Spain to ban flushing of wet wipes, with manufacturers paying clean up costs
The Spanish government is preparing a law that will oblige wet wipe manufacturers to cover the costs of cleaning huge wads of their product from the country's clogged-up sewers and water-treatment plants.
The draft legislation, which is intended to help Spain meet the UN Sustainable Development Goals and comply with EU legislation on reducing single-use plastic products, will also ban people from disposing of wet wipes down the toilet, as well as prohibiting the deliberate release of disposable party balloons containing plastic into the environment because of the marine pollution they cause.
According to the law's outline, wet wipes and balloons are among the 10 single-use plastic items most commonly found on beaches in the EU.
'Wet wipes – even those made with natural polymers that haven't been chemically modified – have a negative environmental impact and significantly affect the functioning of the sewer and purification networks,' the legislation says. 'Because they do not disintegrate completely, they cause obstructions in the sewer system that reduce its water retention capacity and increase the risk of overflows – especially during spells of heavy rain.'
The draft notes that microfibres from wet wipes also end up in rivers and other bodies of water, leaving local authorities with hefty clean-up bills and environmental fines.
Figures from the Spanish Association of Water Supply and Sanitation put the annual cost of clearing wet wipes from sewer and purification systems at €230m (£190m).
Given the environmental damage that wet wipes and balloons cause, the new law will oblige their manufacturers to cover the costs of cleaning up their products, 'including cleaning of sanitation and treatment infrastructure, as well as its subsequent transport and treatment'. In addition to being responsible for both regular collections of litter involving their products and sporadic spills, they will be obliged to cover the costs of 'awareness-raising measures'.
The draft also says that although genuinely biodegradable wipes will be exempt from the ban on 'the disposal of wet wipes down the toilet', the environment ministry recommends people do not throw any kinds of wet wipes down the loo 'so as to minimise the impact on sewer infrastructure and the environment'.
Sign up to Headlines Europe
A digest of the morning's main headlines from the Europe edition emailed direct to you every week day
after newsletter promotion
Asked how the proposed bans would work in practice, sources at the ministry stressed that the law was still a work in progress, adding: 'Educating people and raising awareness are always important elements.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
3 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Government facing increasing pressure to ban bottom trawling in protected areas
The Environmental Audit Committee (EAC) said the fishing technique, which involves dragging heavy fishing nets across the seabed, as well as dredging and mining should be banned in offshore marine protected areas (MPAs). Campaigners have long been calling for an end to such activities that are still permitted in the UK's 178 MPAs. But these calls have been intensifying ahead of a major UN ocean conference that kicks off in Nice, France, next week. The issue recently came to attention after dramatic footage from Sir David Attenborough's new film on oceans captured the heavy metal chains of a bottom trawl net bulldozing through silt on the seafloor and scooping up species indiscriminately. In a report, published on Thursday, the EAC warned that the Government's 'failure to effectively manage gaps in the network of marine protected areas' is allowing these damaging activities to take place. Water minister Emma Hardy recently told the committee that the Government was 'committed to not having bottom trawling in areas that damage the MPAs, especially when they are attached to features that we are trying to protect'. But the EAC report highlighted that the Government has not set out a timeline for taking further action to protect the protected areas from the practice. It also raised concerns about the UK's marine policy statement, which guides planning decisions for the country's seas and was last published in 2011 followed by an update after Brexit. The MPs described it as 'outdated, not fit for purpose and no longer reflects Government policy or pressures on the marine environment'. Elsewhere, the committee criticised the UK's failure to ratify the UN ocean treaty – which aims to establish protected areas in international waters – or at least publish a timeline to introduce the required legislation to do so. In light of this, the group of MPs said they are 'concerned' that the protection of the ocean is not demonstrably a priority for the Government and urged the Government to ratify the treaty no later than this September. The UK's marine policy statement guides planning decisions for the country's seas (Alamy/PA) The treaty will not come into force until ratification by 60 countries, with the current number standing at 28. Toby Perkins, EAC chairman, said: 'UK waters are teeming with complex ecosystems that are not only precious in their own right but also critical to sustaining the delicate balance of marine life. 'Ministers must ensure that marine protected areas live up to their name.' In its report, the EAC urged the Government to press ahead with banning bottom trawling in offshore protected areas where it presents the most risk, update the UK's marine policy statement and set out a timeline for ratifying the UN treaty. Damaging and extractive activities are completely banned only in 'highly protected marine areas' – of which the UK has just three, compared with the 178 MPAs, which cover 51% of inshore and 37% of offshore waters. The committee recommended the Government expand this network to 10% of UK waters by 2030 to meet its biodiversity targets, based on evidence of their effectiveness in marine nature recovery. It also called for a plan to designate more HMPAs to be published by January 2026. The PA news agency has contacted the Environment Department (Defra) for comment.
Sky News
4 hours ago
- Sky News
Paramedic who survived Israeli attack that killed 15 aid workers describes alleged torture in custody
A paramedic who survived an Israeli attack that left 15 aid workers dead in Gaza has given his first account of what happened. Assad al Nsasrah was one of two survivors from the attack on 15 March, when eight paramedics, six firefighters and a UN employee were gunned down by Israeli troops and subsequently buried in a mass grave. The IDF was forced to change its account of the attack several times as new evidence emerged, including details unearthed by Sky News. 19:54 Assad remained missing until 13 April, three weeks after the attack, when Israel said he had been detained. He spent a total of 37 days in custody before being released on 29 April. In an interview with the Guardian, Assad's employer, the Palestine Red Crescent Society (PRCS), has now for the first time relayed key elements of the medic's testimony. That includes the allegation that he was tortured in Israeli custody, and that he heard Israeli troops shooting injured medics from close range as they begged for help. "He was mistreated, he was subjected to physical attack, tied, beaten, also psychological [torture] and starved," PRCS spokesperson Nibal Farsakh told the Guardian. ''He was also being isolated for three days and put in a room with very loud music, which the Israelis called the disco room." The PRCS spokesperson said Assad "described it as like something literally making you feel crazy and that the music was loud to the extent that you feel your nose is bleeding, your ears are bleeding". In response to these allegations, an IDF spokesperson told Sky News that Assad was detained "based on intelligence indicating involvement in terrorist activity". The spokesperson declined to elaborate on this alleged intelligence. "During his detention, he was questioned regarding this matter," the spokesperson said. How the attack unfolded On the morning of the attack, Assad had been called out to search for three colleagues who had disappeared while on a rescue mission. He departed shortly before 5am, with fellow paramedic Rifaat Radwan - who recorded their journey. By matching Rifaat's videos and their metadata to satellite imagery, Sky News was able to map out the exact route Assad took. Assad was the first to spot the missing ambulance, in a ditch by the side of the road. "They're lying there, just lying there," Assad said, as he brought the ambulance to a stop. "Quick! It looks like an accident." Seconds after he pulled the handbrake, a volley of shots rang out. The shooting would continue for at least five-and-a-half minutes. "Mum, forgive me. This is the path I chose, to help people," Rifaat says towards the end of the video. He would later be found dead, buried by Israeli troops in a mass grave along with 14 other aid workers and the crushed remains of their vehicles. "My son was very exhausted from this war," Rifaat's mother, Hajjah, later told Sky News. "This should not have been his reward." What happened to Assad? In his newly-revealed testimony, Assad says the shooting continued well after Rifaat's recording ended. Farsakh told the Guardian that Assad took cover behind the ambulance, next to his wounded colleague Mohammed al Heila, who hugged him before dying. After the gunfire subsided, Assad says, he heard soldiers approaching. "Al Nsasrah said the soldiers came to the scene very close - and then he heard them shooting everyone who was still alive," Farsakh told the Guardian. Farsakh previously revealed to Sky News that a PRCS dispatcher was able to successfully call medic Saleh Muammar as late as 5.45am, 37 minutes after the attack began. Muammar was later found dead in the mass grave, alongside his colleagues. Assad's claims are also consistent with details from the Israeli military's own report into the killings, reviewed by Israeli newspaper Haaretz, which found that troops shot some of the aid workers at "point-blank range". Farsakh told the Guardian that Assad escaped the soldiers' notice by hiding under al Heila's body, leading them to believe he was dead. When he was eventually spotted, Farsakh says, one of the soldiers pointed a rifle at his head. "He told the soldiers: 'Don't shoot. I am Israeli,'" Farsakh said. "And the soldier got a bit confused. Al Nsasrah's mother was a Palestinian citizen of Israel." Assad says he was stripped, blindfolded and placed in a ditch. At 6.55am, Assad managed to discreetly call a PRCS dispatcher. Sky News obtained an exclusive recording of this call, in which soldiers can be heard giving orders to prisoners and discussing the tactical situation. The testimony given by Assad lines up with that provided to Sky News by the only other survivor from that day, paramedic Munther Abed. Munther also says he was stripped, beaten and placed in a ditch. He also says that the soldiers forced him to act as a human shield during the evacuation of Rafah, which was taking place that day. Munther says that Assad was detained alongside him on the day of the attack. "He was accompanied by an Israeli officer, and was beaten before being placed next to me," Munther says. While Munther was released later that day, Assad would be held in detention for a total of 37 days. "Throughout his detention and questioning in Israel, he was held under a temporary custody order in accordance with the law," an IDF spokesperson said. "At the conclusion of the questioning, and based on the information gathered, it was decided not to issue a permanent detention order, and he was released back to the Gaza Strip in accordance with the law. The IDF operates in accordance with the law." The spokesperson declined to say what information led to Assad's release, or why his detention was kept secret for three weeks.
Rhyl Journal
4 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Government facing increasing pressure to ban bottom trawling in protected areas
The Environmental Audit Committee (EAC) said the fishing technique, which involves dragging heavy fishing nets across the seabed, as well as dredging and mining should be banned in offshore marine protected areas (MPAs). Campaigners have long been calling for an end to such activities that are still permitted in the UK's 178 MPAs. But these calls have been intensifying ahead of a major UN ocean conference that kicks off in Nice, France, next week. The issue recently came to attention after dramatic footage from Sir David Attenborough's new film on oceans captured the heavy metal chains of a bottom trawl net bulldozing through silt on the seafloor and scooping up species indiscriminately. In a report, published on Thursday, the EAC warned that the Government's 'failure to effectively manage gaps in the network of marine protected areas' is allowing these damaging activities to take place. Water minister Emma Hardy recently told the committee that the Government was 'committed to not having bottom trawling in areas that damage the MPAs, especially when they are attached to features that we are trying to protect'. But the EAC report highlighted that the Government has not set out a timeline for taking further action to protect the protected areas from the practice. It also raised concerns about the UK's marine policy statement, which guides planning decisions for the country's seas and was last published in 2011 followed by an update after Brexit. The MPs described it as 'outdated, not fit for purpose and no longer reflects Government policy or pressures on the marine environment'. Elsewhere, the committee criticised the UK's failure to ratify the UN ocean treaty – which aims to establish protected areas in international waters – or at least publish a timeline to introduce the required legislation to do so. In light of this, the group of MPs said they are 'concerned' that the protection of the ocean is not demonstrably a priority for the Government and urged the Government to ratify the treaty no later than this September. The treaty will not come into force until ratification by 60 countries, with the current number standing at 28. Toby Perkins, EAC chairman, said: 'UK waters are teeming with complex ecosystems that are not only precious in their own right but also critical to sustaining the delicate balance of marine life. 'Ministers must ensure that marine protected areas live up to their name.' In its report, the EAC urged the Government to press ahead with banning bottom trawling in offshore protected areas where it presents the most risk, update the UK's marine policy statement and set out a timeline for ratifying the UN treaty. Damaging and extractive activities are completely banned only in 'highly protected marine areas' – of which the UK has just three, compared with the 178 MPAs, which cover 51% of inshore and 37% of offshore waters. The committee recommended the Government expand this network to 10% of UK waters by 2030 to meet its biodiversity targets, based on evidence of their effectiveness in marine nature recovery. It also called for a plan to designate more HMPAs to be published by January 2026. The PA news agency has contacted the Environment Department (Defra) for comment.
