
Israel will spread nuclear arms everywhere
Listen to article
When ISIS started around 2014, many people opined that this terrorist group was created by the United States in order to further its interests in the Middle East. While that was not true, the United States actually created the conditions, which created the terror group. The US invaded Iraq and captured and tortured some of the men who had nothing to do with Al-Qaeda. Some of those men went on to create ISIS as a result of the humiliation they had faced at the hands of American occupiers.
Similarly, the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty has been successful in preventing most of the states around the world from acquiring nuclear weapons not because the Pakistani nuclear scientist Abdul Qadeer, who was accused of selling the formula for nuclear bomb to US-designated rogue states, was confined but because most states did not feel the need to go nuclear. Nation states strongly believed that international laws, international bodies, and especially the United States would do the moral thing if these states ever faced aggression from other countries.
That may have changed for good now if not before. Libya was one of those states that gave up its nuclear programme in exchange for benefits and guarantees from the United States. Gaddafi faced the result of that bad calculation and Libya is no longer there as we knew it. North Korea showed defiance in the face of similar pressure to give up its nuclear programme and while it is very poor, it has survived the American onslaughts and shenanigans. Pakistan is a vivid example as well.
Iran signed the NPT. It allowed international inspectors on its soil to satisfy the needs of the world that it was not making a nuclear bomb. The result was that Iran was always accused of cheating and planning to rush toward making a bomb. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned the world that Iran would become a nuclear armed state within 3 to 5 years. He first said that in 1992 and then in 1995. He said it in 2015 and before and after that as well. None of it was true.
Every time an American president opened his mouth about Iran, he issued a threat against it. Obama said, "I don't bluff" and "all options are on the table" including the "military component". After the 1979 revolution in Iran, America has worked against Iran at every step. It provided chemical weapons to Iraq to be used against Iran. It has imposed sanctions on Iraq and deterred other countries from buying Iranian oil. All despite Iran choosing not to go nuclear or maybe because of it.
The truth is Iran never wanted to make a bomb. But that may have just changed. Their calculus, if they have people who can do so much as add and subtract, would only come to one conclusion: Iran must have nuclear weapons in order to deter the world from acting against it. Israel and its unconditional supporter America criticise and impose sanctions on nations that are capable of fighting and defending their sovereignty.
Bloody wars are waged against countries that are defenseless, that are not nuclear armed states. Israel would have never ever dared of attacking Iran, had Iran been a nuclear armed state. More importantly, Iran playing the nice guy and being the norms following player have not yielded any defence benefits for it. It has rather weakened its defence.
And this is not just playing inside the mind of Iran but rather inside the mind of every nation state. Being in the good books of the US by giving up the thought of nuclear weapons isn't a currency strong enough to be banked upon to ensure defence should a US ally attack you. Israel is creating the desire for states to want to go nuclear. Despite the habit of the world to tap itself on the shoulder for being civilised, in the end survival comes down to brute power. Not values, not education, not anything else.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
22 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
New trade order: aligning policy with geopolitical realities
The global landscape of goods trade is currently undergoing a significant transformation. The established flows of commerce are being reshaped by economic, political, and technological forces. Since 2000s, this change and global trade imbalances have become more prominent. Four key metrics now define this shifting landscape: trade intensity, geographic distance, import concentration, and a newly prominent factor 'geopolitical distance'. Together, these indicators reveal how deeply the global trade map is being redrawn and why developing countries like Pakistan must adapt urgently. The new coordinates of global trade Trade Intensity remained a key indicator of globalization but is no longer that effective. Although trade continues to grow in volume, its share relative to GDP has stagnated in many regions. Countries are focusing more on domestic value addition, digital services, and sustainability over absolute trade volumes. Geographic Distance seemed to matter less in an interconnected world but now is reasserting its relevance. As countries seek to shorten supply chains in response to disruptions like the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war, proximity is gaining importance. Nearshoring and regional production hubs are becoming more attractive than distant low-cost manufacturing. Import Concentration is now seen as a vulnerability. Reliance on a few countries for critical goods (e.g., semiconductors, energy, or pharmaceutical) can quickly turn into a strategic liability in times of crisis. Many countries are diversifying supply sources to build resilience. Geopolitical Distance is a novel and powerful concept in today's world. Countries are strategizing and recalibrating trade ties based not only on cost and efficiency but also on political trust. The US-China decoupling, Trump's tariffs, sanctions regimes, and realignment of global blocs are the evidence that trade is shaped by diplomacy not by demand. A realignment in process Global trade is in process of realigning. According to the World Bank, global trade observed at 61% of world GDP in 2008 but then declined to 52% by 2023, indicating a shift toward domestic resilience and services. Cross-border B2C e-commerce reached $2.5 trillion by 2025, growing at a CAGR of 27%, driven by e-platforms (Alibaba, Amazon). A survey by McKinsey found that 67% of global manufacturers are planning to relocate their supply chains closer to home (nearshoring). Likewise, the presence of RCEP agreement (with 30.5% share of global GDP) in Asia-Pacific countries, expansion of South-South trade, the rise of digital platforms, and the growth of services trade are all driving a new kind of globalization. E-commerce has blurred physical boundaries, and countries are increasingly forming regional blocs to mitigate global uncertainties. The global trade order is becoming more fragmented but also more diversified. During 2017 and 2023, US imports from China deteriorated (20 percent) while US imports from Vietnam and Mexico surged (30 percent), reflecting supply chain shifts. Amid this change, resilience and adaptability have become the bases of successful trade strategies. While developed economies focus on strategic autonomy, emerging economies must watch rising protectionism, changing consumer preferences, and digital transformation. Strategic directions for Pakistan in a shifting landscape For Pakistan, being a developing country, the stakes are high. As a trade-dependent economy with limited fiscal space and a narrow export base, adapting to global shifts is essential. Despite globalization and adopting liberalization policies, Pakistan's top 5 export destinations account for over 60% of total exports, showing a lack of diversification (PBS, 20231, URAAN, 20242). Moreover, Pakistan's intraregional trade within South Asia covers only 5 per cent of the region's total trade and makes it the least economically integrated country within the region (Qaisar. S, 2023)3. In new trade order, Vietnam has emerged as a top alternative to China for US imports, Bangladesh's and India's economies are expanding while Pakistan's export diversification remains limited. Hence, new strategic directions are direly needed. The moment calls for vision and significant action. Here's how Pakistan can respond: Strategic alignment with global trends Pakistan's trade policy must be forward-looking and aligned with global developments. This means understanding shifting geopolitical alliances, embracing digital trade, and integrating climate considerations. A trade strategy informed by data and international benchmarks is needed. Build resilience and shock absorbing policy Pakistan must develop a trade framework that can withstand shocks (pandemics, wars, or climate events). This requires improved coordination between government ministries, the private sector, and research institutions to ensure rapid policy response and long-term resilience. Diversify exports Pakistan must move beyond low-value exports like raw textiles. Promising sectors include IT services & other services, agri-processed goods, and high-end textile products. Equally important is branding and then exploring new markets in Africa, Central Asia, and the Middle East, rather than relying solely on traditional partners like the US and EU. Logistical inefficiencies and regulatory hurdles cost Pakistan billions in trade. Urgent investments in port infrastructure, customs automation, regulatory reforms and implementation of URAAN initiative will be essential. Strengthen institutions and regional integration A strong institutional framework is important for managing trade policy. Pakistan should also deepen ties with regional blocs such as SCO, and the GCC, which offer significant trade and investment potential. Bilateral and multilateral engagement can open new avenues for development. Gripping the digital economy & maintaining sovereignty Pakistan must encourage and enable SMEs to use e-commerce platforms for global outreach while ensuring data protection and compliance with global digital trade standards. Digital infrastructure development should be prioritized under the national trade strategy and laws should be made to maintain country's sovereignty. In a nutshell, the global trade order is evolving and Pakistan stands at a crossroads. The country must embrace innovation, integration, and reform. With the right mix of strategy and execution, Pakistan has the potential to adapt to the new geometry of trade and connect with new coordinates of global trade. AnnualAnalytical_Report_on_External_Trade_Statistics_of_Pakistan_FY2023.pdf Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
‘Israel's wet dream'
One of the many enduring paradoxes of American democracy is that a businessman-president—soon to return to his real estate empire and million-dollar book deals—can very much bend the world to serve the interests of another state. And not just in defiance of most of his own people's will, but in betrayal of the no-more-wars promise he made to them. All because that other state has mastered the art of controlling the purse strings that keep the most powerful people in the most powerful country firmly in office and nicely in line. So it's no surprise that Donald Trump has now issued his UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER ultimatum—an effort to bring to life what Israeli journalist Gideon Levy bluntly, and rightly, called Netanyahu's wet dream. The phrase, crude as it is, couldn't be more apt. It captures the disturbing reality that war with Iran isn't some regrettable last resort—it's a fantasy long incubated in Tel Aviv and eagerly underwritten in Washington. And now that fantasy is being realised in real time, with all the grotesque theatre that comes with it. Israel pounds Tehran with airstrikes. Iran retaliates. American bombers reposition. Oil spikes. Traders flinch. Civilians flee. The choreography is familiar because the instinct behind it is rehearsed—manufacture escalation, provoke the backlash, call it existential, then drag the United States into the mess. It isn't just Netanyahu's wet dream anymore. It's becoming a bipartisan one. There's barely any dissent. Not in Congress. Not in the media. Certainly not in the donor circuit. If anything, Trump's language — demanding Iran's 'unconditional surrender,' praising Israel's 'success,' warning of 'brutal consequences' — has only set the tone for what comes next. And none of it has anything to do with American interests. But that's the point, isn't it? This was never about American interests. It was always about compliance. About who gets the funding. Who gets the endorsements. Who gets to run again and who doesn't. Whose secrets will not be spilled. The speed with which Washington closed ranks behind Israel's offensive — before any American life was even touched — says everything about how deep the rot is entrenched. And how complete the capture now is. That's what makes Levy's comment so cutting. Because this isn't about defence. It's about gratification. About delivering the climax of a policy obsession that's been edging forward for two decades. And like all such fantasies, it demands suspension of reason. The pretext doesn't have to make sense. The costs don't have to add up. The global reaction doesn't even matter. What matters is that Netanyahu gets his war, and American power makes it possible. The entire policy architecture sustains itself now — donor networks, lobbying operations, security think tanks, revolving-door consultants — all aligned, all funded, all committed to the same outcome. It no longer matters who occupies which office. The machine runs itself. And it always runs in one direction. Nobody in Washington is asking what this will achieve. They're only asking how much is too much before the polls start to suffer. The calculus is electoral, not strategic. The war has become a stage, and Trump—the showman—knows exactly how to work the lights. He doesn't need to care what happens to Iranians, or Israelis, or Palestinians, or oil markets, or civilian infrastructure. As long as the right people applaud, the bombs will keep falling. And the world will pay for it. In blood, in volatility, in diplomatic collapse. Thousands of Tehranis are already fleeing. Insurance rates in the Gulf are climbing. Global supply chains are bracing. But Washington is too far gone to blink. This is no longer about brinkmanship. It's about indulgence. And that makes it infinitely more dangerous. So when Trump talks about backing Israel 'all the way,' he's not signalling resolve. He's signalling submission—to a foreign policy vision that isn't even his. One that predates him, that will outlast him, and that's now so deeply embedded in the political bloodstream that it no longer registers as foreign at all. The irony, of course, is that none of this is really about only Iran either. Not the rhetoric, not the strikes, not the ultimatums. Iran is just the canvas. The real subject is the unspoken consensus in Washington that no cost is too high, no lie too obvious, and no backlash too severe — so long as the machinery of loyalty keeps running. That's what's playing out now, in all its delusional grandeur. And it's why Levy's vulgar metaphor lands so hard. Because it isn't just about Israel's fantasy anymore. It's about America's complicity in turning that fantasy into policy — no matter who burns. And with Trump now threatening to go further, and no one in Washington willing to say no, this may only be the beginning. Iran's response has been brutal — far beyond symbolic retaliation — and has shocked not just the region but Israel itself. Parts of Tel Aviv and Haifa now resemble the very images long used to justify its own excesses in Gaza. For all his theatrics and defiance, even Netanyahu never dared imagine a nightmare this vivid springing from his fantasy. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Evacuation of Pakistanis in Iran, Iraq: Dar directs PIA to coordinate closely with MOFA
ISLAMABAD: Deputy Prime and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar has instructed Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) to coordinate closely with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) to ensure smooth and efficient execution of the evacuation plans. Dar issued these directives while chairing a meeting to review the ongoing evacuation of Pakistani nationals/Zaireen presently stranded in Iran and Iraq. The meeting was attended by the foreign secretary and other senior officials. Dar was briefed about the progress made thus far and evacuation plans for the coming days. Expressing satisfaction at the efforts made, Dar directed that the Foreign Office, in coordination with other departments, shall expedite the repatriation of Pakistani citizens and provide all assistance to those who are still present in Iran and Iraq. Currently over 4,000 Zaireen are stranded in Iran and as many in Iraq who have been desperately waiting to be evacuated safely to home country. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025