday criticizing what it described as "a fresh salvo of anti-Russian rhetoric". "Russia poses no threat to the United Kingdom and its people," the statement said. "We harbor no aggressive intentions and have no plans to attack Britain. We are not interested in doing so, nor do we need to." Relations between Russia and Britain are at their lowest level since the Cold War. They deteriorated further after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, and Britain and other NATO members have provided large amounts of military aid and other support to Kyiv. China's embassy in London also criticised Britain's defense review, saying in a statement on Tuesday that the document deliberately misrepresented Beijing's defense policy to justify British military expansion. The review had described China as "a sophisticated and persistent challenge", citing its rapid military modernisation, including an expanded nuclear arsenal, and saying Beijing was likely using espionage and cyberattacks, and stealing intellectual property.
Arab News
8 hours ago
- Arab News
Moscow poses no threat to Britain, says Russia's UK embassy
LONDON: Russia's embassy in London said on Tuesday that Moscow had no intention of attacking Britain, rejecting accusations by the British government of growing aggression and daily cyberattacks. Britain said on Monday it would radically change its approach to defense to address new threats, including from Russia, after endorsing the findings of an independently-produced Strategic Defense Review. After unveiling the defense overhaul on Monday, British Defense Secretary John Healey said Europe was facing war, growing Russian aggression, new nuclear risks and daily cyberattacks. Russia's embassy issued a statement on Tuesday criticizing what it described as 'a fresh salvo of anti-Russian rhetoric.' Russia poses no threat to the United Kingdom and its people. We harbour no aggressive intentions and have no plans to attack Britain. We are not interested in doing so, nor do we need — Russian Embassy, UK (@RussianEmbassy) June 3, 2025 'Russia poses no threat to the United Kingdom and its people,' the statement said. 'We harbor no aggressive intentions and have no plans to attack Britain. We are not interested in doing so, nor do we need to.' Relations between Russia and Britain are at their lowest level since the Cold War. They deteriorated further after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, and Britain and other NATO members have provided large amounts of military aid and other support to Kyiv. China's embassy in London also criticized Britain's defense review, saying in a statement on Tuesday that the document deliberately misrepresented Beijing's defense policy to justify British military expansion. The review had described China as 'a sophisticated and persistent challenge,' citing its rapid military modernization, including an expanded nuclear arsenal, and saying Beijing was likely using espionage and cyberattacks, and stealing intellectual property.
