Spain to ban flushing of wet wipes, with manufacturers paying clean up costs
The draft legislation, which is intended to help Spain meet the UN Sustainable Development Goals and comply with EU legislation on reducing single-use plastic products, will also ban people from disposing of wet wipes down the toilet, as well as prohibiting the deliberate release of disposable party balloons containing plastic into the environment because of the marine pollution they cause.
According to the law's outline, wet wipes and balloons are among the 10 single-use plastic items most commonly found on beaches in the EU.
'Wet wipes – even those made with natural polymers that haven't been chemically modified – have a negative environmental impact and significantly affect the functioning of the sewer and purification networks,' the legislation says. 'Because they do not disintegrate completely, they cause obstructions in the sewer system that reduce its water retention capacity and increase the risk of overflows – especially during spells of heavy rain.'
The draft notes that microfibres from wet wipes also end up in rivers and other bodies of water, leaving local authorities with hefty clean-up bills and environmental fines.
Figures from the Spanish Association of Water Supply and Sanitation put the annual cost of clearing wet wipes from sewer and purification systems at €230m (£190m).
Given the environmental damage that wet wipes and balloons cause, the new law will oblige their manufacturers to cover the costs of cleaning up their products, 'including cleaning of sanitation and treatment infrastructure, as well as its subsequent transport and treatment'. In addition to being responsible for both regular collections of litter involving their products and sporadic spills, they will be obliged to cover the costs of 'awareness-raising measures'.
The draft also says that although genuinely biodegradable wipes will be exempt from the ban on 'the disposal of wet wipes down the toilet', the environment ministry recommends people do not throw any kinds of wet wipes down the loo 'so as to minimise the impact on sewer infrastructure and the environment'.
Sign up to Headlines Europe
A digest of the morning's main headlines from the Europe edition emailed direct to you every week day
after newsletter promotion
Asked how the proposed bans would work in practice, sources at the ministry stressed that the law was still a work in progress, adding: 'Educating people and raising awareness are always important elements.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Iran fears ‘existential threat' over Britain's nuclear sanctions
Iran is facing an 'existential threat' if Britain and its European allies reimpose UN sanctions over its nuclear programme, a senior official has said. Britain, France and Germany threatened Iran with crippling economic sanctions it averted in 2015 if it does not begin talks to renew the programme by the end of August 2025. The deal gave Iran's economy much-needed relief after nearly a decade of trade and banking restrictions in return for curbs on its nuclear enrichment programme that would stop it from developing a nuclear bomb. On Wednesday, however, the European powers told Antonio Guterres, UN Secretary-General, they were ready to trigger a 'snapback' mechanism if Iran fails to take action by the deadline, but that they had also offered an extension if it does. 'We have made it clear that if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, [the E3] are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism,' the ministers said in the letter. '[We] are committed to use all diplomatic tools at our disposal to ensure Iran does not develop a nuclear weapon,' they added. The warning has prompted urgent internal discussions in Tehran. 'The Islamic Republic does not have the financial or military capacity to endure the snapback of UN sanctions. It would make the people protest again and this time it might be different,' a senior Iranian official told The Telegraph from Tehran. 'They are more damaging than war,' a senior Iranian official said. 'The supreme national security council has asked the presidential office to find a way for talks before it is too late.' The council directed the foreign ministry in July to reopen talks with the Trump administration, aiming to revive diplomacy after the war with Israel, which saw the United States intervene by bombing key Iranian nuclear sites. Tehran and Washington held five rounds of talks starting April 12, but the sixth round was cancelled after Israel launched strikes on Iran on June 13. The attacks effectively ended the diplomatic process that had shown signs of progress. 'They are asked to do whatever possible because everyone here knows the situation is not like 10 years ago when the deal was signed,' the Iranian official said. Under the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, any party to the accord can restore previous UN sanctions. The most significant resolution that could be triggered is Resolution 1929. Adopted in June 2010, it expanded sanctions beyond technical nuclear restrictions to target Iran's broader economy. The resolution required all UN members to take 'all necessary measures' to enforce Iran's enrichment ban and ballistic missile restrictions. The 'snapback' mechanism was designed as leverage to ensure Iranian compliance with the nuclear accord, which the European countries were original signatories to the 2015 deal alongside the United States, China and Russia. Levels close to weapons grade President Donald Trump withdrew the United States from the accord in 2018 during his first term and ordered new sanctions, but the Europeans said they would stick to the agreement. In response to Mr Trump's withdrawal, Iran started enriching uranium at levels close to weapons grade before Israel began bombing the country in June. While the regime celebrated the end of the June war as a 'victory,' unity has quickly descended into disagreements between hardliners and moderates over the country's future. Hardliners believe they have a chance to bring the country together and show Western weakness, while moderates argue the regime should be open to dialogue. The split became public when a senior Revolutionary Guard official criticised President Masoud Pezeshkian's statements defending negotiations. Aziz Ghazanfari, deputy political chief of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, said Mr Pezeshkian's 'verbal mistakes have increased' since taking office. Mr Pezeshkian had asked critics: 'If you don't talk, what will you do? Do you want to fight? Well, they hit us, we rebuild, and they'll hit us again. 'I don't think we can achieve anything through fighting. We will not do anything without co-ordination and consent from the Supreme Leader, even if it goes against my own opinion,' he added.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Paul Laverty: Why I'm wearing this T-shirt to my Edinburgh events
It's truly mind boggling that hundreds may have been arrested, and some face terrorism charges for wearing this shirt. Before we examine these seven words, can I just make two points. Firstly Israeli Finance Minister Smotrich (below, right) said: 'We are leaving Gaza as piles of rubble with total destruction. This has no precedent. And the world isn't stopping us.' He taunts us all. And he's right. Nobody is stopping them. Secondly: The prestigious medical journal The Lancet has pointed out that the deaths in Gaza are likely to massively underestimated. They say that in conflicts like this, there should be a multiplier of between three and 16 of direct deaths (now at 61,599) to cover the indirect deaths too. Edinburgh University Professor Devi Sridhar estimated there could have been over 335,500 direct and indirect deaths, and that was at the end of 2024. We may never know because the Israeli state bans investigators, bans international journalists, and so far has targeted 237 journalists inside Gaza. Now to the first three words of the infamous T-shirt: 'Genocide in Palestine'. At least three UN bodies, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Medicins Sans Frontier, the brilliant report by Forensic Architecture and many more including Israeli Holocaust expert Amos Goldberg have all said the Israeli state is carrying out genocide. Now to the next four words: 'Time to Take Action'. The Genocide Convention came into force in 1951. It was signed by 153 States, including our own. Article 1 states that all signatory states must actively prevent and punish genocide. It states that individuals can be punished as private individuals or as public officials. 'Complicity in Genocide' is explicitly addressed in Article III (e) which includes 'direct assistance' (weapons or arms) and 'indirect assistance' (political and diplomatic support) and crucially 'failure to act'. The demand to take action is not just a a political and moral position, it is an international obligation. READ MORE: Questions on UK spy plane 'over Gaza as Israel killed journalists' There must be an argument that 22 members of the British Cabinet, who have collective responsibility for the great decisions of state (including our own Secretary of State for Scotland, Edinburgh MP Ian Murray) have colluded with genocide in terms of Article 3. No doubt they will have teams of legal experts to argue otherwise. But in the court of public opinion who will ever forget Starmer's very first interview justifying the cutting off food and water to the entire population of Gaza? Who will forget Foreign Secretary Lammy at the despatch box denying that genocide was happening in Gaza, and Starmer too? It is vital to remember that the Labour Government did not revoke any arms licences to Israel until September of 24, long after tens of thousands of innocents had been bombed. Now you can see the Cabinet scramble for cover as the full horror unfolds in front of our eyes. Ian Murray's letter to his constituents is a case in point. Of course he refers to the revocation of some arms licenses, but he also justifies the exception to the F-35 components which go to a 'global pool'. It takes some untangling from his convoluted explanations but it seems that some UK parts for the F-35s go to Nato and also Israel. He states in his letter of August 11: 'I understand it is not possible to suspend all F-35 licenses to the global pool without undermining the global F-35 supply chain that is crucial for the security of the UK and our allies.' 'I understand', you say? In the face of genocide, and the obligations under Article III, what due diligence did you carry out, what independent investigation did you ask for? Where did you get your understanding Mr Murray – from the arms manufacturers, military figures, the head of Leonardo's arms factory in Edinburgh? I suspect a semi-competent monk administrator in the middle ages could organise a system where one recipient did not receive materials from a pool if the will was there. And here we are in the 21st century with AI and barcodes and sophistication beyond our wildest dreams and you can't separate Israel from a global pool? Murray's letter reveals that the RAF fly over Gaza – not to spy, but to help find the hostages. Murray can swallow that, but a full=grown crocodile would struggle. I see no word of looking for the tens of thousands of starving children. He reveals the UK is still training IDF, but it is an insignificant amount of just 10. Remember Clinton's quote: 'It's the economy, stupid.' We could draw a parallel here of the UK to the Israeli state: 'It's the approval, stupid.' Starmer knew how to give a nod and a wink from the very beginning that they would have the Israeli state's back, and the Cabinet has fallen into line. In another letter Murray lists their great achievements to challenge Netanyahu. It would be comic if it were not so tragic, from their summoning of the Israeli ambassador for a ticking off, to an 'unprecedented joint statement' with other countries 'to express our strong opposition ..." How Smotrich and Netanyahu must be trembling. READ MORE: Israel must be banned from World Cup, says Ross Greer Anything with bite is missing. Nothing this UK Government does, even with its revocation of arms licences, impinges on the genocide machine as it continues to murder the starving. Critically, there is no mention of support for the Boycott and Divestment Campaign which could make a difference. And shamefully, not one UK Cabinet member can say seven simple words: 'Genocide in Palestine, time to Take Action.' One day, when it all comes out, as it will, we will look back in horror and ask how it all unfolded. Western collusion will haunt us. The conscience is on the streets. Paul Laverty is an award-winning Scottish screenwriter
Reuters
5 hours ago
- Reuters
WFP suspends flights to Burkina Faso town after explosion
DAKAR, Aug 13 (Reuters) - The U.N. World Food Programme said on Wednesday it had suspended flights to the northwestern Burkina Faso town of Solle after an explosion near a helicopter it chartered injured a crew member and a government official. The WFP is trying to reach more than 300,000 people during the West African nation's lean season, which runs from June to August and in which "families' food stocks are exhausted," a spokesperson for the U.N. agency said. The blast occurred shortly after the helicopter landed in Solle on Tuesday and was being investigated, the spokesperson said. The injured were receiving medical care and the helicopter, though lightly damaged, had been "safely relocated". There was no immediate claim of responsibility. "WFP calls on all parties to adhere to their obligations under International Humanitarian Law, including the protection of aid workers and humanitarian assets," the spokesperson said. Burkina Faso is run by a military government that took power after two coups in 2022, vowing to make progress against a violent insurgency waged by groups linked to al Qaeda and Islamic State that began in neighbouring Mali in 2012 and has spread to other countries. But deadly militant attacks persist in much of the country. A WFP helicopter transporting food assistance to the northern town of Djibo came under attack in August 2023, though no passengers and crew were injured in that incident.
